Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics  (Read 34539 times)

#### GregorArturo

• Newbie
• Posts: 19
##### Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« on: January 05, 2011, 01:12:24 AM »
Hey everybody, I haven't posted on this website awhile and I felt it was worth sharing some new advancements in vortex mathematics from my research contribution along with others. This information has been shared already with the YouTube community along with constant discussion on the rodin coil group on google.

So the math has revealed that the 1st dimension is magnetic with three components: Scalar, north pole, and south pole energy. Overlapping magnetic fields cause the twisting of the magnetic fields to cancel out, the doubling circuits, leaving only the scalar component, a true one-dimensional string of energy.

By grouping these three sequences it creates a 2D matrix that can be folded in onto itself to create a toroid. The base matrix is 6 x 6 which creates the yin yang and flower of life type flow. This 2D matrix creates a 2nd axis of information which is electric in nature. The Yin Yang is an oscillation of polarized charges.

There are 3 unique and distinct 6 x 6 matrices. These translate into three toroids which interlock with each other forming the celtic knot the Triquetera. However, this is usually seen as one flow, a type of mobius strip. It is 3 distinct toroidal flows the work together to focus or funnel a single magnetic flow into a vortex and implosion. The three toroids are out of phase with each other, a concept Tesla completely understood.

Each toroidal map creates a unique 18 number sequence (which each map contains two of) that represents the oscillating flow of electricity. If you take each three sequences and make them out of phase with each other, you create a 18 x 3 matrix that can further lead to create a 6 x 6 x 6 matrix depicting space and describing the flow and patterns of light.

Currently, I am working on connecting the Fibonacci sequence which is a 24 number cycle in vortex mathematics to the fourth dimension to unify the lower dimensions in terms of how energy flows in, between, and out of them.

A single toroid works only as an oscillating pump with no net energy to say extract as free energy. By elevating the geometric complexity, to allow these pumps to funnel in a specific direction, net energy can be extracted.

There's much more to this than meets the eye, and than what I've already shared. My YouTube channel describes more in detail at http://www.youtube.com/gregorarturo85

I'm just hoping to see some thoughts, and see what things people may build! Feel free to ask any questions. I'll share more on material sciences later in relation to these flows.

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2011, 01:28:35 AM »
This is certainly beautiful math, especially presented visually. What isn't clear is what is its connection with physics. What gives you grounds to attribute physical meaning, say, talking about energy, when presenting these mathematical results?

#### MrMag

• Hero Member
• Posts: 754
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2011, 01:32:25 PM »
Nice work Gregor. And just ignore the troll.

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2011, 02:20:15 PM »
Nice work Gregor. And just ignore the troll.

The above is written by a troll.

#### GregorArturo

• Newbie
• Posts: 19
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2011, 03:01:16 PM »
Omnibus, you are absolutely right. The hardest part about the math has been the interpretation of the abstract patterns in terms of their relationship to attributes to our physical world. However, by creating the dynamic systems the math dictates, you are able to see how certain patterns flow versus others. The 1st dimension has three fundamental properties which fit most appropriately with magnetism. The 2nd dimension oscillates between two opposing energies and applies most appropriately to electricity. When looked at from a holistic perspective, it connects everything together rather flawlessly which is a statement in itself.

To explain how three triadic coils linked together would be replicated here, it involves making the three toroids out of a diamagnetic material. This pushes the magnetic field out of its core, or curves it away from its core. Each toroid has its own intrinisic internal magnetic field that all feed off one external magnetic field. If you lined up the triad so one of the three outer arms faces your closest magnetic pole, then there would be a vortex street effect happening on that point with two opposing vortices fishtailing off the toroid and into a cylical flow around the structure itself. A paramagnetic material could be used to guide this magnetic energy through the hole of each toroid. So essentially the hole of each toroid contains 2 diamagnetic toroids, and smaller ratio paramagnetic toroid which feeds through all three diamagnetic toroids. In the central shaft of the entire structure, a ferromagnetic material can be used to focus and implode the external magnetic field. What this doesis create a drain for the earth's magnetic energy (or any other input magnetic energy you are using) which it vortexes, causing it to accelerate toward singularity.

You don't technically have to wind the toroids. It's a concept like Tai Chi but with material science. I'm currently working on construction of one right now.

So study this animation good. There's going on right there.

#### spinn_MP

• Full Member
• Posts: 224
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2011, 03:38:18 PM »
"Omnibus, you are absolutely right...."

Rotfl!
What a mathematician you are!

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2011, 03:41:07 PM »
"Omnibus, you are absolutely right...."

Rotfl!
What a mathematician you are!

spam

#### MrMag

• Hero Member
• Posts: 754
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2011, 04:35:46 PM »
"Omnibus, you are absolutely right...."

Rotfl!
What a mathematician you are!

He wants to sound intelligent yet all his comments are trivial and off topic. What a joke.

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2011, 04:38:24 PM »
He wants to sound intelligent yet all his comments are trivial and off topic. What a joke.

What a joke, indeed, to write posting as the one above.

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2011, 04:57:50 PM »
It is not trivial and it is not off topic to ask what is the basis to claim connection with physics when a mathematical result is presented claiming such connection. That, of course, is not for people who are not scientists to understand. These people, however, should try to learn and not get encouraged by trolls to respond incoherently and interrupt the discussion.

It is a common fallacy nowadays to substitue mathematical results for physical findings. Our friend here isn't at all an exception. That approach is the rule in some circles and that has to change if physics is to regain its integrity. Physics makes mathematics, not vice versa. Mathematics is only a language which makes physics easier to present. In other words, mathematics in physics is only a tool. It is something extraneous to physics which only helps it. A significant physical result or any physical result for that matter will not become less significant or less physical if it can be expressed in words, avoiding any use of math. Many times, however, using math makes it more convenient to express physics clearly. On the other hand, there are many valuable mathematical results which have no physical meaning whatsoever. Those interested in science have to learn those distinctions in order to avoid unnecessary confusion.

#### void109

• Full Member
• Posts: 177
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2011, 07:30:25 PM »
I'm with Omnibus on this one.  I've been intrigued by this whole notion of vortex based mathematics for awhile.  Ultimately it has just led to my own frustration - as I've yet to see anything that correlates the 'math' to anything physical and real.  Is it popular because of the fancy numerical associations it produces?  Science or numerology?  I haven't seen anything yet that indicates it is science.

How do you use this tool (VBM) to make physical predictions?  You know, so we can test those predictions.

#### Jimboot

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1373
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2011, 10:13:20 PM »
Whilst i don't pretend to understand the more complex aspects of the maths i have enjoyed winding several coils based on them for my pulse motors & loudspeakers. In my limited experience they are so much more efficient than any other coils I've used. So I've confirmed for myself some of the initial claims around efficiency of vortex math based coils, so Im prepared to be further intrigued

#### Gwandau

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 363
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2011, 11:16:42 PM »
If you don't know about Marko Rodin, you just have to check this:

http://www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm

He is the one guy most deeply into vortex mathematics and its applications.

http://markorodin.com/1.5/

Also there is several real intriguing lectures by him on YouTube:

#### Omnibus

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 5330
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2011, 11:45:30 PM »
If you don't know about Marko Rodin, you just have to check this:

http://www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm

He is the one guy most deeply into vortex mathematics and its applications.

http://markorodin.com/1.5/

Also there is several real intriguing lectures by him on YouTube:

I don't see any reason why one interested in OU should ever spend time watching these videos? Where is the experimental proof that coil or approach has anything to do with OU?

#### Gwandau

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 363
##### Re: Advancements in Vortex Mathematics
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2011, 01:37:28 AM »
Seems to me Marko Rodin is onto the very fabric behind our universe.

The geometry of energy fields points clearly towards the vortex concept.

Just look at anything, from atomic spin structures to galaxies.

Thus OU-like effects are very likely to relate to the ever present vortex geometry.

Omnibus, I take the liberty to remind you that we are here to keep doors open.

Gwandau