Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.  (Read 78165 times)

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #75 on: October 27, 2011, 01:35:46 AM »
Maybe Your Pappi was Ariane too, only Mutti of jewish origin?
("Mutter" is probably a better way to put the English word Mother, according to Internet sources.   "Mutti" might be a nickname?)

After 1291, King Edward I expelled all Jews from England, so they left England or became Catholic Christians.   They still intermarried with Ashkenazi blood in their veins.  My parents both had Jewish ancestors and so does about 1/3 of all English people today.
Quote
But tachyons are not needed to be produced.
All what we need to do is, to develope the receivers, such as this small time-mill. ???
And i also wonder, if You had read my replay#12 here:

www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=11115.0


Here's the last post of that thread, which is Reply #11:

"To Harti: Please close this topic, we had abandoned completely this plans.
It makes no really sence to do it, waste millions and 5-6 years to complete all properly, when is possible to achieve similar effects with DRJ200 and better engines. http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10213.0
And to Big M: i will be not teaching You as well others, why a drop of water has 10^14 much more power of LHC, even when it will be 1000 times bigger built.
When You don't understand that the Nature is most powerful builder, You never ever understand anything.
As this really is.
But what i can advise You and others is, to find old memoires of Victor Schauberger and other, and to put Your brains with it on new paths.
Yours
Arius Nowak
www.nspap.salon24.pl
www.facebook.com/nspap"


You use tachyons?   They're theoretical particles.   Thusly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon   You say they exist?   If so, you can generate power with them?   What?   Is that possible?   When they supposedly go faster than light and may or may not be time-traveling?

--Lee

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #76 on: October 27, 2011, 02:54:44 AM »
I think that You should first to read carefully this topic:
www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6760.105
It is 3 years old, but You will find answer for own questions, maybe.
But please don't forget that, such remarring don't do good for "inteligence".
Please see Your friends, Rotschild, Rockefeller (ja wirklich, ein groSSes Fehler des unseres Welt) and others.
John Rockerfeller (b. 1839) was a Christian, but has was also a business tycoon.  Christians can be greedy, too.  They still believe in Jesus.   I knew another man who hated Jews and Native Americans, was was greedy as hell, too.
Quote
When they were really wise, they could allowed even 10 y. ago this Potapov VHG's and other individual energy saving devices, to go between people.
Even if 1% of population of US and EU aquainted them in this time, it had no practical flow on their profits, whats even more, through this small savings, they could not only to show they good will for our civilization developement, but also
to widen in time theirs own bussines.
Okay, I understand that.  You could also have made your group's invention available to the public or OU.com.   You didn't.
Quote
But this is not my fault they simply don't understand this. ;D
I had better calculated this than they do.
Greed has its own punishment.   Even if they think like that, I don't.   I can get by with just enough.
Quote
So please, who is the better Jew? ;D
You really know about the religion?   ::)   :D   ???
I'm a very liberal Jew, and as such, ultra-Orthodox Jews would hate me for being a "goy" = unbeliever.   You think Polish "Nowak" doesn't mean "New Man in Town" in English?   Jews arrived after the Poles and Germans and then began to slowly intermarry with the natives.   Even if it was more than 200 yrs ago, you think you can use the 'drop of blood' argument against me?   The first Jews in Germany were women captured from Roman soldiers, were (r.a.p.e.d) by Germans, and then had 1/2 Jewish children.  Some of their descendants went to Poland, starting in the 11th Century.   Can you run away from this?   We're ethnically related.   So, "Who is the better Jew?"   My mother probably had pre-medieval Kazarian ancestors in East Europe and you may have had,them, too.

What's really a Jew?

--Lee

NOTE:
The words "s.e.x" and "r.a.p.e" are being censored and deleted when the periods are removed by the software of OU.com.

gauschor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #77 on: November 05, 2011, 02:36:33 PM »
Please tell me more about the upcoming WWIII scenario  ;)
And besides... are you really sure it's the russians who own these "invisible" planes? I somehow doubt that.

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #78 on: November 06, 2011, 12:16:01 AM »
Please tell me more about the upcoming WWIII scenario  ;)
And besides... are you really sure it's the russians who own these "invisible" planes? I somehow doubt that.
I speculate:  His group is being coached by little Grey aliens!

I can also conclusively report:  Arius Nowak, the son of the "good Dr.", is gone along with his posts.   They were there and now they're not.

Yea!  Good riddance.

--Lee
« Last Edit: November 06, 2011, 03:34:14 AM by the_big_m_in_ok »

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #79 on: January 05, 2012, 09:15:54 PM »
And to You mein liebe Freund.

Against to put in heads of people such things which are clear in modern times, could You kindly to give answer abour this COP>3.5 (or even 5, as sometimes is written). Half a year gone, next winter closing, and no answer.
Or You are simply not ready for head to head discussion with true aryan?
I give You time till next Sunday.

I tell You why COP>4 by heat gruond pumps stands not much to reality.
It is so by (+) outer temps only.
When making colder weather to (-1)-(-7), they pump 2x small heat and start to take more electrical power as specified.
In this situation is not so bad yet, it can 1.5-2.0 COP achieved to be.
Much worser is in situation when temps fall between (-8) to (-15) degs.
They loose rapidly on heat efficiency 4x to nominal specs, whats more, engines of compressors can even with more than 100% of mechanical power to work.
In such permanent winter conditions it can be 0.7 (70%) to 0.8 (80%) achieved.
Also not much better over conventional electrical heaters which make about 60%.
Our DRJ reactors completely of surrounding conditions independent are.
It is of internal nuclear reaction which goes with 10.000.000 degs.
It works with specified efficiency in space, by (-273) degs.

 ::)

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #80 on: January 05, 2012, 09:24:39 PM »
Please tell me more about the upcoming WWIII scenario  ;)
And besides... are you really sure it's the russians who own these "invisible" planes? I somehow doubt that.

I'm sure now that we have avoided War thanks this:
http://nspap.livejournal.com/1732.html
(But no one can be sure to the end really).
I think but there comes very bad time everywhere.
First EURO sinks, than our Zloty (PLN) till Summer.
Than in Autumn US Dollar goes through chimney.

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for community use.
« Reply #81 on: January 05, 2012, 10:19:22 PM »
This and next year possible is a short, 10 unit serie of model 2013 to built.
Here are technical specs.
S=Siemens, H stays for Helmke engine producer.
Engine power
[kW] .... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... ..11 .... .... ... .... ...15. ... .... .... .... 18.50
Heat production
[kWh] .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ...16.00 .... ... .... ....22.00 .... ... .... .. 28. 00
Electrical power : [kWh]
S/H....................................14.40 /14 .00 .... .19 .50/ 19.00 ..24 .50/ 24.00

Heated room: [m2 ] (by 30/75 kWh norm)
... .... ... ...............................1. 300 /520 .... ... 1. 800 /700 ... .... 2.300 /900

Total mass
[kG] .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ..115 .... .... ... .... .... 132 ... .... .... ... 150
Process efficiency (%)
S/H .... .... .... ... .... ...............110/114 .... .... ..112 /115 ... .... ...114 /117
Mechanical efficiency (%)
S/H .... .... ............................194 /194 ... .... ...195 /195 .... ... ...201 /201

Both engine types are of IE2/2011 Euronorm.
This norm will be valid only through 2013.
From 2014 the new IE3 Euronorm for electrical engines goes into live.
Engines of this will be some 4-5x more in price than todays IE2 types.
Only to say, small 1 kW engine for wash machine, will cost 1.000 USD, even 3x more than today all the wash machine.
Everything will be much, much higher in price than today, even if there will be new money already.
It is proposed change ratio 5EUR:1 DM.N (German Mark New), but prices for most important raw resources will stay on today level.
Only wages go down.

Technical datas for engines model 2013 :
Engine Siemens (S) /Helmke (H) ... .... ...
.................................................11 kW/400V ..15 kW/400V... 18.5 kW/400V
Power nominal/real [kW] 50Hz ....11/8 .25 ... ....15/ 11.25 .... .18.5 /13 .9
Revolutions [rpms/ min.] ............. 2.955 ... .... .... 2. 955.. .... .... ..2.955

cos "&" (S )/(H) .... ...................0 ,87/0 .90 ... ..0.88 /0. 90 .... ..0 .88/ 0.91
Current by 400V [A] docs/practical
Siemens IE2. .... ... .... .... ....20,50 /24. 00 ... ..27 .0/ 32.00 .... .33. 5/ 39.50
Helmke IE2. .... ... .... .... ....18 .70/ 22.50 .... .25. 10/ 30. 20 ... 30. 80/ 37.50
mass [kg] ... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... ..68 .... ... .... .... .... ..85 ... .... .... ... 104
Loud level [dB] S/H .... .... .... ...70/ 81 .... .... .... ... .70/ 81 ... .... ...70 /81

IE2 engines from Siemens make 16x small loudnoise than previous EFF2 (IE1) class engines.
The workhead will be insulated with 10-15 cm foam to have 99% heat efficiency and to reduce noise of nuclear reaction.
The clutch will be for to make distance from engine for it and have better possibility to send workhead alone to proving.

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #82 on: January 31, 2012, 09:18:38 PM »
This who would like to know more about effectivity of NSBRJ (DRJ.200) model 2013 i inform that, this is about 30 to 40% (depending on engine and power) more effective over simple electric heaters which cost some 25-30 EUR's (3 kW).
But it is also same way more effective over each heat pumps.
I mean winter conditions with under (-) 10 temps where users of heat pumps should turn them out for prolonging theirs lifetime.
This comparision of various todays fuels and heating means please choose (only in polish language): http://bioenergia.energo24.pl/189,porownanie-nosnikow-energii .
Generally, by gas it is maximum to  30% to achieve, by coal, newly developed in Poland chimneys some 20%. The last figure, although some 2x better in comparision to old types from 60/70-es is 3x weaker than by industrial, electric power station also, which makes >60% of heat from chemical energy of coal.
Of course, turbine and generator losses make it into electrical energy between 30-33% overall.
So as You see, coal burning in home conditions is not very efficient.
Same is in practice with a gas.
Using of conventional, cheap electric heaters which have 85% efficiency bound with cheap "night" mode electricity prices, was always known as the most efficient way of heating.
The only problem was this, that old homes technology required much of water reservoir volume because of much heatpower consumption.
Everybody was more convienient to waste homespace with coal than with water tanks. Really, it is were logic lost was.
But now, especially with new homes which are build according 30 kWh/sqm rule, they consume some 4x less heat energy than old homes.
And by polish price conditions, when comparing the best 30% gas heaters to 85% electric simple heaters, this last mean is some 33% more cheaper over gas heating.
You can use this next comparision for own purposes:
electricity price 1 kWh night mode =0.07 EUR or 0.09 USD
gas price 1 m^3 =0.40 EUR or 0.55 USD
Generelly, when price of 1 m^3 of gas is 6x higher than "night" 1 kWh of electricity, You have well over 30% less to pay for heating.
And with our NSBRJ which 30-40% more effective over convienient electric heaters, it is better than 2x cheaper.
 :D
http://bioenergia.energo24.pl/118,narodowo-spoleczny-biologiczny-reaktor-jadrowy
The smallest one today, 11 kW engine attached, is born for 1.300 sqm/30 kWh or 500 by 75 kWh.
This last are old homes insulated with 12 cm foam and old types of PVC windows.
So as You see the smallest is for some 8 newly built homes or 3 older type.
The biggest engine 18.5 kW makes 2.300/900 sqm.
It is 18 to 6 homes to divide cost of 4.500 EUR (6.000 USD) between.
To this comes possibility to cure peoples with free, rest, energy of tachyons, as is by the DRJ.600 already (CNFR.600).
http://nspap.livejournal.com/1398.html
Because of this, abroad as well country folks, we limit to only specified persons/groups of potential users.
Free Energy of DRJ.200 is 100 Millions greater (10^24 eV) over big and costly LHC in Switzer-Putzer-Land.
By CNFR.600 it is well 3x greater.
Dr. Adolf Nowak
http://nspap.livejournal.com
NSR POLEN
60-143 Poznan 8)

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #83 on: February 02, 2012, 03:48:00 PM »
Hello Dr.No,
www.smstechnologies.ecrater.com  show us an other solution for a cheap and efficient heater,
electric forced air !
495US$ for 1400-1600sqft heating  area !

Another possibility could be to modify/optimize this forced air-heater with the HTM-material from     www.canlaser.com    .

A cheap and very flexible solution,do you agree ?

Sincerely
              CdL

p.s.: to compare with conventional values here :       www.sonnenkoenig.ch
                                                                                             2000W -old-/1500W-new- construction , 20sqm area
                                                                                             30 degrees Celsius temperature spread

         Germany, average electricity price,night mode 0,12 EUR/KWH netto (+ monthly fee)                               

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #84 on: February 02, 2012, 04:24:57 PM »
Not at all:
http://eurocosm.com/application/products/swimming-pools/pool-heaters-GB.asp
I don't know how much it costs, but here in  Poland, 3 kW heater as this:

http://atinstalacje.pl/opis/2113986/grzalka-elektryczna-3-kw230v-54.html
costs 25-30 EUR (33-39 USD).
With additional 2x 200 L water tanks (each 100 sqm/75 kWh norm), also total invest cost of about 1.000-1.200 EUR (1.300-1.550 USD) You achieve >30% cheaper heating costs over the heat pumps, gas, coal, everything.
Not saying about local ecology and convienience.
This solution is know for more than 110 years, but it will take some centuries when people accept this knowledge.
I only wonder, how many civilizations will take to understand our CNFHR solution?
On our own new class IE.4 magnetic electric engines it makes 170% efficiency.
Also 2x better over all this electric heaters.
3x less cost than gas, coal today.
But this is not the last word in this solution.
But we had abandoned it till 2030 year.
Happy now? :P

Doctor No

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
    • NSPAP
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #85 on: February 07, 2012, 10:38:41 PM »
About the last time mentioned here:
www.overunity.com/11966/new-class-ie-4-magnetic-engines-85-efficient/
i had on my mind "Taschen Kern Reaktor" (Pocket Nuclear Home Reactor).
The DRJ.200 (NSBRJ) will be from 01 March available to public.
This will be 2 series possible to built: 200.2013 on IE.2 and 200.2014 on IE.4 class engines basing standard.
Both will be with commercial prices now in offer, calculated after normal industrial loans, provisions and profits.
So of this prices will range between 12-14.000 EUR (11-18 kW models).
For various party members, of peacefull purposes and other important social needs, ecology f.e., they will be further with "social" prices available.
The main difference is out of effectivity, 110 or 170%, the quantity of each serie.
Model 200.2013 can be in 10 units serie to be built, model 200.2014 in min. 50 pieces of each power range.
I advise all but the last time completely free of charge that, against all this silly speaches about clima change into Africa like conditions, this really is going down.
With temps and as well with peoples minds.
This is s.c. synergetic effect.
Please don't forget that we live in united World.
So when You are happy, everything allround grows too, and vice-versa.
Simply say, You are all sinking on Your own wish.
And nothing helps You.
No power.
This is only selected persons allowed, with proper personality.
So they can achieve better conditions.
Dr. Adolf Nowak
http://nspap.livejournal.com

Maciej41

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • APGP
NOBODY.
« Reply #86 on: April 08, 2012, 01:54:34 AM »
Hey folks, so many years gone and nobody eager is (out of Christian Liechti from Swiss) to prove this wonderful (i think) machines?
And this months only when NWO will start to put millions in concentration camps after riots will start in America with Autumn start.
What's with You?
All completely dumb?
10 years after WTC, many wars and millions of dead?
Or You deserve nothing more as to be "deleted" too?

pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #87 on: November 07, 2013, 08:29:02 PM »
It's end of the year, and Dr.No wakes up again.This time as NWO1968.
For the information: this mental individual was banned from OU by site administrator for his hate speach and neo-nazi propagada.
Please,take him with grain of salt, as he claims sort of cavitation pump his invention, and tries to  sell "home nuclear units" :-D
Regards,
Pix

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: DRJ200 ‹100% CNF reactor for "home" use.
« Reply #88 on: November 12, 2013, 08:51:57 PM »


נאָוואַק -"Nowak" in Yiddish
נובאק -"Nowak" in Hebrew
BigM, we all already know that Yiddish is something You do not know, but can you please tell us how You pronounce it in Hebrew?
       I was born partly Ashkenazi, but I only recently accepted Judaism as a religion in the last 5 years, or so.   My parents weren't Jews, and I don't speak Hebrew or Yiddish.
       As for the family name Nowak, look at this...

http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=nowak

Besides, I've seen a picture of Arius' face while he's standing next to a building, on this or another thread.   Really, I'm a Jew and I know what they look like.   He certainly looks like an East European Jew to me.   How to prove it, definitely?   Test his y-chromosome DNA for gene(s) specific to Jews.   You're not going to do that, right?   The American phrase is, "Finding a skeleton in the closet."

I think you'd like to try and use the 'drop of blood' ploy and discount that a significant number of your members are derived from Jews.   I expect that.   A coward might do that rather than accept personal responsibility.

And, while I'm thinking of it before I'm forced to quit:   "Dr." (No)wak said your invention uses tachyons?   I replied at that time, "Really?"   Those are only theoretical subatomic articles."
       I meant it then and I do now.   I don't think you have the natural ability to think of all this by yourselves.   The German Nazis during WWII didn't come up with the circular flying saucer on their own, either.   Someone---or something---helped them, as well.

I think some conspiracy theorists have part of the truth concerning what the Nazis in general have been doing for the last 60-70 years.   Someone is giving them technology to get them in trouble with other around them by threatening others around them.   Nazis are rightist thugs to my mind and don't mind threatening someone to get want that want or change someone else's mind, for instance.   These benefactors, whoever or whatever they are, don't give a damn about the Nazis.   Only themselves.
       In WWII, some theorists contend that 'little grey aliens' helped give their technology to be applied to Nazis' technical level of expertise and allow the Germans to build low-power flying saucers.   The Moon was about as far as they could go in it.   These aliens didn't really trust Nazis' with more powerful spacecraft, since the Nazis were more aggressive than they were.   No weapons to speak of and no advanced astrogation gear to leave the Solar System with.

There!   I'm a conspiracy theorist!
It's only my opinion, but I suppose you don't care much about my opinion, yes?   It's a theoretical question.   I don't expect an answer.


"Folks, do you have any issues to raise?"

       If I did, I can't or wouldn't be truthful with you.   What I've learned of the truth may be too risky to tell someone like your people.   Why?   I'm not a threat to anyone, so I've been given the responsibility of keeping the SPECIFIC truth of certain subjects to myself.
       However, this is generalized:   I was informed by someone that he knew for sure whether or not JFK was really, actually assassinated.   He said it was true.   What do I think?   I'm not going to check on the details he provided.   I don't particularly care.   I wasn't JFK, so it doesn't concern me.   Fine.   If JFK was actually assassinated, then "whatever trips your trigger".   Big deal.   Conspiracy theorists, even myself, are plentiful, sometimes.   Whether or not they're correct in their assertions is up to debate, that's all.

--Lee
« Last Edit: November 13, 2013, 12:13:26 AM by the_big_m_in_ok »

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.
« Reply #89 on: November 13, 2013, 12:42:07 AM »
Lepiej niech Pix to przetÅ‚umaczy bo te translatory sÄ… do dupy.           ::)
  Here's the English translation:   "Better let this Pix przetÅ" rights because these translators are ... to the honeys."          And that was from Paralink.           If you want to self-translate his blatherings and ravings, just be aware that you might get something returned like the preceeding as a translation.                     --Lee             P.S.    NWO1968 said in a post that these water heaters or whatever they are, are dangerous in the wrong hands because they can be used as atom bombs.   Then why the  Hell?!  are they coming here on a public forum and advertising these things for 'home use' to the technically-oriented Members like us??   We're the 'public', too, you know.