Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84089
  • *Latest: rQBErT

  • *Total Posts: 895687
  • *Total Topics: 15756
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 10

Author Topic: Splitting the electron stream  (Read 73836 times)

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #90 on: December 14, 2010, 09:52:42 PM »
I often envy your smarts!
I think to myself geeeezzz ,what a gift!

And then I see it comes at a cost,somehow you have no real peace

You can't stop thinking,you have to learn to relax , chill,shut the brain off
You're thinking way to much, you'll pull a brain muscle!

Somehow you see me as ,multiple persons?

I am now and have always been Chet Kremens , My real name,I go by no monikers ,handles etc.

I am sorry If you feel I have offended you somehow,by being disingenuous

I really like your contributions,and have been struggling to understand them.

Chet


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #90 on: December 14, 2010, 09:52:42 PM »

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #91 on: December 15, 2010, 11:18:09 AM »
Speaking of your contributions!
The Marinov Motor,
seems like an old promise has been kept![by you]

can you share some of your understanding on this??
Please??
Thank you
Chet

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #92 on: December 15, 2010, 12:56:36 PM »
Speaking of your contributions!
The Marinov Motor,
seems like an old promise has been kept![by you]

can you share some of your understanding on this??
Please??
Thank you
Chet

I kept my promise when I showed how you can polarize a chain of water molecules and experimentally demonstrate the length of time it takes to for a water molecule to rotate 180 degrees. As simple as the experiment was, nobody was smart enough to appreciate the beauty in the simplicity. - You evil lying worm!

I have most of what it takes on the shelf to prove what electricity is and to prove perpetual motion - that all there is, is perpetual motion. Problem is, most people don't have the abstract thinking skills to disconnect from their "local" perception of the universe.

ATTACHED is a nice paper on some aspects of the subject of EM:

Note - Page 6 mentions A-B effect and causality of fields?

Note - Page 7 how Hertz introduced velocity - acceleration?

Note - Page 8 how there must be two different photons? Just because something moves at the speed of light does not mean it is a photon. I posted something a few weeks ago about how a photon is NOT the force carrier of the electromagnetic field as is postulated. There is another particle and that particle is an empty spaceand subsequent shock wave created during mass to atomic energy conversion.

Note  - Page 11 how he tries to introduce imaginary numbers to validate the equations? Maybe that results from an imaginary understanding of electricity? They do after all still regard electricity as either a phenomenon or a story that can't hold water. ...and maybe all that comes from an imaginary understanding of what a particle is? Me thinks that.

Note - Page 13 The closing remarks are precious. He is a smart person that has done his homework correcting other people's homework. Until people understand that electricity is mass to atomic energy conversion, until people understand that the time function must be a part of every physical law, THE PHYSICAL MODELS ARE ALREADY NEBULOUS.

A science paper that shows the mistakes is every bit as important than one that shows an effect or creates a physical law. Had people like Einstein been ignored, had Rockafeller not taken control of academics, we would probably not be in this mess.

When you hide the effects of acceleration to prevent people from understanding free energy devices, you need a lot of glue made of bullshit to keep that physical house of cards from falling. Imaginary numbers and non relative equations don't make good glue.

It seems insane to create new areas of science rather than correct the mistakes of the past. It does not disrespect the scientist of the past, it simply acknowledges that knowledge is also relative. As time progresses, knowledge is squared unless the corporate resistance of personal greed or ego are introduced into the human experiment. The greed of money and ego killed the hundredth monkey of humanity.

Who will be the one to show how Rife split a light wave and explain the double slit experiment relegating quantum science to the trash bin and exposing those that bought into it as insane believers? Would the insane believers listen? Try telling a magical thinking religious person that God is the universe. Then offer experimental proof of that and see if it changes anything.

On a larger canvas, me thinks the reason we can only account for 4.5% of the light in the universe is because there is a .5% measurement error and we live in a two octave resonance of the universal wave. I suspect the universe is not as big as they claim, but we are actually smaller then they realize. It is all relative in a universal transmission with at least 20 gears. There was no big bang, we live in a solid mass that varies in time and most of that time exceeds the local speed of light in two directions.

Tesla made a device (dark rings) that ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT!

Um, did you see that absorbed light part?
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 02:40:49 PM by quarktoo »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #92 on: December 15, 2010, 12:56:36 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #93 on: December 15, 2010, 03:14:51 PM »
Envy.......................
is that a sin?

Yes Perpetual motion is all there is in this universe.

Q
Quote
Try telling a magical thinking religious person that God is the universe
-------------------
I agree,but my universe has lips!

------------------
Absorbes light??
Holy crap?? How? Consumes?

Chet

Offline sigma16

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #94 on: December 15, 2010, 03:56:33 PM »
When Paul Dirac (physicist) postulate "virtual photons", he said they were "virtual" so as not to violate conservation of energy and get a noose around his neck.


Ever hear of anti-photons?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #94 on: December 15, 2010, 03:56:33 PM »
Sponsored links:




quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #95 on: December 15, 2010, 04:07:51 PM »
Physicist claim that for every particle, there is an anti-particle. This is not exactly true. Every particle is composed on both a light and dark waves. Since the dark wave absorbs light and energy, it is invisible to most instruments and the consciousness of most scientists. Without that understanding, we are all just a bunch of half wits.

The dark wave absorbs light. The dark wave is sucking light and energy from the particle at the speed of light.

...and conversely
 
The light wave emits light. The light wave is emitting light and energy from the particle at the speed of light.

You can't have "some"-thing without having "some" of both things. It is the ying and the yang of the universe. You exist where those two cone shaped spiral waves come together and form particles. Particles form atoms. Atoms form molecules. Molecules form matter. Matter forms mass. Mass forms scientists and paper. And finally, scientist write stuff on that paper which they exchange for more paper called money. Unfortunately, most are paid exactly twice what they earned.

Leedscalnin's coil models those two waves that form a particle. It magnetically models and separates the light and dark wave in a fe inductor. Energy is flowing through that space and that energy is also spinning. The imbalance of the negatively charged electricity created when it charged the coils and inductor, creates a vacuum and takes that space out of equilibrium. The space is shielded to some degree by a force field that is created. The field will exist in this state until an equal and opposite force is applied.

A good analogy would be: The matter of the known universe is like the dielectric of a capacitor. Chet is made of that plastic, slimy, oily, non-conductive film that separates the two conductors that carry two opposite charges.

EDIT

Electrons come in and out of existence because they bounce back and forth on those two oppositely charged  springs of light and dark energy.

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #96 on: December 15, 2010, 04:16:48 PM »
When Paul Dirac (physicist) postulate "virtual photons", he said they were "virtual" so as not to violate conservation of energy and get a noose around his neck.


Ever hear of anti-photons?

To state that there is an anti-photon would, I think, be comparing mass to time. They are apples and oranges. A photon possesses both waves, an anti-photon is just reversed time. Dark waves can be replicated in a gas discharge tube.

My guess is that in order to partly hide the existence of free energy devices, Rockafeller's academic system divided the light energy from the dark energy. The light energy he called physics, the dark energy... Rockafeller naturally kept for himself. The "evening and the morning" were the genesis of the Standard Oil Co.

In the evening the Sun is going away from you, in the morning the Sun is coming toward you. From the prospective of the Earth, both Suns are present at all times. I think the Torah teaches a lot more science than people are seeing.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 09:20:52 PM by quarktoo »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #96 on: December 15, 2010, 04:16:48 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #97 on: December 15, 2010, 11:55:28 PM »
Sir,
This is also being discussed here,

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=457.msg7855;topicseen#msg7855

And only because of your recent contribution !
I would be honored if you at least looked in.

Thank you
Chet
PS
And you really should start to get your head around a visit to William,He could use the support of a man who understands as you do.
He was most appreciative of my enthusiasm ,and I felt bad that I couldn't share more with him [because of my ignorance on the topic] ,as he was quite eager to talk!

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #98 on: December 16, 2010, 12:37:12 AM »
Sir,
This is also being discussed here,

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=457.msg7855;topicseen#msg7855

And only because of your recent contribution !
I would be honored if you at least looked in.

Thank you
Chet
PS
And you really should start to get your head around a visit to William,He could use the support of a man who understands as you do.
He was most appreciative of my enthusiasm ,and I felt bad that I couldn't share more with him [because of my ignorance on the topic] ,as he was quite eager to talk!

Chet,

You can  lose the sir thing. You can't replace a broken promise with placation.

As for me, I have my ideas regarding the physical world of science but I am fully aware that my science, is the fringiest science on the web and to be considered for amusement purposes only.

That being said, I also think some aspects of science have entered the twilight zone with electromagnetics and particle science leading the charge. Punny or funny?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #98 on: December 16, 2010, 12:37:12 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #99 on: December 16, 2010, 01:58:51 AM »
I call you Sir, because I never know who I'm talking to with you.[freaks me out,I don't know why?]
Your like a freakin OU Sybil??,man of la moniker?
---------------

No Doubt I am clueless when you start to get all Protony and light speedy, The accelleration /cavitation deal makes complete sense , But being on the fringe seems to be your forte,and you wear it well!

You really seem impressed with Marinov,are the experiences shared by the auther of those PDF's you posted reproducible?

And if so ,whats up with that? can this Marinov motor go OU?
Why would it not be jumped all over by this community?

Chet
PS
What promise are you talking about?? [terror grips Chet]

« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 02:40:50 AM by ramset »

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #100 on: December 16, 2010, 02:43:46 AM »
No Doubt I am clueless when you start to get all Protony and light speedy, The accelleration /cavitation deal makes complete sense , But being on the fringe seems to be your forte,and you wear it well!

You really seem impressed with Marinov,are the experiences shared by the auther of those PDF's you posted reproducible?

And if so ,whats up with that? can this Marinov motor go OU?
Why would it not be jumped all over by this community?

Chet
PS
What promise are you talking about?? [terror grips Chet]

Marinov's perpetual mobile was peer reviewed after he died by his detractors. In the original paper, there was a heart felt acknowledgment by his peers at Berlin University that Marinov was right and they were sincerely sorry they did not listen to him. [paraphrasing]

It was reproduced AND peer reviewed by PHD's in a written and published paper by people that once mocked him. That speaks volumes since they had nothing to gain and everything to lose by doing that.

Quote
And if so ,whats up with that? can this Marinov motor go OU?

Of course it can. Marinov used the same principle used in the horseshoe magnets on the Methernitha which he fully understood. A-B effect. Cavitation of an electron stream ring a bell? The smaller portable unit used a bar magnet which can be clearly seen in the photo but the split and polarization is the same.

Quote
Why would it not be jumped all over by this community?

Because the community is comprised of retards, spooks and me. Both the retards and spooks line up to bend me over when I post.

Seriously Ramset, enough with the lubrication. When I sent you that unreleased photo of Meyer's PWM with FU written on it so you could not reverse engineer it, that pretty much expressed my feelings. I have a complete schematic of Meyer's tube cell driver, including the canceled check and invoice for the boards. I was not wrong during that flame war.

Maybe if stupid was not allowed to take control of the Earth with the help of... Well anyway, enough with the lubrication. In spite of your best efforts, I will never turn gay or trust you again.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 03:10:38 AM by quarktoo »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #100 on: December 16, 2010, 02:43:46 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #101 on: December 16, 2010, 03:02:20 AM »
Douche bag!!

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #102 on: December 16, 2010, 03:09:18 AM »
Douche bag!!

That's more like it. Honest, good and manly and filled with hate!

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7430
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #103 on: December 17, 2010, 06:47:00 PM »
Did you sprout from the universe ,or did you have a mother?

She must have been a wonderful woman to put up with you!
Behave yourself ,you don't need cus words or "nasty" to get your point accross!
You don't even need half your brain "yet"!

More on AB would really be appreciated[really]
Chet

quarktoo

  • Guest
Re: Splitting the electron stream
« Reply #104 on: December 17, 2010, 07:13:52 PM »
Did you sprout from the universe ,or did you have a mother?

She must have been a wonderful woman to put up with you!
Behave yourself ,you don't need cus words or "nasty" to get your point accross!
You don't even need half your brain "yet"!

More on AB would really be appreciated[really]
Chet

Or maybe Chet... she was a catty bitch and now I carry that genetic defect?

Is "bitch" a cuss word?

 

OneLink