Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82250
  • *Latest: Chflynn

  • *Total Posts: 496478
  • *Total Topics: 14612
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 250
  • *Total: 255

Facebook

Author Topic: Successfully looped SMOT  (Read 8187 times)

Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #75 on: February 14, 2018, 12:32:17 PM »
It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn’t invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It’s a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.


Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson


It’s all the same thing

You are right. John Searl is definitely not a scammers.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #75 on: February 14, 2018, 12:32:17 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13634
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #76 on: February 14, 2018, 12:53:17 PM »
It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn’t invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It’s a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.

James Maxwell
Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson
Ken Wheeler

It’s all the same thing
Science does not provide an understanding of magnetism
Maxwell did, but no one understands it, even Einstein needed
help.


There may only be one person alive right now that fully gets it
https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small

You have just lost any credibility you may once have had. Go ahead and build your SMOT according to what you have "learned" from the Great Genius Buddhist Ken Wheeler. It will keep you occupied, and is less dangerous than playing in the street -- but will accomplish much the same thing.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #77 on: February 14, 2018, 02:05:04 PM »
You have just lost any credibility you may once have had. Go ahead and build your SMOT according to what you have "learned" from the Great Genius Buddhist Ken Wheeler. It will keep you occupied, and is less dangerous than playing in the street -- but will accomplish much the same thing.


I can’t use Ken’s terminology, because he tries to coin things as his own proprietary
language. And I’m not willing to re-write physics just to incorporate his small changes
to magnetic theory.
 (He is a pompous ass, self-diluted, and tries to claim everything as his own)


 I do sometimes make use of his description of the magnetic meridian,
or center of magnetism, or “dielectric inertial plane”.
His mathematics are solid and do not conflict with Maxwell’s equations.
(except for one part which is not relevant here, and even then he proves it visually
     using a magnetic viewing tool invented by an unrelated person)
I don’t care about “who he is” or what his religion is.


None of that matters in science.
Not many of the great scientists of history are what I would
consider “good people”.
Most do their work for the wrong reasons, personal greed, nationalism, or pure destruction.


The only thing that matters here is what the magnetic field is/does and what WE can do with it.


Discredit the sources of knowledge if you choose to.
Einstein was a lazy slacker, a plagiarist, and had other people do a lot of his math for him.
But Einstein was (mostly) correct, and in science that is more important than personal idealism.


Who has the answer is not important
What the answer Is, is important.
There is evidence that indicates Ken didn’t come up with this stuff himself
(though he claims to have)
But the work he has done as a magnitician, is invaluable to his field.
He mathematically identified the 3rd field aspect, and gives a more accurate
depiction of the 3 dimensional magnetic field than anyone before him.
Science cannot accept his theories in their current form,
and unless or until he is willing to bridge that gap,
it will probably never happen.
He just wants to sell his book, and take out his anger on the acedemics that shunned him
like a teenage schoolgirl seeking vengeance.


But that has no bearing on the actual knowledge he shares,
a lot of which he released for free, long before he ever wrote his book.
If you don’t like the guy, don’t buy his stuff.
You can learn what you need from his YouTube channel
or d/l a pirate copy or completely ignore him.
eventually a ‘real scientist’ will come along and give us a better description of
the 3rd aspect of magnetism that lies perpendicular to the magnetic polarity.


This same aspect of the meridian that I have shown you here in this thread.






Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3091
Negative Inductance
« Reply #78 on: February 14, 2018, 02:25:44 PM »
@Tinselkoala,

Do you feel the negative inductance measurement in this video is an indication of the presence of an increasing magnetic field in the one series bifilar coil of the "Quadfilar Spiral Torus"? We had a heated exchange about this subject last year as you probably remember.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP2xEKH4qdc&list=UUo9ItsUt0n5ayZlb5K_cwaA&index=20

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6102
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #79 on: February 14, 2018, 03:01:19 PM »
Heated and threatening discussions here are a thing of the past.

attempts at rebooting will not go well.

Smoky2
The person you mention made claims here that many could not reproduce [with true caloric measurement ]
and he would not discuss this disparity when I called him NOR later admit he made an error with his new camera [an artifact of the imaging gave him false readings which did not prove out under scrutiny.[which was pointed out by a member presently posting in this thread ...

the claim being... a strong magnet in the  presence of Bismuth made heat due to his spinning field claims.

there were a lot of happy Bismuth and magnet salesmen...but many experimenters with lighter  wallets and sad faces...
--------------------------------------

Been a lotta bumps in this road...would be better to take a smoother friendlier path...


respectfully
Chet K






Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #79 on: February 14, 2018, 03:01:19 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #80 on: February 14, 2018, 04:07:41 PM »
Thanks Chet,


At the risk of my “low credibility rating” forcing me to finance my own cheeseburger


Let’s continue...


This next demonstration concerns gate transition.
That is, the mechanism required to leave one gate and enter the next.


That mechanism, is field compression (flux switching, named so by HJ)
And the criteria presented by the wiki link above.


I can prove that this occurs in all magnetic gates, not just the extreme values
referenced by Wikipedia, or the work of Howard Johnson.
But for now we will simply show this with the SMoT, since that was the explicit challenge.
keep in mind however, the smot is magnetically synonymous to 1/2 of a magnetic gate
so what I show with SMOT, applies to all such gates.


https://youtu.be/TWlnnk0qsS4



Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #81 on: February 14, 2018, 04:40:55 PM »
This next video is an inverse-SMOT, (center-attractive smot)
and I have implemented the Howard Johnson pole-reversal.
“pole-flipping”, “metamagnetism” caused by field compression.


https://youtu.be/NzBuKGlvxf8

In this set-up, gravity is employed along the 2nd track portion
The 2nd track is declining away from the field, to free the ball.
The magnets are very weak (SmCo), and wasn’t quite enough kick
So, rather than continuing to make adjustments, I took a shortcut
and gave the exit ramp ~2-degree decline to allow a gravity assist.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #81 on: February 14, 2018, 04:40:55 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #82 on: February 14, 2018, 05:00:39 PM »
@chet


The spinning field claims were first made in the early 1900’s
Some of the scientific publications that presented this, were
plagiarized by Ed Leedskalnin, in experiments that better prove
the effect, than Mr Wheeler has been able to show.


Mathematically, the field is moving, as the electrons that cause
the magnetic moment are in motion.
The assumptions that the ‘net field’ is stationary, is a macro-scale
convenience, and has little or no bearing on the reality of the field.


If you want to prove THAT—— simply try to balance a magnet in repulsion
above another magnet.
Then we can talk about whether or not the field moves.


if I were to theorize the reaction of Bismuth,
I would say that due to the bond-energy of the crystalline structure
causes reordering to be an endothermic reaction
Bismuth metal should get slightly colder when you approach its diamagnetic vector
with a magnetic field. To imagine it heating up doesn’t even sound right.
There are better ways to prove the motion of magnetism, as it relates to the motion of the source.


Also, we have never achieved “full magnetization” of physical matter.
Even in neodymium, there are unordered spin-momenta, which result in incoherent magnetic moments.


why is a non-magnetic material NOT magnetic?
Because all of its tiny fields are spinning......


For there to be electromagnetism, there is first motion.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #83 on: February 14, 2018, 05:05:37 PM »
What is the magnetic field of a piece of ionized iron?

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #84 on: February 14, 2018, 05:23:53 PM »
This SMOT is made using a very large steel ball.


This sphere is hollow, and was originally a non-magnetic 305 stainless steel.
I have restructured the crystalline structure
From Austenite to martensite
By placing it in a Leedskalnin PMH loop.


What’s important here, is the large diameter of the sphere
And the effects the accelerating outer surface have on rotational momentum.
In relation to the linear displacement of the ball, through the field.


https://youtu.be/Owkz6w4AhRM


Don’t worry, I’m not going to loop a smot of giant balls,
But I wanted to show you this in exaggerated form to demonstrate
the effects of changing the size of sphere in your particular design.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #84 on: February 14, 2018, 05:23:53 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #85 on: February 14, 2018, 06:13:01 PM »
The point of referencing the magneticians in my previous post
Was not to make people go follow Ken like the guru he would be.
But to show everyone that all of the people on that list
Say exactly the same things, in their own perspectives,
That I have shown here, in a language a 3rd grader should be able
to understand.


The problem isn’t HJ’s technology
It’s people’s inability to comprehend it.
That’s what I’m trying to fix here.


Greg Watson learned from Howard Johnson, just like the rest of us.
But it’s confusing, because it is different from the way magnetic theory is explained.




What science admits to “knowing” about magnetics, exists in the same 3 paragraphs
in textbooks that have been there for generations, copied from book to book.


The magnetic field is invisible, untastable, unfeelable, unsmellable, unhearable.


It is bipolar, having a north and a south


North repels north, south repels south.


North and south attract each other.


Some people can be satisfied and content with this pebble of knowledge.
The rest of us become magniticians.


When we stop learning, science has no use for us.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13634
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #86 on: February 14, 2018, 08:49:21 PM »
You are so wrong it's not even funny any more. I used to give you a score of 80% right, 20% wrong, but you've boosted your "wrong" score considerably today.

When you actually understand how that green magnetic-field-viewing stuff works, you'll see how nonsensical Kenny's claims about "dielectric inertial plane" are.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, has ever been engineered using the fake silly ideas promulgated by KW. Just look at the claims about bismuth and a magnet producing a temperature rise! Ridiculous, disproven by real experiments over and over, artifacts of his camera that are actually even warned about in the camera manufacturer's own literature... yet he still has not retracted his silly claim.

Smoky, you do yourself (and the rest of us) no favours by endorsing that kind of nonsense.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13634
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #87 on: February 14, 2018, 08:52:55 PM »
This SMOT is made using a very large steel ball.


This sphere is hollow, and was originally a non-magnetic 305 stainless steel.
I have restructured the crystalline structure
From Austenite to martensite
By placing it in a Leedskalnin PMH loop.


What’s important here, is the large diameter of the sphere
And the effects the accelerating outer surface have on rotational momentum.
In relation to the linear displacement of the ball, through the field.


https://youtu.be/Owkz6w4AhRM


Don’t worry, I’m not going to loop a smot of giant balls,
But I wanted to show you this in exaggerated form to demonstrate
the effects of changing the size of sphere in your particular design.

No, you didn't change any crystalline structure by putting your balls into a Leedskalnin PMH.

I have those balls too, and without any treatment by me, I can see that they are slightly ferromagnetic around the seam where the two hemispheres are joined together (call this the equator) and less so the further away from the equator you get. It's easy to reproduce your demonstration with my sphere, which has not been subjected to any Leedskalnin fantasy treatment.


Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #88 on: February 14, 2018, 09:12:56 PM »
No, you didn't change any crystalline structure by putting your balls into a Leedskalnin PMH.

I have those balls too, and without any treatment by me, I can see that they are slightly ferromagnetic around the seam where the two hemispheres are joined together (call this the equator) and less so the further away from the equator you get. It's easy to reproduce your demonstration with my sphere, which has not been subjected to any Leedskalnin fantasy treatment.


I’m not sure why you are willing to argue against that
(unless you just like saying nay with no logical reasoning)
But it is easy to prove that the pmh changes the magnetic
properties of ANYTHING!
Including copper, aluminum, wood, plastics, etc.
Build one, test it.
See the PMH thread I have been recently posting to,
see David Lambright’s YouTube channel
He was the one who discovered this. and it is repeatable and verifiable.
Stick anything in a pmh loop for several hours and it is paramagnetic.
Leave it for longer and it becomes ferromagnetic. Regardless of what it is.


When I first got my set of 9 hollow spheres, for use as electrostatic conductors
the first thing I did was test them for magnetism.
None of the magnets had ANY effect on the metal, except my strongest neo
and that magnet would only stick slightly, falling off from its own weight.


Now even my weak SmCo magnets stick to the ball, move the ball, etc.
Which they definitely did not do, before leaving it in the pmh loop overnight.


You are right about the seams, any holes drilled into them, or areas that have
been heated to extreme temperatures during manufacturing
and that is why I test them when I get them.
any magnetism in the spheres changes the properties of the electrostatic spark.
The sparks take on a different color, and even shoot off in strange directions
In “electrostatics”, I consider these effects to be unnecessary losses.


And for the record, the PMH did not belong to Leedskalnin
He stole that experiment from the British Royal Society publications
As he did with every one of his experiments in his book or that he showed
to the public at his castle.
Remember, we’re talking about a guy that got his training from Robert Ripley himself.
There is nothing “fantasy” about the PMH, outside  Leedskalnin’s writings.


I have no reason to argue with you about that.
You have no evidence to back up your claims of “nay”


It is what it is.
Everything is magnetic.
Deal with it




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #89 on: February 14, 2018, 11:09:42 PM »
https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


Any questions?


This was 10 yrs ago, since then we have magnetized
everything under the sun
(solids anyways, I have plans for liquids but not sure yet how to go about it)


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #89 on: February 14, 2018, 11:09:42 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at:


OneLink