Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device  (Read 10534 times)

jadon1979

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« on: December 16, 2010, 11:35:01 AM »
This is based on the Rodin Coil and test I have been doing.  I think this coil has been overlooked for too long.  The coils are all air core.  This bifilar coil setup is based on the hub in a wind generator. Instead of Wind we're using the field generated by the Rodin. The Rodin is a 8" toroid with 22 AWG magnet wire wrapped 18 FULL turns per channel.... 2 channels    I throw this out there for free... so if you run off with it and make lots of money... and men in black suits don't show up at your door step to produce an "accident"... then I have a billion ideas.... just remember me...  throw some seed fund my way.

markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2010, 12:45:40 PM »
Thank you for this,
are there any results that go with it?
I have a good friend that has used the JT device and cheap solar cells to come up with a cheap powerpack with leds solar charged for third world countries. Futher development of this would help his quest.
Mark

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2010, 01:19:58 PM »
I fear, the Lenz law apply like any convontional transformer Rodin coil or not, the secondary BEMF couple back of the primary, so no more OUT than IN...

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2010, 01:45:10 PM »
I think that is a good idea!

Jesus

jadon1979

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2010, 07:20:12 PM »
I fear, the Lenz law apply like any convontional transformer Rodin coil or not, the secondary BEMF couple back of the primary, so no more OUT than IN...

No issues with it thus far.  Thanks.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2011, 04:40:19 AM »
I like your design. You have definately identified where the fields are and what they are doing.
I did a similar task when I reverse engineered the Deyo coil. I emailed Stan and he told me pulsed DC.
In the attached pic check out the fields and all the little Tesla coils which bang against the next inner layer.

jadon1979

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: More OUT than IN - Solid State Device
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2011, 10:36:29 PM »
Get strategic with caps and a 555 circuit - the whole device could then be triggered by just passing a magnet over it one time.  I've ran out of funds to fully complete this for now but will pick it up again later.  Then I'll do a video with the schematic and data - hit the apple store - open youtube accounts - and post it anonymously. 

The sad part is millions could see it working and 10 people would try to build it... of those 10... 8 will mess something up in the build and quit after the 1st time saying "It's impossible".... the 2 left over will get sidetracked... and it'll just be a nice video to show friends.