Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.  (Read 50852 times)

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #60 on: May 13, 2010, 07:47:44 PM »
@Fatbird,  I didn't really think it was identical but just saw similarity to what I know.  Do we know at this time exactly how the TPU coil is wired?  Or what is the most probable coil winding for making it work?  I'm thinking about trying to build one. 

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #61 on: May 13, 2010, 09:57:59 PM »
Based on the picture of SM's Model 1 with that Toroid on top, here is my best guess so far.

My best guess so far is the schematic below, or some VARIATION there of.

.

kooler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #62 on: May 31, 2010, 09:06:38 AM »
hello
i been real busy lately but i got alittle time to work on the tpu again ( few hours )..
i mixed "daniel mcfarland cooks" build in it and WOW the tanks fill instant..
it might look messing but it works good..
i'll be gone for a couple days but here is a schematic..



FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #63 on: May 31, 2010, 02:36:09 PM »
Kooler,  Please post a picture of your setup.

Thanks.

.

Westland

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #64 on: June 03, 2010, 05:27:22 PM »
Thought I would toss in something that might help out here. Don't know for sure. This may sound unrelated, but I think you will understand by the time you get to the end. I will be talking about a standard coil here. Built a coil with 1000 winds of #22. Core was metal coat hangers cut to length that I got from the thrift store by the box full. Had a rotor made from a small wheel with magnets on it. Was using the circuit Imhotep uses on his Bedini fan charger just for the hell of it. My son was handing me components and I was soldering them in. He gave me a 1000k ohm pot instead of a 100 ohm pot, and I put this in. The resister he gave me was also high, like 680 ohms instead of 50. I would spin the wheel, but it would not stay spinning no matter how I adjusted the pot. But I noticed that when the magnet from the wheel passed the coil, my little light that triggers at 90 volts would activate. So I just stuck a magnet near the coil and it begin to emit a whining sound and the 90 volt light lit up and stayed lit. I connected my charging battery up, and it began to charge. I went back through my setup and realized that I had the wrong pot and resister, so I changed them and got my rotor spinning like I wanted it to. But now I think about theat whining coil and the voltage it was putting out just by coming close to a magnet. Does that sound familiar to anyone?

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com

kooler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #66 on: June 05, 2010, 04:11:47 AM »
thanks gk
otto was right that looks just like what i am working on..kool
i just downloaded the pdf file .. so i will be looking over it tonight..
the only device i saw sweet use was the aircoil thingy on the table when bedini was at his house so this file really clears things up..
thanks guys..
if work will slow down a bit .. so i can get back to work on this thing..

robbie

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #67 on: July 08, 2010, 03:10:18 PM »
Here is a JUST RELEASED & UPDATED PDF Book about Free Energy.

It has 2,288 PAGES!!!!!!!


http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PJKBook.html


.

penno64

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #68 on: July 10, 2010, 12:22:35 PM »
@All

Is SM's comment regarding the RCA TV engineers, really pointing to the FLYBACK transformer ??

Regards, Penno


e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #69 on: July 11, 2010, 03:36:58 AM »
I think the color TV hint is that they had to have 3 coils sync'd (one for each of the 3 primary colors R,G,B) so as to produce a clear image out of the three combined color guns that put the image on the CRT.

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #70 on: July 11, 2010, 03:40:28 AM »
@ Penno64

No, he was referring to CRT Deflection Coils.  These are used on all CRT based TVs to Deflect the electron beam up, down, & left, right.

The Deflection Coils Driving Circuitry drifted enough OFF FREQUENCY and caused that catastrophic historic event.

============================================================================

The story is reproduced below for those that never read it:


It took several years of experimentation to discover what frequencies and most importantly how to make small integrated circuits work to perform the control functions necessary to make the demonstrations you see on the video tapes available today.

So in many ways we have early RCA color TV engineers to thank for my discovery of the power generator.   I am sure they are all dead now but they did contribute.  Perhaps a story which had impact on me at that time was told to me by my boss way back in 1970 I believe it was.

He told me that around 1965 or 66 there was an explosion in an apartment in Chicago.  The authorities had concluded that for some unknown reason, a General Electric color television receiver had been the source of an explosion that killed a young black child in the apartment.  My boss went on to relate that he was involved in the investigation because he was in Chicago at the time and he was invaluably experienced with television circuits and etc.  He told us that what they found was, the TV had exploded with some quick furry.  The explosion did in fact kill the poor child who was sitting directly in front but spared his mother who was some distance away in the kitchen.  The explosion was strange because of the absence of expected chemicals necessary to create the explosion.  It appeared that the TV was the exact center of the explosion, however no one could find a reason for the explosion occurring.

Also consider that there is not really much inside a TV to explode with enough force to kill people and destroy the living room a large apartment.  Yes a CRT can explode and kill someone, however this was not the kind of explosion we are talking about.  The most interesting part of the story is that according to our boss, metallic objects especially those containing large amounts of iron were dramatically displaced.  He mentioned that some nails were actually removed from the walls and pulled toward the TV set.  When they found them they were bent and shaped like cork screws!  Everything in the room appeared to have moved or was moving toward the TV as it exploded, or imploded as the case may be.

The child was apparently killed by way of these metallic objects traveling through his body on their way toward the center of the TV set.  As far as my boss knew, there was never a good explanation for the occurrence.  We found out that this was not the only unexplained explosion of TV sets worldwide.

However, the fact that all the sets exploded while in operation may bear some light.  Also most of the TV sets were made by the GE company or were TV sets made using GE circuits and of similar design.  However, this man who had been my mentor for so many years had his own theory which he never told anyone as far as i know, except me.  His theory was that the TV while in operation, somehow managed to become a receiver of more then just television waves and so for a millisecond in time became a receiver and discharged of a huge amount of electrical and magnetic energy.

This discharge of magnetic energy is vary similar to the discharge of magnetic energy during an atomic explosion. . .
Now that is something I have thought about a great deal.  My employer's words had great impact on me.  Not that they meant anything really, but I kept thinking about the possibility of many frequencies combining at one moment in time to produce an entirely different effect then intended by the designers.


.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #71 on: July 11, 2010, 07:29:15 AM »
I knew it was something like that but just hazy on the details.  That does make more sense.  My last real info on those was in the mid 60's when I worked in a place that had several TV repairmen and I'd hang out in their area sometimes just to talk with them. 

     That implosion story (just saw it on the other thread today too) was quite amazing.  You have to wonder what exact set of circumstances came together to cause that and if any others had that problem. 

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #72 on: July 11, 2010, 07:31:50 AM »
double post deleted

powerunlimited

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #73 on: July 11, 2010, 09:35:29 AM »
Heres a question for everybody,why would SM tell you information that was true so you could build a tpu.
Jack Durban said of SM he lies even when he doesn't need to,remember people he sold the rights for millions plus I believe a monthly amount that is gone the moment anyone builds a working tpu,so its in hes interest that no one builds a working tpu .Have anyone ever seen the the video where a compass rotates near a tpu,there isn't any video its a lie,like most things SM has said.

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: SM's TPU SUMMARY. What We Know So Far.
« Reply #74 on: July 11, 2010, 03:30:51 PM »
@ powerunlimited

This might help to clarify some of your questions:


======================================================


Dear L- - - - - -,

I have some very important things to tell you.  First. My attorney left several messages for me over the last week.
I finally called him on Friday and he informed me of the fact he needed to set up a meeting with me in his office in as soon as possible and that I needed to be prepared to meet with someone from the federal government..  I was shaken to the bone!  He also told me that I was not to mention my future meeting to anyone including the following: Paul, anyone with UEC, anyone on the Internet including you, my family, the press, or anyone in the communication business, my elected representatives and etc.  It sounded as though he was reading a list off to me.  He said that, he was.  I told him i was a little scared to show up.  He said that he understood my fear but it would be in my best interest to get into his office Monday and he would do his best to protect me.  I asked him what i needed to be protected from?  He said he had to respond to the authorities about their concerns regarding my possible breaking of federal laws.

He said that the charges could be very serious against me and he needed to keep things from getting out of hand.
He told me that he convinced them (the federal authorities ) that I was not intentionally breaking any laws or going against their wishes in any way.  He assured them that he would get me into his office for them to talk to and they would see for themselves that I am a nice little guy who would never knowingly break the law.  So off i went this morning to my attorneys office in hopes of not getting arrested and placed into prison.  I don't think I would like prison, L - - - - - -...

The first thing there I was taken into a room by my attorney and told what not to say to the Feds.  Also, I was told what to do if I was arrested, etc.  So I was fully scared to death!!!  Next, I was taken into the meeting.  Therein was my attorney and his secretary with note pad in hand.  I was introduced to three gentleman in business suits.  One was from the FBI, ( Federal Bureau of Investigation ), one was from the Atomic Energy Commission of the federal government and the other
was from the Federal Department of Justice, Washington DC.  I now had to go to the bathroom at this moment of my life more then ever!!!

I sat down and listened to the man from the FBI remind me that I had been given a document from the federal government several years ago informing me of the fact that I no longer had control of my power technology because it had been deemed to be in the interests of the American people for it to remain in the control of federal authorities and that I was not to talk about it directly with other people, especially nationals of foreign countries without permission from the folks in
Washington DC.  He also reminded me that to do so would be breaking the law and committing a federal offence, which is a big thing here in America.  He went on to tell me that he was there in official capacity as an investigator from the FBI to see if i had indeed broken the law.  Why had I broken the law?  Because I had been discussing my technology with other people without the permission of the folks in Washington DC.  I asked them how they knew that I had spoken to people about my technology and they told me that:  First of all, it was not MY TECHNOLOGY.  I had no rights concerning it at all.  It is under the control of the federal government for the benefit of the people of the United States.
Second, The ownership of the technology is highly questionable.

Third, Do not play games with us Stephen, you know we know that you have been discussing the technology with anybody who will listen!  They further accused me of deliberately posting information on the Internet.  I said that I absolutely had not!  The man from the FBI said that i had been collaborating with a foreign gentlemen in Australia to post information and therefor had been involved in a conspiracy to dispense information which is against the law for me to
do.  Then he pulled out a rather large stack of papers which turned out to be copies of everything posted Internet wise about my technology for the last ten years or whatever.

Then my attorney interjected and they got into a long discussion which I didn't listen to very much.  I was looking at the man from the Atomic Energy Commission and noted he had a kind face.  He smiled at me and we began to talk.  He told me that he admired my work very much.  He told me that he thought of me as a fellow scientist.  He told me that as scientists we had an obligation to protect people from our findings or things we discover if they may be generally harmful to them or the public at large.  He told me that it was the duty of conscientious scientists to keep the black genies in the bottles so as not to harm society any more then necessary.  He mentioned the Atomic bomb and how much better the world would be if it never had been invented, right? I said , right!  He went on to discuss my technology in detail and reminded me of the destructive capability when the devices reach harmonic perfection.  I told him that was a good analogy, or way of putting it.  He told my that he didn't think I wanted to be responsible for giving out information making it possible and moreover inevitable that someone would make a big crater of a hole where their house used to stand with resulting death of themselves and possibly their families and neighbors too.  He finally finished up with, And for God sake, with the terrorists hunting for weapons of mass destruction, why on earth would you want to hand them something like this to use to kill perhaps many millions of people?  Do you think Moslems are not interested in this technology?  They have a lot of oil so they would be interested in it for another reason wouldn't they Stephen?  I agreed with him and told him I hadn't thought of it in that perspective before.

I told them all that I wasn't trying to do anything wrong at all.  I didn't realize the implications of the possible results of talking to you about the technology.  I told them that you were an engineer and interested in the scientific possibilities of the discovery only.  The agent from the FBI said that I had no real way of knowing who you were and what you might actually be up to did I?  I agreed with him.  He said that they read everything going into and out of your computer whether or not anything is posted on that web site we guys like so much...  He said that the Australian government was allied with the United States regarding this matter and that the Australian authorities would deal with you as need be.  However, let’s hope it does not become necessary shall we? Yes of course I said?  I said, I never meant to get into trouble with this.
I told them I just felt bad because of all the nasty things people were saying about me and that i starting talking to you and you said that you would try and tell the straight story about me and the technology.

I have a right to defend my self don't I?  The answer was, NO!  I am not entitled to defend myself.  What i need to do is, to feel good about doing the right thing.  I need to do what my government tells me is good for me to do.  I need to develop pride in making the correct decision to keep quiet about technology that may hurt other people or even help terrorists to kill many, many others.  I was told that With knowledge comes responsibility!!!  I told them I never intended to do anything wrong.  I was sorry.  I asked them to please forgive me and not to put me in prison.  They said they could prefer charges against me at any time but are reluctant because of my well meaning attitude as displayed during the meeting.

They told me that It would be a good idea if I told you to post information saying that I had no intention of revealing anything about my experiments or how the demonstrations were accomplished to the extent that they convinced so many people of their authenticity.  That the demonstrations were more for amusement then anything else and that I am making it very clear that I never intended to convince the public at large.  People attempting to duplicate anything they have seen in my demonstrations will not be able to do so and should not try.  I asked them if I had their permission to tell you about today and they said yes of course.  So........... that is what happened to me today.  How was your day L - - - - - -?














.