Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION (Read 3545114 times)

Magluvin · « **Reply #7695 on:** January 22, 2017, 05:04:29 PM »

Emm, maybe its just an inductor. The rectangular conductor is neato.

The smd transistors these days are so low in on resistance, very high currents and no heatsink. Im working with some IRLB3034 mosfets. 1.4mohm on resistance.

Mags

Dave45 · « **Reply #7696 on:** January 22, 2017, 07:22:11 PM »

Been thinking about the Don Smith device.where the primary is inserted inside the two secondarys, the premise of this device is to catch the electric field of the primary.
For one thing the secondarys could be gold plated using electrolysis and also i wonder if the primary was encased in glass would there be any bemf absorbed by the primary.
Im not sure the system should be such high voltage, i played with it a bit back in the day and it was very unstable. One thing i did was covered the primary in screen wire and got some crackling noises but like i said the extreme high voltage makes the system unstable.

Magluvin · « **Reply #7697 on:** January 22, 2017, 08:27:01 PM »

Quote from: Dave45 on January 22, 2017, 07:22:11 PM

Been thinking about the Don Smith device.where the primary is inserted inside the two secondarys, the premise of this device is to catch the electric field of the primary.
For one thing the secondarys could be gold plated using electrolysis and also i wonder if the primary was encased in glass would there be any bemf absorbed by the primary.
Im not sure the system should be such high voltage, i played with it a bit back in the day and it was very unstable. One thing i did was covered the primary in screen wire and got some crackling noises but like i said the extreme high voltage makes the system unstable.

Ya know, I played with the primary circuit on Circuit sim as it has an adjustable spark gap component in the list. I set it for 1kv and adjusted an input to a transformer to sim the nst. I was surprised that the circuit can get the LC of the primary going. The nst is setup with the center tap screw and the outputs send charge to the cap full wave rectified. The freq of the input and the cap n primary coil need to be adjusted to get the lc going well.

But now I see that the primary circuit does work as shown.

Then the big sec coils with cap on one would probably need to be designed to operate at the same freq as the pri LC. Been looking at this on and off. There may be something to it.

Mags

luc2010 · « **Reply #7698 on:** January 23, 2017, 05:28:37 AM »

Quote from: ]
Whats going on in this fig?

[/quote

Hello,

a tesla coil? plus ''strange'' capacitor that separate the air?...
All i can see!! Sorry

best regards
luc2010

sm0ky2 · « **Reply #7699 on:** January 23, 2017, 09:49:51 AM »

There lies a difference between old world sketches
and modern day schematics

The following is my attempt to translate this drawing
Into something you understaH(nd

Point (A) is the vitreous charge and point (B) is the resinous

The difference in potential creates a current between points
(K) and (G) through motor(H).

This creates a difference in potential through wire (C)
Between capacitors (D) &(F) with respect to cathod E
of the vacuum tube. Which creates an ionic wind in direction
of the fan on motor (H).
The current through motor (H) induces a current
through primary (M)
Which manifests itself as a potential (P) through coil (N)

The ionic wind then creates a potential between points (K)
And (M) through capacitor (L) which can be viewed as a
Double-plate capacitor with higher capacitance than the rest
Of the circuit.

Dave45 · « **Reply #7700 on:** January 23, 2017, 12:36:39 PM »

Quote

Please dont take offense to this, you just made me ruin my monitor and keyboard, reading your post, the shock of it caused me to choke on my coffee and in desperation for air, coffee was spewed projectile fashion in the direction of 2 year old monitor and keyboard..... The keyboard is fucked....I think the mouse is too.... I typed this on a throwback....

Lmao

I studied the setup didnt get much out of it, but have to admit i didnt read the patent.
I'll read the patent and get back.

Dave45 · « **Reply #7701 on:** January 23, 2017, 01:02:06 PM »

Quote

There lies a difference between old world sketches [/size]and modern day schematics

I studied old world sketches for a long time, that stuff should be left alone it will not lead to free energy.
May open doors that shouldn't be opened.

ALVARO_CS · « **Reply #7702 on:** January 23, 2017, 02:08:35 PM »

About the ozone pat.

What I see in the drawing is a DC motor with two commutators, therefore pulsing its motor coils (electromagnets) at the input comm, and (simultaneusly) pulsing the primary of a transformer with the CEMF at the output comm. Including the LC tank primary-capacitor.

I am not a professional

cheers

Dave45 · « **Reply #7703 on:** January 23, 2017, 07:20:22 PM »

Yea i remember that was an accident, didnt realize it till after.
When i say old world i meant before electricity was ever realized.

endlessoceans · « **Reply #7704 on:** January 24, 2017, 12:18:34 AM »

Quote from: Dave45 on January 23, 2017, 07:20:22 PM

Yea i remember that was an accident, didnt realize it till after.
When i say old world i meant before electricity was ever realized.

Honestly Dave do you ever stop to take a breath or think before just opening your mouth?

This thread is fast approaching 8000 posts and it is actually further away from the truth than it ever was. ERFinder is actually 100% on point and yet none of you are listening. LISTENING!!!!

STOP....quiet the mind and actually LISTEN.

Dave you have freely admitted that you have tested NONE of the hundreds of schematics you post. This is sheer stupidity and pointless toilet action. PLEASE go to the bench and construct some simple circuits. LEARN for a FACT how low voltage/high amperage behaves. Observe with clarity how HIGH Voltage low amperage inductors behave. Once you see the TWO sides of electricity and their opposing behaviour, you will understand how to tap a circuit and practically eliminate HEAT and Lenz.

Sadly this forum many of even the genuine experimenters DO NOT follow SCIENTIFIC PROCESS. Scientific process NEVER marries itself to an idea before establishing FACTS. Understand? This VERY Forum actually violates that principle by its title. OVERUNITY DOES NOT EXIST AND NEVER WILL. You people think Telsa had OVERUNITY....he did NOT. Nowhere in his writings and schematics is there even a hint of this.

What Tesla had achieved was the closest thing to 100% efficiency and something very few of you are even close to.......A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF ELECTRICITY AND HOW TO HARNESS IT NATURALLY.

ERFinder has asked some VERY simple basic questions and none of you have even come close to answering it or showing discernment. Even a two year old by INSTINCT uses scientific methodology in discerning fact. They will see something with the eyes....desire it....scoop it up and place it in the mouth....if its food and a pleasant in taste they will have learned a vital FACT and repeat the process. IF its a lump of dog poo they will also learn and NOT repeat the behaviour!!

Dave you have been talking nonsense for years now about how good the idea of eating dog poo is and yet you have never leaned over to test and see that it isn't actually chocolate but dog poo. Go to the bench....taste the dog poo you crave and then maybe you will realise you should stop desiring something that isn't meant as mental food.

scientific method
noun

A method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

Dave45 · « **Reply #7705 on:** January 24, 2017, 01:18:23 AM »

Lol ok
You dont know me or what iv tested
Yes i have posted some i didnt test it was a.learning process for me.
Im self taught and have found things you will never know.
But i wish you all the best, you keep looking.

web000x · « **Reply #7706 on:** January 24, 2017, 03:20:17 AM »

Quote from: endlessoceans on January 24, 2017, 12:18:34 AM

This thread is fast approaching 8000 posts and it is actually further away from the truth than it ever was. ERFinder is actually 100% on point and yet none of you are listening. LISTENING!!!!

So much yes. Only a fool would not pay this man's work some attention.

Tito L. Oracion · « **Reply #7707 on:** January 24, 2017, 08:15:40 AM »

Quote from: Erfinder on January 23, 2017, 10:31:06 AM

For fuck sake.....

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US568177.pdf

This is a link to the ENTIRE patent! I am not asking you to explain anything to me! I know what's in the patent, I know exactly what it is that I want you to see in the figure. I don't care about making comparisons between what we do today and what was done in the past. I assumed I was speaking with self respecting professionals, I fucked up! It's clear now that I must spell everything out, total bullshit if you ask me. It was implied that you must read the damn patent to get the necessary info you needed for a proper interpretation. I feel as stupid as your interpretation reads, after reading the patent and discovering what those letters really mean.

Please dont take offense to this, you just made me ruin my monitor and keyboard, reading your post, the shock of it caused me to choke on my coffee and in desperation for air, coffee was spewed projectile fashion in the direction of 2 year old monitor and keyboard..... The keyboard is fucked....I think the mouse is too.... I typed this on a throwback....

Regards

Sir please, now i am curious, what other things you see here that we don't see?,

Honestly, What i see here is that tesla does a lot of activity in just a short while.

Tito L. Oracion · « **Reply #7708 on:** January 24, 2017, 09:34:44 AM »

Quote from: Erfinder on January 24, 2017, 08:48:28 AM

None of you have demonstrated that you understand what's taking place in this document. Specifically you. You started this thread, the title is excellent, but the content of the thread is a wet shit sandwich, I am here to help fix that.

Tesla reveals a method for amplification of energy. Stupidity has the majority equating energy with power, when that happens, out come the measurement equipment. A 30 minute video is then made. The first 28 minutes consist of an explanation of how the measurement devices are connected, calibrated, blah blah blah... During the last 2 minutes you realize you aren't going to get the 30 minutes you put into this back....you realize that you just got a lesson in proper measurement practices from a fucking measurement novice....

My purpose for the moment is not to tell you what I see, don't you get it? That's part of the problem. Everyone tells you what to see, then that's all you see, then it's off to the races, or the bench, where a half assed replication takes place, half assed because you went into your replication blind, your replication is based on the opinions of many who wouldn't know an ass from an elbow if they weren't given a fucking picture of each and a 38 hour seminar in the form of a debate between an expert on asses, and an expert on elbows! Most are too proud or two chicken shit to admit they have no fucking clue.

Now.....imagine I have studied the patent....imagine I have put thousands of hours into reviewing every aspect, contemplating tirelessly the possibilities, cross referencing.....and this 16 hours a day for almost a decade.....(I have no problem with you calling me stupid for investing that kind of time.... thing is.....all that time gives me something you dont have.....my perspective) How in the fuck do you expect me to respond to your statement? I am looking for your perspective. Read your post.....you didn't offer me any perspective.....you just scratched your butt and smelled your fingers.....

The point....I am serious about this, probably one of the most serious people here, about this subject. Take it serious, the subject....not me.... and I will take you serious.

Regards

First, you just made us to respond to something that you are the only one seeing it. and that's good, cause you made everyone to think.

Well, There are different doors and ways where learning comes and we have all our different perspective about that. too much serious sometimes others get bored and that is maybe the reason why this thread is still existing.

in some tesla's words, sometimes he is using words not exactly what the word means. cause many of his works don't talk into one point of view, there's lot of meaning and open hidden things especially in his works in magnifying transmitter etc.

anyway thank you sir for your points and that is most appreciated.
i want to talk more but really can't express it clearly sir sorry.

[size=78%] [/size]

Still, everyone is welcome and open here and everything is accepted.

mostly now i am serious and that's maybe the reason why this thread is dying.

Thank you and God bless.
The Floor is yours for Good info.

Otits

penno64 · « **Reply #7709 on:** January 24, 2017, 10:14:24 AM »

Line 19: I have made certain improvements in such apparatus itself which are novel and useful In other and more general applications of the same. I have heretofore shown and described', notably in Patents No. 462,418, dated November 3, 1891, and No. 454,622, dated 25 June 23, 1891, an apparatus devised for the purpose of converting and supplying electrical energy

Line 46: I would state the apparatus which I have de: vised for this purpose is capable of other and highly important uses of a similar nature, so but for purposes of the present case I deem it sufficient to describe its operation and effects when used for the purpose of generating ozone.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION (Read 3545114 times)

Magluvin

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Dave45

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Magluvin

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

luc2010

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

sm0ky2

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Dave45

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Dave45

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

ALVARO_CS

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Dave45

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

endlessoceans

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Dave45

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

web000x

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Tito L. Oracion

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Tito L. Oracion

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

penno64

Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION