Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The SPG - a new concept for non-kinetic permanent-magnet energy harvesting  (Read 13656 times)

Markius_Lanzius

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Also, my input coils (the equivalent of the MEG's coils A and B) are pulling the flux from the permanent magnet and are therefore having their flux recycled back to electricity with the flux of the permanent magnet.

In the MEG, the input coils are repelling the permanent magnet's flux and therefore not reclaimable. That input energy is lost.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Yes you do, but only half of what you'd get if you then apply the opposite polarity field to the coil to get the full inverse current out.

When you apply a flux field to the coil, the free electrons move forward. When you remove the field, the electrons move back to their original position. This gives you the 'hump' of the amplitude sine wave of the electrical output. The 'trough' is the reverse polarity electrical output from the free electrons moving further backwards from the original position when the reverse polarity of flux is applied. When this is removed, the free electrons move forward again to their starting position.

The attached pics show the difference between conventional electricity generation and the workings of the MEG (http://www.overunitybuilder.com/megbuilder.html).

As you can see, only one coil is generating power at a time as there is only one static magnet. The flux polarity is reversed by switching from one coil to another.

My design also switches between coils, but with 2 magnets, it can divert opposite polarity flux to both coils at the same time. Hence, double the output.

Your understanding on how the MEG works is wrong.

You fail to understand that while the flux directing coils direct the PMs flux through one coil,the flux directing coils also produce a magnetic field of the opposite polarity on the other side of the coil.

Now,knowing this,where do you think the PMs redirected flux will travel?


Brad.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Also, my input coils (the equivalent of the MEG's coils A and B) are pulling the flux from the permanent magnet and are therefore having their flux recycled back to electricity with the flux of the permanent magnet.

In the MEG, the input coils are repelling the permanent magnet's flux and therefore not reclaimable. That input energy is lost.

And when the input coil is switched off,where do you think the PMs flux will go?--back through !the now! switched off coil--yes?

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Brad have you a link to the two working circuit diagrams that dont need fancy alloys ?  I thought one of your country men was saying that Neo magnets are banned is Oz, I hope you have a good stash or is that illegal too ?

Markius_Lanzius

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
This is a document outlining one of the fundamental designs of the SPG, and the specifications that would be required to get a prototype built.

I'm uploading this for people who have expressed an interest in the design and understand the maths behind it.

https://www.scribd.com/document/375038644/The-SPG-Technical-Specifications?secret_password=NYXjdM5ZUvl8DeQRZ6Jz