Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: stan meyers  (Read 13149 times)

boyd868

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
stan meyers
« on: January 26, 2010, 06:13:53 AM »
anyone out there still interested in stan meyers or similar works? have found some work that is like his only from the mid 70's. to me looks good. you will need a machine shop as well as electric skills.

4Tesla

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 946
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2010, 08:30:13 AM »
Welcome to the forum!  There is a lot of research still going on in this area.

4Tesla

CompuTutor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2010, 03:09:03 AM »
anyone out there still interested in stan meyers or similar works? have found some work that is like his only from the mid 70's. to me looks good. you will need a machine shop as well as electric skills.

I'm going to guess:   "Andrija (Henry) K. Puharich"  ? ? ?

boyd868

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2010, 07:10:33 PM »
 hi, boyd back. what i found was a patent,u.s. 3980053 matches up with stans. it claims to make hydrogen and oxy. and then combines them at a mixing chamber then feeds them into the carb. how does it make the hyd and oxy. plused power. sound much like stans system. check it out and run with it. thanks for your replies. boyd

WorldOrder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2010, 09:14:40 AM »
hi, boyd back. what i found was a A,u.s. 3980053 matches up with stans. it claims to make hydrogen and oxy. and then combines them at a mixing chamber then feeds them into the carb. how does it make the hyd and oxy. plused power. sound much like stans system. check it out and run with it. thanks for your replies. boyd

I really don't think Stan used any of his pulse circuitry at all.  It was only to cover his technology should someone figure out a way around his real setup.  Remember.  Stan always reminded students of his to "Keep it simple stupid".  The KISS method?

Most of the really complex circuitry was for his water injection system which NEVER worked.  The only water car design he ever built and drove around was powered by the tubal array cell setup.  Check out all the videos and you will see I'm right.

The fancy circuitry was not designed just in case someone found a different method than the high RPM alternator only.  The other reason was to make his technology seem more complex than it really was.  He sure did know his electronics alright but he was just using this knowledge to mislead others away from how simple it really was. 

I am half way to completing a prototype vehicle myself which I don't mind disclosing because I can never patent it anyways.  Meyer already did.  The key to Meyer is the high amp output of his heavy duty 3 phase alternator.  At least this is what I have stumbled onto anyway.  It's really simple if you have a medium to advanced level of electrical knowledge.

Notice Meyer would never attempt to power his fuel cells straight off of his dune buggy engine.  If he did, he would have to open his engine throttle all the way at all time and he may miss the correct RPM.

Why would RPM be so important to an alternator powering his fuel cell (tubal cluster array) ?  Because with an alternator just as with any AC generator, the frequency of the current is determined by the RPMs!  I messed with this aspect for weeks!  You have to find the right RPMs in order to produce the ideal frequency.  Once you find the correct RPMs (just as Meyer had to do) then you need to fix the alternator to run at the ideal RPMs all the time, constantly.  You achieve this by driving the alternator with an AC motor with the correct pulley size by means of a fan belt.  It's not only in his bench demo video.  It's also on his dune buggy mounted on top the driver's side rear wheel fender.  Freeze the videos and you'll see it there too.

Messing which 12volts from a battery charger plugged into the wall means I can garantee you have too low of frequency in your voltage.  You have only 60 hertz which is NOT even nearly enough. 

Now I know where most people go wrong.  They say "But Meyer had a frequency modifying board he patented!".  Yes, this is very true.  He sure did, BUT HE NEVER USED IT!  He always used an alternator where he could PHYSICALLY control the hertz by controlling the RPM of his generator which in his case was an alternator.  Not electronically like he wanted everyone to believe.     

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2010, 01:45:25 PM »
World Order

A specific frequency makes things happen?
which frequency ?
Does it depend on "Tube" size? [would seem so]


Thank you for sharing this info.
 Chet

boyd868

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2010, 01:31:11 AM »
boyd back again, what makes me think that it might have been a starting  point for stan is the way it cycles. also notice that with just the alt. running it feeds the needed amount on demand. other than that i don't know much,on the subject. just ocams razor? me i'm just trying to figure out how pacheco did it. thanks

Charlieb000

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2010, 04:44:36 AM »
he also said to ask the right questions.... like why a resonant cavity....
cb



« Last Edit: August 29, 2010, 05:10:04 AM by Charlieb000 »

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: stan meyers
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2010, 04:25:03 AM »
An old video stated up to 20,000 cycles per sec half amp.Yes from his bench top video it is a bench motor connected to an alternator. Tube size most likley is set to furnish a ballance of reaction volume per sec.The dune buggy has a much larger chamber.As per the time period it was filmed he would likely have used a mesh membrane in the tank to avoid risk of explosion. So a three phase alternator would have to be rewound to make as many phases as possible while still putting out a half amp.12 million cycles a minute at a half amp is a lotta get up and go.