Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 488469
  • *Total Topics: 14373
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 219
  • *Total: 221

Facebook

Author Topic: Earth Electrical Energy Datalogging Experiments  (Read 177890 times)

Offline dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Earth Electrical Energy Datalogging Experiments
« Reply #960 on: September 23, 2010, 09:23:36 PM »


OK ALL,
Yesterday I posted I would do a experiment, the idea is to show which electrodes interact the best picking up earth currents, and the results are surprising.
I used a COPPER as the North and positave electrode.
Aluminium, Copper, Steel and Magnesium coated rod.

Copper Positave and Aluminium produced the best results
                                        AT REST   MOVEMENT   ANALOG
POSITIVE        TEST METAL   V DMM     V DMM         OBSERVATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPPER           MAGNESIUM = 36.0mv     71.0mv        needle slight movement
 
COPPER           STEEL         = -2.9mv     40.0mv        needle not moveing

COPPER           COPPER       = -20mv      -10mv          needle not moveing

COPPER           ALUMININUM = 80mv       198mv          needle swinging wildly back and forth
                                                                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results =
1st Copper as Positave, Alumininun as Negative  produces best results
2nd Copper as Positave, Mag as negative
coper and coper, copper and steel  = zilch
My test photo below showing the setup

Tiny Videos following below this post
jim
 

You will all have to step into the "way back" machine to remember this post from last November.

Question:
Were all the pieces of metal used in this experiment the same size?
I'm referring to surface area and not just length.

I've never seen where copper and aluminum produced the best effect.
So if one of the pieces of metal was larger (more surface area) than the other, then that might be an important fact that we could try to exploit.

DonL

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Earth Electrical Energy Datalogging Experiments
« Reply #960 on: September 23, 2010, 09:23:36 PM »

Offline PhiChaser

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
Re: Earth Electrical Energy Datalogging Experiments
« Reply #961 on: February 12, 2012, 03:15:00 AM »
Hey fellow experimenters!
I have been doing some work with aluminum and pultruded carbon rods, which seem to work just fine for electrical conduction for my battery 'projects'. Cool thing is they don't corrode. At least I'm pretty sure they don't, I'm still waiting for 'long term' results... ;)
I'm not sure if they conduct exactly as well as copper but I can't tell the difference with my cheap digital VOM set on the milivolt setting...
Play safe!
PC


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: