Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)  (Read 338490 times)

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #495 on: July 18, 2008, 08:48:09 PM »
@forest - In those terms, there won't be any back EMF until there is flow, and the kick happens before the flow.

But I am open-minded and eager to learn. Both SM and Stan Deyo relate that there is a difference between the earth's hemispheres that affects these toroidal devices. SM overcame it somehow, but I don't know about Deyo.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #496 on: July 18, 2008, 08:54:01 PM »
Thank you for explanation. You mentioned that this effect occurs only in cold circuit. What do you mean by cold circuit ? A state when vacuum tubes have not heated enough filaments ?

Jon

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #497 on: July 18, 2008, 08:55:26 PM »
@buzzard

I'm a little curious about your circuit board - it doesn't appear to be a prototyping backplane, but instead a manufactured design

I etched the board becuase there is too much to put on a breadboard and I find perf boards take way too long to solder and they always end up ugly. I can post more details but a new improved design is in order.

@all

I would like to know if anyone is interested in working on a group platform for TPU testing. If we can design a board that can be used by lots of people then we don't all have to recreate the same builting blocks.

It could consist of a back plate board that defines pins to connect to the TPU as well as interchangable TPU controller cards and computer interface cards. As a goup we can each have one of these back plates and work on new controller cards as we learn more. We could have the boards proffessionally made with a cost savings if several people are interested. Having a shared platform should make communicating easier as well.

To start the design I mock up a high level block diagram of each functional component I want. The boards and cards I have made will cost a bit though about $75 in parts alone.

Please let me know if you are interested.

Thanks

http://freeenergygroup.com/
 



duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #498 on: July 18, 2008, 09:33:27 PM »
@poynt99 and Buzz

Let me explain a little better my current understanding and it may clear up a little confusion. I think the kick has to do with voltage leading the current on a cold circuit. However, I USED to think it a magnetic field effect, as do many others still. However, I do not think it a magnetic field effect, but probably an electric field effect. I cannot state for sure, as I am guessing at this point. However, what I am seeing ties closely to Loners statement of a "pressure" wave front (or voltage in this case). The "kicks" also tend to caused a damped wave resonance in an improperly tuned circuit, which is what had me fooled for a long time. The effects tend to mask the event.

However, I do know that the "kicks" are easily reproducible, but from my own semi-skeptical viewpoint, I also know that the other scope shots I could produce, excuses would abound about what is being seen.

Almost all of these possible excuses have to do with the magnetic field. Therefore, cancel the field, cancel the excuses.
 
Another major excuse is "transformer action". Remove the possibility of transformer action, no excuse.

Another major excuse is resonance action. Remove the possibility of resonance, no excuse.

Otherwise, I could post scope shots all day long of the effect in various forms, and we would hear nothing but "It is this or that". Reproducing the kicks are simple. Reproducing the kicks where someone cannot easily disregard them is not necessarily so easy.

Now Poynt, I am not saying you would do this, but I know there are hundreds here whom would, and I don't feel like any more senseless arguments from them. What is worse, I know there will be even with the experiment I have designed.  :-[

If anyone sees exceptions to the rule they would like to see canceled out as a possibility, now is the time as I will be doing the scope work/ pics Sunday. (I have been having to work on a stinking car, this afternoon I have to replace a starter, and tomorrow is the sabbath.)

Paul Andrulis

Please try to eliminate the possibility of the kicks being reflections from the end of the line.

   Reflection from a SOFT boundary having the polarity the same as the incident wave.
   
   Reflection from a HARD boundary having an inverted polarity.


-Duff

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #499 on: July 18, 2008, 10:00:05 PM »
@duff - Excellent suggestion. The simplest kick test I've seen anyone mention here is shorting the terminals of a 9V battery with a length of wire. A fast diode on the positive terminal should prevent scope artifacts caused by reflection if any are present, no?

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #500 on: July 18, 2008, 10:13:11 PM »
@duff - Excellent suggestion. The simplest kick test I've seen anyone mention here is shorting the terminals of a 9V battery with a length of wire. A fast diode on the positive terminal should prevent scope artifacts caused by reflection if any are present, no?

May I ask : is this 'kick' supposed to manifest itself only once when circuit is started ? Does it have such behaviour:
'kick' occurs if somebody starts circuit operation for the first time , then any subsequent restart of circuti does not generate this effect unless there is a some time period between each runs ? In other words circuit seems to have some inertia in generating this effect ?

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #501 on: July 18, 2008, 10:29:28 PM »
@forest - There must be a time in between for the circuit to grow 'cold' again. Kicks occur with both the application of power and the removal of it. But I don't think that inertia has anything to do with it.

duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #502 on: July 18, 2008, 10:50:18 PM »
@duff - Excellent suggestion. The simplest kick test I've seen anyone mention here is shorting the terminals of a 9V battery with a length of wire. A fast diode on the positive terminal should prevent scope artifacts caused by reflection if any are present, no?

Here is a simple TDR circuit which I'm posting ONLY as a reference for observing reflections.


-Duff


duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #503 on: July 18, 2008, 10:51:26 PM »
(http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/6448/tdrfig36cz8.jpg)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #504 on: July 18, 2008, 11:02:10 PM »
@forest - There must be a time in between for the circuit to grow 'cold' again. Kicks occur with both the application of power and the removal of it. But I don't think that inertia has anything to do with it.

are both kicks generated always or that is diferrent for AC based and DC based circuits ? with removal of power does it occur only for DC powered circuits or for anyone ?

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #505 on: July 18, 2008, 11:49:55 PM »
@duff - Thanks for circuit post - I understand what you are communicating. I had asked on the forum awhile back about something to put between my scope and the subject - this is what I was looking for.

@forest - All electrical flow is DC in nature. Coherent AC does not occur naturally. Domestic AC is just DC that flips polarity 60 times a second, with voltage ramping up and down in a sine pattern. Measurable kicks like we want come from sharp on-off pulses, in a square pattern. In the TPU, multiplication of kick voltage results in convertible amperage. I think. Maybe.

Again, folks, I'm no authority. I'm only sharing my understanding of things. Please correct me anywhere I'm off the mark.

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #506 on: July 19, 2008, 12:16:58 AM »
sheesh!

no wonder these threads end up going in circles

a] do not overcomplicate and confuse things
b] stick to the facts and don't make up your own (no proof whatsoever SM "tuned" by trimming for eg.)

look guys, pulse a damn piece of wire---that's it fini!

no excuses, just show what you got, that's it. you've seen something, ok, so show it.

how the hell do you know that you are seeing kicks in the first place if you're now saying that they are buried or hidden behind some other wave form or part of it, and must now devise a way to leave only the kick visible?

what the hell kind of logic is that?

no frequencies, no coils, no canceled fields. if you do anything other than this, then you've got nothin' imo period.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #507 on: July 19, 2008, 12:28:08 AM »
Just because you see an oscillation or higher voltage does not mean it is the "kick" that SM spoke.  Part of it is where you see it and the other part is how you caused it.

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #508 on: July 19, 2008, 12:31:02 AM »
I agree about over-complicating things. These discussions have all been done before. Anything I say regarding SM came from overunity.com - I make up nothing.

poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3582
Re: The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)
« Reply #509 on: July 19, 2008, 12:36:44 AM »
Anything I say regarding SM came from overunity.com - I make up nothing.

yes that's exactly the problem--

if the facts didn't come from SM himself, then it's shit.