Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Mechanical free energy devices => mechanic => Topic started by: kyler on August 03, 2010, 05:45:23 PM

Title: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 03, 2010, 05:45:23 PM
Whats the latest from Magnacoaster. I am considering buying a unit.  Is this company ligit or not?

Kyler
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: broli on August 03, 2010, 06:45:01 PM
If you feel comfortable throwing thousands of dollars in a black pit then go ahead. Hoaxtex is known for being very bad at delivering products and refunds.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 08:02:28 PM
Whats the latest from Magnacoaster. I am considering buying a unit.  Is this company ligit or not?

Kyler

Make your own its a lot cheaper and easier to do.  The reason magnacoaster not shipping is he has set his eyes on 5KW+ systems which make the system much harder to control. The technology works and has been in expired patents for decades.

Pulse a coil between neo magnets and the rebound power is MUCH higher. Thats basically it.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on August 03, 2010, 09:03:46 PM
Make your own its a lot cheaper and easier to do.  The reason magnacoaster not shipping is he has set his eyes on 5KW+ systems which make the system much harder to control. The technology works and has been in expired patents for decades.

Pulse a coil between neo magnets and the rebound power is MUCH higher. Thats basically it.

This 5KW or higher figure for a FE device is does not indicate very much smarts.

It would be much better to build a 1.5KW device that runs continuously and
stores unused power in an equivalent to an electrical car battery - which are rapidly decreasing in cost. AND/OR use utility intertie power averaging. The reason is: in worst case a house needs 25KW instantaneous not 5KW. But at the same time only 1.5KW average. So there is big difference between absolute max and average, which seems to call for a buffer.

Trying to design a device with what engineers call; a fast power slew rate
is much harder then designing something that runs continuously at constant
power. This goes for building vehicle engines as well. And running something
that can generate 5KW is probably going to be wasting some energy or
having wasted hardware resources most of the time.

While it's harder to do something right, it's usually worthwhile it in the end.
Bigger devices for heat,electric auto,businesses etc. but they will still need
a buffer. It seems someone who studied the industry should know this.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 09:47:03 PM
This 5KW or higher figure for a FE device is does not indicate very much smarts.

It would be much better to build a 1.5KW device that runs continuously and
stores unused power in an equivalent to an electrical car battery - which are rapidly decreasing in cost. AND/OR use utility intertie power averaging. The reason is: in worst case a house needs 25KW instantaneous not 5KW. But at the same time only 1.5KW average. So there is big difference between absolute max and average, which seems to call for a buffer.

Trying to design a device with what engineers call; a fast power slew rate
is much harder then designing something that runs continuously at constant
power. This goes for building vehicle engines as well. And running something
that can generate 5KW is probably going to be wasting some energy or
having wasted hardware resources most of the time.

While it's harder to do something right, it's usually worthwhile it in the end.
Bigger devices for heat,electric auto,businesses etc. but they will still need
a buffer. It seems someone who studied the industry should know this.

:S:MarkSCoffman

You need to read about everything he has done so far before jumping to conclusions. The reason for going for 5kw and 10kw+ is for many reasons. When he started to get good results he took his system to a test house. They said it will cost you $1/2mio to get type approval on a new energy source unless you piggy back into existing technology. This is the main reason for the delay over the last few years.

So he went into solar NOT because it needs it but its the ONLY way to piggy into existing energy frame work in order to meet all the State approvals not just in Canada but other countries too.

 SO a single small solar panel of around 25 watts will run the oscillator backed up by a small gell battery and the power device will be grid tied. In Canada they are paying something like 18 cents a unit SOLAR that can be pushed back into the grid so the entire system will pay for itself using rebates within say 5 years. The high price incentive is to relief the failing infrastructure a problem most countries now have around the world. Its cheaper to pay people a few cents more then build a new power station and pay carbon tax.

The average house will still be ON grid for peak demand where more then 12kw is required for short bursts. The other 20 hours a day may only need 1Kw so the excess is 11kw going back collecting rebates. So after messing around the last couple of years trying to solve massive overheating problems and plasma balls forming around the coils he had another set back after it was found when grid tied the power unit was pushing KW's of RF noise into the grid as well as RF noise being transmitted. He cant get pass FCC approvals till this sorted. Already spent the last year making screened Faraday boxes etc but the actual device works its everything else is the problem including inverters that can handle up-to 20KW peaks they don't come cheap.

This is NOT going to be a cheap system its going to compete with solar so a 15KW solar system starts around $30k and goes up fast the more batteries and panels you need.

The few people that go OFF grid of course will lose the rebates AND lose the peak demand buffer and for those people its really a case of mind training to know the system limitations. In other words don't expect to run the heating, take a hot shower, put 4 TV's on, run the microwave and washing machine and clothes dryer all at the same time. If you want that it will cost you a fortune rather then spreading the loads.

Now you know why i said just make one, the technology works perfectly and no special devices needed if you keep under 500 watts. Its only over this power you need lots of $200 IGBTS and $100 PUCK 500 amp surge high speed diodes etc. And the inverter alone probably cost another $6K or $7K.

There is no such thing as FREE energy even if you run your house off the TPU you need about 10 of them maybe more if they need to be cycled to allow cooing time,  plus the inverters will still cost 10k for the cheapest system.

Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: FatChance!!! on August 03, 2010, 09:55:46 PM
The technology works and has been in expired patents for decades.
Pardon me, what a load of crap you are serving.
Magnacosters devices does not work and never has. Don't spread false lies.

Pulse a coil between neo magnets and the rebound power is MUCH higher. That's basically it.
Pardon me again, but are you stupid or what?
Pulsing a coil between magnets does not render overunity.
Perhaps you don't know squat about magnetism but pulsing coils betwen magnets
is done by daily basis in all permanent magnet motors and they are not overunity.

Sorry for being so harsh, but I'm feed up with all lies and faulty statements by ignorants.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 10:05:42 PM
Pardon me, what a load of crap you are serving.
Magnacosters devices does not work and never has. Don't spread false lies.
Pardon me again, but are you stupid or what?
Pulsing a coil between magnets does not render overunity.
Perhaps you don't know squat about magnetism but pulsing coils betwen magnets
is done by daily basis in all permanent magnet motors and they are not overunity.

Sorry for being so harsh, but I'm feed up with all lies and faulty statements by ignorants.

Well im sorry you are still in the dark ages thats all I can say. Did you know the Chinese are hoarding all the neo magnets now and there is a global shortage coming very soon? Im not going to discuss it I KNOW IT WORKS i seen enough OU devices. I put this information here for those that want to know more about magnacoaster.

I just scanned back fast over your posts and true enough another TROLL. NOT one single post of value just hop from thread to thread thrusting your doubts on everyone. This sums you up perfect as you posted this a few weeks ago

"There is no such thing as free energy suppression except in the minds of people.
The reason of any free energy devices don't actually get out to people is simply
because they don't work and never has.  It's all a scam. Especially when the
inventors hold something secret, blaim it on MIB's or say's they are going for a patent."

So the question is why are you here? You should take up golf or fishing instead.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Goat on August 03, 2010, 10:28:58 PM
@ bolt

"I KNOW IT WORKS i seen enough OU devices"

Ok I'll bite...show us one OU device that's easily replicated...I've been looking for just one for over a decade and so far it's been truly impossible for me to find one unit that actually produces OU.

Not trying to start a flame war just looking for one unit that actually functions as claimed :)

Regards,
Paul
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 10:55:35 PM
@ bolt

"I KNOW IT WORKS i seen enough OU devices"

Ok I'll bite...show us one OU device that's easily replicated...I've been looking for just one for over a decade and so far it's been truly impossible for me to find one unit that actually produces OU.

Not trying to start a flame war just looking for one unit that actually functions as claimed :)

Regards,
Paul

You have to read back through my posts click my handle and read i published loads. But here is my AWAKENING tool.  Take a 250 watt light bulb and in series fit a capacitor and inductor selected so the i/p power is power factor ZERO.  The watts consumed and measured by any suitable test method will show leakage power around 3 watts when i did this. The 250 watt light is FULLY LIT.  The volts drop across the bulb is about 12 volts. The bulb works underwater perfectly fully lit. The power factor is virtually zero creates standing wave the bulb is powered by zero point energy for FREE.

its the basis for many many OU systems.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on August 03, 2010, 11:01:45 PM
@bolt

I pretty much agree with everything you said. If the power company
asks about the apparent mismatch of our claims to the power to our
solar panels we will just pass them along to Fat Change to convince
them that energy amplification is a theoretical impossibility.  :)

The thing is while, power conversion equipment is expensive and hard to
do, it would only need to be done only once then sort of a plug-play method
developed to assert the power generation method as a separate add in step.
So everyone could use the same design.

I would like to see jumper selectable 3phase 220VAC vs 240VAC split phase US
operation, if you know what I am talking about. I've seen a German company
showing a 1MW windpower grid intertie converter in what looked like 2 x 6ft
tall 19in racks.

Yes sure, plasma blow-ups etc., if you need to design equipment for abnormally
high power requirements combined with high power slew rates. One can do
that stuff in the future, when everything else is under control. 1.5KW is in
the range expected from a Bedini 10-coiler and 3 deep cycle discharge
batteries as the reactor, in a pinch.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 03, 2010, 11:06:36 PM
Make your own its a lot cheaper and easier to do.  The reason magnacoaster not shipping is he has set his eyes on 5KW+ systems which make the system much harder to control. The technology works and has been in expired patents for decades.

Pulse a coil between neo magnets and the rebound power is MUCH higher. Thats basically it.

Hello Bolt

We think alike. I would love to make my own!  I have the time and resources for a project like this.  So  where do find the Info.  Link me?

Kyler
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 03, 2010, 11:21:59 PM
Pardon me, what a load of crap you are serving.
Magnacosters devices does not work and never has. Don't spread false lies.
Pardon me again, but are you stupid or what?
Pulsing a coil between magnets does not render overunity.
Perhaps you don't know squat about magnetism but pulsing coils betwen magnets
is done by daily basis in all permanent magnet motors and they are not overunity.

Sorry for being so harsh, but I'm feed up with all lies and faulty statements by ignorants.

Why are you getting so angry fat. Shouldn't we be happy to hear of people building there own unit to power there own cottage. This is exciting news!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 11:30:31 PM
Hello Bolt

We think alike. I would love to make my own!  I have the time and resources for a project like this.  So  where do find the Info.  Link me?

Kyler

Start with magnacoaster patent (google) he shows the basis there even though many other prior expired patents show the same art under magnetic motors if you do the research.  His same design is currently all the HYPE in another thread over the magnetic neutralization motor thing whatever the thread title is i dunno but no need to spend 25k on special machined motor parts it works 10000% more effective as solid state. BUT for some reason people like motors they can see the cogs going round and it looks more impressive.. Maybe its toys for boys:)
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 03, 2010, 11:34:24 PM
@bolt

I pretty much agree with everything you said. If the power company
asks about the apparent mismatch of our claims to the power to our
solar panels we will just pass them along to Fat Change to convince
them that energy amplification is a theoretical impossibility.  :)

The thing is while, power conversion equipment is expensive and hard to
do, it would only need to be done only once then sort of a plug-play method
developed to assert the power generation method as a separate add in step.
So everyone could use the same design.

I would like to see jumper selectable 3phase 220VAC vs 240VAC split phase US
operation, if you know what I am talking about. I've seen a German company
showing a 1MW windpower grid intertie converter in what looked like 2 x 6ft
tall 19in racks.

Yes sure, plasma blow-ups etc., if you need to design equipment for abnormally
high power requirements combined with high power slew rates. One can do
that stuff in the future, when everything else is under control. 1.5KW is in
the range expected from a Bedini 10-coiler and 3 deep cycle discharge
batteries as the reactor, in a pinch.

:S:MarkSCoffman

The poor mans answer to that is Rotoverter creates virtual phase and plenty of VARS off the shelf motor. Too many people under estimate the hidden secrets of 3 phase rotary magnetic power especially where the power factor has been trashed! I think you are smart enough to know what im saying i seen some of your posts:)
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: giantkiller on August 03, 2010, 11:41:39 PM
Now you are in my infoturf:
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: FatChance!!! on August 03, 2010, 11:45:36 PM
None of you guys have seen a real working overunity device. That's 100% sure.
And why should we read back on your post Bolt if you really know the secret of OU.
Just compile your knowledge, post it, build the device, let it be tested....or shut up lying.
You're a fine example of the typical free energy fanatic saying they "know" for sure it works and
claim they've "seen" overunity in action....but never produce any evidence or replicable blueprints.

If you so sure, then show us the money or continue your life as a mad free energy lunatic.
Don't get me wrong here. I would really love to see or build a working OU device.
That's one of my goals in life, but I don't go around fooling myself into lies.
Please Bolt, have an open mind when you run into claims without proof what so ever.

Btw, the chinese need their NdFebs for regular basis, like turbines, industrial needs, Ecars and so on.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 03, 2010, 11:51:49 PM
Now you are in my infoturf:
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf

Giantkiller Is this KUNEL PATENT enoth to make a few kW of power generation? Is this patten similar to the Richard Willis patten that bolt just mentioned

Bolt, I would think most people would prefer a solid state. less moving parts usually means less energy lost to friction and less parts to replace with time.  Has anybody built one of there solid state models and put some instructions up on the web for our benefit :)

Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: gyulasun on August 03, 2010, 11:56:01 PM
...
  Take a 250 watt light bulb and in series fit a capacitor and inductor selected so the i/p power is power factor ZERO.  The watts consumed and measured by any suitable test method will show leakage power around 3 watts when i did this. The 250 watt light is FULLY LIT.  The volts drop across the bulb is about 12 volts. The bulb works underwater perfectly fully lit. The power factor is virtually zero creates standing wave the bulb is powered by zero point energy for FREE.

its the basis for many many OU systems.

Hi Bolt,

Please allow me to play a layman's role for a moment... Do you not need here a mains transformer because earlier with the 500W bulb you included it here in the other thread:

You want proof? Fine take a normal transformer and load the O/p with a large series choke and a cap. Tune the inductor and or cap to create a perfect out of phase condition. The i/p power is almost zero amps apart from some leakage. Now put a 500 Watt lamp in series and the lamp will light. Re-tune the LC to correct for lamp impedance. The 500 watt lamp is now fully lit. THe volts drop accross the bulb is under 12 volts yet this is a 240 volt bulb.

The i/p watts is leakage in practice maybe 3 watts. The bulb is fully lit! HOW??? this experiment done hundreds of times. RE will power the bulb under standing wave condition. A standing wave condition is a Scaler Wave. The bulb work under water and you wont get a shock.  Tuning is a real pig you might have to spend half hour getting tuning perfect even moving  the lamp wire will knock it off tune but it works.

What you are seeing if you do this is Radiant Energy powers the bulb at Zero Point Nodes its the key to all these circuits. All they are doing is creating VARS yes even Bedini is power factor correcting the RE charge going into the battery.


I ask as a layman:
1) the setup needs or does not need a mains transformer? 

2) What secondary voltage should have on the transformer if I use one?

3) If I  monitor Power Factor at the primary coil of the transformer do I aim for zero or one PF by doing the LC tuning?

Please answer.

Respectfully
Gyula
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 04, 2010, 12:13:41 AM
Hi Bolt,

Please allow me to play a layman's role for a moment... Do you not need here a mains transformer because earlier with the 500W bulb you included it here in the other thread:

You want proof? Fine take a normal transformer and load the O/p with a large series choke and a cap. Tune the inductor and or cap to create a perfect out of phase condition. The i/p power is almost zero amps apart from some leakage. Now put a 500 Watt lamp in series and the lamp will light. Re-tune the LC to correct for lamp impedance. The 500 watt lamp is now fully lit. THe volts drop accross the bulb is under 12 volts yet this is a 240 volt bulb.

The i/p watts is leakage in practice maybe 3 watts. The bulb is fully lit! HOW??? this experiment done hundreds of times. RE will power the bulb under standing wave condition. A standing wave condition is a Scaler Wave. The bulb work under water and you wont get a shock.  Tuning is a real pig you might have to spend half hour getting tuning perfect even moving  the lamp wire will knock it off tune but it works.

What you are seeing if you do this is Radiant Energy powers the bulb at Zero Point Nodes its the key to all these circuits. All they are doing is creating VARS yes even Bedini is power factor correcting the RE charge going into the battery.


I ask as a layman:
1) the setup needs or does not need a mains transformer? 

2) What secondary voltage should have on the transformer if I use one?

3) If I  monitor Power Factor at the primary coil of the transformer do I aim for zero or one PF by doing the LC tuning?

Please answer.

Respectfully
Gyula

Its easier with a transformer because you can use the inductance of it to help slash the power factor to zero. On the i/p mains side you are looking at PF as close to 1 as this is the REAL watts. In practice its around 2 or 3 watts. If you use a Power Savers meter some actually show PF volts watts amps etc very cheap now.

The secondary of the traffo is part of the RLC loop this is where the PF = Zero or if you are RF trained the VSWR  =~ Infinity.  You need another traffo as series inductor and lots of motor run caps and tuning its REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY DIFFICULT. If you sneeze it will go off tune i cant emphasize this enough otherwise people will say i tried it and it don't work LOL

You don't have to use a transformer on the i/p but i think it helps the tuning as it becomes part of the overall RLC circuit. If you do use a big one like 100VA+ Big things always tune easier. If you play with tiny wheezy toroidal cores its hard to get the tuning right.

The reason is RLC leads to OU where PF = ZERO creates scaler wave conditions under resonance. Radiant Energy enters system at NODES as electricity has nothing to do with electrons. Electrons are only a byproduct of waste.  Thats why they call it Electron Theory and not electron FACT... or the Electron LAW:)

OH BTW you can use almost any size bulb here. I know some have used 1000 watt light bulbs the i/p watts was about  EIGHT watts. To be honest i used a halogen flood light this was YEARS ago i don't remember if it was 250 or 500.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: gyulasun on August 04, 2010, 12:19:31 AM
Ok, thanks.  One more thing what secondary voltage should the transformer have if I were to use a mains transformer at the input? 6-10V? 10-24V? higher?

Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 04, 2010, 12:24:29 AM
Ok, thanks.  One more thing what secondary voltage should the transformer have if I were to use a mains transformer at the input? 6-10V? 10-24V? higher?

Try a 120/240 or 120/120 or  240/110 isolation transformers.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Goat on August 04, 2010, 05:03:35 AM
@ gyulasun

Thanks Gyula for asking bolt the right questions.

@ bolt

Thanks for being straight forward on your replies to our questions.

Could we open a new thread for this experiment?  I would like to continue a conversation on tuning the circuit and other questions about the circuit there if you please.

Regards,
Paul
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 04, 2010, 01:04:05 PM
@ gyulasun

Thanks Gyula for asking bolt the right questions.

@ bolt

Thanks for being straight forward on your replies to our questions.

Could we open a new thread for this experiment?  I would like to continue a conversation on tuning the circuit and other questions about the circuit there if you please.

Regards,
Paul

I was here to answer what i know about magnacoaster and explain his current situation and let others know the technology works. But as usual Trolls, drifters and saboteurs, drift past and try to tell ME that RE is all a pipe dream so i gave one example of many to think about. Anyone want more then read back through some of my posts.

So no sorry i don't want to start a new thread dealing with stuff i did over 10+ years but you can if you wish.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Honk on August 04, 2010, 01:23:07 PM
Hi Bolt. Just ignore trolls, they are everywhere.

I have some questions if you don't mind?
1) Is the LC circuit on the output, series connected or parallel connected with the transformer?
    But I do think you mean in series?

2) In your LC circuit, do you say there is no inflow of current at the 110VAC input to the transformer
    when tuned correctly while the lamp being fully lit?

3) How do you measure the voltage and current into the lamp?
    I'd use a series current shunt with the lamp and then measure the voltage across both the
    shunt and across the lamp by a two channel scope. Lamp wattage = Volt times current.

4) Have you performed this type of measurement to exclude power errors?

I hope you find some time to answer my questions?  ;D
It would be most valuable to all of us.

I was here to answer what i know about magnacoaster and explain his current situation and let others know the technology works. But as usual Trolls, drifters and saboteurs, drift past and try to tell ME that RE is all a pipe dream so i gave one example of many to think about. Anyone want more then read back through some of my posts.

So no sorry i don't want to start a new thread dealing with stuff i did over 10+ years but you can if you wish.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: broli on August 04, 2010, 01:53:20 PM
So you're saying if I put a transformer and an LC circuit in series with my load I could slash power by a factor of 100. Would this also work on electric water boilers  :P .
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: bolt on August 04, 2010, 02:00:09 PM
Hi Bolt. Just ignore trolls, there are everywhere.

I have some questions if you don't mind?
1) Is the LC circuit on the output series connected or parallel connected with the transformer?
    But I do think you mean series?

SERIES...AND USE AN RLC ONLINE CALCULATOR TO GET VALUES CLOSE FOR L AND C'S TO MAKE RESONANCE TANK


2) In your LC circuit, do you say there is no inflow of current at the 110VAC input to the transformer
    when tuned correctly while the lamp being fully lit?

CORRECT THE REAL WATTS POWERING THE CIRCUIT IS USUALLY UNDER 5 WATTS.

3) How do you measure the voltage and current into the lamp?
    I'd use a series current shunt with the lamp and then measure the voltage across both the
    shunt and across the lamp by a two channel scope. Lamp wattage = Volt times current.

NO YOU CAN DO THAT  YOU CANT MEASURE RE DIRECTLY AS IT COMES FROM OUTSIDE ITS AN AMBIENT RESOURCE YOU CAN MEASURE THE VOLT ACROSS THE BULB THOUGH WHEN IT FULLY LIT AND WILL BE AROUND 12 VOLTS. ITS IMPORTANT THAT ANY R IN THE CIRCUIT IS EXTREMELY SMALL SO YOU DONT GO PUTTING SHUNT IN OR YOU KILL IT. THE REACTIVE AMPS WILL BE EXTREMELY HIGH IF THE BULB IS DROPPING 12 VOLTS AT 250 WATT THE AMPS = 20.8 AMPS. A 1000W BULB WILL DROP AROUND 18 VOLTS AND 52 AMPS!!!!!!!!

4) Have you performed this type of measurement to exclude power errors?

UP TO YOU TO CONVINCE YOURSELF YOU ARE NOT DREAMING WHEN YOU SEE A 250 WATT LAMP FULLY LIT RUNNING ON 3 WATTS. ALSO THE LIGHT IS A HAZY BLUE WHEN POWERED BY RADIANT ENERGY.

I hope you find some time to answer my questions?  ;D
It would be most valuable to all of us.

NOT ANSWERING ANY MORE ON THIS NOW DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: FatChance!!! on August 04, 2010, 05:24:04 PM
NOT ANSWERING ANY MORE ON THIS NOW DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

You sound strangely angry Bolt.... could it be that your claim is not OU.
Why research? If you really had anything real going, you wouldn't need others to build it.
You could just as easily build it yourself and let it be independently tested.
If it was overunity you would get financial backing in a minute to develop it further.
I'm 100% sure you are wrong about the LC device, it's simply a measurement error
due ignorance in electronic physics and how to perform accurate testing.
 
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on August 05, 2010, 02:32:02 AM
@Fat Chance;

I think the problem is not lack of availability of devices showing
Overunity Energy, but severe lack of knowledge by the folks when
They try to prove or use the extra energy.  I can easily list seven areas of
knowledge required to build a “balance beam” system that doesn’t require any
instrumentation or calculation during demonstration of OU.  Easily done on you-
tube. I don’t think I have ever seen it done correctly. I don’t think the majority
of people have those areas down pat enough to demonstrate or even know
whether they have overunity or not. So it’s a near universal lack of knowledge
problem.

Even if ZPE explanations are all completely bogus there are several
“not very utilized” energy sources that could be utilized that are OU simply
because they are not thought about. A number of energy systems cannot
be looped because of implicit inefficiencies in Carnot cycle heat engines
and photovoltaic implicit inefficiencies wipe out energy gains when in a
loop.

How many Bedini systems have never automatically swapped a battery?
Nearly 100%. How many spiral magnetic motors using pulses to get
across the sticky spot have ever listed the pulse energy required to
do so. nearly 0%...See..This is what I am talking about. You can't
expect proof, just general storied validations.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on August 05, 2010, 02:54:21 AM
On bolt system; Is it overunity? It's hard to say.
The light probably is not coming from the filament
the way it's supposed to but rather a glowing plasma
inside the bulb's near-vacuum. The high voltage excursions
of high Q LC resonance are capacitive coupled into the bulb so
the bulb would likely not have it's usually 95% inefficient
heat to light ratio, which is why incandescents need to be
gotten rid of. Of course there is no such thing as radiant
energy, just standard stuff.

Then on the input side I would like to see the system powered
by a 12VDC inverter of measured inefficiency so I could
see non-pulsed 12VDC power measurements which is the
*only* one most inexpensive DVM's can make.

It maybe somewhat overunity because of the free electrons the
high voltage pulses attract from the environment. I doubt
that it's enough to operate a 20% efficient photocell converter.
And I doubt it generating proper heat to do anything with.

You just have to know what you are looking at, is all.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 10, 2010, 12:29:59 AM
is anybody else have an interest in replicating this patten(on a small scale. maybe 500W)?   I need a recommendation on magnet sizes are these desirable

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=DX0X0-N52&cat=168         
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on August 10, 2010, 01:28:06 AM
is anybody else have an interest in replicating this patten(on a small scale. maybe 500W)?   I need a recommendation on magnet sizes are these desirablehttp://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=DX0X0-N52&cat=168         

@Kyler,

Not wanting to create disinformation, but I looked at photos on the
magnacoaster's web site recently. One seemed to be of a superconductive
thingy. Do you really know what he is doing? You don't have to answer...
just something to think about. With serious funding comes access to
"additional" technology.

Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: kyler on August 10, 2010, 03:26:19 AM
I don't this its very complicated . If Richard Willis can build one in his workshop so can I.  I would bet most people on this forum have more intelligence and wisdom that he does. Not to take anything away from him.

The real Question is it it worth the investment of time and money to pursue this method or are other methods more efficient? 
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: TheCell on November 22, 2010, 08:13:12 PM
@bolt

it is important to know, if the transformer is necessary or not.
The lc series circuit without the lamp will create a short cut if in resonance. In a LCR circuit IN RESONANCE you can simply drop the lc
because the don't have any effect on it.
If you use a transformer the lc circuit in resonance will drive the core into saturation because the current is maximum in resonance.
In all this similar devices saturation of the core is used to get the effect.
Please do your experiment and let us know.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: LarryC on August 03, 2011, 06:35:37 PM
Sounds like Magnacoaster may actually be starting production. But won't believe it till some proof is shown.

http://twitter.com/#!/magnacoaster
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: forest on August 03, 2011, 10:24:08 PM
 ;D ;D ;D compare to Ismael Aviso method  ::)

I see blood circulating ... it's alive !  ;D
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: TheCell on August 04, 2011, 08:58:48 AM
Hello

on his site : http://www.magnacoaster.com/magna/
there is a 'Todays Build order' List.
Even one German customer is there listed.
I wrote him to arrange a contact to this person,but
he has not replied yet.
There is nothing that convinces me.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: ramset on August 04, 2011, 02:38:23 PM
Bob,
Your link has a phone number
519-896-3354.

I just tried to call..........
It must be nice to sell OU energy systems?
Hours of operation 10 am to 3 PM and closed from12-1 for lunch.

I'll try again later.....

Chet
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: ramset on August 05, 2011, 11:59:58 PM
Crap,
I keep forgetting to call Richard..........,well not entirely true
It's more that his hours of operation are so limited ,every time I go to call he is closed!!
My daughters having a baby (two days now no baby yet)

Guess it will have to wait till Monday now.

Chet
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: supersam on August 06, 2011, 02:49:33 AM
hey all

i have one stupid question,  or maybe two, has anyone actually received one of the units, and how is it working?

thanks sam
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Neo-X on October 03, 2012, 07:28:42 AM
Please someone tell me how can a magnacoaster device makes a bouncing current or makes a harmonics? I have read that the magnacoaster device output frequency is much higher than the input frequency. How is that possible?
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on December 27, 2013, 10:45:12 PM
To all,

It is nearly 2014; do you know where your overunity energy is?

*Can anyone point to an internet post link showing an independent someone's actual experiences
using the Magnacoaster Vorktex product?* I really wish someone would sell a lower power selfrun
overunity system so I could at least intelligently inform my hopes.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Dave45 on December 28, 2013, 01:42:47 AM
I have been thinking alot about the Magnacoaster setup for awhile now, may give it a shot.
The field around a magnet is as shown, if we pulse against it, the field should rebound into the bifilar coils.
About that field I was talking about http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3grPo81fBrA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3grPo81fBrA)
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: gadgetmall on December 28, 2013, 01:50:17 AM
Magnacoaster is a total bulshiter. We have his suitcase device. Piece of crap free transformer. Goes dead in a few hours. The for sell 9000 dollars and is the original in his garage video. I otherwise it's collecting dust..

Ps: inverter and batteries were not included they are an extra 5000us
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: alex on December 28, 2013, 02:51:03 AM
Magnacoaster is a total bulshiter. We have his suitcase device. Piece of crap free transformer. Goes dead in a few hours. The for sell 9000 dollars and is the original in his garage video. I otherwise it's collecting dust..

Ps: inverter and batteries were not included they are an extra 5000us

Have you tried to get money back?
As I know at least 5 US and Canada customers payed for it and never get devices or money back.
We can combine efforts and open the Legal Case for refund.
By alone it's hard to get him, he's just ignoring any conversation.

And friend of mine paid for NEO generator; absolutely same story - no product, no money, no way to get it back.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: SkyWatcher123 on December 28, 2013, 05:52:33 PM
Hi folks, Hi gadget, alex and all with complaints, please provide some kind of evidence, instead of just words.
Pictures, video or anything that looks like evidence.
You see, the reason i ask, is i am fully aware of the reasons for energy suppression and the fake power and fake money revolving around the whole scenario.
And knowing those suppressing also control shipping routes, i can see them easily causing problems there.
So please, lets see your evidence and not just more words on a screen, thanks.
peace love light
tyson
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: alex on December 29, 2013, 12:54:19 AM
You don't want to see the details; what it can change?
It's a fraud, and only way to get this crook nailed and if possible to return money (I doubt; he will claim bankruptcy in this case) is to combine efforts and bring it to the Court.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: infringer on January 01, 2014, 07:03:24 AM
So its all a sham ....

Didn't he get like 1,000,000.00 in funding from one of the guys on dragons den?

I think I recall there was an investor that was willing to put up that much with some added criteria IDK something along the lines of a power plant.

Wow pretty gutsy move if he knew it was a sham but then again people many times are just really not all that smart and do not realize the VUDU of electricity so they come up with these stories about what they think may be happening.

Here is one for the folks that have the device why don't you disassemble it and post the full schematic online for other people to try there is no illegalities in doing so.
If it is a sham why not record yourself taking this sham apart so that others can replicate it and expose the fraud for what it is?

This would be far more damaging than any lawsuit of a class action type and if you insist you could always do both sue and post the info for a double whammy!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: markdansie on January 01, 2014, 07:26:38 AM
The Dragons Den people did there homework and never invested as it could not do as claimed. He will eventually be delt with legally like many of the other free energy fraudsters
Mark
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: alex on January 01, 2014, 07:50:08 PM
Yes, I would do it if  I have it;  gadget have it, and he has already spoken - piece of sh.t.
The false promises on site still attract people,  and Richard and his mom  hoping they will be able to build something worthy to send to customers. But it's obvious they can not do it; a few  they sent recently are not working neither.
So far only  two of us ready to open a  lawsuit, but need more "victims"  to claim it internationally.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Pirate88179 on January 01, 2014, 10:18:24 PM
So its all a sham ....

Didn't he get like 1,000,000.00 in funding from one of the guys on dragons den?

I think I recall there was an investor that was willing to put up that much with some added criteria IDK something along the lines of a power plant.

Wow pretty gutsy move if he knew it was a sham but then again people many times are just really not all that smart and do not realize the VUDU of electricity so they come up with these stories about what they think may be happening.

Here is one for the folks that have the device why don't you disassemble it and post the full schematic online for other people to try there is no illegalities in doing so.
If it is a sham why not record yourself taking this sham apart so that others can replicate it and expose the fraud for what it is?

This would be far more damaging than any lawsuit of a class action type and if you insist you could always do both sue and post the info for a double whammy!

Excellent idea Sir!

Gadget is just the guy for the job too.  He knows his way around electronics and, unless he is worried about a lawsuit, could do what you suggest.  I personally would not worry about a lawsuit if it were me because I was sold something that did not work as claimed.  Gadget is in the US where we have the 1st amendment for freedom of speech.  As long as what he posts is true there should be no worries.

I detest scammers and our work over here seems to draw them out of the woodwork.  It makes all of the honest researchers look bad.

Bill
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: synchro1 on January 01, 2014, 10:26:40 PM
Quote from above:

"We have his suitcase device. Piece of crap free transformer. Goes dead in a few hours".

The Magnacoaster generator has merely targeted the wrong market. This generator should operate as a "Range Extender" for plug in electric cars. Goes dead in a few hours means also that "It works for a few hours" I bet the ferrite suffers saturation and all the generator has to do is rest.

An all electric car stuck on the road between charging stations could use a few extra miles of kilowatt range power. The charger can rest for a few days in the charging garage and be ready to supply a needed boost to the system under the next set of emergency conditions!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: MileHigh on January 02, 2014, 12:27:31 AM
From my perspective Magnacoaster is simply a company that has never delivered, will never deliver, the guy Richard is a fraud and he is also an electronics fraud.  He barely knows anything about electronics, trust me.  Same deal for John Rohner, Daniel Nunez and many others.  If you are going to claim competency then you have to be able to show competency.

For example this clip:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBYeTeVmUnI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBYeTeVmUnI)

That clip is an electronics clown in action.  He is clueless and clearly has never worked seriously in electronics design and manufacturing.  He is a fraud.

Can anyone post a link about a customer that has been sent a box from Magnacoaster and they are satisfied with the product and it's producing free energy?  If not, then there is no valid reason to believe.

Remember, the burden of proof is on Magnacoaster and any advocates of Magnacoaster to demonstrate that they have anything.  It's probably close to a year ago that Sterling reported the claims from Magnacoaster that the first units werre finally shipping.

MileHigh
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: synchro1 on January 02, 2014, 04:03:46 PM
Quote from above:

"We have his suitcase device. Piece of crap free transformer. Goes dead in a few hours".

The Magnacoaster generator outfit has merely targeted the wrong market. This generator should operate as a "Range Extender" for plug in electric cars. Goes dead in a few hours means also that "It works for a few hours" I bet the ferrite suffers saturation and all the generator has to do is rest.

An all electric car stuck on the road between charging stations could use a few extra miles of kilowatt range power. The charger can rest for a few days in the charging garage and be ready to supply a needed boost to the system under the next set of emergency conditions!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: TinselKoala on January 03, 2014, 10:39:26 AM
From my perspective Magnacoaster is simply a company that has never delivered, will never deliver, the guy Richard is a fraud and he is also an electronics fraud.  He barely knows anything about electronics, trust me.  Same deal for John Rohner, Daniel Nunez and many others.  If you are going to claim competency then you have to be able to show competency.

For example this clip:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBYeTeVmUnI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBYeTeVmUnI)

That clip is an electronics clown in action.  He is clueless and clearly has never worked seriously in electronics design and manufacturing.  He is a fraud.

Can anyone post a link about a customer that has been sent a box from Magnacoaster and they are satisfied with the product and it's producing free energy?  If not, then there is no valid reason to believe.

Remember, the burden of proof is on Magnacoaster and any advocates of Magnacoaster to demonstrate that they have anything.  It's probably close to a year ago that Sterling reported the claims from Magnacoaster that the first units werre finally shipping.

MileHigh

That video is hilarious! He doesn't even have the probe's reference lead hooked up to the board, apparently, and can't set the scope's trigger properly to display a stable trace. And the "special glue" on the 555 chip is a hoot! I've used ordinary CA (superglue), Zap Thin kind, to glue TO-247 package mosfets to heatsinks. It works fine, holds fine, even when the mosfets are smoking hot, and it costs about 6 dollars for a half-ounce, which is about a year's supply for me.
No user serviceable parts! What a hoot.

No, nobody has a unit from Magnacoaster that "works" as claimed. Running for a couple of hours isn't "working" and the reason it stops, Synchro, is because the batteries are _depleted of charge_.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Ralis on January 03, 2014, 10:44:21 PM
I understand that someone here has a Magnacoasters box.
Why don't you post some photos of it, including the coil/magnet arrangement.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: infringer on January 04, 2014, 06:33:07 AM
Working or not it would be best if someone fully disclose the full build of this device.

Nothing illegal about posting the whole device.

I don't see why it would be so hard to post pictures of the device disassembled.

If people could easily build it and verify it is a fake it would stop others from getting ripped off.

Instead we do the reverse lets let people keep getting ripped off because it serves my own needs better in presenting a class action lawsuit the more people ripped off the better or so it seems this is the logic. Why not post the thing let her rip and let others build and disprove.

He won't be getting my money but there are people who no matter what you tell them they'll think otherwise living on a hope and a prayer perhaps or maybe they view you and others who say this as proponents of the energy party.

Either way the best bet is to do both post it and file your lawsuits it extends more credibility to your word and will get the religious like believers to think twice and wait for someone to replicate before wasting money on the device.

I could be wrong here and have flawed logic maybe they will believe it works either way dunno but I must express my thoughts on this due to my inability to see a better option.

I guess for the rest DO NOT BUY IT until there is some sure science behind it!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: alex on January 04, 2014, 07:23:39 AM
It might work quite opposite, kind of free ad for them.
You always can call them and talk to his mom :'( and get handful of  promises and assurances, but to me (and few others) I was literally fooled by them and just want my money back, even if it's a "free energy".
Ask Gadget, he might place some photos, but it won't help you, they're building completely different device now. They've sent two, but they're  not working as well; call, and they will tell you why not, but  very convincing.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: greengirl on April 12, 2014, 02:24:34 AM
for anyone still following this debacle just a heads up


apparently magnacoaster is dead. closed up shop. no longer in operation. the web site was down  for a while but seems to have been put back up (maybe to keep people from realizing no unit is being shipped?). but a little birdy told me that he has moved on to other projects and is no longer working on this. i haven't tried calling the office number to see if it is still hooked up.


anyone who spent money and never received anything, now might be a good time to pursue your options. it is my understanding that for civil actions there is a time limitation of 2 yrs to file.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: MileHigh on April 12, 2014, 02:27:54 AM
Technically, with respect to electronics, the guy never had a clue what he was talking about.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: MarkE on April 12, 2014, 10:17:27 AM
for anyone still following this debacle just a heads up


apparently magnacoaster is dead. closed up shop. no longer in operation. the web site was down  for a while but seems to have been put back up (maybe to keep people from realizing no unit is being shipped?). but a little birdy told me that he has moved on to other projects and is no longer working on this. i haven't tried calling the office number to see if it is still hooked up.


anyone who spent money and never received anything, now might be a good time to pursue your options. it is my understanding that for civil actions there is a time limitation of 2 yrs to file.
Someone should ask Sterling Allan what he has to say about this since he has since June 2012 promoted Rasavihari's lies about Magnacoaster shipping working units since April of 2012.  Those lies included Rasavihari claiming that he had received his working Magnacoaster prior to Sterling's June 2012 interview:  http://www.mevio.com/episode/316060/fen.120607
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: TinselKoala on April 12, 2014, 12:55:05 PM
Maybe he lost some weight.... and got himself kidnapped.


Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: mscoffman on April 12, 2014, 02:03:49 PM
Magnacoaster's web site is running. I think a big problem is that even free energy generators still need to be sold.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: TinselKoala on April 12, 2014, 05:09:24 PM
An even bigger problem is that someone has to buy them.

But those problems pale in front of the biggest problem of them all: they have to work as claimed.

Does Richard still have that crazy money-back guarantee on the site? The one that requires the device to be in full working condition in order to be returned for a refund?
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: gadgetmall on April 13, 2014, 03:17:28 PM
Hi Tk,;
As far as i know my partner and i are the only one who have it.it is the suitcase one in his video and dragons den demo.that was simply put a useless ferromagnetic transformer setup that is basically a bad bedini oscillator setup that supposed to feed back more power back to the large bank of industrial truck batteries.. we have already shown it to to a few famous well know prestigious fe inventors to have there opinion and that is it is is no more than a  self wound ferro transformer that does nothing for the battery and inverter but use more power .A piece of shit.
We promised we would not say who  tested it first hand on their bench while watching  the thing being tested and tore down and put back together.
As for a refund magnacoaster is on the run. We know where the broke bastard lives at in CAN and  my  partner has already tried t catch Richard and served papers that resulted nothing..

The moral is when you pay cash  for a piece of shit just know that you considered it flushed down  the sewers;
We got or proof he is a con man .

If anyone wants it  for the hoax museum they can have it for half cost plus shipping battery and inverter not included for 5000 dollars..just know you are getting his piece of  shit and no refunds!

Gadget

Renewableled inc.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: Paul-R on April 13, 2014, 03:56:36 PM
The sad thing is that the two basic designs might actually work. The research needs to be done rigorously, starting with Patrick's write up and the man's patent.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: SaneOne on May 06, 2014, 10:25:09 PM
The sad thing is that the two basic designs might actually work. The research needs to be done rigorously, starting with Patrick's write up and the man's patent.

Read through this thread and it should answer some of your questions: http://www.overunity.com/13919/magnacoaster-hero-or-villain/

Little Dickie has been hiring hundred for years, and now he is downsizing.

Obviously no one wants free energy. Right.
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: darediamond on June 06, 2016, 09:07:04 AM
Well im sorry you are still in the dark ages thats all I can say. Did you know the Chinese are hoarding all the neo magnets now and there is a global shortage coming very soon? Im not going to discuss it I KNOW IT WORKS i seen enough OU devices. I put this information here for those that want to know more about magnacoaster.

I just scanned back fast over your posts and true enough another TROLL. NOT one single post of value just hop from thread to thread thrusting your doubts on everyone. This sums you up perfect as you posted this a few weeks ago

"There is no such thing as free energy suppression except in the minds of people.
The reason of any free energy devices don't actually get out to people is simply
because they don't work and never has.  It's all a scam. Especially when the
inventors hold something secret, blaim it on MIB's or say's they are going for a patent."

So the question is why are you here? You should take up golf or fishing instead.
Wao, What A Befitting REPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Magnacoaster - Vorktex
Post by: nix85 on October 01, 2020, 02:28:56 PM
You have to read back through my posts click my handle and read i published loads. But here is my AWAKENING tool.  Take a 250 watt light bulb and in series fit a capacitor and inductor selected so the i/p power is power factor ZERO.  The watts consumed and measured by any suitable test method will show leakage power around 3 watts when i did this. The 250 watt light is FULLY LIT.  The volts drop across the bulb is about 12 volts. The bulb works underwater perfectly fully lit. The power factor is virtually zero creates standing wave the bulb is powered by zero point energy for FREE.

its the basis for many many OU systems.

This is a great post and few following replies by bolt, i had a similar belief myself that reactive power can do real work. This is also one good point from Thane Heins, that reactive power can do real work.

So, bolt says load is put in series with inductor and a cap and that power factor is zero and that there are standing waves. So he is talking about resonant circuit. But series resonant circuit is not power factor zero, PF zero is when circuit is purely inductive or capacitive, at series resonance it is like short circuit as TheCell replies...

@bolt

it is important to know, if the transformer is necessary or not.
The lc series circuit without the lamp will create a short cut if in resonance. In a LCR circuit IN RESONANCE you can simply drop the lc
because the don't have any effect on it.
If you use a transformer the lc circuit in resonance will drive the core into saturation because the current is maximum in resonance.
In all this similar devices saturation of the core is used to get the effect.
Please do your experiment and let us know.

I believe this to be valid approach, i believe bolt powered 250W bulb with 3W of active power, but what exactly did he mean.

LC in parallel with source and load makes more sense as parallel LC is like open circuit. But he said series.

Some more from bolt replying to questions from Honk

https://overunity.com/9521/magnacoaster-vorktex/15/

Quote from: Honk on August 04, 2010, 01:23:07 PM

Hi Bolt. Just ignore trolls, there are everywhere.

I have some questions if you don't mind?
1) Is the LC circuit on the output series connected or parallel connected with the transformer?
    But I do think you mean series?

SERIES...AND USE AN RLC ONLINE CALCULATOR TO GET VALUES CLOSE FOR L AND C'S TO MAKE RESONANCE TANK


2) In your LC circuit, do you say there is no inflow of current at the 110VAC input to the transformer
    when tuned correctly while the lamp being fully lit?

CORRECT THE REAL WATTS POWERING THE CIRCUIT IS USUALLY UNDER 5 WATTS.

3) How do you measure the voltage and current into the lamp?
    I'd use a series current shunt with the lamp and then measure the voltage across both the
    shunt and across the lamp by a two channel scope. Lamp wattage = Volt times current.

NO YOU CAN DO THAT  YOU CANT MEASURE RE DIRECTLY AS IT COMES FROM OUTSIDE ITS AN AMBIENT RESOURCE YOU CAN MEASURE THE VOLT ACROSS THE BULB THOUGH WHEN IT FULLY LIT AND WILL BE AROUND 12 VOLTS. ITS IMPORTANT THAT ANY R IN THE CIRCUIT IS EXTREMELY SMALL SO YOU DONT GO PUTTING SHUNT IN OR YOU KILL IT. THE REACTIVE AMPS WILL BE EXTREMELY HIGH IF THE BULB IS DROPPING 12 VOLTS AT 250 WATT THE AMPS = 20.8 AMPS. A 1000W BULB WILL DROP AROUND 18 VOLTS AND 52 AMPS!!!!!!!!

4) Have you performed this type of measurement to exclude power errors?

UP TO YOU TO CONVINCE YOURSELF YOU ARE NOT DREAMING WHEN YOU SEE A 250 WATT LAMP FULLY LIT RUNNING ON 3 WATTS. ALSO THE LIGHT IS A HAZY BLUE WHEN POWERED BY RADIANT ENERGY.

I hope you find some time to answer my questions?  ;D
It would be most valuable to all of us.

NOT ANSWERING ANY MORE ON THIS NOW DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.