Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82043
  • *Latest: brf69

  • *Total Posts: 494072
  • *Total Topics: 14521
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 89
  • *Total: 92

Facebook

Author Topic: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment  (Read 4742 times)

Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2017, 09:42:02 AM »
John, are you kidding me? Photon?

it is bs from the start to the end. those people are full of it.

they should be locked up.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #16 on: November 20, 2017, 09:52:54 AM »


   It's taken me almost 70 years to get a bit of an idea about relativity.
One of the most exciting things to happen during my life is when I
came across electromagnetic induction and how its purported to work.
To me it's a mechanism of sheer beauty.
   You've certainly got your work cut out as you'll have to rewrite the
whole story.  Good luck, youll be one of the most famous people in
history!!!!!
         Kind regards. John.

faraday's em induction law is description, not explanation, they don't know the mechanism of magnetism yet. they don't even know the mechanism of light.

Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2017, 07:46:52 PM »
every time i hear scientists talk about photon, feel like to puke.

what is photon? no mass, no charge, travels in vacuum at light speed. carries energy, has wave length, has frequency, has polarity, can knock out electrons from atoms, can heat up matters.

is it true? not at all.

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein

He won nobel for photoelectric effect theory. godfather of qm, why scientists take his own words as shit?

there is NO such thing as photon, quanta, quantum, black hole and dark matter exist, but science lies ruled the world.

i am really pissed, monkeys, liars, control the world.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2017, 10:47:13 PM »



  You silly person.
  Of course photons exist, so do phonons too!
  You just don't understand, maybe you'll catch up one day? ???
   The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of view is TIME.
        John.

Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #19 on: November 21, 2017, 01:41:24 AM »


  You silly person.
  Of course photons exist, so do phonons too!
  You just don't understand, maybe you'll catch up one day? ???
   The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of view is TIME.
        John.

do you understand? what is photon? you know better than einstein?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #19 on: November 21, 2017, 01:41:24 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2017, 03:05:04 AM »
all scientists think light is photon/em wave/particle that travels at light speed in the vacuum space.

they don't know light speed is infinite in space. because they don't know the cause/mechanism of light.

2 electrons at distance r, repel each other with a force f=Ke x ee/rr.

that force acts like a physical rod between the two electrons, if 1 electron is moving, the emf force will instantly transfer to the other electron at opposite direction, this is the true mechanism of light/em wave/radiant energy.

the sun is not an active nuclear reactor, the sun is not shooting out energy to space, it only shares energy with matters surround. sun's energy is from star formation.

energy cannot leak/vanish into space, energy can only exist within matter.

matter and energy are both immortal, space has no boundary, time has no beginning or end, existence is immortal.

but who we are? what we become?

phono? read and believe? true science is follow the precise mechanism, don't be fool.

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2017, 09:33:49 AM »



You'll get there one day. The. Sun loses mass.
Hydrogen to helium, neutrinos and pure energy.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2017, 09:33:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #22 on: November 21, 2017, 10:01:10 AM »


You'll get there one day. The. Sun loses mass.
Hydrogen to helium, neutrinos and pure energy.

bs. read and believe. what is energy? do you really understand? e=mcc is total bs. but you won't believe me. never mind. it is all good.

just ask yourself 1 question, if the earth is as hot as the sun, will all nuclear fuel ignite at once?

Offline isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #23 on: November 21, 2017, 10:13:26 AM »
in fact, if you believe atoms are as science told you, 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a hydrogen atom, you are a fool.

you know opposite charges attract each other, but you don't ask why ?  how? the cause and precise mechanism of the structure.

you follow others, worship big names, listen to teachers, read books. smart enough to not question. you are a sheeple.


Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #24 on: November 21, 2017, 10:45:39 AM »



 We've got a 40kw. solar pv. and a Tesla car and it works.
 Please explain.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #24 on: November 21, 2017, 10:45:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3200
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #25 on: November 21, 2017, 11:10:42 AM »

Pilot-wave theory makes all the same predictions as the probabilistic formulation of quantum mechanics (which wouldn’t be referred to as the “Copenhagen” interpretation until the 1950s), but without the ghostliness or mysterious collapse.  The old, deterministic alternative of QM is not mentioned in most textbooks and most people in the field haven’t heard of it. Sheldon Goldstein, a professor of mathematics, physics, and philosophy at Rutgers University and a supporter of pilot-wave theory, blames the “preposterous” neglect of the theory on “decades of indoctrination.”  At this stage, Goldstein and several other noted researchers risk their careers by questioning quantum orthodoxy.  The physicist David Bohm resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, with Einstein’s encouragement, and made clear that it did work, but it never caught on.  The theory is also known as de Broglie-Bohm theory, or Bohmian mechanics.

By 1932, when the Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann claimed to have proven that the probabilistic wave equation in quantum mechanics could have no “hidden variables” (that is, missing components, such as de Broglie’s particle with its well-defined trajectory), pilot-wave theory was so poorly regarded that most physicists believed von Neumann’s proof without even reading a translation.  More than 30 years would pass before von Neumann’s proof was shown to be false, but by then the damage was done.  Later, the Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell went on to prove a seminal theorem that many physicists today misinterpret as rendering hidden variables impossible.  But Bell supported pilot-wave theory. He was the one who pointed out the flaws in von Neumann’s original proof.  And in 1986 he wrote that pilot-wave theory “seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.”  The neglect continues to this day.....

Now at last, pilot-wave theory may be experiencing a minor comeback — at least, among fluid dynamicists. “I wish that the people who were developing quantum mechanics at the beginning of last century had access to these experiments,” Milewski said. “Because then the whole history of quantum mechanics might be different.”  The experiments began a decade ago, when Yves Couder and colleagues at Paris Diderot University discovered that vibrating a silicon oil bath up and down at a particular frequency can induce a droplet to bounce along the surface. The droplet’s path, they found, was guided by the slanted contours of the liquid’s surface generated from the droplet’s own bounces — a mutual particle-wave interaction analogous to de Broglie’s pilot-wave concept.

The photon carries momentum. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is not possible to measure location and momentum at the same time. If the momentum is distributed throughout the entire volume, if one measures the entire momentum, the whole volume must be considered. Since the volume spreads all over creation, it is impossible to say that it is located at a point.  It seems that the meaning of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be reinterpreted to support the present conclusion of the nature of the photon. If it has aperture and length, the momentum is not located at a single point. If a single point is assumed for the structure, no momentum can be measured. It seems that the significance of the uncertainty principle has been highly overrated.  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle simply says that the photon has volume.  Calculation shows that the energy and thus the mass is distributed uniformly throughout the structure. The same fact applies to the distribution of momentum.  Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the wrong assumptions of the Copenhagen interpretation has been proven false!

Reference:  Fluid Experiments Support Deterministic “Pilot-Wave” Quantum Theory (<----- Dead Link - Snapshots shown below)

Gravock

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3200
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #26 on: November 21, 2017, 11:50:26 AM »


   It's taken me almost 70 years to get a bit of an idea about relativity.
One of the most exciting things to happen during my life is when I
came across electromagnetic induction and how its purported to work.
To me it's a mechanism of sheer beauty.
   You've certainly got your work cut out as you'll have to rewrite the
whole story.  Good luck, youll be one of the most famous people in
history!!!!!
         Kind regards. John.

Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an interpretation that has been proven false?  The whole story has already been rewritten!  However, you John, have been indoctrinated by this system of things.

Gravock

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #27 on: November 21, 2017, 01:32:19 PM »
"there is NO such thing as photon, quanta, quantum,
black hole and dark matter exist, but science lies
ruled the world."

Fear not my fran,its all relative

Offline profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #28 on: November 21, 2017, 01:39:16 PM »
"Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe
based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven
false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an
interpretation that has been proven false?'

What does it matter how john sees the world.how does
the world see the world is all that matters
 

Offline minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #29 on: November 21, 2017, 01:47:40 PM »



 I'll see if I can find my Hanbury Brown and Twiss.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #29 on: November 21, 2017, 01:47:40 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: