Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: new Watercar success claims  (Read 11426 times)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
new Watercar success claims
« on: May 13, 2005, 10:27:45 AM »
Here is a summary of some new
watercar rebuilts from wasserauto.de forum
posted into the autobild.de
forum:

http://www.autobild.de/forum/showthread.php?s=4a9e5dffaa651176aaea012b2f6cf360&threadid=12123

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2005, 04:37:00 PM »
Here is a summary of some new
watercar rebuilts from wasserauto.de forum
posted into the autobild.de
forum:

http://www.autobild.de/forum/showthread.php?s=4a9e5dffaa651176aaea012b2f6cf360&threadid=12123

It is for the person who can not read german realy bad. If you use an electrode from titanium as kathod than the electolysis is muche better but titanium is not funktion as anod.

rensseak

rlm555339

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2005, 09:06:48 PM »

It is for the person who can not read german realy bad. If you use an electrode from titanium as kathod than the electolysis is muche better but titanium is not funktion as anod.

rensseak

Why not?  It conducts.

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2005, 10:43:53 PM »
Quote

Why not?  It conducts.
Quote

Good question, next question. ::)
Yes, titanium is a conductor and I do not know why only as cathode. That is what I have experienced.

rensseak

rlm555339

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2005, 04:04:03 AM »

Good question, next question. ::)
Yes, titanium is a conductor and I do not know why only as cathode. That is what I have experienced.

rensseak

Could it be that it's conducting just fine but that an anode produces oxygen instead of hydrogen?  The cathode delivers twice as much gas because there is twice as much hydrogen as oxygen.  Perhaps?

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2005, 08:41:29 AM »

Good question, next question. ::)
Yes, titanium is a conductor and I do not know why only as cathode. That is what I have experienced.

rensseak

Could it be that it's conducting just fine but that an anode produces oxygen instead of hydrogen?  The cathode delivers twice as much gas because there is twice as much hydrogen as oxygen.  Perhaps?


Mmmh, may be! The titanium cathode is producing hydrogen, that's right. If I use titanium as anode and cathode nothing will happen.
In the periodic system I read, titanium at high temperature absorbs much hydrogen. Could it be that then palladium is a better electrode because it absorbs much more hydrogen already at low temperature? Do you know if there is a alloy from this two metals?

regards
rensseak

rensseak

DADINK

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2005, 11:43:18 PM »
I think absorbing hydrogen is bad AND wrong

sypherios

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 114
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2005, 08:29:56 PM »
dadink??

DADINK

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: new Watercar success claims
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2005, 12:30:29 AM »
thats me :)