Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 490850
  • *Total Topics: 14443
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 234
  • *Total: 236

Facebook

Author Topic: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector  (Read 23107 times)

Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« on: December 26, 2008, 02:04:36 AM »
If you are tired of all the bull on OU sites these days and notice how incredibly ineffective the OU community has been in accomplishing anything , you are not the only one . The reason is because there is nobody  working on something credible , there is a lack or proper direction . There is also no communication between serious experimenters and finally too few experimenting and way too much ``theorizing`` ..

To counter this trend , I am organizing a research team of amateur researchers in order to uncover the secrets of Stanley Meyers VIC 6-1 , so far we are 5 people working on this and will be communicating our findings and methodolgy . This has never been done by anybody yet . We are looking for more qualified people who wish to work with us in order to solve Meyers once and for all .

These are some interresting videos about the VIC coil , you may also read more about it in the briefing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6hJEmw3mes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSlF7khibs0


Tools necessary for this adventure : Stainless steel 430FR wire , 28-32 AWG magnet wire , 40-44 awg magnet wire , delrin bobbin material , ferrite core 1/4 to 1/2 ferrite core or electrical steel core , High precision scale . Basic tools . The coil itself will be small , about 630 feet per choke , time 2 , so 1260 feet per VIC coil . It will be quickly made since 430-FR wire has 18.8 ohms per foot .

I will be providing the stainless steel wire for the experiment since I made a big order of this . I payed 3000$ for this wire and it took 6 months to make .

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1185

Read this quote if you wanna know my take on this , I believe it has to do with single wire transmission and scalar potential

http://energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3240-real-injector-vic-coil-6-1-a.html

So if you wish to join the team and work on the most promising project in history pm me
« Last Edit: December 26, 2008, 09:07:23 PM by dankie »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« on: December 26, 2008, 02:04:36 AM »

Offline Farlander

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2008, 06:22:50 PM »
If you explain to me why stainless steel wire is needed, I'll consider joining.  But I'm not buying anything.


Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2008, 06:50:14 PM »
Hello again D.

The last link you provided is crippled.
Also read this this post: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained-3.html#post38406

Who do you know of have created the steam resonator? (part 11 of the techbrief)

gr8 to see more people are thinking beyond the 'HHO' hype.

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2008, 07:11:43 PM »
If you explain to me why stainless steel wire is needed, I'll consider joining.  But I'm not buying anything.
Why not, Meyer said SS is necessary.
It is needed to lag the current even more. (correct if i'm wrong)


Offline Mr.Tesla

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2008, 07:28:21 PM »
If you are tired of all the bull on OU sites these days and notice how incredibly ineffective the OU community has been in accomplishing anything , you are not the only one . The reason is because there is nobody  working on something credible , there is a lack or proper direction . There is also no communication between serious experimenters and finally too few experimenting and way too much ``theorizing`` ..

To counter this trend , I am organizing a research team of amateur researchers in order to uncover the secrets of Stanley Meyers VIC 6-1 , so far we are 5 people working on this and will be communicating our findings and methodolgy . This has never been done by anybody yet . We are looking for more qualified people who wish to work with us in order to solve Meyers once and for all .

These are some interresting videos about the VIC coil , you may also read more about it in the briefing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6hJEmw3mes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSlF7khibs0


Tools necessary for this adventure : Stainless steel 430FR wire , 28-32 AWG magnet wire , 40-44 awg magnet wire , delrin bobbin material , ferrite core 1/4 to 1/2 ferrite core or electrical steel core , High precision scale . Basic tools . The coil itself will be small , about 630 feet per choke , time 2 , so 1260 feet per VIC coil . It will be quickly made since 430-FR wire has 18.8 ohms per foot .

I will be providing the stainless steel wire for the experiment since I made a big order of this . I payed 3000$ for this wire and it took 6 months to make .

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1185

Read this quote if you wanna know my take on this , I believe it has to do with single wire transmission and scalar potential

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...html#post36042

So if you wish to join the team and work on the most promising project in history pm me

I have to agree on this one,there's too much crap on this and other forums aswell am not critisizing nobody am just saying it could be better.
Too much blablabla but no proof to show it's working.Numerous topics opened without a single picture or experiment to back it up.

Oh and thanks on the new vids.Haven't seen these.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2008, 07:28:21 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2008, 09:09:05 PM »
link is fixed , I posted the wrong link , sorry guys , I was mixed up with all the pages i had opened ...


I wont explain why it was used other than the following links and the video I provided . You may look yourself on the web for some wire ... good luck . Minimal order is like 2000$ and there few months lead time

http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=4302ao9.jpg

http://img300.imageshack.us/my.php?image=430or5.jpg

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5979
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2008, 09:43:01 PM »
dankie
Farlander posted on this thread last night http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6396.0;topicseen something  I have never seen before [thankyou farlander]

I believe your idea is way overdue and would gladly participate

can you comment on this farlander post and your seemingly different approach

Thankyou
 Chet

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2008, 09:43:01 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Mr.Tesla

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2008, 10:56:52 PM »
He produced 200LPH with just 1.2 Watts :o Mind blowing stuff...

Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2008, 11:45:05 PM »
Tad Johnson , the man himself , posted a picture of his cell over @ ionizationx.com

under the username ``unclefester``

He had a huge ass cell worth 5000$ dollars in stainless steel . He used double steamed distilled water . And he mentionned it was a very unstable cell without advanced elecronics .

What he achieved was the electrical polarization process , anybody could achieve that .


Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2009, 03:16:57 AM »
These are a few links to show the kind of "resistance"  I and other people have received throught the last year .. Note that I am the only one who didnt get discouraged by this "resistance" ...

Looking back I find their attitude very suspicious and off-topic  ... But where are these people now  ???

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1027

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1033

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=953

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1082

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=802&start=15

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=3119&highlight=#3119

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2009, 03:16:57 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2009, 08:51:37 AM »
http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=4302ao9.jpg

http://img300.imageshack.us/my.php?image=430or5.jpg


I have come to the conclusion that stainless steel is not more expensive than copper , it is just more bastardly to acquire . Ive had people say to me to follow the KISS method 6 months ago and to forget the idea , well ... this is the KISS method my friend.

This may be also due to the stumbling industrial base , maybe it was more common in Stan's days but I can see why this coil has never been reproduced properly .

If somebody were to respect Stan words when he describes the VIC coil 6-1 and 7-1 , Stan says resistance of 11.6k ohms per choke is suitable .

You would need about 2.3 pounds or about 28,000 feet of 36 awg wire ... @ 90$ a pound... thats 200$ per coil ... you need 2 coils...  so thats 400$ per VIC

http://www.planetengineers.com/default.asp?cat=Wire%2C+Magnet

With stainless steel 430 FR you can make a 11,6 k choke with 590 feet , times 2 ... thats 1180 feet  ... Thats 47.6 times less wire if same AWG is used .

With 1 pound of stainless steel 430 FR you can make 10 VIC

With 4.5 pounds of copper you can make one VIC ...

Not to mention way way way less winding to do

So it just makes sense to use S/S wire instead , less time to wind , 10 times cheaper to make 1 choke  + we are respecting what Stan is saying .

Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2009, 10:00:07 PM »
You should know that only a few classes of alloy are meant to be used as coil wire .

Plz read and compares quote # 6 with what carpenter is saying .

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/6299/4302ao9.jpg

http://cartech.ides.com/datasheet.aspx?i=103&e=63&c=techart

http://www.cartech.com/techarticles.aspx?id=1562


Taken from carpenter...

Saturation induction or magnetization (Bs) – this is the force that can be applied via a magnetic core to overcome mechanical forces (i.e. springs). High magnetic saturation allows development of a strong magnetic field, enabling control devices like solenoids and fuel injectors to function with as little input energy as possible. The higher the magnetic saturation or induced field, the more force can be applied and the greater the mechanical efficiency of the control component. Likewise, the higher the magnetic saturation the smaller and lighter the component can be designed without any loss in performance.
– this is the force that can be applied via a magnetic core to overcome mechanical forces (i.e. springs). High magnetic saturation allows development of a strong magnetic field, enabling control devices like solenoids and fuel injectors to function with as little input energy as possible. The higher the magnetic saturation or induced field, the more force can be applied and the greater the mechanical efficiency of the control component. Likewise, the higher the magnetic saturation the smaller and lighter the component can be designed without any loss in performance.

Permeability – High permeability means that less magnetizing force, with smaller applied field, is needed to obtain desired performance. High permeability induces high magnetism, allowing the design of smaller, cheaper components that can perform with greater efficiency and with less power input.

[/b]
Coercive Force (Hc) - this force permits rapid demagnetization, essential in opening and closing devices such as valves and injectors quickly. The lower the force required to open and close without "sticking", the better. Low coercive force, for example, can permit design of a smaller spring to allow a fuel injector to operate in harmony with a higher speed cylinder.
) - this force permits rapid demagnetization, essential in opening and closing devices such as valves and injectors quickly. The lower the force required to open and close without "sticking", the better. Low coercive force, for example, can permit design of a smaller spring to allow a fuel injector to operate in harmony with a higher speed cylinder.

Electrical Resistivity – High electrical resistivity is desirable because it impedes the formation of wasteful eddy current in AC or rapidly pulsed DC applications. High resistivity means that less power is needed to drive the control device. Low eddy current loss results in a more responsive device which becomes more important as operating speeds increase.
– High electrical resistivity is desirable because it impedes the formation of wasteful eddy current in AC or rapidly pulsed DC applications. High resistivity means that less power is needed to drive the control device. Low eddy current loss results in a more responsive device which becomes more important as operating speeds increase.


Offline Farlander

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2009, 10:19:04 AM »
@ Ramset -- thank you for the recognition, it's certainly the first time anybody has commended me for water fuel research.

@Dankie -- excellent information.  I understand the significance of the stainless wire now.  Copper wire has a low permeability in comparison, meaning that current flowing near it will not generate a very large magnetic field.  Stainless on the other hand, comprised of a lot of iron and nickel, is highly permeable, thus very electro-magnetic.  The chokes should be wound of stainless so they generate stronger fields to impede electron leakage.

Also, the graph from video 6? of the Colorado Free Energy series talks about the exponential rise in HHO production with rise in voltage... how interesting.

Ok Dankie, I"m on board with your team idea, if it's still active.  Here's my status:

I have been corresponding with some electrical engineers and we redesigned the Lawton D14 circuit.  Some resistor values have been changed, and the driver circuit has been improved.  I'm waiting for parts to arrive on Monday so I can rebuild it, again.  I hope I can test soon using my stainless steel plate configuration.
I am committed to seeing this thing through to the end and I will give/take as much help as I can.   For now, most of what I know is on my site -- a lot of Meyers patents and diagrams can be found there.  It's still a mess but getting there.

The way I see it though we need to figure out the automatic resonant detector.
Ciao

Offline dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #13 on: January 18, 2009, 09:24:50 PM »
better hurry up , only have 3 pounds left @ 400$ a pound .

Specs and info is there , very informative thread , you can also see some of my very satisfied customers...

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1185

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BeojLzAlDc&feature=related ( most high performance fuel injector are made with 430FR )

http://www.asminternational.org/pdf/misc/cartech.pdf

Quote from advanced materials and processes :

Type 430FR has the best magnetic properties and lowest residual magnetism of all the stainless steels .
« Last Edit: January 19, 2009, 01:29:40 AM by dankie »


Offline fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2009, 01:24:02 AM »
Its very easy to understand:

If you want to maximize the energy transmission from a "fixed" source to an oscillating circuit - you need a short pulse and low damping. ( think on how you excite a tuning fork - if you stay in contact with the tuningfork after touch down - too much damping).
On Meyers mechanical hv contact assemblys - the oscillation of the cell is only damped by the ionized air on opening the switch.
If you feed pulses with his vic setup - you need high voltage. To achieve step charging - there has to be more energy comming in (during the pulse) - than is drained in between the pulses because of dc current thru the chokes.
The vic setup allows a low(or lets say right) impedance - high power pulse to be transmitted - but acts as high inductance - high resistance - high impedance thing between the pulses.
I read somewhere that the impedance of one choke was around 14.3k Ohm ?
If you calculate how much copper wire you would need for such coil - ss is a nice option - this is how you come down to a reasonable sized coil.
Another option would be to have all impedances/freq. matched - that you could achieve that without high resistive wire. At some point it was said that Meyer used ss wire setup as additional feature to protect his invention - because you can overcome the problem from both sides.

Lots of people don´t understand his "pulsetrains".
He means a "train" of pulses - not a pulse-train alike voltage from a voltage source. He means - pulse - high-z -pulse-high-z .....

After building some vic things (not with ss - just to understand the principle) - I´m now up to build a solid state hv switcher - because this should be somehow easier to tune.

On an VIC setup - everything influences each other - thats in combination with the ss wire a difficult job.

rgds.





Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Stanley Meyers and the VIC/injector
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2009, 01:24:02 AM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: