Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82082
  • *Latest: Dave Dee

  • *Total Posts: 495146
  • *Total Topics: 14569
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 201
  • *Total: 202

Facebook

Author Topic: Overunity is it possible?  (Read 6683 times)

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 610
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #90 on: October 23, 2017, 01:41:24 PM »
IMO, the ambiguity about overunity comes from the way energy efficiency ratio is defined.
In the case of electric circuits, we usually define it as the ratio of the output power to the input power, measured in the electric circuit.
But we should rather define it as the ratio of the useful output electric power to the absorbed power, the absorbed power having two origins: the input electrical power and the energy transfered from the active vacuum medium to the system (considered as a open system from the thermodynamic point of view i.e. able to exchange matter and energy with the outside environment).

To achieve energy conversions between the vacuum and the system, the vacuum must be described as a dynamical system possibly modeled as an infinite fluid. This fluid has to be compressible to allow waves to propagate with finite speed (as sound in air) and inviscid (non viscous) for not dissipating thermal energy. In this scheme, particles of matter have finite sizes and appear as stationary vortices. In the normal conditions, vacuum energy is uniformly distributed and matter continuously receives energy from the vacuum and radiates the same quantity of energy (so the mean energy balance is null). So, if this equilibrium is broken, energy has to flow to restore equilibrium. If this non-equilibrium state is maintained, a stationary current can be established.  If we consider the vacuum as a compressible fluid, its density can vary. So, if we are able to create a stationary vacuum energy density gradient, a energy current can be created between the system and the vacuum. Scalar wave solution of Maxwell equations allows non electromagnetic energy to propagate.

The main problem to solve is how to convert this energy into a coherent electromagnetic energy to create an electric current.
This involves that vacuum fluctuations (considered as electron-positron virtual pairs) must be stabilized to allow either the separation between electron and positron charges or the creation of superconducting pairs. The Big Bang theory tells us that such a charge separation is possible, because, assuming that matter emerged from vacuum energy fluctuations consisting of matter-antimatter pairs, matter and antimatter should be present in equal quantities and we should not exist. Several hypotheses might explain this unbalance state:  matter and anti-matter were (very) swiftly separated before mutually annihilating (but where is the anti-matter now?) or a part of anti-matter was converted into matter. Electric circuits where free energy is observed are generally composed of coils, capacitors and magnets (permanent or electromagnets) and the source of energy excess is often attributed to the magnets. Recent studies of magnetic materials that showed there exist numerous interesting interactions between electric current, spin current and the crystal lattice magnetic spins to create magnetic structures such as skyrmions might provide a further insight into ways of understanding how matter and energy interact in magnets.


Thanks for that makes sense to me.





Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #90 on: October 23, 2017, 01:41:24 PM »

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 610
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #91 on: October 24, 2017, 10:33:39 PM »
The person who came up with spitting the atom knew full well creation can in actual fact create or destroy but create and destroy are both incompatible to each other or not varying on how it is perceived which of course defy's cannot create or destroy.


So thanks to the guy who came up with splitting the atom i have now succeeded in accomplishing my idea.


So instead of being slapped with conversion law and being cut off that was my last hope and hooray it breaks all the laws of physics and bypasses the heart of conversion law.


The bit where zpe wakes up to smell the coffee (zpes/vaccum own perpetual process) in conjuction with the power to destory which is what zpe is i have now succeeded in getting zpe to perpetuate.

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 610
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #92 on: January 03, 2018, 05:27:20 PM »
So yea just to recap.


If you cannot create nor destory then we shouldn't exist simply put if you find the thing responsible for creating us to exist you will have cracked it on the head - i mean it is the holy grail of free energy it has power to create.


If you cannot go faster than the speed of light, what speed is infinity again am correct in saying it is instantaneous in speed no matter the distance.


Anyways happy new year all!




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2650
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #93 on: January 04, 2018, 11:55:38 AM »
I believe it was the same guy who figured out about atomic energy
That stated energy could not be created nor destroyed.
He also gave us the equation that relates energy to mass.
E=mc^2


Atoms are not destroyed in fissality, but rather converted to other forms of energy.
The energy output of this is the same energy that went into the fusion of its creation.






Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2650
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #94 on: January 04, 2018, 12:15:02 PM »
The Law of Conversion is the fundamental principle of Thermodynamic Theory.
It sets the stage for the theoretical “closed system” (which itself is impossible)


The heat-pump, by definition, is not a closed system. But rather designed to
transfer thermal energy between two systems.
Both of which are also Not closed systems.


If it were possible to enclose all 3 of the systems in the heat-pump,
the theory states that they would reach thermodynamic equalibrium.
And once in this state, no heat would be further transferred.
This cannot be verified, due to the impossibility of closing the systems.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #94 on: January 04, 2018, 12:15:02 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1564
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #95 on: January 05, 2018, 12:22:13 AM »
The Law of Conversion is the fundamental principle of Thermodynamic Theory.
It sets the stage for the theoretical “closed system” (which itself is impossible)


The heat-pump, by definition, is not a closed system. But rather designed to
transfer thermal energy between two systems.
Both of which are also Not closed systems.


If it were possible to enclose all 3 of the systems in the heat-pump,
the theory states that they would reach thermodynamic equilibrium.
And once in this state, no heat would be further transferred.
This cannot be verified, due to the impossibility of closing the systems.
Oh I don't think so, most laws are based on 'political correctness'
and since most of us know some things we don't by any means know it all
and to some in here all these threads are just a political soap box view to many.
no offense intended but if you read more you will find out more,

ps think out side the box

AG

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2650
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #96 on: January 05, 2018, 02:12:58 AM »
reading without experience is how people end up believing those “laws”


it is better to both read AND experiment.


Thermodynamic theory (“law”) is the church of capitalism.
It governs our educational system


It cannot be proven, yet it is accepted as absolute fact.


Until we can get past this mythology as a society,
we here are Wilbur and Orville.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #96 on: January 05, 2018, 02:12:58 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 610
Re: Overunity is it possible?
« Reply #97 on: January 05, 2018, 05:37:06 PM »
reading without experience is how people end up believing those “laws”


it is better to both read AND experiment.


Thermodynamic theory (“law”) is the church of capitalism.
It governs our educational system


It cannot be proven, yet it is accepted as absolute fact.


Until we can get past this mythology as a society,
we here are Wilbur and Orville.


I for one would prefer to think out side of the box as much as possible, and would rather not believe the ''reading without experience is how people end up believing those “laws” so to speak.

If it cannot be proven then, then the fact is self evident all by it self.

I hope we can get past the myth as you put it.

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at:


OneLink