Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.  (Read 9396 times)

ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« on: October 30, 2009, 06:54:52 PM »
In a thought experiment of building a mechanical battery I found the following calculation very sobering.

In order to simply store the equivalent of One Kilowatt-Hour of energy the following is required:

One Kilogram of water falling one meter produces:

(1 kg water)(9.8 m/s2)(1 meter) =  9.8 kg-m2/s2 which is equivalent to

9.8 Joules of energy

                       ------------------------------

1000J/s for one hour is One Kilowatt-hr of energy

(1000J/s)(60sec/min)(60min/hour)  =  3.6 million Joules .

In order to store this much energy by raising a weight to a height of  3 meters we would need a total weight of:

(3600000 kg-m2/s2)/ ((9.8 m/s2)(3 m))  =  122000 kg. raised to a height of 3 meters.

For those of us in the United States it is equivalent to approximately 134 Tons raised to a height of approximately 10 Feet.
                                  -----------------------------

Wet sand weighs approximately 2.3g/cm3 or 19.19 lbs/ gal

A single ton of this heavy stuff would require 53 cubic meters of volume. Multiply this by 134 and you can see why energy is never stored by raising a weight, and why a gravity-based battery has never been economically developed.

For the first time in my life, my old sore knees being now ignored, I am looking at the reality that the force of gravity is a very weak force indeed.

spoondini

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2009, 11:42:16 PM »
Resinrat,
   On another post somebody had a very clever idea to perform electrolysis, take advantage of the natural buoyancy of hydrogen and let it rise in a tower, react with oxygen from the atmosphere (burn) at altitude and capture that energy, the capture the hydro power as the water fell back down.  A perpetual water fall if you will.  Sounded great to me.  I did the math and after taking into account efficiency losses, I calculated the tower would need to be really freeking tall, like stratospheric to even break even.

Are knees certainly don't perceive gravity as a weak force, bu math sure as hell does.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2009, 11:58:21 PM »
or using water instead of sand, 1 gallon weights 3.787 Kg

so,  1 KW-Hr is roughly 32,220 gallons per hour, or approx. 550 gallons per minute through an hydroelectric generator.
with a drop height of 9.8 ft.

size = its about a 20-ft by 40-ft / 5 ft deep swimming pool.
completely dumped in 1 hour.


ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2009, 01:59:33 AM »
Yes, the math does show what a pittance of energy gravity potentially can store; but doesn't this also hint at the fact that even if a perpetual motion wheel could possibly be invented, it would require such a large number of them to produce even a small amount of energy from gravity that it would be a waste of energy even building them?

I originally thought of digging downward and building the mechanical battery with a shaft in the ground a hundred feet deep. Even this would require such a large weight (over 13 tons) that it was ridiculous to even consider it.
 

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2009, 03:12:51 PM »
Yes, but consider that such an eventuality is not really about gravity wheels at all....

But instead, certain tangential possibilities.

From there, a single great leap is possible.


TS

brian334

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2009, 01:21:36 AM »
Mr. Rat,
A single ton of this heavy stuff would require 53 cubic meters of volume.

2tiger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2009, 04:15:56 PM »
Hi all
Why not use water.
1 liter water = 1kg
1000 liter = 1000kg = 1t

to Spoondini:
Is that the idea you red somewhere?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3422.0

Bye

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2009, 04:36:48 PM »
Gravity is weak compared to electro-magnetism anyone who knows something about nature knows that. Even Besslers big wheels were maybe 100-300 Watt strong. Back then that was a lot of muscle power. Now it would be sufficient for a few light bulbs. The cost will in no way justify the energy production. Wheels must become ferris size to output usable energy. Weights have to be made from plutonium to keep the size down. There has to be a whole team of technicians around the clock maintaining such a dynamic mechanical behemoth.

Only a deluded person would not accept these facts. Gravity wheels are toys that will end up in museums, they won't change our energy hungry societies.

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2009, 07:39:57 PM »
Gravity wheels do not function.  ;)

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2009, 08:01:22 PM »
...

Wet sand weighs approximately 2.3g/cm3 or 19.19 lbs/ gal

A single ton of this heavy stuff would require 53 cubic meters of volume.
...

I’m not familiar with US system. In kgms, 1ton = 1000kg, math is easier.
In the above quote there is a math error. 2.3g/cm3 would be 2.3 tons/m3. 1 such ton would require only 0.43m3.

Instead of wet sand, one may better use lead. Or even steal. Gravitational batteries are still used today although not widely; check large bridges i.e. the famous London Bridge (before its refurbishment).

Gravity is indeed weak, still hydros provide the cheapest, cleanest and one of the most reliable energy source we have. But also your knees are right…  ;)
Try multiplying mass by several hundreds km to see its real power.
Alternatively, check the size of fuel rocket tanks in comparison to the size of payload itself.

Best regards,
Tinu

ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2009, 11:35:39 PM »
I’m not familiar with US system. In kgms, 1ton = 1000kg, math is easier.
In the above quote there is a math error. 2.3g/cm3 would be 2.3 tons/m3. 1 such ton would require only 0.43m3.

Instead of wet sand, one may better use lead. Or even steal. Gravitational batteries are still used today although not widely; check large bridges i.e. the famous London Bridge (before its refurbishment).


What?

Let's see, wet sand weighs about 19.19#/gal so a ton is:

2000#/(19.19#/gal) = about 104.2 gallons

A gallon is 3785 ml or 0.003785 m3

so (104.2 gal ) (0.003785 m3/gal) = 0.3944 m3 ... DOH!!

Leave it to a Chemist to screw that calculation up.

so 134 tons would be (134 tons)(0.3944 m3/Ton) = 53 m3.

OK so now is this right? I probably screwed it up again, but it looks OK to me now.

I also thought about lead or steel first, but I wanted to get as close to the same densities and be very, very cheap. You can't beat sand for cheap except with water, but the wet sand density is over twice the density of water, so I figured it was the best to use to get the most weight in the smallest volume at the cheapest cost.

Still, it is very disappointing for size vs. power storage.

Thanks for finding my error.

ResinRat2

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1242
    • Hydrogen Reactor Vids
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2009, 11:46:11 PM »
So you can see this idea is very, very simple. I know there is nothing new here.Store excess energy from solar/wind into a mechanical battery composed of a shaft downward and a very heavy weight held by a cable. Simply raise the weight with excess power during the day, and reclaim it once the solar/wind activity ceases for the day by allowing the weight to again go downward into the shaft and turn a generator (maxing out the gear ratio to get the most energy possible from gravity's pull). No chemicals, no battery memory effect, no toxic lithium to dispose of, and no need to tie into the Electric Power Grid.

As simple a mechanical battery as a simple mind could conceive. I don't think you could get a patent on this one however, and digging the shaft wouldn't be too cheap; nor would the mechanical equipment needed to raise the weight. Can it be commercialized into something practical? Especially in our "green" era?

That was the whole idea behind it though.

Thanks for everyone's input and interest.

RR2
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 01:59:24 AM by ResinRat2 »

brian334

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2009, 01:15:11 PM »
Mr. Rat,
I like your idea.
Sort of like a grandfather clock, only a lot bigger.


brian334

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2009, 06:21:52 PM »
Mr. Rat,
Think flywheels for energy storage.

fletcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Re: The Power of Gravity - You might find this interesting.
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2009, 07:21:07 PM »
Taking the same idea & tweaking it - have a barge in a tidal area - have the barge act like a pontoon i.e. four poles in the sea floor & guides mounted on the barge so that it rises & falls with the tides but doesn't move laterally - either run a cable thru a sea floor mounted pulley to land &/or a cable to a pulley above the barge then to land - have both for max work capacity - the land based cables lift a weight via a pulley on top of a tower etc to raise the masses gravitational Pe [to do work when released, say driving a generator] - the buoyancy of the barge lifts the land based mass up the tower as the tide comes in - having a dual system allows another mass to be lifted into position when the tide goes out & the barge falls, lifting the mass - free energy 4 times a day limited only by the scale.