Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Curlitron  (Read 5843 times)

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Curlitron
« on: November 16, 2009, 11:05:57 PM »
Philip Hardcastle has a very interesting "free energy" machine that could very well work. I've proposed a simple experiment that would cost maybe $2 in parts to test his theory -->
 
 http://globalfreeenergy.info/2009/11/16/curlitron-proposed-experiments/
 
Philip welcomes everyone to work on the Curlitron. I've told Philip that I will open-source my design, but first I need to verify his claim by doing my $2 experiment. Philip claims that a low cost Curlitron device could produce massive amounts of power.
 
Regards,
Paul
 

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Curlitron
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2009, 11:08:45 PM »
keep us posted with your experiments. thanks for sharing open sourced.


PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Curlitron
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 07:27:36 PM »
Thanks. It's Philip Hardcastle's baby, and I might do a simple experiment is all, but I'll post any update on it here.

Paul
 

Creativity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
Re: Curlitron
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 09:30:46 PM »
On ur animation the electron comes back to the wire, why would it do so? I think it will just escape and reduce the charge on the wire so the amps will go down. Voltage my increase simultaneously but only the electron's velocity vector that is parallel to the wire will count in favor (red on the picure). If electron leaves in the direction opposite to the current flow we will have a loss.

Anyhow very interesting experiment. U have some good tools to measure it (me not really  :|).

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Curlitron
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2009, 03:00:30 PM »
Hi,

It takes a lot more energy for the electron to fully escape the metal surface. Some of the electrons will escape the metal surface, and will travel through the vacuum and eventually hit the vacuum wall, where a charge will build up and flow back to the original metal. Most electrons do not escape because as the electron ejects from the surface it leaves a hole, positive charge, and that positive charge draws the electron back. All the magnetic field is doing is redirecting the electrons kinetic energy (from ambient thermal energy) toward the left in the animation. So the end result after the electron comes back to the material is increased kinetic energy toward to left.

Paul

Creativity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
Re: Curlitron
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2009, 05:33:07 PM »
few observations then that may lead to the non conclusional experiment results:

Is metal loop connected to the box? It will then be a parallel current flow, one via wire and one via the box. If not it will produce a simple capacitor and won't return the lost charge. Obviously, if the box will catch the electrons that have escaped it won't stop current from decreasing, because the electron will "leak" on the way not reaching the destination. To have a good measurement in this experiment we have to keep that in mind (even if the effect works, experiment may show no positive effects just because we forgot the lost charges in equation..)

In flowing current the hole may be replenished by the electron flowing by and not the electron that almost escaped. If not so then I guess the electron on its way back will reach the surface a bit away from the hole so it will return back to the hole via the wire and just against the positive influence it has just made. OK i just gave it a fast thought so maybe I am next to it. But if 'm right we would get some current and voltage fluctuations that a diode may sort out to count in one way only. 

I think the best would be to put the wire next to the magnet and no current at all. Then if an electron gets thermally kicked off there the part of e-field (between the hole and the electron) will be perpendicular to the m-field and some flow of current will be observable. The drawback will be that only some directions of thermal knocking will be utilised, giving much less voltage and current to observe.