Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82082
  • *Latest: Dave Dee

  • *Total Posts: 495167
  • *Total Topics: 14570
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 189
  • *Total: 193

Facebook

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
Void: »I would guess that they are probably power transistors«

If one can show me transistors connected with two wires only. There is definitely no third wire connected. But if you still prefer to go around in circles without any progress regarding this subject, I will not interfere any longer.

TinselKoala: »AND I see that once again, someone has posted extra-wide pictures«

Doesn't bother me anymore, see bottom of reply 32. At least a little progress.
2
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by Erfinder on Today at 10:06:17 AM »

My comment was originally intended for TK. Never mind.
So, what is your method of converting var to watts then?


Mine is not a method through which vars are converted into watts, I process the vars.


[/size](EDIT: Sorry, it seems that you both were talking about the similar idea.)


we aren't...  not even close.
3
Gravity powered devices / Re: inertial propulsion with gyroscope
« Last post by woopy on Today at 09:56:22 AM »
The "weight loss" phenomenon is a special case of forced precession.  There is no weight loss, as any number of scale experiments have proved.

As a Chinese fortune cookie once told me: "Every action has a counter action. Just if you can see it or not."

For your amusement:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a81hS_iCi4E

Hi TK

Many thank's for the chinese words. It is excatly that.

In spinning mass, as a gyro, We CAN NOT SEE WHERE the action is taking place.

So the dear Isaac can RIP.

And it is the aim of this thread , to attempt to understand WHERE and how action and reaction are taking place . So no offence to established "laws" but open minding our brain.

We are often attracted by antigravity with gyro, but as i see at 2.50 of the video that me and Centralflow joined above, it would be very informative to redo the  Laithwaite big wheel experiment on the scale but forcing the wheel counter the natural precession, to see if the scale also does not show a WEIGHT INCREASE.

And at 2.50,  it seems almost impossible to "Veratisium" to lift the wheel in counter natural precession, even when trying to use his knees as a lever, and if in this special case, the scale does not show any weight increase, i think that the location of action and reaction is not at the right place we think that  should be. And if the scale does effectively show an increase in weight then ????....

As i doubt very much that "Veratisium" will show a test with the big wheel in counter rotation , i think i will try to do it myself. Or perehaps Chet could take one of his big saw and jump on a scale and rotate the saw in both directions ?

Could it be a mass transfer, as Laithwaite and many other as spoken about ?

Also thank's for the very intersting video, have you made it youself as i can ear your voice at the end ?


@MagnaProp

Without replicating i can not say anything.

But interestingly, Laithwaite understood that if the device has to work as a space propellant, it has to be not only a twin system but a double twin to direct the motorising effect in one direction.
So not easy at all to replicate without very high grade craftmanship.

Laurent



4
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by blueplanet on Today at 09:14:57 AM »

you assume that I use common practices to generate what I refer to as reactive power.....


a condition one would be wise to comprehend and multiply.


your statement reveals that you are only aware of one means of "integrating" voltage and current.  I am aware of more than the collectively agreed upon you are referring to.


it's clear you don't comprehend the nature of a tank and how energy moves within it.  Fortunately my machines don't work based on your logic, I have significant current flow.....and the coils are sightly above ambient...and I know why....



If I were discussing over-unity, if i cared about efficiency, or a self sustaining system, your point would be valid.  I am focused on usable phenomena relating to the apparatus and method of conversion.


My comment was originally intended for TK. Never mind.
So, what is your method of converting var to watts then?


(EDIT: Sorry, it seems that you both were talking about the similar idea.)

5
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by blueplanet on Today at 08:56:56 AM »


That's the funniest thing I've heard all day!
You've shown time and again what page you are on. I'm not even in the same book as you!

Thanks. Maybe you can even learn something by watching carefully, if your cup isn't already overflowing.


Have just gone through some of the videos from your group. It is fascinating.
6
Gravity powered devices / Re: inertial propulsion with gyroscope
« Last post by MagnaProp on Today at 08:28:31 AM »
Very good replication woopy. You mention Laithwaite who also has a patent for a gyroscopic propulsion device. He mentions at the end of his "Heretic" video that he mathematically proved that his gyroscopic propulsion device does actually works. Unfortunately the video ends with him moving a piece of a toy mock up but doesn't show the actual device working in full.

Do you think it actually works as he claimed?

https://www.google.com/patents/US5860317
7
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by Erfinder on Today at 08:01:58 AM »
That's the funniest thing I've heard all day!


indeed....

You've shown time and again what page you are on. I'm not even in the same book as you!


maybe I have....maybe I haven't.....  fact is....I am about halfway through this book I am reading, and its pretty damn good, considering your projected persona, I am fairly positive that whatever it is you're reading is boring...there I said it...... 


What brought you here was a guy claiming he had accomplished what I have both solid state and mechanical, you responded to him, and I chimed in as you should have known I would, as neither of you are demonstrating what I am suggesting.....  here I am yet another suggesting "resonance" and you remind  those who still visit this thread that you beat the qeg folk, at least in your mind.  If you knew what I was up to, if there was any room in to spare in that cup with your ego, you could/would take what I have from me and beat me over the head with it.  I've seen you do that before.  The fact that you haven't tells me you think I got nothing, you're right where I want you..... ;)

Thanks. Maybe you can even learn something by watching carefully, if your cup isn't already overflowing.


yeah...sorry, but I don't have the space in my cascade to accommodate your ego.
8
News / Re: Curiosity on chemical process
« Last post by franco malgarini on Today at 07:48:19 AM »
9
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by hoptoad on Today at 07:36:42 AM »
I have done both.  Solid state and mechanical.  Principle well understood and it far beyond anything that has ever been posted at this site, that's for sure.

Care to extrapolate or demonstrate/show any data or other visual evidence of your work?


TK always shows what he knows, his capability and knowledge is widely acknowledged and he is well respected for his contributions.
But even TK might not be seeing something obvious in a given circuit, when the obvious might be so easy to dismiss.
10
Resonance Circuits and Systems / Re: The secret to Overunity
« Last post by Erfinder on Today at 07:31:31 AM »
The output current waveform is not a pure sine wave.


you assume that I use common practices to generate what I refer to as reactive power.....


This is an indication of the presence of non-linearity in the circuit.


a condition one would be wise to comprehend and multiply.


You cannot multiply amplitudes of voltage and current and their cos angle together to get the output power.
To get the real power, you need to integrate V(t)*I(t) for the whole cycle.


your statement reveals that you are only aware of one means of "integrating" voltage and current.  I am aware of more than the collectively agreed upon you are referring to.

On the other hand, if the current was truly that much, it will generate a lot heat.


it's clear you don't comprehend the nature of a tank and how energy moves within it.  Fortunately my machines don't work based on your logic, I have significant current flow.....and the coils are sightly above ambient...and I know why....


The best way to validate overunity efficiency is to check if it is self-sustaining over a few months.


If I were discussing over-unity, if i cared about efficiency, or a self sustaining system, your point would be valid.  I am focused on usable phenomena relating to the apparatus and method of conversion.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at:


OneLink