I am the Ebay Seller that sells the 680uh ferrite coils. They are the ones used Dr. Stiffler as I sold them to him. I logged in to this site to see what all the commotion was about. OU  interesting.

Many thanks for coming over here.

I hope you don?t sell them now at 100x the initial prize !

ABout barium titanite transducers:

Found here:

http://209.85.129.104/search?q=cache:1ysyrWRpTVwJ:www.most.gov.mm/techuni/media/EcE02041ElectronicMeasurement.doc+barium+titanite+transducer&hl=de&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=de

Piezoelectric transducer

    * Asymmetrical crystalline materials, such as quartz, Rochelle salt and barium titanite produce an emf when they are placed under stress.
    * This principle is used in Piezoelectric transducer, where a crystal is placed between a solid-base and the force summing member
    * When the external force is applied, the current produced is proportional to the amount or pressure
    * Since this transducer has a very god frequency response, it is used in high accelerator.
    * The disadvantage of this transducer is that it cannot measure in static condition.
    * The output voltage is also affected by the temperature variations of the crystal.

I realy do not understand, why there is nobody, who closes the loop to plug off the battery or an external powered signal generator!!! To close the loop, use a mini-solar-panel, fed by the light of the LEDs. To start-up the circuit, put external light on the panel, powered by a battery/supply or so. After successfull initialization switch off the battery and remove it completely. WHAT YOU ARE WAITING FOR???

Isn't closing the loop going to break the dia-pole and rid us of the radiant energy being created? When that happens we end up in the realm of the underunity where all of our conventional devices work in...but not really where we want to be.

Is it possible to generate energy @ a overunit rate, then transfer that energy to a closed loop system, that is take energy from open ended system, transfer it to closed loop system while not disturbing the OU system.

Hi

I will assume you wanted to say "It is..." rather than "Is it...", and I agree there is a way to transfer the energy, one of them by charging and discharging a capacitor the way Bedini does it, but I was hoping to allude to a lack of devices that use radiant energy directly from the source and are based on open loop system.

I think we should divide our focus not just on tapping into the sea of radiant energy but also constructing devices that are powered by it directly in accordance with natural principles. Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways.

", but I was hoping to allude to a lack of devices that use radiant energy directly from the source and are based on open loop system. "

I think we should divide our focus not just on tapping into the sea of radiant energy but also constructing devices that are powered by it directly in accordance with natural principles. Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways.

Well observed Amigo.

I've been reading this thread diligently and excitedly as replications (of sorts) have added to the weight of Dr Stifflers work.

Between 1990 and 2002 I spent those years analysing the Adams Motor and other pulsed motor systems. Never once, in all that time, and after building 100's of the pulsed "little demons", did I, IMHO, ever achieve O/U.
But a couple of things about the Adams motor really bugged me. So much about their characteristics and the way they operated intrigued me to a point where I persisted with every possible experiment I could conceive of.

And I'm glad I did. I am still skeptical of the notion that you will get O/U from an Adams Motor. But I am damn sure about one thing in particular, and that is: AN OPEN MAGNETIC SYTEM is more effiicient than a Closed Magnetic System! And an Adams pulsed motor/generator, if nothing else, is a useful tool in proving it!

When I first started experimenting with pulsed motor systems, I was completely skeptical of the notion of O/U in any sense or meaning of the words.

My years of experimenting with pulsed motor/generator systems has left me sitting in the "middle of the fence" these days. I still lean towards skepticism in O/U forums, especially when words like "something from nothing" appear in a sentence, as opposed to "something for nothing".

Bu these days I consider myself to be an "active skeptic". Meaning, that I try to keep an open mind to all possibilities, and actively seek to understand new phenomena or explanations by way of literature research and hand's on experimentation where my skills allow. To me replication is the key to verification. Understanding will follow!

The possibilty of "tapping" a heretofore unknown or misunderstood source of energy is one that needs the greatest of attention in the here and now.

I applaud the work of all those who come to this forum, seeking to exchange their ideas and freely expressing their thoughts.

Sorry to go a little off topic here, but Amigos, you're right on the knocker with your statement. "Else, if we continue converting to our closed loop system we just perpetuate the old inefficient ways."


If any of you are interested, I set up a few pages a couple of weeks back to help some "Adams motor" beginners deal with some of the issues
they had with component failure inthere motor circuits. I never intended it to, but the few pages grew to a total of ten. Once I started recapping
on some old knowledge to try to help these guys out a little bit, it just kinda started frothing out of my mouth, so to speak. Anyway, the long and the short of it is this, on page 10 I outline a very simple experiment that can be done by anybody with some rudimentary electronic/building skills which shows that you can easily "Bend Lenz's Law".

Those are bold words, I know! Notice I didn't say "break", just "bend". But Bend in a big way. After proving this myself (and to other peers), and knowing that anybody else can also prove it themselves, I am much more open to the idea that other "Laws" can probably be "bent". The key here is not to do what has always been done, and not to assume what is always assumed.

For anyone interested in "Bending Lenz's Law", heres a link. When you get there just click on page 10      http://www.totallyamped.net/adams


Cheers and KneeDeep from the Toad who Hops 

P.S. Keep up the great work everyone!