Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The paradox of overunity  (Read 102755 times)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #60 on: December 29, 2010, 10:15:31 PM »
until you cease with the logical fallacies and provide such evidence or proof.

You can't judge either way even if I provide evicence. So, drop the subject.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #61 on: December 29, 2010, 10:18:39 PM »
You can't judge either way even if I provide evicence. So, drop the subject.
another logical fallacy... LOL ::)

"It's not up to you to judge." even if you could provide evidence, which you cannot, which is why you continue avoiding the merits of the argument with the logical fallacies... ::)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #62 on: December 29, 2010, 10:19:27 PM »
another logical fallacy... LOL ::)

"It's not up to you to judge." even if you could provide evidence, which you cannot, which is why you continue avoiding the merits of the argument with the logical fallacies... ::)

Drop the subject. It is above your head.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #63 on: December 29, 2010, 10:20:19 PM »
Drop the subject. It is above your head.
that's another logical fallacy. and that's not for you to judge...  ::)

I have shown conclusive proof to that effect.
where?  nowhere that's where.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #64 on: December 29, 2010, 10:23:44 PM »
that's another logical fallacy. and that's not for you to judge...  ::)
where?  nowhere that's where.

It's for me to judge if I am to show evidence. I'm not crazy to be bothered by random individuals on the net who have shown no evidence of credentials and a filling threads with crap contributing nothing to the discussion.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #65 on: December 29, 2010, 10:25:52 PM »
It's for me to judge if I am to show evidence. I'm not crazy to be bothered by random individuals on the net who have shown no evidence of credentials and a filling threads with crap contributing nothing to the discussion.
another red herring, with an appeal to authority mixed in, how quaint... LOL i got all day omni, keep digging.

let me refresh your memory omni. you have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir despite your claim that you have.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #66 on: December 29, 2010, 10:29:53 PM »
another red herring, with an appeal to authority mixed in, how quaint... LOL i got all day omni, keep digging.

let me refresh your memory omni. you have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir despite your claim that you have.

I have all day too to tell you this is not your place. Go find other amusements.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #67 on: December 29, 2010, 10:31:47 PM »
I have all day too to tell you this is not your place. Go find other amusements.
continued use of  logical fallacies will get you nowhere and just serve to demonstrate your incapacity for logical, rational discourse. address the argument with a cogent rebuttal and i might.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #68 on: December 29, 2010, 10:33:44 PM »
address the argument with a cogent rebuttal and i might. continued use of  logical fallacies will get you nowhere and just serve to demonstrate your incapacity for logical, rational discourse.

You are incompetent to judge the validity of this particular claim so go find something else to do. Don't fill the thread with gibberish.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #69 on: December 29, 2010, 10:35:53 PM »
You are incompetent to judge the validity of this particular claim so go find something else to do. Don't fill the thread with gibberish.
denied. logical fallacy, red herring also known as: smoke screen, wild goose chase. (a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. the basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic).

let me refresh your memory omni. you have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir despite your claim that you have.

Gwandau

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #70 on: December 29, 2010, 10:37:14 PM »
Hey dear participants in this energetic discussion, :D

I believe we are out in real deep waters here.

How on Earth would it be possible to ascertain that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device?

I mean, just the fact that we do not detect any presence of an energy source does not
prove that there is no source.

What is not known does not exist???

To prove the total absence of a source, you need to know everything there is to know about our universe which of course is impossible,
and most certainly for a primitive species like the human race, who just have started fiddeling with the uppermost top of the iceberg of knowledge.

So the present level of this discussion seems a bit futile.

Gwandau

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #71 on: December 29, 2010, 10:38:10 PM »
denied. logical fallacy, red herring (a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. the basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic).

let me refresh your memory omni. you have shown no evidence nor provided a single proof that indicates these alleged OU machines do not deplete a pre-existing energy reservoir despite your claim that you have.

That's gibberish. You'll get this response every time you post here.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #72 on: December 29, 2010, 10:40:23 PM »
Hey dear participants in this energetic discussion, :D

I believe we are out in real deep waters here.

How on Earth would it be possible to ascertain that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device?

I mean, just the fact that we do not detect any presence of an energy source does not
prove that there is no source.

What is not known does not exist???

To prove the total absence of a source, you need to know everything there is to know about our universe which of course is impossible,
and most certainly for a primitive species like the human race, who just have started fiddeling with the uppermost top of the iceberg of knowledge.

So the present level of this discussion seems a bit futile.

Gwandau
indeed. similar to the question of whom will be standing at point infinity to say 'yup, it's perpetual...'  ;)

of course omni is claiming that he has ascertained that there is no pre-existing energy reservoir fueling the OU device... which, as you described, is obviously ludicrous. so here we are, trying to teach omni what a cogent reply is.

thanks for yours.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #73 on: December 29, 2010, 10:45:57 PM »
That's gibberish. You'll get this response every time you post here.
no that is a cogent response. i called your fallacies out for what they are and restated my position. your continued use of logical fallacy as a response and your continued refusal to present said evidence or proof will now be accepted as a tacit admission that you cannot provide said evidence or proof.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: The paradox of overunity
« Reply #74 on: December 29, 2010, 10:47:25 PM »
your continued use of logical fallacy as a response and your continued refusal to present said evidence or proof will now be accepted as a tacit admission that you cannot provide said evidence or proof.

This above is spam.