I am new around here so I thought it would be better to drop my little bit of conjecture into half baked ideas. Then if peeps think it is a load of bull, I guess it is in the right place
Why is over unity not really over unity?
I guess by now, everybody knows there are grand unification theories all over the place virtually bursting the net at the seems. Some plausible and some just so crazy your have to wonder what they are smoking.
So why should what I have to say be any different to those ideas.
1. This is conjecture, not a theory
2. This is only and increment of measurement. (not a set definition for the structure of the universe)
3. This does not require you to re-write current accepted laws of physics.
A GUT that allows over unity and does not re-write the laws of physics?
Has this grabbed your attention.......? if not then I guess this will be a bit of dull read for you, maybe I can suggest some funny videos over on www.youtube.com
to pass your time whilst the non single cell amoebas have a read of this post. I am sure they will let you know when they are finished
Only joking, but seriously, don't feel compelled to read this just to dis the contents as you will find it is not quite so easy to attack as you may think. (Not that it this adds the slightest shred of validity to it, but I have been trying for over 25 years to disprove it, with no luck, it's a tough little nut to crack, the reasons will become apparent as you read on).Zero point, Physics stumbling point.
As a young child at school I first heard about this issue of how finite physics just gets thrown out of the window when we reach zero point. The analogy that the teacher presented to our class of 8 year old's was;
"How do you have a physical object less than zero, and how would you measure such a thing"?
The fellow students piped up with the usual answers, which where easily pronounced as being wrong by the teachers counter arguments.
Just sort of daydreaming I flicked through the math's text book and came across the simple image describing scale. Basically it was tree, a man and I believe it was a dog. With a line going from the top of the tree, to the man, the dog and so on to the ground.
Not quite sure why, but I reached for my pencil and my ruler and started to draw a line vertically, Half between the tree and the man, and the same between the man and the dog.
Then out of the blue I blurted out, what if zero, was only our zero? (meaning in terms I know use, what if this was only a relative zero point and not absolute zero?).
The teacher look at me very oddly.
Realising I had just said that aloud. I paused for few seconds and said it again. Louder this time.
"what if zero, was only our zero?"
The teacher asked me to explain......
So a thought for few more seconds and looked at what I had drawn. Then said.
"What if the zero point, is only a horizon"?
"Only one of many such scale horizons"?
"If you numbered each scale region from horizon to horizon (scale universe to scale universe) to the largest number possible","You could use all measurements in each scale in the same way as you do now".
I then held up the picture (forgetting in that moment that I had just defaced one of the school text books).
The teacher was not annoyed about this, but instead the colour just drained from her face.
It was at that moment that I realised I had discovered something rather unusual, being a child I did not realise just how much this simple discovery would shape my entire life and my understanding of our universe.Time Density and Mass (TDM)
No that is not a contradiction in terms, Time density is rather different than the relative term of mass. For the sake of explanation I will describe few term which I have had to create for TDM since nothing existed that I was aware of at the time to describe these things.
Pseudo Superlimunal = This refers to the theoretical velocity when comparing two or more scale universes as an external observer.
Subluminal= This is an existing term referring to a relative velocity which is less than that of light in vacuum.
TDS= Time density signature, this is the specific scale, density and or resonant frequency of an object if you where to take every possible type of matter/energy and line it up from infinitely small to infinitely large. In reality doing so would actually be an absolute void (Absolute zero point) but that a bit steep of learning curve for the moment so I will leave that to the side.
EVF= Electromagnetic Vortexial Form, this is 3 dimensional electromagnetic energy, the importance measuring the other dimension rather than just a wave form will become apparent.
Fawcett and drain principle= (For the British readers, please excuse the Americanism, I know lot of peeps from Stateside of the pond and this saves a lot of time explaining what a tap and plug hole is) This is a very important principle of each finite universes structure, without it the universe as we know it would be a closed loop (well actually it is a closed loop, but again that is a bit of a steep learning curve for this stage in the explanation)TDM States:Question:
What are TDM states?
Quite simply they are nothing more than an increment of scale related measurement based upon the definition of our finite universe. A glorified tape measure if you prefer that term.
Our current relative finite universe in this theoritical mathematical structure is defined as TDM state 0 , this spans from the smallest definable measurable unit of energy (highest relative density) to the maximum possible physical state where light can no longer propagate in this finite universe (lowest relative finite density). Question:
How many TDM states are there?Answer:
Infinite possible scale versions of the finite universe. (TDM states).Question:
How are they arranged? Answer:
Have you ever seen a Russian doll? (see picture) where you open it up to find one just alike but smaller inside it, then open that one to find another even smaller and so on? Well in the same way each TDM state exists at the relative zero point (horizon) of one and the absolute lowest density of another. (inside each other)
As and example of just 15 TDM states:
TDM-7, TDM-6, TDM-5, TDM-4, TDM-3, TDM-2, TDM-1, TDM-0,
TDM1, TDM2, TDM3, TDM4, TDM5, TDM6, TDM7
Relative absolute velocities in each scale (TDM state) and the pseudo superluminal velocities when compared with the original TDM state zero by an external range of observation to that of the finite universes.
Increasing density TDM states
TDM state Relative velocity Pseudo Superluminal velocity
0 0 to C 0 to C
1 0 to C C to 2C
2 0 to C 2C to 3C
3 0 to C 3C to 4C
4 0 to C 4C to 5C
5 0 to C 5C to 6C
6 0 to C 6C to 7C
7 0 to C 7C to 8C
Decreasing density TDM states
TDM state Relative velocity Pseudo Superluminal velocity
0 0 to C C to 0
-1 0 to C 0 to -C
-2 0 to C -C to -2C
-3 0 to C -2C to -3C
-4 0 to C -3C to -4C
-5 0 to C -4C to -5C
-6 0 to C -5C to -6C
-7 0 to C -6C to -7C
As you can see each in each finite universe in its relative scale the given object is actually subluminal (less than light velocity) when compared to matter/energy that is of a similar scale, yet when compared with other non relative scales of interaction it has a pseudo superluminal velocity (Faster than light) velocity. In this way TDM can both conform to classical physics in each relative scale and also allow for easy interpretation of FTL velocities without defying the laws of physics.
As one common argument still exists in TDM, ?nothing can exceed light velocity?, As to do so would cause it to be subluminal in another TDM state. (I.E the resistance acting upon it causes compression that increases its Time density signature (resonant/oscillation frequency) to that of objects in another scale range of observation and interaction).
So for an example if a unit of force was the energy required to compress an object to such high density that on our relative scale range it was zero.
What would happen if you applied 6.5 units of energy per volume of compression force upon that object?
I am sure you can work out the classical physics terms of how this is impossible, most people in that frequent this forum will very familiar with that conundrum and that would take more energy than exists in our universe, in classical physics on its own you would be correct, but you are still left wondering where did all that theoretical energy go as it would be 5.5* greater than the energy needed to destroy the universe.
In TDM I can say its is interacting 0.5 along the curvature of space time in TDM state 5 and travelling at subluminal velocity of 0.5C. but when compare to its original TDM state zero its has a superluminal velocity of 5.5C
If you want to know, I can show you how you plot that?
Also that if you scale that state back up to our own Universe you can work out the exit co-ordinates in our finite universe. Yes I am talking about plotting the so called folding of space time ;-)
By now you are scratching your head? thinking I am a crackpot or your jaw has just hit the floor. If you really do not want to know about this then just put this down to few minutes of wasted time and read on in the forums.
If you Want to hear more...
Want to know how to quantify gravity? why energy is 3 dimensional and the importance of the electromagnetic vortexialform? And many, many other answers? Or is that yet more fodder for questions?
That is the down side of leaning more, you will realise that in the scale of things that really what we know is like a tear drop in an ocean that is our infinite universe....
OK, So I can't go cutting off this post in midstream, without giving you all a taster which could be very interesting to the guys around here.
A little question and a TDM answer that may catch your full attention.
If I am travelling along in my car at night time at 100 miles an hour and switch my headlights on, would the photons be travelling at C + 100 mph?
Well we all know the classical physics interpretation about how fast light propagates and the various conflicts in mass between SR/GR and QM that this simple question creates as well as the silly philosophical answer that current classical physics returns. Philosophy and physics never do mix well.
But what if I said the photons that the observer of those headlights sees are not the photons emitted by the lights. Would you think I was crazy?
Ok so you probably already think that... so I will pose another question to help explain.Question:
What happens when you gently drop a large heavy stone into a bucket of water that is full to the brim?Answer:
in normal circumstances the water overflows!
Now if we treated the photons as being a matter state (since energy and matter and interchangeable), what would happen to particle passing through other objects?
Now if I said these particles where compressed
proportionate to the resistance and there increased velocity by the vehicle. You may begin to understand. There physical structure becomes too dense
to interact with other matter in the current relative scale range (TDM state 0) they cannot
physically collide with anything on this scale, However they now interact with matter of a similar scale range in the next higher Density TDM state 1 (as very low density subluminal matter). In doing so TDM state 1 has gained matter, to compensate it expands. Whilst this has been occurring the car and the observer in the original TDM state 0 have followed the normal curvature of space time and increased their density proportion to volume and resistance. So they are now of a scale range that can interact with the lower density particles of the previous TDM state 1 which are being displace, Which in turn are now extremely high density particles on the original TDM state 0. This displaced matter is the photons that the observer see?s coming from the headlights of the car approaching at 100 mph.
Now if something was between the lights of the car and the observer to act as a moderator ( An object to cause rapid compression of the photons through several TDM states) how much energy would be returned? oops not supposed to be explaining the time density shift of ZPE yet
I will give you clue, if you use a specific density moderator between your field coils, how powerful do you think your TPU experiments will get?
Study a combination of Faraday ZPE work and that of Dr.Gunter Nimtz's Quantum Electron Tunnelling experiments and you may begin to understand how this moderator alters the TDS more rapidly.
You may also realise that the above actually explains the scattering effect of photons observed in photon slit experiments.
You can read more about TDM here. it is old stuff, http://www.crownedanarchist.com/timedensitymass.htm
quite a few typos, it was an email interview I did a few years ago, btw it is seriously long... don't say I didn't warn you.
Should you want to know more. then feel free to post questions, well that's unless the moderators around here don't wan't TDM on the site. If that is the case then feel free to ask me questions in the chat about anything
section on http://www.r-force.org
, it's one of my sites so the topic can't get booted.