Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: I found a flaw in modern physics  (Read 3848 times)

atomicX

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
I found a flaw in modern physics
« on: July 22, 2008, 12:31:38 PM »
First I'd like to say hi to everyone.

Like I said, I found something interesting in modern physics.  However, it's hard to share it with people for numbers of reasons.   I just think this is a cool place to be and if anyone who should know about free energy existance, you guys are the first to be.  I might be right, I might be wrong, but if I'm wrong, it'll be another group laugh in this forum.  No big deal, Right?  Do I have a hell yeah, welcome to the hub?

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 12:37:48 PM »
Are you holding back for a reason? Please share your findings  ;).

greendoor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2008, 12:40:07 PM »
Only one flaw, eh?  But Hell Yeah!!  Let's have it!

atomicX

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2008, 02:47:04 PM »
Sigh... thanks for the support guys.  You're right.  I'm holding back for reasons.  First i'm holding back because I don't like the nay high educated people.  It's a different reason now.  I just don't know if this is good or bad news.  I don't mind get laugh at for being wrong, but what if I'm right.  You're right, I only find one flaw, but if this flaw is legit, then it could explain why Newtorian physics break away and becomes quantum.   I need some times. 

Onevoice

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2008, 07:39:25 PM »
Bit if you don't speak your thoughts, then no one will be able to learn from it either. If you tell and it is BS, the worst you'll get is others pointing out the flaws. Consider that it's possible you have found something, but that it's a little different from what you think it might be. The forums here are meant for people to present ideas and bounce around counter theories. To disseminate new information and ideas. Expect some people to disagree - and expect others to give it serious thought as well.

"Hell yeah, welcome to the hub"  ;D

therealrasta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2008, 07:48:29 PM »
Hell yeah.. Tell us.. And if your wrong someone will just let you know.. But if your right..   ;D

atomicX

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: I found a flaw in modern physics
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2008, 12:27:08 AM »
You know what guys, the world is already messed up as it is today.  Let's have fun today.  Off we go...

I believe that we are right.  There exist extra energy added to unity.  In this argument, I will pick Isaac Newton and his work .  I will not express my idea as other scientist and believers by experimenting but rather through the scientific reasoning.   Physics has stumbled hard on explainations that it divided into branches now such as classical, quantum, relativity, high particles.. etc...  I believe that all of them are wrong because they based on the mathematical framework that is not perfect.  I'm calling out Calculus is the root cause in this .  Let's take us a little bit back to the old days when Calculus was born.  It actually not excepted by the mathematicians back then because it did not satisfy Archemedian properties.  Archemedian properties believe in infinitely small (0) or infinitely large (infinity) and not "infitestimal small" like Calculus.  Be aware that though infinitely small  is almost the same as infitestimal small, they are NOT the same.  Let's consider a case where Calculus failed us in identify free energy.

Assume we have an object mass m attach with a fine string with constant circular motion about its center.  Let's consider the forces consider by Calculus, namely the Centrifugal/Centripetal force pair.  Calculus describe the force as dv/dt .  The direction is pointed directly to the center.  If one looks closely at the derivation of how dv/dt work.  The direction is a resulting vector of 2 velocity vectors that when they ultimately come together, will point directly at the center.  The term "as t approach zero", direction of acceleration APPROACH  perfectly inward.  Note that the term approach implies "infitestimal", thus it will never be perfectly inward... but off center!  Therefor, a none zero tangent acceleration (call Z acceleration) exist as a component of this off center acceleration!  One may argue that we do have to freeze the picture to actually calculate the point like, I argue that freezing the picture implies t=0 .  t=0 is a fictitious state for mathematic and will have no sense in reality because time will never be zero in reality.  In term, my arguement is even a bit stronger than Mr. Newton. 

All this concluded to the existance of Z acceleration tangent to the circle with constant velocity.   Its magnitude is proportional to centrifugal accleration, hence a =kZ where k is a constant (sin.beta to be exact) .  If centrifugal acceleration is proportional to the mass and radius of the system, then Z is stronger as the intertia of the system increase.  The extra energy one get per circle is proportional to  Z times the circumference (if ball system) .   If the resistance (I call interference due to many type of resistance) is greater than the extra energy per cycle (power), then the system will stall .  If less than, the system is overunity. 

I'll verify these effect by case induction.  Big generator  self substain due to high Z .  Magnetic motor self substain at high speed due to high Z at high speed and over come interference.   This will implies on all rotating object.  They will generate extra energy.  In theory, if you equip your car with higher inertia wheels, you will save gas! 

Hope you guys have fun and enjoy this post.