Author Topic: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler (Read 1480318 times)

amigo · « **Reply #540 on:** November 09, 2007, 05:12:56 AM »

It appears that this discussion has been moved to google groups, at least I can conclude that from Dr. Stiffler's page.

Sadly the group is by invitation only and no mention how ones gets invited in (I presume I can't self invite myself, can I?

)

hartiberlin · « **Reply #541 on:** November 09, 2007, 08:45:51 AM »

I can not access his google groups yet.

Has nobody got some comments to my last postings ?

Hi Ben, what are your latest results ?

How do you measure your output versus input power ?

I am still waiting for the cores to come in.
They are already shipped via airmail, but it still can take
a few days to go through customs until they will be here.

Regards, Stefan.

abassign · « **Reply #542 on:** November 09, 2007, 12:18:35 PM »

Also I have asked for 3 spar in ferrite, 10 days have almost passed, but I have not received anything.
Here in Italy the post service and custom doesn't work very well... $:-\$ , therefore it needs to have patience.

I have tried to subscrive me in the group:
http://groups.google.com / group / stiffler-replication
But, for now, my registration has not been approved. be a true sin!

@Stiffler
Hi Stiffler, can subscribe me in your forum on Google? I would be honorable of it.

@All
Are there experimenters that can describe their progress?

k4zep · « **Reply #543 on:** November 09, 2007, 08:42:45 PM »

Quote from: hartiberlin on November 09, 2007, 08:45:51 AM

I can not access his google groups yet.

Has nobody got some comments to my last postings ?

Hi Ben, what are your latest results ?

Measure input current via conventional iron vane ma meter in series with circuit. Output is simply current and voltage. Results are very encouraging and circuit development is coming along. IT takes a LOT of knowledge to do this right as my circuit base frequency is around 9/18/ 27 MHz. It will drive a DVM to false readings which makes it almost useless with these circuits.

How do you measure your output versus input power ? See above.

I am still waiting for the cores to come in. I got 10 of the 600+uh off Ebay and they work great.

They are already shipped via airmail, but it still can take
a few days to go through customs until they will be here.

You will like the results. Strive for a high output stable Osc, square wave out.......Picture of my latest unit. 1 Watt in. Totally experimental circuit. Osc. is designed by a friend, Ossie in AU. Oddball Osc, works like a champ. Lots of things become clear as you work with it. I have spend at least 150 hours working on this thing so far (talk about a crick in the neck!), not nearly there yet for a high power unit. I have been liberating silicon smoke, getting burned with RF, making a mess in my shop but I'm starting to get a handle on it. Just for reference, each AV plug can put out about 14.5 ma @ 12 V in this circuit. (known value from charging battery) With Neon, voltage/current is different. Input does not change with this load!

More to come from Dr. Stiffler when he feels he is ready, I'm just the experimenter and this is for fun. For him, this is damn serious.. He is the father and it is his baby.

Respectfully

Ben K4ZEP

Regards, Stefan.

starcruiser · « **Reply #544 on:** November 09, 2007, 10:11:15 PM »

@Ben,

What do you think of using this theory on the TPU? Well if this is how it is happening then maybe it wouldn't really be a TPU would it?

Thinking out loud here now, instead of using the ferrite what about a bundle of wire for the core?, multiple segments for the transformers (four of them, maybe even 3) using a simple blocking Osc or similar, maybe even a 555 using a Tip33 for the driver. L1 could be a small torrid coil. Maybe use a strong neo to provide saturation to the core material.

Now take 3 or 4 AV plugs and use them to pulse charge a large cap that has a voltage rating of say 200vdc, then try to power a bulb after a bit of a wind up.

What do you think??

Just a my mind wandering.... humm

DrStiffler · « **Reply #545 on:** November 10, 2007, 01:25:39 AM »

I have opened up some additional information on the coils and how to do some measurements.

www.drstiffler.com/buildup.asp

DrStiffler · « **Reply #546 on:** November 10, 2007, 02:24:03 AM »

NOTICE:

I am now posting information on my web site from associate researchers working with me on the advanced development of the SEC devices.

These researchers have given 'me' permission to post some of their work on my site and as a result all Copyrights will now be enforced. Anyone copying information from my site and making it available on any other site, list, group or news service is prohibited.

The only way this can now be legally done is to get the express permission of the specific researcher that the information originated from.

Please be sure to follow these rules, we must enforce them in order to protect the property of our associate inventors and researchers.

Thank You..

Dr. Ronald Stiffler
Stiffler Scientific

HopeForHumanity · « **Reply #547 on:** November 10, 2007, 03:05:51 AM »

omg.... great.... the start of the end??? $:-\$

amigo · « **Reply #548 on:** November 10, 2007, 03:15:36 AM »

Interesting developments, sadly I've been so busy at work this past week that my spare time at home is spent mostly resting.

Perhaps I can get something done over the weekend and will report here...

@HopeForHumanity

start of the end of what?

DrStiffler · « **Reply #549 on:** November 10, 2007, 03:26:13 AM »

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on November 10, 2007, 03:05:51 AM

omg.... great.... the start of the end??? $:-\$

Your wrong!

Its the beginning.

Many researchers have invested hundreds of hours in this research and all they are asking is that their work be controlled in one place. Nothing is stopping people from talking or working with us all. The resource must be controlled or people will have various versions, buggy versions or obsolete versions. By maintaining information in one place means you will be able to obtain the latest and best information in a timely way.

I see no reason why this should close anything off to the public. We hope to release information as soon as it has been confirmed by multiple researchers, this means 'You' don't waste time and spend money going in the wrong direction.

The research has so advanced in the last weeks that 'Many' reputable researchers have confirmed many of the circuit designs to in fact be OU, but the maximum to date from a circuit is 5 watts with around 1 watt input. These circuits are very unstable but getting better by the day.

Stay tuned, if I don't get stoned for the offer, I am considering making 1 watt evaluations units available, built and working and ready for testing. We will see how this will be accepted before it becomes official.

k4zep · « **Reply #550 on:** November 10, 2007, 03:26:32 AM »

Quote from: starcruiser on November 09, 2007, 10:11:15 PM

@Ben,

What do you think of using this theory on the TPU? Well if this is how it is happening then maybe it wouldn't really be a TPU would it?

Thinking out loud here now, instead of using the ferrite what about a bundle of wire for the core?, multiple segments for the transformers (four of them, maybe even 3) using a simple blocking Osc or similar, maybe even a 555 using a Tip33 for the driver. L1 could be a small torrid coil. Maybe use a strong neo to provide saturation to the core material.

Now take 3 or 4 AV plugs and use them to pulse charge a large cap that has a voltage rating of say 200vdc, then try to power a bulb after a bit of a wind up.

What do you think??

Just a my mind wandering.... humm
Let the old noggin wander, what your purpose is good for about a week of testing. Go for it!!!!!

Mr.Entropy · « **Reply #551 on:** November 10, 2007, 03:37:51 AM »

Quote from: RStiffler on November 10, 2007, 03:26:13 AM

Stay tuned, if I don't get stoned for the offer, I am considering making 1 watt evaluations units available, built and working and ready for testing. We will see how this will be accepted before it becomes official.

I'd buy one.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

hoptoad · « **Reply #552 on:** November 10, 2007, 04:05:17 AM »

Yep, Kneedeep kneedeep,

I'd buy one too!

The Toad who Hops

dean_mcgowan · « **Reply #553 on:** November 10, 2007, 06:37:58 AM »

Quote from: RStiffler on November 10, 2007, 03:26:13 AM

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on November 10, 2007, 03:05:51 AM
omg.... great.... the start of the end??? $:-\$

Your wrong!

Its the beginning.

Many researchers have invested hundreds of hours in this research and all they are asking is that their work be controlled in one place. Nothing is stopping people from talking or working with us all. The resource must be controlled or people will have various versions, buggy versions or obsolete versions. By maintaining information in one place means you will be able to obtain the latest and best information in a timely way.

I see no reason why this should close anything off to the public. We hope to release information as soon as it has been confirmed by multiple researchers, this means 'You' don't waste time and spend money going in the wrong direction.

The research has so advanced in the last weeks that 'Many' reputable researchers have confirmed many of the circuit designs to in fact be OU, but the maximum to date from a circuit is 5 watts with around 1 watt input. These circuits are very unstable but getting better by the day.

Stay tuned, if I don't get stoned for the offer, I am considering making 1 watt evaluations units available, built and working and ready for testing. We will see how this will be accepted before it becomes official.

And would I be wrong in supposing that any violations of this new law would bring about the withdrawal of informations from your site ... :O .. please say it isn't so !!!

edited :
I meant to say, that posting information on the internet where sharing and replication of information is the expected if not accepted norm and then asking the millions of people to not do a standard practice is almost certain to fail, copyright clause or none. Seems to be weighted to a certain outcome in my humble opinion. Though I do respect owners and their rights.

Aside from that ...
ummm .. here goes .. HOW much is FREE energy going to cost us Doc?

HopeForHumanity · « **Reply #554 on:** November 10, 2007, 08:28:36 AM »

Quote from: RStiffler on November 10, 2007, 03:26:13 AM

Quote from: HopeForHumanity on November 10, 2007, 03:05:51 AM
omg.... great.... the start of the end??? $:-\$

Your wrong!

Its the beginning.

Many researchers have invested hundreds of hours in this research and all they are asking is that their work be controlled in one place. Nothing is stopping people from talking or working with us all. The resource must be controlled or people will have various versions, buggy versions or obsolete versions. By maintaining information in one place means you will be able to obtain the latest and best information in a timely way.

I see no reason why this should close anything off to the public. We hope to release information as soon as it has been confirmed by multiple researchers, this means 'You' don't waste time and spend money going in the wrong direction.

The research has so advanced in the last weeks that 'Many' reputable researchers have confirmed many of the circuit designs to in fact be OU, but the maximum to date from a circuit is 5 watts with around 1 watt input. These circuits are very unstable but getting better by the day.

Stay tuned, if I don't get stoned for the offer, I am considering making 1 watt evaluations units available, built and working and ready for testing. We will see how this will be accepted before it becomes official.

I don't think it's going to be as simple as this... You've got yourself into a big complex thing, and I don't think it will be as easy as you think.

My point is that there is a dark side to those kinds of restrictions. Don't let anyone scare you into thinking that you must control every piece of information you have. IMO it would be better to have a few buggy versions than no versions at all. Look at all the other open source inventions and programs out there. Study how they became succesful without having to restrict or control their information.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler (Read 1480318 times)

amigo

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

hartiberlin

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

abassign

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

k4zep

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

starcruiser

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

DrStiffler

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

DrStiffler

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

HopeForHumanity

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

amigo

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

DrStiffler

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

k4zep

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

Mr.Entropy

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

hoptoad

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

dean_mcgowan

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler

HopeForHumanity

Re: Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler