Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy  (Read 236180 times)

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #300 on: February 13, 2018, 05:32:42 AM »
Oh, I don't know about that. God is omnipotent, right? But can He create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it?

What I mean is this: consistency even puts constraints on God. The universe may be unfathomable to us mere mortals, but so far as we _do_ know, it is entirely consistent, whether made by God to be so, or not. So perhaps God could make a nucleus orbit around an electron... but the rest of the universe would be very different from what we see now, since it would have to be consistent throughout with that kind of orbit. That is, if A is true, then all its implications and consequences must also be true. 

Newton II

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #301 on: February 13, 2018, 08:26:49 AM »

But can He create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it?


I don't understand that question.  You know weight comes into picture only when gravity is present and if God makes a huge rock bigger than earth or sun,  it has to be lifted from where? With reference to which gravity?   He can make a rock which cannot be lifted in gravity and lift it in the absence of gravity or just make it an anti gravity ball.


What I mean is this: consistency even puts constraints on God. The universe may be unfathomable to us mere mortals, but so far as we _do_ know, it is entirely consistent, whether made by God to be so, or not. So perhaps God could make a nucleus orbit around an electron... but the rest of the universe would be very different from what we see now, since it would have to be consistent throughout with that kind of orbit. That is, if A is true, then all its implications and consequences must also be true.


As far as the philosophy I know,   flow of time is different in physical world (earth) and non-physical world (heaven).   God's few seconds or few minutes is equivalent to millions of years on earth(our time).  So,  after few days of his time he destroys the universe and creates a new universe with different material properties and which will be after million or billion years of our time.  How do we know that the universe is consistent?   Of course when he creates a fresh universe,  all implications and consequences will be true to the properties of new universe.


Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #302 on: February 13, 2018, 08:55:07 AM »
 Yes well this is an interesting debate. Are we talking about the God of Israel or the Creator who made everything? First one is just a member of a sophisticated race and the second one is the unified consciousness


AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #303 on: February 13, 2018, 09:00:11 AM »
Hmm! what amuses me is how many people think the King James version version of events was written in English and how many of the quotes are pagan!
And I think you will find Gad're'el is Satin (book of Hanock,( NOT ENOCH) !, Gad pronounced God (bar over a = o sound) but how can this be ? In the translation from Arabaic Hebrew to King James English. 'chew that one over' and explain how the creator becomes a God from ''Yawah'' ? (in the translation) !

It was all the consistency at my place of work, that manifested as time went on, I had to go back to the original for reference realised what was going on and moved on.
So sorry if it offends any one but no of fence intended
Allen
« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 01:04:01 PM by AlienGrey »

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #304 on: February 13, 2018, 10:34:16 AM »
Well when tribes conquer others they take part of those conquered tribe's knowledge and culture with them. That is why Noah's and Mosess stories are just copies of older tales from Sumer. Gilgamesh and Sargon.

Also when a tribe with One God conquers others, they would destroy stuff that would prove otherwise. Egyptians had knowledge and techniques far beyond ours in some aspects, but all that was lost. They moved massive blocks of stone that modern engineers could only move up or down. Somehow they moved them hundreds of miles and then placed them in Baalbek.

I think New Testament is the worst. You steal a religion by saying this "new god" is the son and he calls the shots now. No historian that lived when Jesus did writes about Jesus. Then the gospels arrive 150-450 years after Christ. How many edits were there? The gospels don't even match each other. But then again the message in the new testament is ok. So you'll be fine if you don't take it literally. If you take the bible literally you can conjure up any kinda religion you want from incest pedophiles to murdering you friends.

I am inclined to believe more in genesis that was copied from old Jewish texts where the Sumerian gods (the giants) ruled the earth and created Adam to do work for them. Makes a lot more sense to me that an ancient race came here and created us to do labor.

 

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #305 on: February 13, 2018, 12:17:49 PM »
Can  be used  to generate energy a process, similar to this "Terrestrial gamma-ray flash"?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrestrial_gamma-ray_flash

Quote
Tesla Cosmic Ray Motor May Transmit Power 'Round Earth - Brooklyn Eagle - July 10, 1932, John J. A. O'Neill:

"I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of (cosmic rays).  I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges (ions and electrons).  These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor."


Device to Harness Cosmic Energy Claimed - by Nikola Tesla - New York American - November 1st, 1933:

"This new power for the driving of the world's machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities."

Prepared Statement of Tesla (For interview with press on 81st birthday observance):

There is one more discovery which I want to announce at this time, consisting of a new method and apparatus for the obtainment of vacua exceeding many times the highest heretofore realized. I think that as much as one-billionth of a micron can be attained. What may be accomplished by means of such vacua is a matter of conjecture, but it is obvious that they will make possible the production of much more intense effects in electron tubes. My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large body carrying a surface charge and not an elementary unit. When such an electron leaves an electrode of extremely high potential and in very high vacuum, it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than the normal. This may astonish some of those who think that the particle has the same charge in the tube and outside of it in the air. A beautiful and instructive experiment has been contrived by me showing that such is not the case, for as soon as the particle gets out into the atmosphere it becomes a blazing star owing to the escape of the excess charge. The great quantity of electricity stored on the particle is responsible for the difficulties encountered in the operation of certain tubes and the rapid deterioration of the same.

....in my experiments with a high potential vacuum tube I brought out in 1896, which I consider one of my best inventions. I have operated it with pressures ranging from 4,000,000 to 18,000,000 volts. More recently I have designed an apparatus for 50,000,000 volts which should produce many results of great scientific importance.

https://teslaresearch.jimdo.com/radiant-energy/

It looks like a lamp similar to an X-ray lamp. But the Tesla lamp worked at a voltage of 40 to 180 times more than conventional X-ray lamps, which are used in medicine. Probably such a lamp could produce relativistic electrons, as in a dark lightning.

..and a very hard X-ray

Runaway breakdown
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runaway_breakdown

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #306 on: February 13, 2018, 01:07:58 PM »

It looks like a lamp similar to an X-ray lamp. But the Tesla lamp worked at a voltage of 40 to 180 times more than conventional X-ray lamps, which are used in medicine. Probably such a lamp could produce relativistic electrons, as in a dark lightning.

..and a very hard X-ray

Sounds like it would cook your dinner in front of it  ;D

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #307 on: February 13, 2018, 02:16:57 PM »
Hmmm, who is this “ Dog “ person anyway?

I suggest reading the works of Oolon Caluphid.

http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Oolon_Colluphid

Cheers Graham.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #308 on: February 13, 2018, 02:58:31 PM »
Politics, religion and sports

subjects which almost always get us twisted up a bit [us men]

If you Look back thru Fernandez posts you will notice HE has been consistent  and confidently beating a drum.

and a very very simple drum....

filled with remarkable suggestions for cheap and expedient investigation ...[I really like this guy]


perhaps a thread to discuss and investigate ?

it truly seems a simple path.

if there is an assumption or error it should become apparent rather quickly.

respectfully
Chet K
PS Fernandez bench marked post here [post 261]
http://overunity.com/17535/kapanadze-stepanov-barbosa-leal-and-the-secret-of-free-energy/255/#.WoLwhbmWzoY

Sergh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #309 on: February 13, 2018, 03:15:32 PM »
returning to Tesla's words about cosmic rays as a source of Free Energy:
NASA | Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes Create Antimatter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXKt7UVjd-I

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #310 on: February 15, 2018, 08:30:30 PM »
I think Kapanadze's secret was already in his magnetic motor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY&t=188s

Toroid xformer, PC power supply and something under a circuit board. Doesn't matter how the motor turns or the generator works. That setup powers from a battery and then keeps powering the motor

I think he realized someone could figure this out and the the next videos are aquariums and other shit with old TV-panels painted black and extra wires up the wazoo.

Ground cables going through scrap metal coils and going into his know-how box.

tomd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #311 on: February 18, 2018, 01:30:53 PM »
                                                ****************   February 9th 2018   ****************




User Zeitmaschine, I am going to give you credit, you put a lot of effort into your posts (even though you are wrong) BUT I want to put you and some others in this world on the right track and moving in the right direction.




Here is the truth, take it or bury it
I will keep this short and drama free, the words Free Energy, Overunity, and Zero Point Energy has corrupted your thoughts because the device is............ so easy you will laugh

For starters your statement is incorrect Lenz's Law is actually a blessing, you need to wrap your head around that first. Let's review Lenz quickly

All of you globally have missed the key word in that statement, you are too quick to denounce Lenz's Law as the culprit, the destroyer of energy. However, if I highlight just one word in that statement we open up a new method of utilizing Lenz's Law.

So the beauty is, if I create a magnetic field in a coil with some current NATURE rewards me with a duplicate magnetic field that opposes mine. Already I got something for almost nothing. (BTW... that's my first Primary coil usage, to create a Lenz induced field)

So I now have a Primary magnetic field that gave rise to an induced magnetic field as stated by Lenz. Pay close attention here, this is important! Now take another coil (call it Primary 2) and feed your Lenz induced magnetic field so you complement its growth. So in other words your North pole of Primary 2 faces the South pole of Lenz field (or Vice Versa). Because Lenz is only present in change of original magnetic flux. Are you starting to see? Lenz has no interest in my second Primary because Primary 1 is the parent of Lenz induced field. You really need to appreciate how powerful that statement is. Ignore what has been written in any other thread that talks about these devices, lots of people using big words and way to complex algorithms to build something a child can assemble. 

So do you now understand why Barbosa and Leal explain in their patent the pole of the induced complements the primary pole? Do you now understand why that guy Tariel says........ it's so easy you will laugh, see why Clemente Figuera said "this is like the egg of Columbus". Because it really is that silly and simple, you simply feed the induced magnetic field with another magnetic field. There is no Lenz that opposes Primary 2, Primary 2 doesn't create an induced field (if you time it right) it ADDS to what has already been induced from P1. The result is a strong Rectified Magnetic field. That is your resonator, not so glamorous now that you know how everyone including Steve Mark pull this off. I apologies if you where looking for something more complex or other worldly. Unfortunately many of you will still be looking for a more complex solution because your mind will never accept such a simple solution to a problem that had you perplexed for years.

That is the theory behind the how it works some of you are smart enough to figure out the build details, but I will get you started. You are going to wind you primary's like a Poly-Phase motor (Yep a Tesla invention) take special note that a capacitor is used to delay a phase (this is super cheap and EZ). These devices use impulses and you need to split the wave in half so diodes are used. So one coil is at its magnetic max while the other is not, also you need to split the wave between coils, so half wave per primary but that is why you are using diodes (or tubes if your that type of guy Steve). Timing is very critical between the coils, remember you are building a resonator and nothing more.

Like I said before, take some iron from a tire jack and cut the ends off. Get a C-clamp to close the ends and you have a simple core that allows for different coils. To extract you need a secondary but that is simple, wrap it around your low budget iron core, use a thick or thin secondary.

So its up to you and figure out if the primary's should be CW or CCW, shouldn't take that long. BTW... bifiler coil doesn't mean crap.  The beauty of this device is different inputs (voltage/frequency) changes the output and output varies based on type of coil. Start simple, low voltage and don't kill yourself. You have more in this post then you ever wanted.

One more thing, Tesla patent, 413,353 not glamorous and not your FE but excellent facts and my personal opinion is as close as it gets for Tesla.

For those interested. This is the best explanation of back emf and transformers I have read. It's only one page so wont take long to read.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #312 on: February 18, 2018, 02:35:20 PM »
tomd
nice simple Doc

can you find one on  resonators ?

Fernandez quote from your above repost

Timing is very critical between the coils, remember you are building a resonator and nothing more.

and  some ? instructions from Fernandez ....[there are more instructions in other posts he has made here in the last 4 years]
Quote
You are going to wind you primary's like a Poly-Phase motor (Yep a Tesla invention) take special note that a capacitor is used to delay a phase (this is super cheap and EZ). These devices use impulses and you need to split the wave in half so diodes are used. So one coil is at its magnetic max while the other is not, also you need to split the wave between coils, so half wave per primary but that is why you are using diodes (or tubes if your that type of guy Steve). Timing is very critical between the coils, remember you are building a resonator and nothing more.
End quote



respectfully
Chet K

PS
still getting feedback from persons on this build [the resonator part

No tire irons have been harmed YET...

when that happens it will happen here in a dedicated thread

* first a schematic will be proposed for discussion... to accomplish this "Fernandez resonator"


norman6538

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #313 on: February 19, 2018, 02:19:32 AM »
The Lenz factor has me confused but I want to add what I picked up from the
Bouforn patent....
it says in my words the coils protrude inside each other...
in his words...
  either both opposite sides of its core will be into hollows in the corresponding
inducers and in contact with their respective cores, or either, being close the induced
and inducer and in contact by their poles,
 but in no case it has to be any communication (contact??) between
 the induced wire and the inducer wire.
....

a. into the coil - not  core hollows (remember this is a spanish to english translation so
the words will not be the best)
b. no contact with each other ( translated uses communication)

Did  I understand this right?

Norman

tomd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #314 on: February 19, 2018, 03:30:36 AM »
A couple of links that may be helpfull.
1. Tesla patent 413353 mentioned by Fernandez: https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-413353-method-obtaining-direct-alternating-currents
2. The Qeg2 which I believe has been modeled on patent 413353. The blog was started in 2016 but for whatever reason came to an abrupt halt: https://qeg2.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/introducing-qeg2/