Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Sonic Resonator Results and Findings, As Well As LTspice Models To Download  (Read 26447 times)

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
In the end .....

I have worked with spice since the early fortran based versions missing a graphical frontend....
Spice is just a tool to simulate traditional, nonrelativistic EE on numerical basis. This means that only a tiny fraction of traditional EE is handled by it. By selecting - or "autoselecting" not useful boundary and iteration conditions - complete nonsense may happen.
If there would be OU in spice circuits - the programmers  would have had to implement that.
This is the reason why its absolute nonsense to use it without understanding what you do - even more if you have no approach to basic concepts of electricity.
So are you interested into research - or are you interested in software testing - without knowing details of the application.

Hunting for OU in spice is like searching for a virgin which gave birth to 10 kids.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
I have a system right here, a real one, not a simulation, that runs on 120 volts AC, draws about 10 amps, has a 20 amp fastblow fuse on the line input. It produces an output that is adjustable, between 15 and 25 KILOVOLTS at currents of as much as 1.5 KILOAMPS. This power is sufficient to shatter almost any container, to literally vaporize wiring, to puncture holes in 1/4 inch thick sheet metal. The current is so strong that it will turn a 19" equipment rack into a giant one-turn transformer and literally weld itself together at the seams. By the logic expressed in this thread, this device is WAY overunity. Waaaaaayyyyyy OU.




Thank goodness its duty cycle is short. It can only produce about 10 pulses like that per second, and each pulse is only microseconds long, representing the ringdown of a 3 uF 30 kV capacitor bank. But if I approximated that ringdown waveform with a square wave, according to my own private model...and then computed the RMS power, whatever that is, and equated that with energy, then I too could claim waaaaayyy overunity, and with a real device, too, not just a simulation.


(This is called a reductio ad absurdum.)

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
This is a perfect example of why I don't trust measurements.
I don't care what the measurements say about a device.
I won't believe a device is truly OU until it can run itself,
and have power left to run something else.
All measuring devices are calibrated to the presently known
model of the universe, and that model is probably full of error.
So the measuring devices are also unreliable.
If you get something to run itself with power to spare, then there
can be no question that it is collecting energy from somewhere.


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
I actually agree with you.

 ???



poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Truly amazing how a little knowledge can lead folks so astray.

I actually thought taking the bait on this one might do some good...evidently not.

.99

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
The output of the simulation was made up of pulses.
When pulses are involved then you are trading time for power.
Charge a cap over time and then release that power as a pulse.
This tends to mess up measuring devices too.



poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
The output of the simulation was made up of pulses.
When pulses are involved then you are trading time for power.
Charge a cap over time and then release that power as a pulse.
This tends to mess up measuring devices too.

YES ;)

It would seem Mr. Jackson either does not agree with or does not understand this. A square wave is 50% duty cycle. Anything else and the duty cycle must be used to calculate the RMS value.

Also, the DC offset has to be considered as well. For example a square wave (or more correctly a pulse train with 50% ton and toff) that extends only from 0V to +10V has a RMS voltage of 7.07V, not 10V (and not 5V).

.99

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
In all fairness, I think he's attempted to account for duty cycle--at least his concept of it. In fact his claim of OU depends rather sensitively on "duty cycle", and in my mind a big problem, as I have tried to show, is that his output isn't square enough to justify his assumptions. Particularly the duty cycle calculation. Hence, even on the face of it, using his own data, the claim of OU fails.

All this, of course, ignores the issue that he can simply have LTSpice integrate the instantaneous power waveforms over a given amount of time to give the actual input and output ENERGY--as was done in the original posting of the info in this thread--by, was it .99 ? I forget, and since the original thread has vanished down the memory hole, I can't check and see.

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
AGAIN ....

How should a numerical machine based on traditional EE proof OU ?
Thats a quite fundamental question.
The explanations so far are that OU exists because of incomplete models, special material effects, cold fusion, quantum effects, not yet discovered magnetic effects, anomalies (....)

_ALL THIS STUFF IS ____NOT____ EMULATED BY SPICE_   

(how can you implement things you dont know?)

How should a programmed numerical non OU machine exceed COP 1 if ?

The only answers are rounding and iteration artefacts.

A cow is not a dog.

This is quite fundamental issue.
What do you think ?

Can I pull myself out of the lake on my own hair ?

===== THE INTERESTING THINGS ARE WHEN SPICE PREDICTS SOMETHING COMPLETLY DIFFERENT - AS HAPPENS IN AN EXPERIMENT (taken all the usual suspects aside) =======

So using Spice to discover OU is a "Schildbürgerstreich".

For the non-germans: The "Schildbürger" (kid book) are quite famous for their creativity.
They build a town hall and forget about the windows. They try to get light in by catching the light with bags and mouse-traps - and carry them into the building (....)

Ghazanfar_Ali

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Dear Friend. Here is another LTSpice circuit by some friend I have forgotten his name. I implemented it in  LTspice, optimized it by slightly modifying and changing values of the components. I am attaching it here for study and analysis. I will appreciate comments by all on it. Thanks in advance. I am also attaching the actual cct by that unknown friend here, which I optimized to get more power output. You can drive the same with a 5V DC also. It was basically enlisted in Joule Thief category.

dimbulb

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Most space time energy devices are made of conventional electronic parts each having a module.
Since custom modules can be made and used in simulation it is feasible that if you know where
the conversion is taking place you should be able to modify that module to emulate this process.

For example you believe the transformation of a wave happens in the center of an inductor then
add a sub-circuit to that inductor. If the simulator and the space time energy device both agree
then you have something useful.