Uh, actually I think that torsion is not wasted energy as it is not converted to another form.
With a pendulum, most likely its' v would be calculated by the vertical drop and the distance it would travel.
 In other words, if its' swing is twice the distance as the vertical drop, then it would have 1/2 the acceleration rate of gravity.
 So what would need to be accounted for is the slower rate of acceleration. And how does its' motion effect this ? Does it cause a further slowing in its' acceleration or does it help to increase it ?
 Such as, if the fulcrum is being lifted, does this cause the bob to lose force relative to the lift of the fulcrum ?

I do not mean torsion, but when pendulum swings it stretches. Stretching usually wastes energy by turning into heat and the material that stretches loses its mechanic durability. On the other hand if we pretend that pendulum's arm stretching does not cause energy loss and always recovers then this suggests that inertia inversion in a large body without much energy expense is possible. You just have to think how it's possible. However, if you change inertia into the direction opposite to fall, the inertia will quickly revert to zero due to ever-lasting gravity pull. This means that the other element of "gravity engine" beside inertia shielding (or redirecting) is required: which is gravity pull shielding, and that is out of the scope of just the mechanical device. Well, if my speculations on gravity are valid: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Anti-Gravity:DC_Acoustic_Waves_Hypothesis then gravity device should include some exploding or imploding processes just to be able to shield the earthly gravity force.

Hi all,

I had a chance to work and experiment with the two-stage mechanical oscillator of Veljko Milkovic you are talking here about.

I did several analyses that confirmed Milkovic's claims and here are the first two that are translated in English:
 

MEASURING THE RATIO OF OUTPUT AND INPUT ENERGY OF THE TWO-STAGE MECHANICAL OSCILLATOR BY VELJKO MILKOVIĆ:
"...Therefore, ratio of energy at the output and energy at the input is 22.89..."
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Images/Analysis_Jovan_Bebic_2-measuring.pdf[/li][/list]

Congratulations Jovan!!!
Finally somebody (trying to) do a real work-energy measurement.
BTW I did the same measurement but with different device so our results are different.
The way I solved "the problem" with measuring heights on weight 2 (output) was to do 10 experiments and use average or minimal heights values...but I suppose that even this one experiment could be enough for the insight about the magnitude of output work...
1. For your measurement to have more scientific and other influence I think you should shot experiment with video camera... ofcourse if you have time and resources... You can use paper and draw lines on it as a ruler. Then put the paper behind weights ...so the camera(s) can catch almost exact heights!

2. I think the one more (little) different experiment is needed so I ask you, or somebody else, to do it! PLEASE!
That would be the final proof!
Put some consumer or generator to measure output work!!! For example try to do electric measurement with unimer or oscilloscope or ...
Since we now exactly know input work, by putting consumer or generator on the output end, we could precisely measure and prove or disprove overunity! If you or somebody else do this and document whole experiment with video camera and if that measurement show overunity, you (or somebody who do this) will be world famous (scientist and) person!!!
PC: I think all previous experiments (done by other people) that show forces "measurement" have no scientific or real value, but this type of (work, energy) measurement, like you do, are the real ones!!! You have precise data about input work. That is something that hasn't been done  yet! (Stroking pendulum with dynamo lamp do not show input (energy or) work and observing large output forces also do not show output (energy or) work!)

One more Congratulations on your effort to do the real scientific measurements!!!

"It is also important to notice that, according to the energy conservation law; total
potential energy of the lifted weight is wasted on deforming the surface and heat emitted
into the surroundings, when the freefalling weight hits the surface."

Damn... I do not know physics well, but I think we could maybe have a problem here...
What if this whole system behaves like one big pendulum?

If we lift the pendulum weight and measure heights that it reaches we will also have "overunity" on a single pendulum weight itself! 
But as I remember from physics book that its not the case because of the "pendulum law" - forgive my ignorance if I made mistake!
Our "deforming the surface and heat emitted" in that case could be air resistance and sliding friction at pendulum joint point.

So (I think) the only way to prove "overunity" is to do real useful work on output end of the system and to measure it!
So we should put some generator or consumer and measure useful output work!

Hi Jovan,

I am not in the position to doubt about your measurements. My question is: What con I do with Milkovics mechanical socillation system. For what is it good for? Is it possible to get energy form it? I think no one want to stand beside a pendulum and push them every 10 seconds?

I am also failing to understand Jovan's analysis of centrifugal work doing extra work. Isn't it the centripetal force that is responsible for circular movement of pendulum? If there is no centripetal force, then pendulum can not move in that motion. And isn't this centripetal force equal and opposite to centrifugal force as per Newtons law? Then how come centrifugal force is doing additional work?

it is very simple to test. Make a basic set up that functions, use a large heavy wheel on the output side..and connect to the central bearing of the heavy wheel by the use of two ratchets, one on each side of the rotating wheel's bearing.  Connect to the vertical arm via springs, to the ratchets. This keeps the energy in the springs and releases it effectively to the rotating massive wheel.

Then pull power off the rotating wheel.

Of course..that experiment then brings other ideas to mind......

This device, is 'sound'.. it is an application of the fact that gravitation is a 'polarized-oriented-gradient'.
It is NOT equal in the vertical vs the horizontal orientation, with regards to energy given and taken, with respects to physical distances moved. This application takes advantage of that simple point.

This point, in combination with Bessler type massive wheels and magnets, can be used to move the steel balls around the wheel positions when the balls are nearly in the horizontal domain/position, to positions either closer in or further out for greater or less leverage. Far less energy is required to move the balls when they are horizontal. Static magnets positioned slightly away from the moving wheel can be used to force the balls about.

in other words ...

you need to use hydraulics to prove "over-unity" or "perpetual motion" with the Milkovic machine.  you might be able to improvise with 2 syringes, some tubing, & water.

hydraulics will also allow you to convert from a "small distance, large force" (the dead weight), to a "long distance, small force" (to push the oscillating weight).