Koen1 i am doing all this to promote electrinium.pdf,
Great. But instead of spreading the Electrinium gospel that you have decided to believe in blindly,
why do you not try to actually understand material physics?
And why do you feel you must fill this Crystal Cell thread with that Electrinium stuff?
We, the people in this thread who actually do experiments and try to build crystal cells,
have actually studied the Electrinium hypothesis and found it not in accordance
with just about everything known about electrodynamics in solids, or at least not in the
manner described in that pdf. If there were any evidence of it being a valid theory, then
that evidence is well hidden for we have not been able to dig it up. If you do have any
evidence that there is validity to the hypothesis, then please give us weblinks to that.
But I know you don't have that kind of evidence, you just "want to believe" very much.
You may of course "spread the Electrinium gospel" if you like, but please stop trying
to force it on people in this thread, ok? We have read it, and it does not fit into our approach.
For that matter, I still seriously doubt there is any validity to it at all, and not in the least
because the author of that pdf claims to be very close to producing a prototype in the
last parts of the text, yet in the past 20+ years no such Electrinium battery has surfaced
ever, so I get the strong feeling he made it and it didn't work, and he dropped the entire thing.
If you have any good reason to believe it is valid, such as tangiable evidence of the authors
prototype in working order, then of course I will have to admit I was wrong. But so far
there is no indication whatsoever of such a prototype ever having been built nor of it functioning
like the pdf states. If you just want to repeat "read Electrinium.pdf!" over and over again,
please start an Electrinium thread of your own so you don't mess up our crystal cell thread
which, just in case you hadn't noticed it, is not about Electrinium batteries but about Crystal Cells.
now i have reach that goal, and like DClarkson, Jeanna, nightlife, Topgun, many more members will read this text, you were just in my way, see you objectivly in others topics !
Dude, that doesn't make sense. I was "just in your way"? In your way of spreading a pdf that has been floating around in OU circles for over 20 years?
And you decided you were going to play the Electrinium prophet just because you felt like it? And you decided messing up someones thread over it,
without being able to counter the arguments you provoked, and following it up by accusing that person of being an illuminati reptilian disinfo agent,
was the correct and civil thing to do?
Jeez man, do you really think people aren't smart enough to dig that pdf up themselves? Do you really think they need you to preach it to them?
Well do what you must, but keep it out of our Crystal cell thread please?
Central Sun give power to all blacks hole shining super light, this super light is transform by our sun, our sun is not nuclear power, then any atoms and molecules get power from super light each second, we are in an ocean of energy, and electinium explain in a simple way all of this
And that is exactly what I meant with "new age quasi-religious pseudo-scientific mumbojumbo". Central suns, black holes shining super light, sure. Have another mushroom won't you?
(kidding)
You see, although that sounds like an interesting alternative theory, it is not really supported by any evidence. And it doesn't "connect with" established scientific theories either... so we can't "link in" to for example electrodynamics with it, or at least not in this form, perhaps if some renormalisation were applied...
i am not enough good to talk the details , but i am better in understanding than writing
hmm well that may be an explanation as to why your insistant posts on Electrinium don't seem to make much sense at all...
... but it could also be that you believe you understand it better than you really do. And that could also be the reason why
you can't explain it well. ... ?
I think things are not so simple as mere harmonic resonance of atoms with some mysterious AC field emitted by our sun,
I believe quantum electrodynamics and material physics on the level of atomic crystal lettices and their electron exchange patterns
are more along the path to follow, and if you study those subjects you will quickly find it is more complex than such a simplified
model as the one used in the Electrinium theory. And it just so happens that science agrees with this, and not with the Electrinium hypothesis.
You know what, if you understand the Electrinium hypothesis so well, and you are so convinced it works, then why don't you build
a simple Electrinium battery and show me how wrong I was?
Build one, even the simple version you suggested using carbon and iron will do, as long as it produces a certain voltage at a certain amperage
and does not run out, you will have succeeded and I will admit there may be something to the electrinium theory after all.
I may even come to visit you to do some measurements and take some pictures of it, if you manage to build one and will allow me to do so.
But untill you do some hands-on work trying to build one, if you only keep shouting that you believe in the hypothesis, you are not convincing anyone.
sorry for the mess,
's alright, apology accepted
this topic should aslo consider military diode, Hutchison began with them ! good clue !
We did discuss the Germanium diodes. Not too much of a clue though. Fortunately we were able to
dig up quite a bit more info than the vague remarks like that one.
We know quite a bit about Hutchisons cells now. And about the related research.
But Hutchison is too busy with his new friend Paris Hilton at the moment to do much research,
and he never was very communicative...
And he seems totally unwilling to share his info with other inventors out of fear of them "stealing" the invention.
Not that he's doing anything with them, but he still refuses to tell people how to make them...