Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ORBO Technology Now Available To (Technical) Public - Any takers for €399?  (Read 19535 times)

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Omnibus,

I already have most of the proper test equipment (1GHz 4CH scope, 500MHz probes etc.). My current and differential probes are 50MHz, but if 200MHz are required, then I can hopefully borrow those.

.99

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
@poynt99,

I would be most interested to see the results from your studies. Also, I'd encourage you strongly to communicate with @Omega_0 who did a superb job in replicating eOrbo although with much lesser equipment than needed. This area needs desperately more researchers such as @Omega_0 as well as yourself (I'll never forget your excellent modeling of Steorn's integration results; these need to be continued without delay).

AquariuZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 645
@Omnibus
Long time no see.... Hope you are well... I am posting a small update on Abeling later.

@Stefan
Thoughts on ORBO-kit?

AZ

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
@poynt99,

Just wanted to let you know what I’ve concluded so far regarding OU in electrical systems in case you’ve missed that. Some of those reading here know that I did a lot of experimentation earlier this year. Unfortunately, it appears that even the most advanced equipment available at present won’t be enough to reach conclusive results (short of demonstrating a self-sustaining device). Proceeding from this conclusion I decided to analyze the situation purely theoretically, thus avoiding objections connected with experiments. Please take a look at the text, attached below, which summarizes these findings. As is seen, it appears that the possibility for the production of excess energy is inherent under certain circumstances in the very existing theory of electricity – the excess energy is produced as a result of saving from the input. Would be interested to know what’s your take on that.

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
I'll have a read Omnibus.

In the mean time, is it possible to test the theory with a circuit? Presume I have a 10GHz scope and probes of all types, do you believe it would be possible to measure?

Also, since the proof was arrived at from a mathematical perspective, would not a simulation also prove the theory? Provide a circuit and I will simulate it. With the simulation, I believe I can achieve as accurate a measurement as one would need.

.99

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
I'll have a read Omnibus.

In the mean time, is it possible to test the theory with a circuit? Presume I have a 10GHz scope and probes of all types, do you believe it would be possible to measure?

Also, since the proof was arrived at from a mathematical perspective, would not a simulation also prove the theory? Provide a circuit and I will simulate it. With the simulation, I believe I can achieve as accurate a measurement as one would need.

.99

It's not that the theory isn't correct. It simply appears that it contains the OU possibility but that hasn't been noticed so far.

As for the experimental verification there are a lot of intrinsic problems. First off, the partitioning. 8-bit, even 10 or 12 bit scope is just not enough in view of the precision sought. Then the very procedures of digital integration and/or processing of data appear quite problematic when such accuracy is desired as here in these studies. Then, the probes themselves. Probably you remember, I used a Hall effect current probe from Tektronix but then it became apparent that the passive probe I was using may pose a problem having in mind it has something of the order of 115pF internal impedance. The experimental effect observed is so sensitive to phase shift that any parasitic such (from the circuit of the probe which is not the studies circuit) may lead to subtle errors with substantial consequences. So, in terms of experimenting with circuits, coils, transformers etc, aiming at evaluating the power balance would be suspect on so many accounts that it isn't even worth spending the hundreds of thousands of dollars for equipment. I'm even contemplating to sell my Tektronix DPO 2024, the current probe and so on and use the money for something that's more likely to bring in a conclusive result.

As for modeling, I think what I've done is modeling per se and it brought about unsuspected math problems in addition which complicated the matters even more. I think we should look for something really definitive and not just play with these things just for fun. Having fun is OK but it would be very desirable to also reach some final conclusions along the way. So far what's being generates are more and more questions and practically no solutions. Wouldn't you agree?

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
I don't mean to mess up the thread, but as far as I understand this project, it contains signals at very high frequencies. How should the wiring be if not all energy are lost as electromagnetic radiation? All wires and components should be terminated correctly, and all wires should be screened (?) - if not the theory and the measurements will not make sense?
Regarding the resolution of the scope, 8, 10 or 12 bit; If 12 bit resolution isn't enough what "OU rate" are we talking about? I did "read" the PDF - it is too complicated for me to understand. Anyways, for an limited braincapacity in electronics as myself, I still wonder, if the measurements are this delicate, should there possibly be extremely small amount of OU (?).

Vidar

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Omnibus,

If OU can be proved via a mathematical treatise, then I would suspect if can also be proved using a mathematical "engine" to achieve visual results of the same.

If it can be simulated with electrical components, provide the circuit and I'll do it. If not, then perhaps we'll wait for your new equipment to arrive.

.99

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Omnibus,

If OU can be proved via a mathematical treatise, then I would suspect if can also be proved using a mathematical "engine" to achieve visual results of the same.

If it can be simulated with electrical components, provide the circuit and I'll do it. If not, then perhaps we'll wait for your new equipment to arrive.

.99

I wonder how this simulation with electrical components can be done. We're talking about comparisons of the input and the output power. Earlier in the discussion we were talking about constructing a cnverter which would transform the output waves into proper corresponding input waves (suppose if we have capacitors to acquire the output and then the convertor prepares the input waves from what's in the capacitors). Unfortunately, the losses will be horrendous and that will kill the OU effect. I'd be curious if you have any other suggestions.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Show me a single functioning 'Orbo' device powering anything. You can't, it doesn't exist. Four years later. The end.

I can.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emj8kSREv7c


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Tisk tisk mr disingenuous

Nope, everything you see in the Orbette videos is absolutely real and anyone can do it. The Orbette 1, as shown above, works exactly like Steorn's Orbo: it is a core effect motor driven by the neutralization of the attraction between the magnets in the rotor and the core; it shows all the characteristics that Sean demonstrated at his various demos, including some that he only claimed but never demonstrated, like running on a battery that it charged itself, and, as shown in this video, generating power from a separate generator coil (the loopsticks) which produce light at the bank of LEDs. Since Orbette's rotor is turning for the exact same reason, using the same drive system and similar input power, if you believe that Steorn's rotor is turning "for free" then you must either believe the same about mine, or demonstrate why mine isn't but Steorn's is.
Therefore, as shown in the video, if Steorn's Orbo is performing as they claim, the power lighting the LEDs in my video is generated for free. It is FREE ENERGY from an Orbo device....if Steorn's claims are true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi_FJwpPrQk

happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Nope, everything you see in the Orbette videos is absolutely real and anyone can do it. The Orbette 1, as shown above, works exactly like Steorn's Orbo: it is a core effect motor driven by the neutralization of the attraction between the magnets in the rotor and the core; it shows all the characteristics that Sean demonstrated at his various demos, including some that he only claimed but never demonstrated, like running on a battery that it charged itself, and, as shown in this video, generating power from a separate generator coil (the loopsticks) which produce light at the bank of LEDs. Since Orbette's rotor is turning for the exact same reason, using the same drive system and similar input power, if you believe that Steorn's rotor is turning "for free" then you must either believe the same about mine, or demonstrate why mine isn't but Steorn's is.
Therefore, as shown in the video, if Steorn's Orbo is performing as they claim, the power lighting the LEDs in my video is generated for free. It is FREE ENERGY from an Orbo device....if Steorn's claims are true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi_FJwpPrQk

Tisk tisk mr disingenuous. Enough with the word games, you don't claim OU with the 'Orbette 1.'