Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509744 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1095 on: March 27, 2011, 02:44:01 PM »
Sorry to interupt this episode of
      "Watts the answer"?
But My wife has Charles Stanley [Tito's preacher ]
On the Tele.......

Tito,Do you really "Listen" to this man?
Brother, you gotta be Tormented!

This morning he's asking if we "Listen"? And what do we hear?

I hear,                           
                   SHARE !!    TITO !!

People are Dieing!!
This could make Chernobyl look like a Picnic!!

ChetKremens@Gmail.com
PS
Well, I heard other things too [but there for me].
Thats all I heard for You.

SHARE........................................!
« Last Edit: March 27, 2011, 03:40:54 PM by ramset »

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1096 on: March 27, 2011, 10:45:44 PM »
I am going to post this again. If you read back to titos early posts, you will find he describes the transformer as if home made. It seems he was using a trifi coil, as per his description and also makes note of a zener diode, but we cant see these things in the circuit.
I still believe my description on the previous page is a good one. Yet it still may be missing visually these other ingredients.

Mags

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1097 on: March 29, 2011, 01:14:18 AM »
@Magluvin

Regarding the diagram in your post above, it seems like this is not right. There are two direct lines from the battery to the inverter that will stay as the direct feed. Even if that transformer was pulsed it will not really add to the output. Also the bridge rectifier seems totally useless since the output of the transformer will not be AC.

I think you are better off removing that direct line and put a dioded capacitor tank at the transformer output that feeds the inverter. Then at the output of the inverter you can always send some recharge back.to the battery while supplying the load.

wattsup

PS: I will post my answers to the three questions later tonight. I made an animation but it needs just a few more changes. I'm done in about an hour.


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1098 on: March 29, 2011, 02:37:33 AM »
Hey Watts

I can say that im not sure that it would work. I just assumed things based on my knowledge that I have now as compared to when I had first seen it.

I believe that the primary(220v side) is set into oscillation via the cap across the switch. Not just singular pulses. Teets doesnt acknowledge that the cap is there for that reason, but along the way, that is what I can assume. And the diode/resistor combo does do as I have suggested. ;]

It may be flawed as to exactness of the circuit as we see it.  he mentioned that a zener diode is in place. But now Tito wont even comment. He has said just to forget it. So I feel that there may be some relevance to the circuit, not just an embarrassing moment for him as an amateur circuit.

He doesnt like that I show the circuit. Hasnt replied since the last showing.  So again, I assume that it may be what he started with and got him at a giving moment.
I wish he would just divulge any critical info on it so we can have something from ALL that he GAVE us, and we can begin there.

As for your test.  Well using a meter is what was requested. But being that you seem to claim that its not really proper, the test is a bit tricky. ;]

Waiting for your briefing.  ;)

Mags

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1099 on: March 29, 2011, 10:26:04 AM »
ok  :D

mags seing it right and seing some gold  :)

but as i said this is my elementary start in ou world, i believe yes there are errors there but i think we can edit and make some improvements there. just make your fire extinguisher ready  ;)  :D

sorry everyone i'm very busy nowadays.

there is no actually some especial in this diagram ok , this is obsolete not a good diagram.  :)

What is important is that by now we should be knowledgeable in caps already if we really want to see real power ok?

bye be careful  :)

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1100 on: March 29, 2011, 02:47:19 PM »
ok  :D

mags seing it right and seing some gold  :)

but as i said this is my elementary start in ou world, i believe yes there are errors there but i think we can edit and make some improvements there. just make your fire extinguisher ready  ;)  :D

sorry everyone i'm very busy nowadays.

there is no actually some especial in this diagram ok , this is obsolete not a good diagram.  :)

What is important is that by now we should be knowledgeable in caps already if we really want to see real power ok?

bye be careful  :)

If the drawing is not correct, why not post the right drawing.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1101 on: March 30, 2011, 03:10:59 AM »
Wow. I have been preparing this for several days now (with a very long post) going through several levels of logic, etc., and now realize I should not post this the way it is and risk being misunderstood or even opening up a pretty crazy Pandoras' box.

If you think real carefully on those three questions, especially #2 and what I am specifically asking, it really reaches so far that I am not prepared to put it into words before I have the actual evidence through a proper experimental process.

So I decided to just put up the following animation without any comment at this time. If guys want to mull this over, please do, otherwise please use your time better on the bench.

Anyways, here is an animation, crude and slow so you can see what I think is happening in the coil.

wattsup

PS: In case the file is too big for this forum, I put a copy here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups%27%20stuff/coil-pulse1/coil-pulse-anim1.gif


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1102 on: March 30, 2011, 03:46:02 AM »
hey Watts

I will retink my answers on this.  ;]

Teets   

Hey, well Im glad you are cool with it now. No big thing. I dont think anyone gets what i see anyways. ;] Seems thats the way it is in this business.

Think about this teets..  Lets say you dont want to tell particularly how its suppose to be. And just leave it at that, and nobody gets it.
I can see that you are content that we dont know. Its easy to see.

Now what if I had really gotten the water idea and figured it out in a split second as to how to do it. Would you have been upset?   ;)

So what is the difference?   ;)  Would you be happy if anyone had taken your clues and produced a working unit and then they shared with the world?

Well its good you have come around. You are what makes this thread what it is. Its all you pal. Do with it as you please.

With your guidance, maybe others wont need a fire extinguisher as they would have gotten the proper experienced knowledge to do it right the first time.   ;)

You do what you feel best. Im working on some things that may just have a lot of merit. And as I go, I share it.   Im a poet!   ;D

Its not all on you teets. There are others that know these things.

It is an interesting circuit you have there though. Ill have to give it another go, as I have a better understanding now.  As for the diodes, I will try zeners there, just for giggles. What was it 3v or more?  ;)

See ya around Teets.  :-*

mags

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1103 on: March 30, 2011, 11:01:12 AM »
I wonder if that 3V zener was between a charged cap and a power source ...
Would it keep voltage of capacitor above battery voltage ?

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1104 on: March 30, 2011, 01:38:21 PM »
Hi guys!

I just discovered what @tito has been trying to explain all this time with his words game.

He was trying to build an @imhotep circuit and make it self run but needed help to accomplish it.
He posted his idea saying that it needed an improvement (meaning it does not work but with the forum's help it may work).

People took it literally that he knew and did not want to share.
He posted a short explanation but nobody listened and continued thinking that he has something.

It seems that that amused him and began the game that I know and you dont.

His short explanation about the posted circuit is here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8841.msg231073#msg231073

Taking that into account. Let us begin from there and build something useful as a group.

Did you understand?
Did you checked the link and its videos?

Jesus

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1105 on: March 30, 2011, 06:58:27 PM »
Tito circuit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUdrEhFxOM0  :D

IMHO it's not OU but can extend battery life many times

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1106 on: March 31, 2011, 05:38:29 AM »
Tito circuit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUdrEhFxOM0  :D

IMHO it's not OU but can extend battery life many times

Is it Tito's circuit or did Tito get it from this guy. I'm not sure when Tito posted it but the date of the video goes back a few years.
This guy also explains the reason for having the diode and cap in the circuit.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1107 on: March 31, 2011, 05:56:34 AM »
Well I remember one thing when I tested titos circuit, when I put a very tiny ceramic cap across the relay switch, the contacts burned harder. Something was happening there but I wasnt sure what.  And the vid is a bit different as it doesnt include the resistor.  Teets,  whats the resistor do? Was it as I said?
=]

Mags

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1108 on: April 01, 2011, 07:23:35 PM »
Quote
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups%27%20stuff/coil-pulse1/coil-pulse-anim1.gif
Regarding posted Reply #1101,

Hadn't there ought to be a high-enough voltage capacitor paralleled with the coil to store a charge for spark gap shorting to the battery?

(I looked and saw that something might be missing.  Otherwise, the circuit is simple and straightforward.)

--Lee

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #1109 on: April 02, 2011, 02:21:34 AM »
I agree, he won't get any spark across that switch with only the charge that is stored up in the inductor.