Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: R.I.P. Lee Crock  (Read 54309 times)

crowclaw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2010, 06:42:40 PM »
I have done some reading and decided to build the device.

What I found vague was the reason of the amount of batteries and the type. Is this so the battery can cause more charge to accumulate on the sheet? And would Li-ion batteries work as good?
Hi broli

This thread seems to have gone quite, did you put one of these devices together?
I'm in the process of experimenting. Regards M

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2010, 09:55:39 PM »

For anyone interested, Tom Berryhill (mistakenly called Berryman in an earlier post) sells the low draw switching circuits he made for Lee Crock @$150.00.

As of 2 weeks ago, he had a couple of demo Energy Cleaner units going for $200 dollars.

He can be reached via his email address   twb8899@yahoo.com

Regards...


Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2010, 01:00:57 AM »
I did make a mat without the switiching device (couldn't find the schematic -thanks for posting it).  Used a 6' x 4' cut of aluminum screening and manually switched polarity every 15 minutes 2 or 3 times. Wasn't good for my marriage when I put it on the mattress - especially after the cut edges of screening kept getting caught on covers, pyjamas, skin... Hmm, maybe I'll put that downstairs.  The Lowes mat sounds good.

I think it was Jerry Decker who claimed he was using the device hooked to his car chassis (from the trunk) on long drives. He said he would feel refreshed after a drive (rather than drained), and his back didn't give him problems.

Maybe I'll try this again - thanks for the tip.
Bob

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2010, 06:01:50 AM »
When I made mine, I cheated on the timer circuit. I happened to have a delay on/off timer that I powered through a 24VAC adapter. I then ran the batteries through the contacts. Quick and simple. I folded over the edges of the screen and taped them. Put the screen on the mattress and covered it with a sheet. You couldn't even tell it was there. I left it on all the time.

I did notice a difference at first, but after a few months it didn't seem to do much. Maybe the batteries went dead? I guess I should have checked them but you never have a load connected so I thought they would last a long time. Maybe it's time to throw it back on and try it again.

crowclaw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2010, 09:40:54 PM »
Hi Bob & Mr Mag
Well I finished my design based on a PIC micro controller which gives me precise timing intervals pulsing a biased coil change over relay. The circuit is powered from a 9 volt DC universal power supply.  "D" cell batteries  3 volt arrangement. I looked around for flexible mesh but decided on aluminium foil until I stumbled upon a foil backed foam camping mat on a roll. My wife suffers with arthritis so I placed this under the mattress. Twice she has woken up in the early hours with a strange tingling sensation through her body!! I don't know if anybody else has had a similar experience?  Interestingly while re checking my circuits etc I discovered the flylead clamped to what I thought was the bare foil of the mat  turned out to be a clear insulated film?? I have since lined the mat with ali foil and am re testing... she has not experienced any tingling as yet. So I'm not sure
 if what she experienced was good or bad!
And... hey Bob, at least the tingling sensation was not caused by rough metal edges your comments made me laugh. Thanks for your replies Guys, Kind regards

crowclaw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2010, 10:20:04 PM »
Progress since last post... Still have this device in use, for me I seem to have more energy and less problems from back ache. My Wife's arthritic problems have marginaly improved. The tingling sensation's she earlier experienced was not related to this device. So some benefits, I feel have been gained from using this design.
I would be interested to here from others who have tried using this device and their own personal experiences or any other electronic healing type device.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #21 on: October 01, 2010, 01:08:23 AM »
Glad to hear it's working for you Crowclaw.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2010, 03:38:23 PM »

I found another amazing battery device called 'Godzilla' here...

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/

I have had excellent results with this device...very simple to make also.

Regards...


MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2010, 05:03:52 PM »
I found another amazing battery device called 'Godzilla' here...

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/

I have had excellent results with this device...very simple to make also.

Regards...

Your better off using a pulsed unit then just connecting a battery to you body. Use a bugzapper or download Huda Clarks PDF. It describes how it works, what frequencies to use and has a simple schematic of how to build one. Or, just do like I do and use a frequency generator.

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #24 on: October 07, 2010, 05:18:03 PM »

Your comments reflect a lack of understanding research of the concept of the device.

To dismiss without first doing due dilligence, will serve only to discourage others from getting help for themselves.

It is better to let people make up their own minds.

Regards...


crowclaw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #25 on: October 07, 2010, 10:42:22 PM »
I found another amazing battery device called 'Godzilla' here...

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/

I have had excellent results with this device...very simple to make also.

Regards...

I'm interested in this device do you have any details of it that you can pass on please. it seems you have to be a member to access any info.Many thanks

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #26 on: October 07, 2010, 11:17:54 PM »

You really have to read it yourself cc...there's just too much to report.

You just have to register to access the files...they will also keep you updated if you wish.

Its all free info.

Happy reading.

Regards...


MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #27 on: October 08, 2010, 06:16:47 AM »
Your comments reflect a lack of understanding research of the concept of the device.

To dismiss without first doing due dilligence, will serve only to discourage others from getting help for themselves.

It is better to let people make up their own minds.

Regards...

Not necessarily. I think that my comments show a very good understanding with multiple devices that are used for the same purpose. The unit you are recommending could cause electrolysis and I don't think that's what you want. All we need to do is put a small charge on the cells to keep the microbes from attaching to them. If the microbes cannot attach themselves to the cells they will die. Beck's and Clark's devices do this by using a frequency which is more or less a dual duty device. Not only does it charge the cells but when the unit is set for the proper frequency "supposedly" the microbes would explode due to the resonant frequency on the device.

To recommend a device without disclosing the possibility of injuring one self is very neglectful. I know you sent them to a site to read about it but some people might just look at the picture and think that they should try hooking themselves up to a DC battery.

I am not discouraging people to treat themselves. I am only trying to show them safer alternatives. If you really think I'm against this, your wrong. I presently drink colloidal silver, I use My frequency generator as a Huda Clark device, I've used the Lee Crock unit, and I am in the process of building a Lakhovski MWO. So I guess your preaching to the choir.

No hard feelings, I just hate to be told that I have a lack of understanding of the device when the person saying it doesn't even know me or know exactly what I do understand or believe.

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #28 on: October 08, 2010, 01:53:51 PM »
Is it just one wire to the mesh? Also.
Can it be hooked to the spring box metal frame?

Jesus

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: R.I.P. Lee Crock
« Reply #29 on: October 08, 2010, 02:31:55 PM »

"No hard feelings, I just hate to be told that I have a lack of understanding of the device when the person saying it doesn't even know me or know exactly what I do understand or believe."


Well...if you had an understanding of the device as you say, then you would have read that the electrolysis issue is not a concern with the device,

That is all I have to say to you on this subject...as my time is valuable to me.


Jesus...the energy cleaner screen's field extends 10 inches on either side of the screen.

Your bed frame may be too far from your body...unless you have a very thin mattress.

Lee recommended hooking up to the springs in the mattress as an lesser alternative to the screen.

Regards...