Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)  (Read 338498 times)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #180 on: April 27, 2008, 12:52:35 AM »
  The torroidal configuration SM used is not necessary to get free energy from the phenomenon it  exploits.  It is poorly designed with no intrinsic safeguards. 
Please review the below circuit.  This circuit is now incorporated in Tesla
Howitzers.  (replace the little battery circuit with a dc ionizing field). 
  Now imagine taking the barrel of a gun and bending it into a ring firing a bullet that makes more gunpowder and detonates it every time it comes around.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #181 on: April 27, 2008, 08:22:52 AM »
@aleks
I first started reading your posts and thought you had no knowlege as to electronics, then you said some things that only someone with actual knowledge in the field would know.  Then you screw it up again fighting with paul who has said some of the most important things I have ever heard.  You are wrong about the laser, it does work by causing electrons to shift levels, and no a mirror and light is not a true LASER it is a focused light source, I mean cmon dude you should really think about what you say but OK.

An electron DOES NOT have a missing proton that causes it to be negativly charged.  That only happens with atoms.  Just that really makes me think how much you know about anything to do with particle physics.
Do not start this again please, re-read what I've written. It is proton that lacks electron, not otherwise. About lasers, read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser and check out its principal components. While 'stimulated emission' is important in real-world lasers, it is not the basis of laser work, and the only energy they receive is via external light or electricity source. Otherwise lasers would be perpetuum mobile devices (or COP>1 devices). So, it's still some form of reflection - this is what I was saying. In other words, it is a process of Q factor change in the photon energy probability space: the peak of probability increases while side-lobes of probability distribution function shrink. In signal processing this is usually achieved by some forms of feedback: be it via reflective surfaces or via some internal atomic feedback.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 09:09:35 AM by aleks »

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #182 on: April 27, 2008, 12:45:16 PM »
@Rhombus

   Hi! 

       Go next door some time and ask your neuclear scientist guy  if electrons have mass.  Then ask him.   Why do neuclear power plants find it necessary to mess around with the neuclear mass when there is a guy on the internet that says you can convert some of the mass of the electron into energy.

      You can also tell him that radio frequency excitation of spent neuclear fuel rods can render them null within minutes instead of 20 or 30 thousand years.
Should rock his world a little. :D

    @alecks     have you taken the time to compress more knowlege of the kick phenomenon ? ;)

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #183 on: April 27, 2008, 03:27:15 PM »
Great schematic Mr Sparks.

Can you please label which winding is copper & which iron.
Can you also please label where the output is.


Thank you.
.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #184 on: April 27, 2008, 03:48:01 PM »
Green is iron wire   copper color is copper :)  output will be whatever you want to intercept a very fast changing magnetic field flux.  A regular iron core transformer should give you dual voltages.  Low voltage high amps out of the primary or high voltage low amps out of the secondary.  You can couple one of these outputs to a capacitor to store the power from the kicks and buidt a pulse generator later to initiate the pulse.  Core should be plastic with a small winding in there to saturate it magnetically.  You could also use a permanent magnet.

aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #185 on: April 27, 2008, 04:29:46 PM »
    @alecks     have you taken the time to compress more knowlege of the kick phenomenon ? ;)
It's not necessary anymore. The more I read the more I become assured that this whole overunity thing is about DC acoustic (phonon) waves, and in some cases about equal frequency heterodyning (e.g. when two processes of the same frequency produce opposing forces with nullifying movement - like oscillation of two closely standing membranes - halfwave they are oscillating, halfwave they are standing still stopped by each others motion - maybe even Casimir force is about this and not about quantum ZPE Dirac space). The only complex thing in this understanding is finding the method of utilizing this DC acoustic wave component to gain energy. The main problem is that this DC wave component is not a particle nor transversal nor longitudal wave. It is a third type of wave. If conditions are rather ambient creation of this DC wave component may not produce any serious change on the surrounding matter and energy levels. So, in order to gain any energy either a very powerful DC wave component should be created (e.g. via high-power discharge or explosion), or a rather "fluid" energy field should be created (e.g. varying magnetic field) that can react on even small DC wave component, and then normally induce displacement current that corresponds to this change. My previous reasoning was solely based on these ideas.

I do not really think neutrinos should be added to this equation. What I'm talking about is a way to gain pure energy. And I mean pure: this energy is produced out of nowhere, it does not require molecular or atomic destruction (if used correctly).
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 04:50:25 PM by aleks »

Eden

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #186 on: April 27, 2008, 06:29:11 PM »
    @alecks     have you taken the time to compress more knowlege of the kick phenomenon ? ;)
It's not necessary anymore. The more I read the more I become assured that this whole overunity thing is about DC acoustic (phonon) waves, and in some cases about equal frequency heterodyning (e.g. when two processes of the same frequency produce opposing forces with nullifying movement - like oscillation of two closely standing membranes - halfwave they are oscillating, halfwave they are standing still stopped by each others motion - maybe even Casimir force is about this and not about quantum ZPE Dirac space). The only complex thing in this understanding is finding the method of utilizing this DC acoustic wave component to gain energy. The main problem is that this DC wave component is not a particle nor transversal nor longitudal wave. It is a third type of wave. If conditions are rather ambient creation of this DC wave component may not produce any serious change on the surrounding matter and energy levels. So, in order to gain any energy either a very powerful DC wave component should be created (e.g. via high-power discharge or explosion), or a rather "fluid" energy field should be created (e.g. varying magnetic field) that can react on even small DC wave component, and then normally induce displacement current that corresponds to this change. My previous reasoning was solely based on these ideas.

I do not really think neutrinos should be added to this equation. What I'm talking about is a way to gain pure energy. And I mean pure: this energy is produced out of nowhere, it does not require molecular or atomic destruction (if used correctly).

this sounds like Tom Bearden's theory.
This also seems to be a logical evolution....!


aleks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
    • DC Acoustic Waves Hypothesis
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #187 on: April 27, 2008, 08:22:28 PM »
this sounds like Tom Bearden's theory.
This also seems to be a logical evolution....!
It's all good if correct. It's also nice to see Tom Bearden announced availability of 'Radiant' commercial products: http://energenx.com/products.html This is a strong step since as you know if they can't stand their advertisement claims they can be sued easily. Still no claimed overunity, but who knows? When you are charging your battery it's hard to compare grid power to battery charge power, it costs pennies to charge a battery so nobody will really care if his device gives COP 1.1, for example. ;) But of course it's a huge step if even generally invisible.

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #188 on: April 27, 2008, 08:58:44 PM »
Haha, awesome.  I'm going to buy one.

11. Can the Solid State chargers be used for Overunity Applications?

    The only Bedini Battery charger products now in production are strictly designed for battery rejuvenation and longevity and not for overunity purposes.

    We are not testing them for overunity applications as they are designed for the purposes of rejuvenating old batteries and maintaining new and used batteries only. While they are very efficient, efficiency in energy conservation is not at all our primary goal. And we have never made any claims of overunity about the Renaissance Charge, LLC products.

    In regards to the RC-2A12, the power supply alone produces most of the losses as can be seen by the heat. And in order to reduce the wasted energy consumption considerably a much more expensive product would have to be made. Our costs are already very high and we cannot afford to raise the price higher for the consumer in order to get higher efficiency out of it.

    If other people have tested these products and found overunity, we are not aware of it. However, if you consider that you can rejuvenate useless batteries to working condition again, then this can be considered free in a sense as you are gaining a battery that was useless.

    Because the purpose of the chargers are to be used in homes and plugged into the AC 110/220V grid, we have limitations on this charger. We have safety features that protect the circuitry from disconnect, wrong polarity, and from shock. We also have to have it limited to 12V batteries. These and other necessary features do prevent the chargers from being used as a device to connect up to other circuits or systems. When people attempt to use the chargers for other purposes then they void the warranty.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #189 on: April 28, 2008, 08:05:37 AM »
Hello all,

@Feynman

A combination of sine waves + kicks??

Otto

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #190 on: April 28, 2008, 08:15:39 AM »
@Feynman

Okay, first of all, I have just read through the entire thread.  Paul, I think your ideas here are excellent. You should not listen to detractors who have nothing to contribute.   

Update:

I have finished the Arduino microcontroller protocol, including the implementation and circuitry.  The device is called Gemini.  I will tell you how to build it with full plans and part list for free.  If you want I can also build one for you.

Don't offer, if you are not serious, as I will take you up on it in a heartbeat. :D


@all

Due to the experiments conducted over the last week, I have determined that each coil may well be specific to a design frequency, which should be no real surprise to anyone at this point. The size (diameter) of the collector coils, and the characteristics, size, and placement of the control coils determine the necessary input frequencies. I started to see a drastic increase in voltage output at around 4.9Mhz (I threw the coil setup together) which is from poor designing during the "thunking" stage. I've also noticed a drastic waveform changes.

However, I cannot push the overclocked 555 any higher, (2.7mhz MAX cmos 555 timer stabilized in its timing circuit with two signal diodes and a NPN transistor to help regulate internal waveform, thus keeping the waveform as close to 50% duty cycle as possible in the timing circuit itself. Circuit Diagram somewhere earlier in this thread.) and my highest frequency  (B&K) generator only goes to 5mhz.

I have noticed some interesting things:

1. A horizontal coil should not magnetically interact much with a vertical coil..... Yet my scope set on dual channel, comparing the controls to the collectors were showing obviously something happening, as the output waveforms from each were matching, and on XY I had a somewhat circular pattern (for those whom know what this means)...... :)

2. Small, improperly designed coils may well work..... OUTSIDE YOUR FREQUENCY GENERATING CAPABILITY (Ugggghhhhh. :( ) No wonder so many have come so close, but never were "there", so to speak. The results thus far gained are from WEAK harmonics (possibly 3rd or 4th from a much smaller wavelength higher actual design frequency)

3. AM "Nodes" appear at a harmonic. Switching through the scopes frequency ranges demonstrated various superimposed waveforms, upon the original waveform through Amplitude Modulation. (unless 60hz is measured in microseconds, it is not line interference... :D )

4. At such resonance, very small frequency bandwidth changes drastically affect the voltage on the collectors.

Noting all this could well spark some insight. Hopefully they were worth jotting down.

Paul Andrulis




pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #191 on: April 28, 2008, 08:51:46 AM »
@Feynman and Loner

Concerning collector coil material...

There is a simple solution if Air core. Figure the circumference of your desired toroid. Cut a hollow flexible tube to this length. Wind your controls on this tube. Cut one (or more) wire(s) of ordinary copper at > circumference x 2 + 4 inches <.

Push through tube until only 2 inches remain. Bend wire(s) around and reinsert into tube and push through. Bend tube until other end protrudes. Pull both ends until you have your desired toroid. (Until tube ends meet.)

This gives you a testing toroid, in which you can find the right frequency which gives best results. You can at any time cut the copper wire and replace with another material, without having to re-wind the controls, and the frequency will stay the same....... :D

Paul Andrulis

 

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #192 on: April 28, 2008, 01:45:41 PM »
1. A horizontal coil should not magnetically interact much with a vertical coil..... Yet my scope set on dual channel, comparing the controls to the collectors were showing obviously something happening, as the output waveforms from each were matching, and on XY I had a somewhat circular pattern (for those whom know what this means)...... :)

Sorry to butt in.....

When looking at magnetic coupling between coils, perpendicular to each other.... Induction still occurs. The magnetic is still crossing the secondary wire. The pulse width will be related to the time it takes for the field to cross the diameter of the wire. Hence - extremely short pulses in-phase with the primary.
I found this is a good way to create incredibly short pulses from a circuit that isn't capable of short pulses.

Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #193 on: April 28, 2008, 04:46:04 PM »
Hey pauldude,

Good to hear you are making some progress. . . a few questions...

How many control coils are you using?  What is the configuration of your collectors (2xparallel/1xseries, etc)?
What voltage are your control input signals? And what diameter is your TPU?


As for replicating the computer controlled oscillator, you need:

Arduino: $35, http://sparkfun.com
Three LTC6904 programmable oscillators: $3/each, http://digikey.com
Three OPA633 buffers: $9/each, http://digikey.com

And lastly, you probably want your choice of amplification, which generally will be either a fast MOSFET driver/high-speed MOSFET, or a vacuum triode like the 12AX7.




Feynman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • Feynman's Lab
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #194 on: April 28, 2008, 05:12:53 PM »
(http://www.mindsensors.com/images/pagemaster/i2ccompass.jpg)

CMP2X is a digital magnetic compass, which can be used in I2C mode to detect deviation from magnetic north pole (heading). It appears as 24xx series EPROM, with a different I2C address. This compass uses orthogonal two-axis magnetic sensor from Honeywell (HMC1052).