Ok,  Lets start with Faraday Efficiency (from my understanding), and I'll get into the problems w/ measuring "Faraday" in series cells later....



Faraday electrolysis efficiency uses quantities of electrons (coulombs) and gas volume to determine the efficiency of an electrolytic cell.

According to Faraday law, 4 moles of electrons moving through a cell will create 2 moles of H2 gas, and 1 mole of O2 gas, at 100 percent Faraday Efficiency.

How to calculate 100 percent Faraday Efficiency:

First convert 4 moles of electrons into amps. (4 moles) * (avagadro's number) =
4 * 6.0221417e23 = 2.408856716e24 (electrons)

Then divide the total electrons by 1 Coulomb (quantity of electrons)

2.4088567e24 (electrons) / 6.24150947e18 (1 Coulomb) = 385941 Coulombs

Now calculate the Amp Hours:

Since (1 Amp) = (1 Coulomb * 1 Second)

(385941 C) / (3600 Seconds) = 107.205 Amp Hours (Ah)

Now figure out how much gas is in 2 moles of H2, and 1 mole of O2.
According to the ideal gas law, one mole of gas has a volume of 24.446 Liters at 25 C, 1 Atm. So:

(3 moles) * 24.446 L/mol = 73.338 Liters of HHO gas

So this is as exciting as Faraday Efficiency gets, it deals with Amps and Moles (quantities of electrons) only (not energy or voltage)....

So 107.205 Amps over one hour will generate 73.338 Liters of H2 O2 gas at 100 percent Faraday efficiency. That's it, 100 percent Faraday Efficiency.



Any problems with this, Wilby?

no problems, post whatever you want. i'll catch up when you start posting your measurements, those are what i am really interested in...

    Uh, well the above will be pretty important to understand ... And, I might have made a mistake..   I'll continue in a little bit.

Newbie didnt even build the frikkin 101 cell .

Newbie123 why dont you stfu .When you actually build an 101 cell THEN you can come back and say how efficient it was AND COMPLAIN ABOUT IT .

I do actually.... Toroid as well.    Lol.    But what is with your  attitudes, why do you guys need to be so rude (and act like little 12 year olds) ?  Are the facts that painful for you guys to hear?    I'm starting to feel like I'm debunking your religion...   And if thats the case I'll just stop now..

 

Hey! I know that guy in that video! cool! I wondered where he went! Glad to see he is still experimenting. I wouldn't call it no amperage exactly though.

How do you hijack a thread by willbe?

Bob Boyce is full of shit. His story is crap and all the designs come from others. That three frequency torroid is complete bullshit too. I dont care what you say, a series cell is shit. I have built many and they all did the same fuckin thing. each plate adds resistance resulting in each plate producing less on one side of the cell. Even if it did work, it's too fuckin expensive to be economical to the average person. Read all you want, believe what you want, It doesn't change the fact that I did the experiments and they are bogus by a HUGE margin. Stan Meyers setup is none the cheaper but it at least makes much more sense than Big Bob's bullshit.

Just curious.    Did  the cells leak?   If each individual cell isn't totally 100 percent water tight (ie, electrolyte leaking between cells) ... You'll get current/ion leakage when you fire it up .. and  It won't work for squat.