Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration  (Read 71298 times)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #45 on: January 23, 2011, 06:16:21 PM »
yes it is him via proxy!
the above is an unsubstantiated assumption.

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2011, 06:17:12 PM »
Herger,

They are referring to an ex member here "Grumpy". He was banned some time ago. His IP is banned, so he can not read this site. I doubt you are him (via proxy server), but indeed whomever you are, imo you hit the nail on the head with your posts here.

.99

.99, you must miss me a whole bunch to make a special trip to a thread that you have contributed noting but trolling me in. You and Grumpy should stop trolling me and develop some new lines. Those are getting tired.


Quote from Herger:

Quote
Hell, there is nothing so suppress in the first place, second all you have done is talk.

Quote from Grumpy
Quote
Overunity is a term used by people who do not know what the Hell they are talking about.  There is no "everunity", there is only lack of knowledge and ignorance.

Two Post that use the work "hell" in a sentence and both claim OU is not possible.

All your bases are belong to The American Troll Society.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #47 on: January 23, 2011, 06:20:44 PM »
Two Post that use the work "hell" in a sentence and both claim OU is not possible.
::) and from that you deduce that herger is grumpy ???   LMFAO  hell, ever heard of non sequitur? 

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #48 on: January 23, 2011, 06:23:14 PM »
I still want to hear something funny or witty?

That would be a first!

Chet

XS-NRG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #49 on: January 23, 2011, 06:26:07 PM »
the above is an unsubstantiated assumption.

That does not mean it cannot be truth! and in this case....i ASSume it is..

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #50 on: January 23, 2011, 06:30:40 PM »
That does not mean it cannot be truth! and in this case....
indeed... regardless, it remains an unsubstantiated assumption.

i ASSume it is..
the invention of arbitrary hypothesis does seem to be your forte...

XS-NRG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #51 on: January 23, 2011, 06:36:00 PM »
I think you need to go too.

MrsNancy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #52 on: January 23, 2011, 06:38:57 PM »
After reading through this thread I think it is pretty clear that WilbyInebriated, Grumpy, Herger and POYNT99 are at least trolling this Quarktwo or stalking him as he claims.

I am stunned that this type of behavior is allowed to take place. Isn't the site owner responsible?

As a women, I am more sensitive to this type of activity. I hope that Quark person has a big gun and a husband that knows how to use it.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #53 on: January 23, 2011, 06:39:05 PM »
I think you need to go too.
opinions are like arsholes, everyone has one, and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks...  care to expound on the reasons why you think i need to go?

XS-NRG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #54 on: January 23, 2011, 06:45:15 PM »
Can you point me to at least one constructive post you made, involving at least one replication attempt or at least anything other then WORDS ?

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #55 on: January 23, 2011, 06:46:38 PM »
opinions are like arsholes, everyone has one, and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks...  care to expound on the reasons why you think i need to go?

Work smart not hard. The shorter list would be why should you stay? You contribute nothing but words and you build nothing. All you do is attack the people that do build but then thanks to grumpy we know that is to get us to fill in the gaps.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #56 on: January 23, 2011, 06:47:06 PM »
Can you point me to at least one constructive post you made, involving at least one replication attempt or at least anything other then WORDS ?
yes, but you can do your own due diligence...

you seem to be implying that people who don't replicate or do anything other than post WORDS should be removed... i'm surprised q2 hasn't started crying again.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #57 on: January 23, 2011, 06:47:48 PM »
I like MrsNancy

We don't get many woman folk these parts! 8)

Chet

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #58 on: January 23, 2011, 06:48:37 PM »
Work smart not hard. The shorter list would be why should you stay? You contribute nothing but words and you build nothing. All you do is attack the people that do build but then thanks to grumpy we know that is to get is to "fill in the gaps".
you are completely wrong. i have contributed just as much as you or XS or any of your other aliases.

XS-NRG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Re: Q2/S16: Acceleration and Deceleration
« Reply #59 on: January 23, 2011, 06:51:43 PM »
yes, but you can do your own due diligence...

Thats what i thought and now you know  :)
By the way assumptions do not have to be substantiated.


 i have contributed just as much as you or XS

I highly doubt that  :D