So-called armchair posters are no worse than blind experimenters.  Though typically lacking in practical experience, armchair posters often apply far more grey matter to the issue than the blind experimenters who blunder along without giving any consideration to controlled experiments, and who do not know how to interpret results even when they have them.

Armchair posters often proffer very valid information and can provide valuable comments, which sadly are often simply ignored by so-called hands-on experimenters.

Logic dictates that a balance has to be struck between the two.

I'm not really sure where this thread is headed, because while those of you believe that voltage alone can pull water apart (into what exactly?), it is clear that no-one possesses the necessary chemistry background to even hypothesise on what interactions and reactions could possibly be happening at molecular level for this to occur.

Rather than blindly experimenting as most people seem to do, it is far better to devise specific experiments to prove or disprove theories and so provide valid arguments.