Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !  (Read 2223274 times)

shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #600 on: February 20, 2008, 01:45:24 AM »
@all,

having looked at this site,since the beginning and doing several experiments, i now realize that you can't take the power off of the center fulcrum, without killing the effect.  there is simply not enough torque.  however looking at the water pumping proplems with a very innefficient type of pump even,  i have to ask the stupid question,  has noone ever heard of a "foot valve"?  it seems to work much like a diode, only allowing water to flow in one direction.   when used with air it can effectively increase the distance verticaly that you can pump water by the use of an air tank with a bladder.

it seems to me if we can develop enough head pressure, whith water, and the right water turbine, we should be able to have a closed loop, where we can run the pendulum with the power generated.

lol
sam

Did you come from the Lead Out thread?  Lawrence Tseung goes on at length about the benefits of a foot pump, one way valves, and mixing air and water.  You should probably read his experiments if you are not familiar with them.

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #601 on: February 21, 2008, 03:57:44 AM »
Hi all -

I'm trying to move the pendulum from the 6 o'clock position by 45 degrees to the right applying the rotor "fins" to the pendulum.    The "fins" slope push the pendulum, allowing it to drop at the end of the "fin".

How to reduce the friction/impact to minimize rotor speed reduction?  Materials?  Bearings?  Designs?

Scratch this idea and instead do "_____" ?

Thanks for any ideas!

CH



Prophmaji

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #602 on: February 21, 2008, 04:30:35 AM »
Gravity is a polarized, oriented gradient.

Hope that helps.

Edit: Now...what does that mean...concerning inertia?

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #603 on: February 21, 2008, 07:20:02 AM »
G?day all.

Quote from my post 601 page 41 this thread.

Consider the following:

You have a balance beam, but this time you have on each end a pendulum of exactly the same length. This is important since the pendulum's frequency in this case is solely dependent on its length. You now give one pendulum a push and it begins to oscillate. The balance beam behaves as before, going up and down at twice the frequency of the pendulum.

What do you think happens after a while?

This is one of the classical experiments in physics because the effects are unexpected.

Say we have given the right pendulum a push. As it swings there is a noticeable diminishing of amplitude. The left pendulum now starts to pick up momentum, which increases with every loss of inertia on the other side. After a while the right pendulum will come to a standstill with the left one in full swing. Slowly the right pendulum will start to pick up momentum as the left one now starts losing energy. After a while, when the left pendulum's energy is spent the right one is in full swing again. The process keeps repeating itself until all energy is spent through friction, drag and heat. If there were no losses the process would carry on forever.

All this flies right into the face of what Milkovic and Lindemann are saying.

So all this Hoo-Haa about Newton being wrong and that the Milkovic device proves it is a lot of crap.

Try the experiment with a coathanger and two pendula of equal length suspended from it on opposite sides, give one of them a push and observe.

Hans von Lieven


To which I received this reply from abassign:

@hansvonlieven

Excellent the analysis, but it is not the motive for which the object proposed from... it has some strange properties.
I have said that the process is not reversing, or the movement of the arm doesn't influence the oscillation of the pendulum. Non only, the force applicate on the arm not influence the pendulum oscillation. Your clear scheme shows that or move of the arm provokes a move of the pendulum but the energy of the pendulum, at the end of the cycle, it is always nothing.

There is not a transfer of energy between the move of the arm and the pendulum, energy that the pendulum accumulates with visible oscillatory movement.
For instance, if the pendulum oscillates, and I stops the arm, the oscillatory energy in the pendulum remains.  From the mechanical point of view, the pendulum is isolated in comparison to the arm, in the direction arm - > pendulum. Instead it is not isolated in the direction pendulum - > arm. The system operates as a sort of diode, the strength applied to the arm, for reaction, can't have influence on the pendulum oscillation.

In mechanics the systems to double pendulum are not often studied, in how much they ask for the calculation of chaotic systems. The study is often made with the theory of the impulse, but the results are always rather scarce, the chaotic systems are not predictable...


Wrong.

There is transfer of energy through the balance arm. No increase of energy is observable, the total energy in the system is static.

I have made a computer simulation of my proposed demonstration using WorkingModel2005. Only gravity has been programmed into the model, no drag or friction has been allowed for to show what happens in the system without outside influence in an ideal scenario. If there was any excess energy it would show up here since there are no other influencing factors.

I repeat it again, Milkovic cheats.
The demonstration of his that allegedly proves that Newton does not apply where his system is concerned is flawed, as I already pointed out in post 601.

Here is the proof.

I am sorry the avi of the simulation is very large (38MB) but I wanted to show a complete cycle.

You can clearly see the transfer of energy, very slow and almost unnoticeable at first and then speeding up as the process accelerates until all energy is transferred, at which point the cycle reverses.

Newton?s laws remain intact and so does CoE. There is NO overunity in the device as designed by Milkovic.

Hans von Lieven

As I cannot upload the avi to the server here because of its size I have put it on my website.
http://keelytech.com/overunity/milkovicdouble.avi you can download it from there.

gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #604 on: February 21, 2008, 09:56:00 AM »
Hi all -

I'm trying to move the pendulum from the 6 o'clock position by 45 degrees to the right applying the rotor "fins" to the pendulum.    The "fins" slope push the pendulum, allowing it to drop at the end of the "fin".

How to reduce the friction/impact to minimize rotor speed reduction?  Materials?  Bearings?  Designs?

Scratch this idea and instead do "_____" ?

Thanks for any ideas!

CH

I don't think I had seen that concept before.

This is a great idea I think. I don't really care what anyone else thinks, I like it :-)

(http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1763.0;attach=17840;image)

gradually push the pendulum sidewards.

Bessler describes that.

Clocks of course use an escapement mechanism.

As a note:

Keep looking for ways to make gravity powered devices.

I already know how to do it but I'm trying to find attention for my permanent magnet overunity invention.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=750
View topic - Perpetual motion made simple.

That anyone can understand.

 ;)

PulsedPower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #605 on: February 21, 2008, 10:02:36 AM »
Just a thought on how to drive this and extract power from it. Variable reluctance driver triggered by a position sensor to drive the pendulum as shown in the italian diagram and a magnet or a stack of magnets moving past a slotted pole piece with a coil to extract power from the magnetic circuit, better known as a linear motor (generator in this case) rectify the output from the coil use the DC to run the pendulum exciter. No problem with variable stroke, cyclic linear motors like this are well proven in the refrigeration and cryogenic fields where they are used to drive compressors.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #606 on: February 21, 2008, 11:01:51 AM »


Newton?s laws remain intact and so does CoE. There is NO overunity in the device as designed by Milkovic.

Hans von Lieven

As I cannot upload the avi to the server here because of its size I have put it on my website.
http://keelytech.com/overunity/milkovicdouble.avi you can download it from there.


Hi Hans,
nice animation. Well done.
Yes, now I see, what you mean.

You mean a 2 coupled oscillator system where the energy swings from one
oscillator back to the other oscillator and back and forth again.

Well, maybe you can post your WM2D file.

I think the Milkovic device can only work,
if the 2 fulcrum lever arms have a different length.
Then there is the needed asymmetry there and THEN
ONLY can the gravity energy conversion work.

The principle to extract gravity energy is to modify the weight
of one fulcrum lever arm and thus lift the other arm up and down
with a much higher force x distance = Energy.

This can only work, if both lever arms have a different length.

So your example does not fit or just describes the case
where the energy amplification has a factor = 1 so COP = 1.

You have to choose the right setup parameters to get COP > 1
that means to set the lever arm length on each side right.

Regards, Stefan.
P.S: Also we have another slightly different setup as in your example,
cause we "rectify" the motion of the pendulum who does the output load work
(pump action in the last example)
cause we just lift and release a weight VERTICALLY, so it can not swing
horizontally, so we "rectify" or "limit" the dimensions it can swing in...( so to say)

If you look again to the guy who is pushing the pendulum at the blue
pump, no way he is using more than 1 to 2 Watts for this action
and the pump needs at least 10 Watts including all the friction to pump up
the water.
Also you see, that it also does not use the leverage of blue pump handle
which you can see, that it is not used anymore, so the
Milkovic lever arm has to pull the pump rod with lots of force
to directly lift the water up.
So the pump device has at least a COP of 5 in my opinion.

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #607 on: February 21, 2008, 05:56:16 PM »


Hi Hans,

...................Well, maybe you can post your WM2D file.


Not a problem Stefan. Here it is:

Hans von Lieven

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #608 on: February 21, 2008, 06:01:22 PM »
Upon further evaluation ? I?m not sure it?s over-unity.  In fact ? I think what the device/principle is really doing is:

Applying a long stroke/low power impulse to the pendulum

And converting it to a short stroke/high power impulse to the anvil end.

Thus ? just changing the frequency of the energy.

Someone earlier mentioned something along these lines - to long a topic to search for who......

Anyway ? the device and ideas are interesting.  It?s application as a water pump seems efficient.  Low power applied to pendulum results in high power driving the pump.  Thus the ?work? required by the user is reduced significantly.

A small, elderly woman could do the work that would normally require a strong, young man to do.

- - -

No takers on refinement ideas for my "cog fins" idea?

CH

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #609 on: February 21, 2008, 06:41:29 PM »
Upon further evaluation ? I?m not sure it?s over-unity.  In fact ? I think what the device/principle is really doing is:

Applying a long stroke/low power impulse to the pendulum

And converting it to a short stroke/high power impulse to the anvil end.

Thus ? just changing the frequency of the energy.


That is exactly what it is doing CH.

As far as your cog fin idea is concerned this cannot work as drawn. The pendulum must receive a short sharp push at the correct time in order to absorb energy. Anything else will be counterproductive.

You have two cycles of the working end lever to every one cycle of the pendulum. What you must do is to store that energy and release it in one burst at the correct time. Your arrangement cannot do this.

Hans von Lieven

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #610 on: February 21, 2008, 07:54:52 PM »
@hansvonlieven
Quote
I have made a computer simulation of my proposed demonstration using WorkingModel2005. Only gravity has been programmed into the model, no drag or friction has been allowed for to show what happens in the system without outside influence in an ideal scenario. If there was any excess energy it would show up here since there are no other influencing factors.

LOL, hans you don't honestly believe a 2bit simulation can accurately describe reality do you  :'(, the first real lesson I learned in the field is that all the sims and calculations in the world cannot prepare you for reality, it has a way of making even the most educated persons look silly sometimes.
I have built the balance beam-dual pendulum on precision bearings, fully adjustable, using weights from 5 to 15 lbs, and I would agree that there is a large oscillation(beat) or transfer of energy between the pendulums . But there is more to see than your simulation is going to show you, one is the fact that the balance beam moves with this beat through a given range of motion proportional to the pendulums period of oscillation, another is that a dampening effect in the beat has no relevance to the period of oscillation in the pendulums nor to the transfer of energy. Another is that should the period of oscillation be very large the balance beam will make 360 Deg rotations and in the right context the upper pendulum will fall through a vertical line drawn through the center of rotation and accelerate the balance beam, I learned all this in 15 minutes ---- Milkovic has been doing this for Years---- you do the math on that one.


hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #611 on: February 21, 2008, 08:22:01 PM »
@ allcanadian,

The main reason for the simulation was to show that the Milkovic demonstration where he moves the balance arm and states that this does not introduce oscillations in the pendulum is wrong.

Having built various versions of the Milkovic device I am aware that a simulation of this kind does not completely show everything there is to know, but for the purpose stated the simulation is valid and shows the interactions of forces accurately.

Milkovic states that the movement of the balance arm does not influence the behaviour of the pendulum. This is also wrong as it clearly does.

Try the following experiment. Use the Milkovic arrangement with the counterweight on the other arm as designed and doing some work as in hammering an anvil. Start the pendulum with a measured push, let it run its course until all energy is expended and the pendulum comes to a standstill. Count the number of oscillations.

Next clamp the balance arm and from the same starting position and with the same amount of push repeat the experiment. Count the number of oscillations.

Perhaps then you will see what I am driving at.

Hans von Lieven

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #612 on: February 21, 2008, 09:07:50 PM »
@ hansvonlieven
Quote
Try the following experiment. Use the Milkovic arrangement with the counterweight on the other arm as designed and doing some work as in hammering an anvil. Start the pendulum with a measured push, let it run its course until all energy is expended and the pendulum comes to a standstill. Count the number of oscillations.
I tried this experiment as well,  I could not make anything work as claimed but have yet to admit it cannot be done.


hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #613 on: February 21, 2008, 09:22:49 PM »
@ hansvonlieven

I tried this experiment as well,  I could not make anything work as claimed but have yet to admit it cannot be done.


@ allcanadian,

I never said it cannot be done.

All I am saying is that the device as designed by Milkovic does not produce OU. There may be a way of doing this, but it would require major modifications, the nature of which I am presently uncertain of.

Hans von Lieven

abassign

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #614 on: February 21, 2008, 11:37:26 PM »
@hansvonlieven

If you move toward the fulcrum of the arm of lever the weight of right, the system it behaves in different way. The weight of left salt and it regularly goes down in how much the program of simulation for smaller angles has smaller errors. I have worked in the programs of mechanical simulation as the CSMP, and I know that the simulation happens through enough exact differential equations for small variations, but less and less exact for ample variations.
Don't trust too much such programs, kind if, as in the case of Milkovic we enter the world of the chaotic motions. Sooner or later the pendulum of left certainly starts to scillate, but more than I approach to the right weight, and therefore I considerably increase the mass of it, different it will be the behavior of the left weight. Is sure that there are couples of values, both in the masses of the pendulums and for the positions of application point, that can bring to a stable system as the Lagrangian point L1-L2-L3 of the planet orbits.
The interaction among the two masses is of fact an action of smaller order, respect other actions measured by Milkovic. As I already told you, the system of Milkovic seems to operate as a diode, obviously it doesn't create energy.
Then it doesn't seem to produce energy, but simply to exploit it in correct way.
However it needs to make some measures him to a real device, that operates under the same chaotic conditions of the Milkovic device.
However the example from you done it is stupendous for his genial simplicity!

Ciao
Adriano