Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: joe cell  (Read 15038 times)

raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: joe cell
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2008, 04:44:26 PM »
The claimed stages I haven't investigated. I'm just trying to run this what is referred to as stage one or simply a browns gas generator. I have my suspicions now that the Boyce cell produces more gas. It is hard to nail this down as the Joe Cell needs a vacuum to produce well.

The other stages, I'm a little skeptical. Not completely mind you. Sending the fuel through a solid plug? Of course there is an oddity found in Quantum Mechanics found by researchers that would explain this claim possibly. That may be a misleading statement let me try again. Quantum researchers have sent small particles through solid objects, the actual explanation is going to forthcoming I hope. As I don't have the equipment to study this, I have no choice but to wait for there explanation.

I'm just keeping it small simple and real. As Water4fuel will tell you you don't need that much gas production to drastically help your mileage. I'm not prepared to tear down an engine completely and rebore everything .005 over, plane the heads and install stainless valve seats and guides to .005 stainless plate everything so I can run on straight Hydrogen either. Right now I have a little 2.5 liter engine that doesn't produce enough horsepower on the gas it was designed to run on. I'd have to make a lot of inroads before I would try straight Hydrogen. Hydrogen fueled engines habitually get moisture in the crankcase and they do not run hot enough to evaporate it. If I were to try straight hydrogen I would build a Bricklin-Turner engine that has no crankcase and is easy to construct. This engine is all torque the whole thing spins. It also develops a lot of horse power. In fact the test engine made surprised the inventors because they got hundreds of more horses than expected. About 1/2 of this engine runs in power overlap. Meaning approximately half the cylinders are pushing all the time. Just a thought to you about all the engine designs in my head throughout the years and maybe a helpful direction for someone ready for it. Building it does not require a great deal of machining. It is probably also the fastest engine you can build from scratch too.

Aluminum is much cheaper yes, but environment wise not a good idea.
We have the government working on giving everyone Alzheimers, check this out.

http://www.rense.com/general82/chemm.htm

Even with Germany refusing to do chemtrail operations the whole Northern Hemisphere is giving them their fallout, I do thank Germany here and now for publishing the truth about chemtrails though and all the people that spend monies on research to warn us. This goes off topic to tell you take care of your health use stainless. You are already way overdosed on aluminum.
 
« Last Edit: June 09, 2008, 05:04:57 PM by raburgeson »