Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: Theoretical Research on October 29, 2017, 05:48:30 PM

Title: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on October 29, 2017, 05:48:30 PM
Just thought I'd ask. Who would you like to witness a self running free energy machine being demonstrated in Los Angeles county along with full access to an air core device that demonstrates the Steven Mark's effect where the voltage changes when the device is flipped relative to Earth's surface? I don’t know that many people in the free energy community, but off the top of my head I would vote for Stefan Hartmann (owner of OU), Sterling D. Allan (owner of Peswiki), Tom Bearden. Is Tom Bearden alive? There’s another well known person I would have died to witness the event, but he recently passed away. Maybe he’ll be there in spirit. :)
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: e2matrix on October 29, 2017, 07:13:38 PM
Stefan is based in Germany - that would be great if he could get to L.A. but I somewhat doubt that will happen.   Sterling seems to have lost his mind (  http://www.worldviewopinion.net/following-sterling-allan-of-peswiki-friends-say-he-has-lost-his-mind/ (http://www.worldviewopinion.net/following-sterling-allan-of-peswiki-friends-say-he-has-lost-his-mind/) ) so I wouldn't say he is a good choice.   Bearden would be good but he's not on this forum as far as I know.   Not sure who on this forum or is a well known FE researcher is close to L.A.   Maybe some others will speak up as this would be great to have some known trustworthy people in on viewing your device.   I've been following the other thread on this.   One problem you may want to consider in light of statements you've made about this would be the safety of your meeting arrangements considering the potential you have stated this discovery has.   Best of luck.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on October 29, 2017, 09:38:47 PM
If it happens it would probably be held at a notable University out here, if I can find some EEs & physicists who seem hopeful about the demo.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: TinselKoala on October 29, 2017, 11:35:45 PM
I'm sure Sterling Allan would love to see your demonstration. Unfortunately I don't think he'll be able to make it -- since he's in the Utah State Prison on multiple convictions for child sexual abuse, and he'll probably be spending the rest of his life there.  He'll have his first parole hearing in about 21 years -- when he's 73.

http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/fountain-green-man-sentenced-to-possible-life-in-prison-for/article_dc13e908-b078-58f7-b648-90df5e45d579.html

Why don't you give Jim Woodward a call. He's in Fullerton, which isn't too far away, and I'm very sure he and his grad students would love to see what you've got.
https://physics.fullerton.edu/component/zoo/item/dr-james-f-woodward
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on October 29, 2017, 11:41:17 PM
Thanks for info on Jim Woodward. If it happens I'll definitely contact him.

As far as Universities, it should be one that's known for physics and engineering. According to this helpful website it seems California Institute of Technology and Stanford University score about the highest overall in both areas.

https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/quantum-physics-rankings

https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/electrical-engineering-rankings?int=9d0e08&int=a06908

Someone told me that it could be difficult to get a demo going at a University. Something to do with signing agreement papers and stuff?
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: TinselKoala on October 30, 2017, 12:14:31 AM
Your work is right up Woodward's alley.

As far as demos and paperwork.... just pack up your stuff into a suitcase, get up to CalTech or even JPL, find out where the EE and Physics grad students and techs drink their beer, and set up your demo there. Buy a pitcher or two, do your thing, and stand back.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on October 30, 2017, 12:30:02 AM
Your work is right up Woodward's alley.

As far as demos and paperwork.... just pack up your stuff into a suitcase, get up to CalTech or even JPL, find out where the EE and Physics grad students and techs drink their beer, and set up your demo there. Buy a pitcher or two, do your thing, and stand back.
Wow! What an amazing individual!

https://physics.fullerton.edu/component/zoo/item/dr-james-f-woodward
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_F._Woodward
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodward_effect

It would be an honor to meet him one of these day.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: isawit on October 30, 2017, 03:27:14 AM
same bs as em drive, powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma.

fart in space, fart atoms will push you away. momentum conservation, no matter what you fart.

fart inside the spaceship, its momentum will not change.

Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: PolaczekCebulaczek on October 30, 2017, 06:14:40 AM
same bs as em drive, powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma.

fart in space, fart atoms will push you away. momentum conservation, no matter what you fart.

fart inside the spaceship, its momentum will not change.

they tested em drive and it worked? or it was just farting in space? soon there will be rockets made from gigantic microwave oven ?
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: isawit on October 30, 2017, 06:42:37 AM
all bs. what mechanism? what's the efficiency?
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: isawit on October 30, 2017, 06:45:59 AM
A radio frequency (RF) resonant cavity thruster, also known as an EmDrive, is a controversial proposed type of electromagnetic thruster with a microwave cavity, designed to produce thrust from an electromagnetic field inside the cavity. Sceptics have deemed it to be impossible.[1][2][3][4][5]

Such thrusters have been hypothesized since 2001 when British engineer Roger Shawyer published details of the concept. To date, there is no theoretical consensus as to how a resonant cavity could produce such thrust.[6] As of 2017, a few tests of prototype drives have observed a small apparent thrust, while other prototypes did not show thrust, and no prototype has been successfully tested more than once.[7] Due to apparent discrepancies with the current laws of physics[8] and lack of reproducible evidence, many theoretical physicists and commentators have been led to label the device "impossible", explaining the observed thrust by measurement errors.[9] The arising scepticism has led many media platforms to refer to the engine as the Impossible Drive or the Impossible Space Drive[10][11][12][13][14].  wiki
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: PolaczekCebulaczek on October 30, 2017, 07:07:28 PM
they promised test in space WHERE ARE THOSE TESTS?? WHY IT TAKE SO LONG?! yeah.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on October 31, 2017, 11:39:29 PM
Looks like I'll be meeting a very wealthy Chinese guy near Griffith observatory tonight. He caught my attention by mentioning lots of money for equipment which is something I need. Shall see.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 01, 2017, 04:39:04 PM
My smart & trustworthy friend said to not go. So I sent the Chinese guy a private message back on youtube. He wrote back telling me all I was seeing was gravity affecting everything such as the battery and core when the device was flipped. It seems people are becoming skeptical of everything nowadays. In the U.S. a high percentage of the public automatically says “fake news” if it doesn’t fit their political beliefs. Nobody is going to believe it until a self runner is powering their home longer than a battery could and even then they might doubt it.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 02, 2017, 04:16:35 PM
Looks like my smart friend was correct. Mm. Hello agent smith world lol. Having fun?

Test was successful. I should listen to him more often.

ps your people are not in power of this planet despite what your little egos tell you. ;)


tic, toc, tic, toc
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Paul-R on November 02, 2017, 05:27:52 PM
I would suggest Patrick Kelly, but there are so many wild goose chases that I would be reluctant to suggest it to him.

What is the prime purpose of this demonstration?

If it is to gain venture capital, then maybe they will follow up this event with one in London.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 02, 2017, 05:34:36 PM
Thanks, but never mind about the request because I was trying to rush the process. Humanity isn't ready, yet. I'll be back when it's time, about 3 years, but apparently I'm to release it in person to be by hand. Either a piece of paper or small disk that contains all the details. :)
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Paul-R on November 03, 2017, 04:45:23 PM
Humanity isn't ready, yet. I'll be back when it's time, about 3 years
If humanity isn't ready now, it won't be any more ready in 3 years.

My guess is that it doesn't work dependably.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: blueplanet on November 03, 2017, 06:21:21 PM
If humanity isn't ready now, it won't be any more ready in 3 years.

My guess is that it doesn't work dependably.

I have to agree with you.

In the air-core of his/her circuit, the inductive current of the space source B2 reaches 2A and the voltage reaches 0.9KV. This means the power of the so-called vortex is in the order of kilowatts. This so-called "air-core" looks like an artificial power source rather than any natural occurring source. Unless the inventor can shed more light on it, this power is simply not realistic.

With so much power, we don't need such a complicated circuit to detect it.

(Disclaimer: I am an academic. )


Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 03, 2017, 08:12:41 PM
I have to agree with you.

In the air-core of his/her circuit, the inductive current of the space source B2 reaches 2A and the voltage reaches 0.9KV. This means the power of the so-called vortex is in the order of kilowatts. This so-called "air-core" looks like an artificial power source rather than any natural occurring source. Unless the inventor can shed more light on it, this power is simply not realistic.

With so much power, we don't need such a complicated circuit to detect it.

(Disclaimer: I am an academic. )

You're academic?? Show the math. 2A @ 0.9KV? Kilowatts? Oh my. Academics would understand a basic concept called phase angle taught in 101 electronics. I've already shown my math. Point out the error in my math. Show your math and  I'll point out your error. smh
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 03, 2017, 08:38:13 PM
This post proves you don't know much about electrical engineering.

ps, I'll save you the time. The 0.9KV you talk about is more like 1.10KV across the capacitor and 1.12KV across the inductor, while the voltage from the free energy source is about 10mV (10E-3 V, 0.01 V). What academic are you? No offense, but it's obviously not electrical engineering. Lets save our time here and end this nonsense unless you want to prove to a lot of people you're an agent. ;)

It's okay, but please learn at school or on your own. Not at the cost of others. Or maybe that's your goal.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Magluvin on November 04, 2017, 02:13:04 AM
If humanity isn't ready now, it won't be any more ready in 3 years.

My guess is that it doesn't work dependably.

Tesla said it in an interview way back then, 'There is no better time than now' when asked if he thought the world was ready for free energy. ;)   And I agree

Mags
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: blueplanet on November 04, 2017, 02:33:20 AM
You're academic?? Show the math. 2A @ 0.9KV? Kilowatts? Oh my. Academics would understand a basic concept called phase angle taught in 101 electronics. I've already shown my math. Point out the error in my math. Show your math and  I'll point out your error. smh


It is not from my maths. I actually ran LTspice simulation on your circuit. I agree that the power at B2 is most likely zero. However, the steady current of B2 was about 2A. This much current is unlikely from space waves. As I said, I am interested in your air-core. If there is any secrecy concerned, you can PM me.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 04, 2017, 02:40:06 AM
The 2A is caused by the oscillator. Again, please learn basic 101 electronics before making such statements.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 04, 2017, 02:42:04 AM
Tesla said it in an interview way back then, 'There is no better time than now' when asked if he thought the world was ready for free energy. ;)   And I agree

Mags

Yup. I'm more of an Einstein guy, who later greatly regretted helping scientists and engineers develop the nuclear bomb.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 04, 2017, 02:47:11 AM
If humanity isn't ready now, it won't be any more ready in 3 years.

My guess is that it doesn't work dependably.

After such technology is released to the public then how long would it be before they understand the physics that allows north korea and terrorists to blow up entire continents? Lets say it's 4 years. If the device is released in 2020, then maybe by 2024 the world would have calmed down, humanity enters full adulthood, and everything is okay. Release it now and maybe by 2021 the world isn't ready. Better to be safe.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Magluvin on November 04, 2017, 03:02:08 AM
Yup. I'm more of an Einstein guy, who later greatly regretted helping scientists and engineers develop the nuclear bomb.

Well then it would appear you have just turned to Einstein in the last day or so, as it seemed you were showing something to everyone here, till now.

Mags
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 04, 2017, 03:08:44 AM
Well then it would appear you have just turned to Einstein in the last day or so, as it seemed you were showing something to everyone here, till now.

Mags
How so? The spectrum footage? Nah that didn't show anything except an interesting self-runner effect.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Magluvin on November 04, 2017, 03:16:22 AM
How so? The spectrum footage? Nah that didn't show anything except an interesting self-runner effect.

lol  Well then what is the point????

Mags
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on November 04, 2017, 03:19:12 AM
lol  Well then what is the point????

Mags
Just to show an interesting effect. :/
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Magluvin on November 04, 2017, 03:21:42 AM
Just to show an interesting effect. :/

Ok

Mags
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 05, 2018, 09:49:34 PM
Your work is right up Woodward's alley.

As far as demos and paperwork.... just pack up your stuff into a suitcase, get up to CalTech or even JPL, find out where the EE and Physics grad students and techs drink their beer, and set up your demo there. Buy a pitcher or two, do your thing, and stand back.

Best advice of the year!
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 02:01:47 AM
Thanks for info on Jim Woodward. If it happens I'll definitely contact him.

As far as Universities, it should be one that's known for physics and engineering. According to this helpful website it seems California Institute of Technology and Stanford University score about the highest overall in both areas.

https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/quantum-physics-rankings (https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/quantum-physics-rankings)

https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/electrical-engineering-rankings?int=9d0e08&int=a06908 (https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools/electrical-engineering-rankings?int=9d0e08&int=a06908)

Someone told me that it could be difficult to get a demo going at a University. Something to do with signing agreement papers and stuff?

Your posts and threads you've been creating are highly suspect to me.  In the above posting, you reference Stanford University.  In another thread, you reference the zoo hypothesis (http://overunity.com/17550/zoo-hypothesis-we-are-here/) along with phrases such as "we are here" and "we are watching you".  In a third thread (http://overunity.com/17497/2020/), you reference a self-runner that will produce well over 1W, technology that will quickly allow humanity to leave the nest, and the AI Singularity.

Stanford University is guilty of entomological terrorism and should be charged with crimes against humanity.  Entomology is the branch of zoology concerned with the study of insects.  This entomological terrorism also leads to the AI Singularity in which you speak of.  It appears as if you may be one of the parties responsible for this entomological terrorism against humanity.

Reference Video:  MHS 19: PATENTED MORGELLONS: INSECT HORMONE ECDYSONE SWITCHES DISEASE ON/OFF (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmhRL0QpD4)

tic toc, tic toc, tic toc

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 02:11:58 AM
Your posts and threads you've been creating are highly suspect to me.  In the above posting, you reference Stanford University.  In another thread, you reference the zoo hypothesis (http://overunity.com/17550/zoo-hypothesis-we-are-here/) along with phrases such as "we are here" and "we are watching you".  In a third thread (http://overunity.com/17497/2020/), you reference a self-runner that will produce well over 1W, technology that will quickly allow humanity to leave the nest, and the AI Singularity.

Stanford University is guilty of entomological terrorism and should be charged with crimes against humanity.  Entomology is the branch of zoology concerned with the study of insects.  This entomological terrorism also leads to the AI Singularity in which you speak of.  It appears as if you may be one of the responsible parties responsible for this entomological terrorism against humanity.

Reference Video:  MHS 19: PATENTED MORGELLONS: INSECT HORMONE ECDYSONE SWITCHES DISEASE ON/OFF (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmhRL0QpD4)

tic toc, tic toc, tic toc

Gravock

If that's your video and you're actually trying to prove something, then one suggestion is to add references, preferably peer reviewed references. I've never heard of any such silly accusations against Stanford University. Sounds like a conspiracy theory.

Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 02:24:17 AM
If that's your video and you're actually trying to prove something, then one suggestion is to add references, preferably peer reviewed references. I've never heard of any such silly accusations against Stanford University. Sounds like a conspiracy theory.

There are references in both the video and in the description of the video, along with patents.

See Morgellons at CitizensAHT.org
Citizens Against Harmful Technology
NARRATED version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0PWi77uMH0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0PWi77uMH0)  <----  Malformed link corrected

Supporting research at http://www.skizit.biz/2013/07/21/ecdy (http://www.skizit.biz/2013/07/21/ecdy)...  <---- Malformed Link

The only way genetic transformations in Morgellons can occur is with the strict tight control by inducible expression systems such as ecdysone.

Here is a model of the ecdysone receptor molecule. This is what the new DNA inserts, a molecule which will accept non-human hormones to start the transcription of foreign DNA in the body.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-9wOuqbIwQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-9wOuqbIwQ)  <----  Malformed link corrected

MORE MORGELLONS VIDEOS HERE:
http://www.youtube.com/user/skizitgesture/videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/skizitgesture/videos)  <----  Malformed link corrected

For more information on gene therapy and human hair in Morgellons, please see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9ab-is8hcA&list=PLEPFBadkrzNnX75HHABLsIkaYquDVUlt9 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9ab-is8hcA&list=PLEPFBadkrzNnX75HHABLsIkaYquDVUlt9)  <----  Malformed link corrected

What is a possible treatment for Morgellons insects, bacteria and fungi?  See https://www.nap.edu/read/1924/chapter/5 (https://www.nap.edu/read/1924/chapter/5) <----  Malformed link corrected
Medicinal Uses for Neem Tree Oil (take internally only denatured neem)

Morgellons patents:  US 6245531 Polynucleotides Encoding Insect Ecdysone Receptor, http://www.patentlens.net/imageserver (http://www.patentlens.net/imageserver)...  <----  Malformed link

US 5514578A Polynucleotides Encoding Insect Steroid Hormone Receptor Polypeptides and Cells Transformed With Same, https://www.lens.org/lens/search?q=US5514578#/p0 (https://www.lens.org/lens/search?q=US5514578#/p0)  <----  Malformed link corrected

Inventors:
David Hogness, 650-723-6166, tran@cmgm.stanford.edu
Michael Koelle, 203-432-5662, Michael.koelle@yale.edu
William Seagraves, 203-432-4537, William.seagraves@yale.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPRING HOUSE, Pa.--(BW HealthWire)--May 7, 2002
Agreement grants Invitrogen nonexclusive, worldwide rights to manufacture and sell Ecdysone-Inducible Expression research kits.  RHeoGene today announced it has negotiated an agreement to grant Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) a nonexclusive, worldwide sublicense for sales of Invitrogen's Ecdysone-Inducible Expression System and related products for research purposes only. RHeoGene holds an exclusive license to Stanford University patents U.S. 5,514,578, 6,245,531 and EP Patent 0517805 that cover sales and use of certain ecdysone-based products.

Invitrogen has been manufacturing and selling its Ecdysone- Inducible Expression System under a separate license since 1996. Under its license from RHeoGene, Invitrogen will continue to provide Ecdysone-Inducible Expression System products to academic, government, industrial, and clinical institutions for research purposes. Customers wishing to use ecdysone receptor-based gene expression systems for commercial purposes should contact RHeoGene for a commercial license.

"This licensing agreement is the first external validation of the importance of RHeoGene's exclusive license to the intellectual property encompassed by these Stanford patents after broader claims to U.S. 5,514,578 were granted," said Tom Tillett, RHeoGene Executive Vice President for Operations.

The Stanford patents are directed to genes that encode insect-based ecdysone receptors from a broad range of insect species and methods for regulating gene expression in host cells. The patent coverage includes ecdysone receptor (EcR) genes originating from Drosophila, the basis of Invitrogen's Ecdysone-Inducible Expression System. The patents are based on the pioneering research of Dr. David Hogness, Emeritus Munzer Professor of Developmental Biology and Biochemistry at Stanford University. RHeoGene's exclusive license to these patents encompasses all uses outside of plants, including cell-based assays, genomics, proteomics, gene therapy, cell culture/fermentation, transgenic animals, and biosensors.

RHeoGene focuses on delivering customized inducible gene expression technology systems to advance proteomics, drug discovery, biotherapeutics production, and human gene therapy. RHeoGene's operations are located in Spring House, Pa., and Charlottesville, Va.

For more information, visit www.rheogene.com (http://www.rheogene.com).

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 03:02:44 AM
[snip]
Supporting research at
http://www.skizit.biz/2013/07/21/ecdy (http://www.skizit.biz/2013/07/21/ecdy)...
[snip]

In Japanese it says "This page can not be found."  Is there another research page?
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 03:33:02 AM
In Japanese it says "This page can not be found."  Is there another research page?

The links were malformed.  I have corrected most of the malformed links.  Is there another research page?  Yes, how many do you want?  You can start with David Lawrence Dewey (http://www.dldewey.com/morgel.htm), the channel of skizit Gesture (https://www.youtube.com/user/skizitgesture/videos), and the corrected malformed links.  Let me know if you need to be spoon fed some more if you can't do a search for yourself!

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 05:27:53 AM
The links were malformed.  I have corrected most of the malformed links.  Is there another research page?  Yes, how many do you want?  You can start with David Lawrence Dewey (http://www.dldewey.com/morgel.htm), the channel of skizit Gesture (https://www.youtube.com/user/skizitgesture/videos), and the corrected malformed links.  Let me know if you need to be spoon fed some more if you can't do a search for yourself!

Gravock

smh. Again, where's the evidence regarding your Stanford University conspiracy theory?

As far as Morgellons skin condition, you can read the Wikipedia article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgellons

"Morgellons (/mɔː(ɹ)ˈdʒɛlənz/) is the informal name of a self-diagnosed skin condition in which individuals have sores that they believe contain some kind of fibers.[1] Morgellons is poorly understood but the general medical consensus is that it is a form of delusional parasitosis; the sores are the result of compulsive scratching, and the fibers, when analysed, turn out to originate from textiles."
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 06:14:45 AM
smh. Again, where's the evidence regarding your Stanford University conspiracy theory?

As far as Morgellons skin condition, you can read the Wikipedia article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgellons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgellons)

"Morgellons (/mɔː(ɹ)ˈdʒɛlənz/) is the informal name of a self-diagnosed skin condition in which individuals have sores that they believe contain some kind of fibers.[1] Morgellons is poorly understood but the general medical consensus is that it is a form of delusional parasitosis; the sores are the result of compulsive scratching, and the fibers, when analysed, turn out to originate from textiles."

I am fully aware of the wiki article on Morgellons.

The wiki article on Morgellons is outdated!  It is not a delusional parasitosis mental disorder as falsely asserted in the wiki article when the wiki page was first created.   However, the wiki Talk:Morgellons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Morgellons) page has confirmed that the disease is a specific skin infection. The filaments, that have been found in the skin of patients, are composed of keratin and collagen. The bacteria responsible for lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, predominates as the infective agent in most of the Morgellons skin specimens studied so far. International Journal of General Medicine - Morgellons disease: a filamentous borrelial dermatitis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072536) 

Snapshot of the wiki Talk:Morgellons page shown below for a quick reference.

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 06:31:33 AM
Great. Assuming it's a peer reviewed website, it will be added to the Wikipedia article. Academics, including Stanford University, are not interested in spreading lies. A quick note. What will most likely happen is that the new findings will allow medical industry to distinguish between "delusional parasitosis" cases, which is a real, and the tickborne infection.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 06:46:24 AM
Great. Assuming it's a peer reviewed website, it will be added to the Wikipedia article. Academics, including Stanford University, are not interested in spreading lies. A quick note. What will most likely happen is that the new findings will allow medical industry to distinguish between "delusional parasitosis" cases, which is a real, and the tickborne infection.

Wrong again, it is not a tick-borne infection as you have falsely asserted.  Most Morgellon victims are suffering from Lyme disease (approx. 45%) and other unknown multibacterial infections. But Lyme disease is not Morgellons!  Morgellons is a systemic infestation of mold, parasites, fungi, bacteria, viruses, insects, etc.  This is a man made infestation/disease targeting the general population and it has Stanford University's name written all over it.

Reference:  Morgellons Diagnosis (http://www.morgellons-research.org/morgellons/morgellons-diagnosis.htm)  <----- I can provide more references if needed!

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 06:49:55 AM
Wrong again, it is not a tick-borne infection as you have falsely asserted.  Most Morgellon victims are suffering from Lyme disease (approx. 45%) and other unknown multibacterial infections. But Lyme disease is not Morgellons!  Morgellons is a systemic infestation of mold, parasites, fungi, bacteria, viruses, insects, etc.

Reference:  Morgellons Diagnosis (http://www.morgellons-research.org/morgellons/morgellons-diagnosis.htm)  <----- I can provide more references if needed!

Gravock

Again? Where's the 1st? You're the one who posted broken links. Couldn't backup your conspiracy theory attack against Stanford. BTW I was merely referencing the article regarding tickborne infection, which writes, "Although MD was initially considered to be a delusional disorder, recent studies have demonstrated that the dermopathy is associated with tickborne infection, that the filaments are composed of keratin and collagen, and that they result from proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts in epithelial tissue."  And, "A study found that 98% of MD subjects had positive LD serology and/or a tickborne disease diagnosis,5 confirming the clinical association between MD and spirochetal infection."
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: TinselKoala on January 06, 2018, 07:03:58 AM
Again? Where's the 1st? You're the one who posted broken links. Couldn't backup your conspiracy theory attack against Stanford. BTW I was merely referencing the article regarding tickborne infection, which writes, "Although MD was initially considered to be a delusional disorder, recent studies have demonstrated that the dermopathy is associated with tickborne infection, that the filaments are composed of keratin and collagen, and that they result from proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts in epithelial tissue."  And, "A study found that 98% of MD subjects had positive LD serology and/or a tickborne disease diagnosis,5 confirming the clinical association between MD and spirochetal infection."

I hope you realize that you are arguing with someone who believes, or at least pretends to believe, that the Earth is flat, along with all the rest of the astronomical nonsense that FE believers espouse.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: gravityblock on January 06, 2018, 07:05:00 AM
Again? Where's the 1st? You're the one who posted broken links. Couldn't backup your conspiracy theory attack against Stanford. BTW I was merely referencing the article regarding tickborne infection, which writes, "Although MD was initially considered to be a delusional disorder, recent studies have demonstrated that the dermopathy is associated with tickborne infection, that the filaments are composed of keratin and collagen, and that they result from proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts in epithelial tissue."  And, "A study found that 98% of MD subjects had positive LD serology and/or a tickborne disease diagnosis,5 confirming the clinical association between MD and spirochetal infection."

Most of the broken links are fixed and the Stanford's University patents clearly links it to the morgellons infestation/disease outbreak.  I also find it highly suspect in how hard you are trying to defend Stanford University!  Once again, this highly suggests you may be one of the parties responsible for this diabolical man made infestation/disease that was intentionally created to wipe out 90 - 95% of the worlds population.

Gravock
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: Theoretical Research on January 06, 2018, 07:11:59 AM
I hope you realize that you are arguing with someone who believes, or at least pretends to believe, that the Earth is flat, along with all the rest of the astronomical nonsense that FE believers espouse.

Thanks for letting me know. Yes, it has turned into an argument. I was hoping to getting some of these people to seek a bit more evidence in what they believe. Oh well.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: TinselKoala on January 06, 2018, 07:24:29 AM
See: delusions on top of paranoid delusions, and an impressive resistance to factual argument. TR, there is no point in attempting a reasonable discussion with this person.
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: AlienGrey on January 06, 2018, 12:26:22 PM
See: delusions on top of paranoid delusions, and an impressive resistance to factual argument. TR, there is no point in attempting a reasonable discussion with this person.
congratulations Tinsel you have just described the most of the worlds secret military dictating politically controlled governments.  8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

Any way, who is offering a 'view visit' ? that actually works  ;D

is a dam good question  ;D , I would nominate Tinsel Koala in the west, Grumage in the bit in the middle and Stefan in the est!
Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: sm0ky2 on January 10, 2018, 12:38:45 PM
It’s a good thing the aliens left us a gravity-generator.
To make up for the spherical mass missing from the flat disk
Otherwise we would just float right up to the glass dome.
(wait, doesn’t the glass dome make the flat earth round again?)

Title: Re: Who would you like to witness a self-runner?
Post by: SkyWatcher123 on January 10, 2018, 04:49:57 PM
Hi smoky, that makes the overall design structure, like a snow globe.
peace love light