Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81922
  • *Latest: bobdring

  • *Total Posts: 490750
  • *Total Topics: 14441
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 216
  • *Total: 219

Facebook

Author Topic: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits  (Read 289946 times)

Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #630 on: April 23, 2010, 05:29:37 PM »
i c everyone has been busy ... 

kooler 5 stages your nutz !  : )

tysb3

you seam keen ! 

i useing flb's for stage 2 as i get 1500vdc spikes per pulse from a 3/4 dead aaa : )

i have scoped it !  and this is on every single wire in the transformer im useing 2 bulb ballasts  so i have  4 pairs of  wires ..  fireing 1500 vdc from 1 pulse

from a depleated aa

so i made the mini power stack   just 2 main stages and a few aux stages .. 

sir it is ou ...  : )   BIG TIME

william

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #630 on: April 23, 2010, 05:29:37 PM »

Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #631 on: April 25, 2010, 08:30:13 AM »
my stage 2 unit is really a stage 3 unit in my entire device ..  but it has many things in 1 unit

this is what it does

salt water cell  power source
freq convertor   like a joule thief
pulse motor / hf switcher machanical ...
kicker module 
OUTPUT

i built it in a stack i use a 12vdc battery for power source for the kicker bords it is recharged from the pulse motor and the salt water cell and solar ..  the pulse motor is powered from a boost cap wich is recharged from the freqcon! : )

i have built most of this already and am almost done ..  it is A LOT OF WORK !   

W


here is a video of the ist way stage 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_vIF_K3QSo


Offline tysb3

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #632 on: December 01, 2010, 07:21:57 PM »
@ all Hi,
Thanks to wattsup and Magluvin for good ideas, -  SIDAC + ignition coil.
Now I  put on this JT, -  SIDAC + ignition coil + JT.
Now I dont need double JT because of SIDAC
I dont try it yet, because I dont have SIDAC and ignition coil,
but I will do it. 
 

Offline tysb3

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #633 on: December 01, 2010, 09:52:12 PM »
you will not becomes enough voltage and power in Capacity, that the sidac can fire
this to ignition coil.

The pancake coil help nothing here.

Pese

Hi
thanks for comment.
this is yet only on idea stage. I check sidac for parameters. You could be right. they heave big leakage current at stand-offvoltage and perhaps to big breackdown voltage.
for start I find this ones: TRISIL LS5018B/LS5060B
Im not physicist. pancacke JT coil is for additional reiciving energy from addtional pancacke coil. on this I could be wrong.





Offline Wolfgang29

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #634 on: August 17, 2011, 09:21:09 AM »
IST:

That statement means absolutely nothing and yes I and everyone reading this should demand that Gadget show some proof that he has over unity.  He doesn't have it and it is extremely unlikely that he is capable of proving it.  That's the case for you also.

Broli:

There are the right ways to learn and there are the wrong ways to learn.  Spending a hundred dollars and hundreds of hours building and testing something that doesn't even work is not the right way to learn.

MileHigh

Mile,
While I am new here, and I have not posted much, in the last two years through the help of this forum I have gone from knowing almost nothing of electronics to being able to understand and build such basic things as captrets, inverters, pwm's, solar chargers etc.
Your statement, "Spending a hundred dollars and hundreds of hours building and testing something that doesn't even work is not the right way to learn."  is a rather illogical one at best, and a pessimistically misguided one at worst. Your statement only functions on the assumption (or decision you have made) that this device does not function to its specs in the slightest. To which I must say that the burden of proof concerning this statement is solely upon your shoulders. Prove thoroughly that it is not. Additionally, the only way one can know with surety that something does work, and know which exact and specific parts to only ever use for that something, is if one already knows the outcome. And, I must say dear sir, experimentation is not exactly about what we know (or think we know, since your claim is unverified), experimentation is as much about taking a leap into the dark, and what we don't know. If we constantly walked into a lab TRULY knowing the answers, we would end all experimentation. its called experimentation, Not verification.
I would also hesitate to determine that there is a wrong or right way to learn something, and if my way should be imposed on you, or vice versa.
   Furthermore, your statement, " He doesn't have it and it is extremely unlikely that he is capable of proving it.  That's the case for you also." is not only an Ad Hominem argument,  but it is a statement which functions solely upon assumptions. People's interactions in life are largely influenced by how much they bring in from their past. Assumptions are at their core, guesses based on the past. At the end of the day, human beings dwell in slavery and oppression because one man is too afraid to give up his power over another, for fear of reprisals seen in the past. If only each side could fathom that the other wants peace and respite just as badly. This was the assumption of the cold war. This is the fallacy of assumptions: that all that has existed is all that can exist. We do not have to dwell in a world of pre-determined options, but rather a world of uncreated possibilities. If you drive forwards and look backwards, you will surely get a ding. My advice, without any judgement upon you, is to unclench your fist and your mind, and have a little faith in your fellow man. Be well. 8)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #634 on: August 17, 2011, 09:21:09 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline FreqShift

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits
« Reply #635 on: July 23, 2013, 08:32:19 AM »
Very True.
If one is close minded, one will never advance.

So what happened to this thread?

It started with something good, a practical purpose.

Then, inevitably, greed and the quest for the 'wholly prize' diluted and killed all progress?

Thanks again guys.

 >:(

Don't you see we are not getting anywhere,..  And will NEVER get anywhere because of this.

Forget a patent, it will get you no-where. There are already patents ! And 'where' are we?

Give me something practical ! Give me the device that heats an electric heater core 'efficiently'.
The cheap Ceramic Walmart heater would be nice.

Here are other great searches:  'Electric Heater Elements', or  'Heater Water Heater Elements'.

Forget the Peltier chip. They are Extremely inefficient.  20% at Best.

Someone, anyone?
-
-
-

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: