Resonance make on Tesla coil is wery smple, then you find resonance, the voltage on secondary coil rise wery much. You can hold neon lamp near secondary coil  and then you gett resonance, then it lights. But I try many times get energy from secondary, but I only get about 70-90 precents efficienty. So resonance not giving energy.

hi MenoFather and everyone,

I would have to agree with you-MenoFather getting just "one" receiver coil in resonance with transmitter coil will not yield over-unity best would be around 90% efficient.

But what if there is 2 or better still there is 3 receiver coil in resonance and in close proximity with transmitter coil.Question to you would there be overunity in this configuration ?

Just like one radio transmitter is able to broadcast to many radios even crystal radios without effecting another crystal radio somewhere nearby.


I have attached a working Tesla transmitter and receiver lighting a mains bulb about 1.5 meter away.
  Без проводка
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFMwg52dbmU

Schematic of Tesla transmitter base on above video.
Схема ГТБМ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pra2gMwjVX0

The receiver Tesla coil is just mains bulb and aluminum plate(Bottom of similar telsa coil and plate is connected to mains bulb.Take note the aluminum plate spacing to telsa coil is similar to a "tuning air cap" to get maximum resonance and output).
I did not save the link where the above youtube user demonstrate this similar device in an exhibition.But there was 2 earth ground used for transmitter and receiver(alu plate to earth).

Do you think if there is 3 receiver tesla coil as shown in video each located around 1.5m from the transmitter.Would there be ou if all these are linked to form a output.This output power from 3 receiver would be higher than the transmitter."Just imagine that"."Take note receiver coil located 1.5m away will not effect oscillation of transmitter coil"

Hi Zeitmaschine,

where does the cable 4 go and where does the cable 3 come from?
can you explain the connections in simple steps?

Regards

And the other building blocks are chokes and transformers.

All right. There remains one simple question to be asked: Why is it that a carpenter (Stepanov) and also others (like Kapanadze and Barbosa) could stumble over a Free Energy transformer configuration by chance, but people doing experiments since years on their workbenches do not? Is it because they are all working with three-phase transformers? Actually YES and NO. It is NOT because of the three-phase feature. It is because of the STEP-UP feature of those transformers. Normally you won't get a 220V/50Hz step-up transformer with a number of KV output at the next radio shop. But you will get a 380V step-up transformer in professional three-phase design.

Meaning? Don't experiment with flybacks. Neither high frequency nor DC nor pulsed high voltage (with or without a spark gap) will do it. Use 50Hz sine wave high voltage (e.g. from a microwave oven transformer) instead. The high(er) voltage has to be in resonance with a LC circuit.

So as it appears, we are now down to three single building blocks: Two transformers (one step-up, one as choke) and one capacitor. Happy connecting!!

Also quite interesting how quickly this posting of mine got buried without any real reply.

Regards

Ok way off subject here but lets get a few things straight.


 Tesla's wireless system did not use Hertzian waves, Period.


 Yes the system was never meant to be 100% broadcastable. He stated that at Colorado he could only attain 98% efficiency at the "Antenna". The efficiency was only an indicator of breakdown at the antenna which resulted in loss as Tesla put it. At the NY site he was addressing the issue with a new type of vacuum single terminal tube. This tube allowed the longitudinal streams to lower in intensity enough to spread out and not cause the air to break down at the surface of the tubes. The tubes were shaped like bulbs.


 If the system Tesla was working on only affected one receiver then how in blazes was he gonna give the whole world power from one station? Think people..... The greatest thing about his longitudinal waves were that they were one way. They did not oscillate back to the source. If they did it would have ruined the source and degraded the source power. Tesla's ideas about using this for a signalling system were not yet implemented yet. Meaning that you had to have another unit slightly off tune at another resonant frequency to communicate to another receiver. Then you could transmit two way communications. His original ideas were sort of a teletype system at first then a second channel would be added for two way communications.


 When Hertzian waves are employed you get a feedback to the source. Case in point: any exciter setup we see today. This is a field of back and forth waves. when you put a load in the field it affects the source and further loads in the field will draw a portion of the total field down. This is very evident in all experiments with these types of fields that we see today simply because the field is oscillating back and forth in respect to the source of the field. This is RF and not Pure longitudinal fields. A longitudinal field would flow much like a stream of water. Any disturbance of the stream down stream does not affect the source in any way. Only local effects can be seen where the disturbance is in that stream.


 Most people see the Tesla wireless system as being a transmission from the antenna but it is not so. The broadcast source is the planet itself and radiates outwards from the earth. This negates local disturbances totally. The topload or capacitance was only used as a Virtual ground to pump the Earth. You could think of this like this. The capacitance is to be pushed against forcing the earth to be energized and radiate outwards. Lets try a little experiment here. Try to push a car by yourself. Hmm very hard right? Now put a wall behind yourself and use it to push against. Not so hard now right? Same concept.


 To sum up Longitudinal waves are stream like. They move like this (Source)--->----->------>   The intensity is what changes not the direction of travel. Each successive wave overlaps the other and this is where the standing waves form. Each stream has a value. When one value is compared to the next you have a difference. This difference is the one stream when compared to the previous stream in Time.


 Hope this helps.
 jbignes5

Everything you cited is correct and I understand perfectly that Tesla Transceiver are not the same with Hertzian waves, the energy travels/propagate within the Ground/Earth.

Thanks for your great info and detailed, happy to have some people that really understand how a Tesla Transceiver works.

On my post above, once you disconnect one of the GROUND/EARTH terminal the load= bulb wont light even a little, if everything meets the novel design of the great Nikola Tesla, any load, any secondary coils as much as u like will only boost the performance of such device. That transformer above wanted a overloaded scenario, it really wants to have a SHORTED circuit=close loop coil on the secondary to x2 its power output on the Load. The Tesla 1 wire transmission is the prototype to the Tesla Rarefied Gas Transmission then to the Wireless Transmission of Energy it is just improvements of simple device which works solely on energy propagation on the Ground.

Meow..