Hi to all that replied to my post,
While I must first state that I really am not here to provide schematics or go into long dissertations regarding the achievability of OU devices, (because I expect that all posters should have a bit of knowledge in this area and have made something work) I will provide a few clues to help every with success.
1st, let's think a minute about how all of these boards and groups over the years have spread the information. Then reflect on the success stories, based on the "AVAILABLE" information.. Hhhhmmmmm. There is a common factor. There is something always missing.
Lots of people always claim to have great engineering backgrounds and state Ohms Law 50 different ways, and therefore negate any possibility of success if it does not function as per the commonly known theories of physics.
I ask, have ALL of the laws of physics been discovered? No. We are not yet advanced to know it all yet; as well, the establishment has conveniently "lost" the things that were being discovered 100 years ago.
Ok, now for some light on this subject.
Yes, I have experimented extensively with Tesla Switches, Bedini devices of all sorts, and many other OU claims. I will respond to your replies in order.
Sorry to have missed the post regarding previous Tesla Switch info. I just located this thread and thought I would briefly help clear up some misconceptions.
Can I post a schematic for the circuit? Well, I thought I did when I attached Bedini's diagram. Just because Bedini "mostly" uses moving parts, does not mean that ALL of Bedini's information is related to mechanical processes. If you have studied his work, there are Solid State circuits also, and Yes, I have built them, and yes again; they do work (if an engineer knows how they function to make adjustments)
Also, yes I am still connected to the grid also. When enough money allows, perhaps something on a large scale could be constructed to change that, but for now, I am like most other people scraping for money, buying gasoline, and paying the utility companies.
Next, well, many individuals building Bedini circuits and others don't really see what is happening. Many things come into play to achieve the results that should manifest. Proper battery conditioning is a factor. Something that Sterling Allen did not do properly before he started reporting the Schoolgirl Motor results.
When properly conditioned, the batteries will put out MORE power than when new, and charge MUCH quicker. There is a lot of that in the Public Domain now that John has discussed it thoroughly.
Next, did you actually put a "timing light" on the Bedini motors to look at the pulse timing? Yep, here is how the cancellation of energy is avoided. The line delay of the inductor makes the transistor fire in such a way that the magnet is NOT over the pole piece when it sends it's energy to the coil. As a result, what happens to the "back-emf"
?? Think about it.
Now, one MUST start out with batteries that are SIMILAR and in good condition to see the effect in a reasonable time. Instead, many people take junk batteries for overunity experiments, and get no results.
Now, in my previous post. If you keep the supply battery in a higher state of potential than the output battery, what would happen? Your potential would travel from high to low, THROUGH the circuit (powering it for what cost???) and end up in the output battery! You paid NOTHING for the energy, only the transistor switching cost (if it is properly tuned)..
Sooo.. How much did you "pay" to charge the battery?
? How about the wheel turning??? Kinetic energy as well..... Add all of the Joules and see how much you got for what you paid.... Oh yeah, when your meter says a certain number of mA to run the circuit, did you remember to calculate the PULSE WIDTH?
The power is NOT steady on like DC, it is PULSED.. So lets subtract the off cycle width from the meter readings.... Getting close to even or better yet??? Geezzzz. This machine just keeps running past the battery specs....
OK, now to the Tesla switch info. There has been a lot of misinformation out there, and speculations.. Let's clear it up. What does it do??
Runs a higher potential through a load to a lower potential. Therefore the charge ends up in a different battery.. Ok, now take that battery with the gain, and put it in series with another battery to give higher potential through the load again to a lower potential one. What happens? The charge then moves again from high to low, and ends up in the lower one as gain (powering the load).
So, lets cycle it over and over again.. Round and round..... Just run high to low, THROUGH the load, moving from battery to battery... Now you have a big loop of ENERGY SHUTTLING!
Next, when the battery impedances reach the same, it will go into resonant operation, and you will see much more gains... Nuff said???
I don't give out circuits, and engage in long discussions. I just want people to think about what is happening in the circuits, and design circuits based on what NEEDS to happen, instead of following incomplete internet schematics and claiming that they don't work!!!!! OU has been here forever, but too many have closed eyes and believe all that they hear instead of analyzing THEIR empirical results.
Get to building the Bowling/Bedini/Tesla circuit. Let's see how many can make it resonant and get OVERWHEALMING gains, without draining those batteries... Hint- If your batteries do not ALL charge back up completely, then move the one with the most gain into the series (High potential) position...
Then keep running the circuit, and charging battery after battery...Convert all of this energy (from charged batteries and loads operated) into Joules and compare at how much it originally took you to charge the 2 batteries...... Compared to the amount you can draw from all of your charged batteries and loads.......
I know the answer, and Mr. Bowling and a few others have a good idea based on REAL experiments.. Put down the brainiac mindsets and get back to the workbench..
I don't really like food shortages and $4.00 per gallon gasoline..
But, until all of us can stick together, then let's just fill the pockets of the Arab countries with our hard earned money. Forget that food we must eat; hell, we gotta a monkey on our backs called OIL!
Just food for thought.