Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: To the experts  (Read 3056 times)

Farlander

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
To the experts
« on: January 28, 2009, 08:58:23 AM »
Hi guys,
I'm close.... ok, actually I'm still pretty far away.  I get the concept, and I've done the physics research to back it up.   I've been conversing with the guys at AAC for awhile now and reading their volumes.  This links to the main conversation
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showthread.php?p=114811#post114811

Some critical tidbits I learned are the properties of a resonating wave.  When you have an inductor-capacitor circuit, the resonant wave form is always a pure sine wave.  In addition, the volts and amps are 90deg out of phase.  The coil manifests energy as current, and stores charge as a magnetic field. The capacitor manifests energy as voltage, and stores it as an electrical field.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_6/1.html
This raises some questions -- if the resonant wave is a sine wave, does that mean our input wave must be a sine wave, or some portion thereof?

An idea -- why not place the diode to the primary side.  Wouldn't this allow true resonance to occur while protecting the primary driver circuit from any back emf?

Gentlemen I will humbly welcome any invitations to groups or forums where immaturity is not accepted and real scientists work.  For a long time now I've felt that going alone was the only way, because nobody else could match me.  But I realize now there's a LOT of info and ideas to sort through and without some kind of properly organized analysis we're all just pissing in the breeze and highly susceptible to misinformation.  Count me in on any worthy teams and I will carry my own weight in research and experimentation.  I really want to see a collusion of the top experts here -- what has been tried, what worked, what didn't, data data data.   One big obstacle is just trying to keep track of so many different sites.  However, the ultimate and most perilous of all downfalls, the snarly turd burger itself, is greed.  It's crept into my mind from time to time, the selfish desire to figure it out and be hailed as a hero, billion dollar jet fleet, you know.  But I think if someone does figure it out, they should open source it, there will be enough business for everybody.  It is in that spirit that I know we must work together if we are to succeed.

Alien509

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: To the experts
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 04:02:31 PM »
The input signal must be dynamic and change according to the period and geometric arrangement of the atoms. The avalanche effect takes hold in the process.