When magnets get near or touch metal, that metal becomes magnetized as well, even if it is temporary. So it is safe to say THE WIRE IS MAGNETIZED.
That depends on what type of metal you're using.
If you're using a magnetic or ferromagnetic metal, then yes, it will become magnetised by the magnets field.
But if you're using a paramagnetic or non-magnetic metal, then it will not.
You can test if a metal is magnetic or not by simply trying to stick a magnet onto the metal. That will work for iron for example,
but not for aluminium.
Aluminium will not become magnetised when you hold a magnet next to it. Iron will.
Don't you see the hidden truth?
No... not yet anyway
Your current knowledge of "electricity" has you believing that a magnet creates electricity
Really? Well not my knowledge... maybe you need to
run an update on your "current knowledge of electricity" then? Where did you get this idea that magnets create electricity? What about galvanic reactions that
power batteries then?
Electrostatic induction was known and used before electromagnetic induction was discovered...
, and electricity creates electromagnetism.
Also not true. Electricity and magnetism were discovered to be two sides of the same coin, that is the reason why they switched to the term electromagnetism. Before they realised it's the same thing, they did indeed talk about two seperate things, and saw electricity
as something electrostatic and electrochemical, and magentism as the curious rock sticking to metal phenomenon. Then they figured out electromagnetic
induction, dynamos, electromagnets, and electromagnetic waves, and were forced to merge the two concepts.
The truth is, electricity doesn't exist, and it is just another name for magnetism.
Well, you're entitled to that view, but I think you could just
as well say "magnetism doesn't exist, and it's just another term for electricity", but I think more correct would be the statement "electricity and magnetism do not exist as seperate entities or forces, they only exist as a unified electromagnetic force".
This explains why wires have "electroMAGNETIC force" outside of it when there is "electricity" running through the wire. That is not "electricity" that is just magnetic force.
Doesn't really explain it still. Is just semantics so far.
Touch a magnet to wire, and the wire now has a North and South pole somewhere on it.
only if it's a magnetic metal.
Move the magnet across the wire, and you successfully moved the North and South poles of the wire which created "electricity".
No, you've
moved the wire with its metal crystal lettice through the magnetic field ("cutting the flux lines"), which induces an electron flow in the metal electromagnetically as in the Hall effect.
But it wasn't "electricity" it was just magnetic force moving its axis of north and south poles through the wire.
You seem to be forgetting the perpendicular relationship between the magnetic and electric field, which is quite important for any e/m induction to occur...
Run a magnet across a wire with a lightbulb attached to it long enough, and the magnet will wear out. It will be become dead, but not after a very long time. This is because magnets are techincaly zero point energy batterys.
So what you're saying is that any permanent magnet used in an electromagnetic generator (dynamo, homopolar generator, any type) will become demagnetised
due to its use?
That does not appear to accord with observations, as far as I know.
To my knowledge, only internally conductive permanent magnets will demagnetise with use, and even then mostly when used in opposing magnetic field arrangements...
I don't follow the rest of your story very well.
You describe electromagnetic induction but not very clearly, and I think you take the analogy with breathing too far, as well as
convieniently omitting to see the input energy for movign the coil as the driving force...
But like I said, I don't quite follow your reasoning there, so I may have misunderstood.