Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81958
  • *Latest: otrok

  • *Total Posts: 491701
  • *Total Topics: 14471
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 80
  • *Total: 84

Facebook

Author Topic: A simplified MT 13 ...  (Read 7261 times)

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
A simplified MT 13 ...
« on: July 14, 2009, 08:13:43 PM »

   ...is a possibility to shorten,reduce,simplify the design of MT 13 from ;   www.orffyre.com/mt1-20.html   into   www.geocities.com/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text009.jpg 

     A wheel with 12 spokes,becomes a wheel with 2 spokes,only (one constant,one variable).

       All the Best! / Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

A simplified MT 13 ...
« on: July 14, 2009, 08:13:43 PM »

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2009, 10:55:15 PM »
   
   Hi Jim !

 There are three great differences between MT13 and the proposed "Flip-flop wheel 01":

  - 12 vs. 2 spokes

  -as a helpful effect,an "amazing" much longer gravity fall (30* vs. ~350-355*)...just try to put in motion this design,beginning with  pos. nr.3 (variable  arm, as a long arm, in the up position ).

  -bump effect to switch small arm into long arm

  This is why I suggested a simplification,digest of  MT13...and to use a part of this,only.
 
 I believe that a test is more efficacious than a lot of words...sorry,that for the moment I am out of possibility to make experiments.

      All the Best! / Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2009, 01:43:11 AM »

        Hi Jim!
  I agree, about your mass difference argument...

  Now,please take into consideration for your math:

    -friction :6 times smaller

    -fall time:11-12 time greater (v=g*t , Ek=1/2m*v*v )

  By the way,the non-simplified mathematics of pendulum is a matter of study ,so far...we can't use it for the moment.

  As I said,a simple test of this elementary design ,can be more conclusive than a lot of words or  ...of mathematics .

             All the Best! / Alex

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2009, 02:57:01 AM »

    Hi Jim !

  If you take a look in the history of PM,you can learn a lot of things...sometimes,that "Nothing is new under the Sun",a lesson to respect our ancestors.

  Long time ago,without the help of "modern tools" (mathematics,computer simulations...) they used their minds and hands to solve the basic problems of life.

  For instance,a MT 13 simplification,is a step only,in a long -lasting evolution of the same vision/idea of a possible PM :the long arm on the same side of the fulcrum.

  Let's take a short look on net,for the history of the same "illusory" design;

   -Taccola (1382-1458)
   -Leonardo da Vinci(1452-1519)
   -Bessler ~1712
   -others...

  On paper,this concept,has two critical points :0*(360*) /top position and 180*/down position,where we need a self-commuting process (short arm must move into a long arm,on the same side of the fulcrum).

  In reality,this concept "hangs in the middle" :
   -the critical down point(180*) works so easy (is self).
   -the critical top point (0*/360*) has a lot of "problems" :needs a long period of time and space..but the most important fact...it's not self.

  As a whole,the concept in reality ,it's not self.

  Bessler made a step forward :he imagined to reduce the top commuting space from 180*(270*to 90*),to 30*(330* to 360*).

  How can work his scheme,of an older concept...is the reason of this topic: "A simplified MT 13"...

       All the Best! / Alex


Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2009, 11:47:38 PM »

    ...can be tested in a simple manner.

  All that you need ;

   -a rotary frame(bar or your bike wheel)

   -two equal masses

  A mass plays medium arm/handle,lever on a fixed position.

  The second mass,on the same diameter,plays changing back and forth,face to medium arm.

   How moves the second mass is your...lottery ticket.

              All the Best! / Alex     

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2009, 11:47:38 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2009, 05:55:48 AM »

  ....face to the original MT 13 (   www.orffyre.com/mt1-20.html  ) shows as the most important distinctive feature,the possibility to collect more power,because only gravity does the work.

      The power drawn from gravty acts on the falling mass,relating to the time and space  factors.

      With the original MT 13,we have a fall,no more than 30* (between two successive spokes).

      With the "simplified" MT 13 ,we have a...surprising continuous 12 times greater fall (the design,pos.3,beginning with the "blue" mass in the top side,as a long arm).

    All the Best! / Alex

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2009, 06:20:42 AM »
The earth does have its own radio rf broadcast so to speak and we know rf from man made can be converter into power since rf it self is powered by electric.

Does it mean that the earths own rf broadcast cannot be converted into electric?

No.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2009, 06:20:42 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2009, 07:13:45 AM »
 
    Hi !
  A simplified radio receiver is crystal radio (   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio ).

  This is in the same line as a simplified MT 13.

  Sometimes,less is more,because we discover a starting point for complexity.

        All the Best! / Alex

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2009, 07:16:39 AM »
 
    Hi !
  A simplified radio receiver is crystal radio (   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio ).

  This is in the same line as a simplified MT 13.

  Sometimes,less is more,because we discover a starting point for complexity.

        All the Best! / Alex

I see it as simplicity.

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2009, 11:09:48 PM »

      Hi P-Motion!

 If the gravity is the only source of power (does the work...),due to a falling mass,then:

   -MT 25 falls no more than 45*,at every step

   -MT 13 (12 variable spokes),falls no more than 30*,at every step

   -MT 13 simplified (2 variable spokes),falls no more than 180*,at every step

   -MT !3 simplified  (2 spokes,one fixed,one variable ),falls no more than 360*,at every step

  It's a real fact,that a longer fall is related to an EVER ACCELERATED VELOCITY (m*v or 1/2 m*v*v...as you like).

  To maintain a continuous motion of the up here sketches,we need,at every step to remake the short arm,into the long arm on the same side of the fulcrum...nothing more.

  As you can see, with a simplified design,we can get a much greater power ,for the same "remake" consumption,use.

  If you don't like the "avalanche" aspect of gravity fall ,then you can play with persistance,as all the people the "arabesque" decoration wheels...

      All the Best! / Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2009, 11:09:48 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2009, 01:24:24 AM »

         Hi Jim !

   You need no math or a plenty stack of words...

   Imagine that you are living in the Middle Age...

   Imagine that you have a simple stick,bar with a hinged end.

   Imagine that you really have the free will to make it work...

   Imagination is more important than knowledge,because doubt grows with erudition.

   Sure,is more convenient to say "no",than to  move over the things...

                 All the Best! / Alex     

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2009, 11:38:42 PM »

        Hi JIm !

    ...can be tested in the most simple manner.

       All that you need is a bar:a long narrow piece of solid material.

       Imagine this bar,to play as a first degree lever ,with two unequal arm.

       The small arm will play the median arm.

       The great arm must have a small hinged part,so to can play greater or smaller than the median arm,due to the hinged part.

       This changing end of a linear bar ,is the "key" of the PM motion problem.

             All the Best! / Alex         


Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2009, 04:10:16 AM »

     Hi  Jim!

  I agree with you that ..."there are different ways..." to maintain the CoG on the same side   of  the fulcrum/pivot , as a main condition for a running PM.

  Sometimes,you can perform directly upon CoG as  a "free gravity rolling ",if you look at  :
  www.geocities.com/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text018.jpg

          All the Best! / Alex

Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2009, 02:47:48 AM »

        Hi !

  I made a simplification of MT13,you can see it in a simple preliminary drawing.

  You say that..."there is a way your idea can be modified" and..."a weighted lever swing   down and lift one or both weights".

  I agree...so we have:

   -the original :Bessler's MT13

   -the simplified conversion of MT13

   The next step(change) is yours...

  I wish you success!
                                         All the Best! / Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline iacob alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1061
    • Stellarotor
Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2009, 10:25:24 PM »

      Hi  Jim !

 We play the same game,but in two different manners:
   -to simplify is one...
   -to complicate,intricate is the other...

 But you see,sometimes the less is more.

      All the best! / Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: A simplified MT 13 ...
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2009, 10:25:24 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: