Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 08:15:41 PM

Title: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 08:15:41 PM
here"s a thread for discussion on the possibility of building a low energy nuclear explosive.the rules are only one rule: enriched uranium is not allowed.input is welcome
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 08:27:58 PM
I've got three basic designs in mind that are suited to three possible mechanisms.

1)..............................
 ...............................
  ___________________
   flash initiator
  ___________________
  Lenr mix
  ..............................
  ...............................<< Fissile X (not necessarily
fissionabl)

Design 1 where the heat source,lenr particle generator and target coat are seperate entities
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 08:33:46 PM
2)...............................
  ___________________
   flash initiator
  ___________________
  Lenr mix
  .............................. Fissile X (not necessarily
fissionabl)

Design 2 where the heat source is seperate but the lenr particle generator and target are intimately mixed
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 08:56:05 PM
3)___________________
   flash initiator
  Lenr mix
   ___________________fissile X (not necessarily
fissionabl)


Design 3 where the heat source,particle generator and target are all mixed.

The expected size of these devices would be around 1meter/300cm or so I imagine and could yield anything between 1 and 500 tons tnt depending on constituents.if these are not already in military stockpiles I feel there's a chance that they will be in future
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 30, 2017, 11:35:09 PM
"The
challenge is to supply UDH as if it was
neutron flux."

The way around this issue is a suitable cascade magnifier. UDH > particle enhancer generator element or compound > extra neutrons
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on August 31, 2017, 06:20:37 AM
                  " Good Morning !"(PT-time)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapefruit (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapefruit)

http://www.rexresearch.com/marks/marks.htm (http://www.rexresearch.com/marks/marks.htm)
A tiny generator the size of a grapefruit could be made to provide all the power your home needs --- from the waste furnace heat now going up your chimney.
This is the conclusion of physicist and inventor Alvin M. marks, who recently patented a new way to generate electricity without moving parts, magnetic fields, or expensive chemical reactions.
The new generator requires only a jet of gas containing liquid vapor and the presence of an electric field and the presence of an electric field that helps condense it into a fine, electrically charged mist or aerosol.
What’s more, the little model aerosol generator sown here can be made so efficient in converting heat energy to electricity (up to 70%), that it promises to make obsolete conventional thermal generating conventional thermal efficiency of 35%. Reason: it converts heat and kinetic energy directly to electricity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMGyob166Cg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMGyob166Cg)
https://pesn.com/news/2017/05/09/64 (https://pesn.com/news/2017/05/09/64)
https://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/20/okayama-solar-absorbers-use-%E2%80%9Cgreen-ferrite%E2%80%9D-to-generate-super-cheap-electricity-from-heat/ (https://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/20/okayama-solar-absorbers-use-%E2%80%9Cgreen-ferrite%E2%80%9D-to-generate-super-cheap-electricity-from-heat/)
http://www.overunity.de/1808/mystery-wattloser-strom/wap2/

https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&q=children%27s+garden+foundation&oq=childrens+yarden+foudation&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i13i30k1j0i8i13i30k1l2.10221.45262.0.49039.66.39.0.0.0.0.481.7885.0j5j24j2j1.32.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..37.26.6400...0j0i7i10i30k1j0i7i30k1j0i67k1j0i10k1j0i22i10i30k1j0i22i30k1j0i10i19k1j0i19k1j0i13k1j33i160k1j0i13i30i19k1j0i13i5i30k1.-er3BuX6UIM (https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&q=children%27s+garden+foundation&oq=childrens+yarden+foudation&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i13i30k1j0i8i13i30k1l2.10221.45262.0.49039.66.39.0.0.0.0.481.7885.0j5j24j2j1.32.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..37.26.6400...0j0i7i10i30k1j0i7i30k1j0i67k1j0i10k1j0i22i10i30k1j0i22i30k1j0i10i19k1j0i19k1j0i13k1j33i160k1j0i13i30i19k1j0i13i5i30k1.-er3BuX6UIM)

Die Grapefruit (Citrus × aurantium bzw. Citrus paradisi), selten auch Grapefrucht oder Paradiesapfel genannt, ist die Frucht (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frucht_%28Botanik%29) des Grapefruitbaumes, einer Zitruspflanze (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zitruspflanzen), die ein subtropischer Baum (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baum) aus der Familie der Rautengewächse (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rautengew%C3%A4chse) (Rutaceae) ist. Sie ist eine Kreuzung (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreuzung_%28Genetik%29), die aus der Orange (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_%28Frucht%29) (Citrus × sinensis) und Pampelmuse (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pampelmuse) (Citrus maxima) entstanden ist.[2] (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grapefruit#cite_note-2) In der Umgangssprache (besonders in Norddeutschland) wird sie deswegen auch häufig als Pampelmuse bezeichnet. Der Name Grapefruit ist eine Zusammensetzung der englischen Wörter grape für Traube und fruit für Frucht. Er bezieht sich auf die weinrebenartige Form, in der die Früchte am Baum wachsen.

                    para'iso paradies paradis
           expression from Phenike(Kleinasien,small asieia)
                                   for :
           Yard/-en,Jard/-im,Gart/-en,Eden et vet.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 10:10:49 AM
You are on the right track lanca.start with something small and grow it up but I suspect a pomogranite may be better suited design here but what can we use to speed it up?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 10:43:21 AM
Is there a way to speed thisup? Speeditup on the right channel?maybe
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: LabDeSyn on August 31, 2017, 10:51:57 AM
@ lanca. This GREEN FERRITE sounds interesting. After 2011 we heard nothing from this 'invention' anymore.
---Okayama Graduate School of Science and Technology is one of many developing solar cells and batteries, but its research team, led by one Professor Naoshi Ikeda, has a unique approach. Instead of silicon, currently the standard component in solar cells, the Okayama team is using an iron oxide compound it calls “green ferrite,” or GF. Professor Ikeda has gone so far as to claim his product will produce 100x the amount of energy as a traditional silicon solar cell.
Part of the increase in energy production would come from the infra-red spectrum — solar cells do not currently convert heat into electricity, but apparently the green ferrite has that capability. Professor Ikeda speculates that any area collecting waste heat (the ceiling of your kitchen, for example) could serve as a home for a GF solar cell.---
I still believe that a 'heat 2 electricity' cell has a bright future. Professor Ikeda was however selling snake oil for 6 years ago.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 11:23:40 AM
Can we boosti?in the same way that we boosti?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 11:30:38 AM
When I say “fissile" I don't necessarily mean a chain react and I don't necessarily mean actinide
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 11:54:53 AM
Can we use unexpected material at the end or inbtween?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 12:09:46 PM
Can we compromise all 3 designs?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on August 31, 2017, 12:26:10 PM
Kohaesions-/Adhaesions-movement and forces:
thin kapillar-tubes use
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19760115&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=2429086A1&KC=A1&ND=5# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19760115&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=2429086A1&KC=A1&ND=5#)

instead +/- rare-earth(Lantaniden) material use of nano thin em-foils/coils

3in1 ? https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19850131&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=3409478A1&KC=A1&ND=4# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19850131&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DE&NR=3409478A1&KC=A1&ND=4#)

profitis, in search of Compton them the partner :
                       Compton-Paar ?
https://www.google.pt/search?q=compton-pair&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=-OWnWaqjFe2s8wewqLToBQ (https://www.google.pt/search?q=compton-pair&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=-OWnWaqjFe2s8wewqLToBQ)


https://www.patentauction.com/
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 12:43:31 PM
Is an intimate understanding necessary or is it a matter of flinging ideas,or both?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on August 31, 2017, 02:07:41 PM
Is an intimate understanding necessary or is it a matter of flinging ideas,or both?

http://e-catworld.com/2017/04/17/what-is-the-evidence-for-the-quarkx/ (http://e-catworld.com/2017/04/17/what-is-the-evidence-for-the-quarkx/)



probably off-thread,quem sabe ? :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19281115&CC=GB&NR=300311A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19281115&CC=GB&NR=300311A&KC=A)
Such a machine has two major parts A and B. These parts may- be composed of any material capable of being charged j5 electrically. Mass A and mass B may be termed electrodes A and B respectively. [/font][/size]Electrode A is charged negatively withrespect to electrode B, or what is substantially the same, electrode B is charged positively with respect to electrode A, or what is usually the case, electrode A has an excess of electrons while electrode B has an excess of protons. While charged in this manner the total force of A toward B is the sum of force g (due to the normal gravitational field), and force e (due to the imposed electrical field) and force x (due to the resultant of the unbalanced gravitational forces caused by the electro-negative charge or by the presence of an excess of electrons on electrode A and by the electro-positive (harge or by the presence of an excess of protons -on electrode B). Likewise the total force of B toward A is the sum of force g (due to the normal gravitational field), and force e (due to the imposed electrical field), minus force aX (due to the resultant of unbalanced 0 gravitational forces caused by the electronegative charge or by the presence of an excess of electrons on electrode A and by the electro-positive charge or by the presence of an excess of protons on electrode B). By the cancellation of similar and opposing forces and by the addition of - similar and allied forces the two electrodes taken collectively possess a force 2x. in the direction of B. This force 2x shared by both electrodes exists as a tendency of these electrodes to move or accelerate in the direction of the force, that is, A toward B and B away from A. Moreover any machine or apparatus possessing electrodes A and B will exhibit such a lateral acceleration or motion if free to move. Such a motion is believed to be due to the direct control and influence of the energv of gravitation bv the electrical energy which exists in 'the unlike electrical charges present on the affected electrodes. This motion seems to possess no equal or opposite motion that is detectable by the present day mechanics.


Eastern Europe 70ties academian(Akkad-) knowledge standart : Prof.Dr.Dipl.-Ing. Florian Raul D. Popescu (-Goetsch) ,(R.I.P.)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=DE&NR=3146576A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19820916&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=DE&NR=3146576A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19820916&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
                                                   description,page 1 ,BRIEFKOPF

                                            Honor to whom honor

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=florian+popescu&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=florian+popescu&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 04:23:28 PM
"A smelly stew of deception and conspiracy? Is that what
you really think or does your gut tell you that maybe,
just maybe, something real is going on here?"

From e-catworld.com

Personally I think that where there is smoke (or fishing line?) there is definitely fire.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 04:40:07 PM
"This results in
the formation of a ball of metallic helium which floats
freely in space. Hydrogen gas is converted in the
plasma torus into a plasma, which means that the
hydrogen nuclei have lost their internal binding
energy to the benefit of the atomic particles and that
the nuclear spin is low."

Lovely stuff.can we do a bomb without  huge electrics?  a bomb with partial electrics (triggered with battery) is acceptable
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on August 31, 2017, 05:01:17 PM
Some elements appear to have special properties.how many elements have special properties that we haven't even discovered yet? Or taken note of yet?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on August 31, 2017, 10:32:28 PM
2017 , going the time-line 35/36 years back :1981/82
http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14339645.html (http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14339645.html)
http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14337069.html (http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14337069.html)
                    "the clean weapon"

                    Perversion des Denkens

                only destroying biological live

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marschflugk%C3%B6rper (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marschflugk%C3%B6rper)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4350360/Russia-develops-unstoppable-4-600mph-cruise-missile.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4350360/Russia-develops-unstoppable-4-600mph-cruise-missile.html)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_7YOXBrTqk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_7YOXBrTqk)
                  8 min :42 sec >...
    appropriate war declaration against the own live/life
           also : "PERVERSION DES DENKENS"
                   
           died for the PATRIA by unfriendly fire and
           with final shot :       21:44
                                        Judas Priest :cruzifix,ameno

http://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Riesen-Asteroid-rast-an-der-Erde-vorbei-article20010285.html (http://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Riesen-Asteroid-rast-an-der-Erde-vorbei-article20010285.html)
If not Europe : Northamerika ? Korean Peninsula ? Lanc-ing !
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 06:01:37 PM
"In an interesting paper by Magdi Ragheb, the
author discusses the various mechanisms
whereby deuteron disintegration in condensed
matter through photonuclear and wave
polarization reactions aid in the source of
neutrons leading to the apparent
transmutations being proffered as the source
of anomalous heat in LENR events.
The author relies heavily on the Oppenheimer–
Phillips process or strip reaction which is a type
of deuteron-induced nuclear reaction. In this
process the neutron half of an energetic
deuteron (a stable isotope of hydrogen with
one proton and one neutron) fuses with a
target nucleus, transmuting the target to a
heavier isotope while ejecting a proton."

Some theories may or may not shed light
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 06:42:32 PM
Can we do this in a room?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 07:25:38 PM
" small explosions
in cold-fusion cells are
not unknown. At the
tops of some cells
palladium-wire
electrodes areexposed
to oxygen and
deuterium (heavy
hydrogen) gases. If the
palladium wires are
not protected by films
of water, the palladium
can catalyze the
explosive combination
of the oxygen and
hydrogen. This
sometimes happens if
a dry spot develops on
a wire. Such
detonations, though,
cause little damage.
The SRI explosion was
much more powerful.
The detonating cell
(only 2 inches in
diameter and 8 inches
long), not only killed
Riley but peppered
three other
researchers in the lab
with debris.
(Charles, Dan; "Fatal
Explosion Closes Cold
Fusion Laboratory,"

Chemical or nuke?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 07:45:52 PM
  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xCKGA9yDNgQ

Keanu reeves outruns the ideal device
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 09:53:47 PM
"Californium-251 has a very small calculated critical
mass of about 5 kg (11 lb). The low critical mass of californium led
to some exaggerated claims about possible uses for
the element."

Some elements are highly unstable.can we flash-produce a small quantity of an supercritical powerhouse and simultaneously crush it? we just don't know yet
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 01, 2017, 10:45:58 PM
"Protactinium-231 is naturally occurring, as well as a
byproduct of thorium breeder cycles, is fissionable, and is
potentially fissile. Estimates suggest that if it is fissile, the
critical mass in most favorable geometry is probably
hundreds of kilograms.
Uranium-231 is synthetic and probably fissile (but critical
mass unknowable from available neutron data). Its half-life is
a few days, so pointless for nuclear weapons or reactors.
Uranium-232 is synthetic and reported to be fissile, but
critical mass uncalculated. It is better known as an
undesirable contaminant in U-233, also fissile.
Uranium-233 is synthetic (made from breeding Th-232) and
critical mass is 581 g. Nuclear weapons and reactors made
using U-233 have been tested.
Uranium-235 is natural, prepared from the natural element by
enrichment, and critical mass is 800 g. It has been used in
warfare ("Little Boy" at Hiroshima) and in countless nuclear
reactors.
Neptunium-234 is synthetic and probably fissile (but critical
mass unknowable from available neutron data). Its half-life is
a few days, and it is a very intense gamma radiation emitter,
so probably pointless for practical applications.
Neptunium-236 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 68 g. However, its half-life is about a day,
making it impractical.
Neptunium-237 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of hundreds of grams ("about as good as U-235",
according to a Los Alamos experiment). No known nuclear
weapons have been made from Np-237, although successful
critical assemblies have been reported.
Neptunium-238 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 101 g. However, its half-life is about two days
and it is a horrendous gamma emitter, making it impractical
for weapons or reactors.
Plutonium-236 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 1.48 kg. Its half-life of 2.8 years makes it an
impractical material.
Plutonium-237 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 141 g. Its half-life of 141 days makes it an
impractical material for a weapon or reactor.
Plutonium-239 is synthetic and fissile, made by breeding
U-238, with a critical mass of 516 g. It has been used in
warfare ("Fat Man" at Nagasaki) and in reactors.
Plutonium-241 is synthetic and fissile, with a critical mass of
301 g. It accompanies weapon-grade Pu-239 as an
undesirable contaminant, decaying to the potent gamma
emitter Am-241. It is formed in, and burned in, uranium- and
plutonium-fueled reactors.
Plutonium-243 is synthetic and fissile, with a critical mass of
2.3 kg. It is found in reactor-grade plutonium from high-
burnup fuels, where it is a short-lived (hours) gamma-
emitting contaminant unsuitable for further use. However, it
does contribute to fission power generated in uranium- and
plutonium-fueled reactors.
Americium-241 is synthetic and fissile, a potent gamma
emitter with a high critical mass in the tens of kg and no
known history of being used in critical experiments or
weapons. It is best known as the radiation source in smoke
detectors. Created and burned in small quantities in uranium-
and plutonium-fueled reactors.
Americium-242m is synthetic and fissile, with a very low
critical mass of 20g that suggests some interesting nuclear
applications of this isomer of Am-242. That said, criticality
experiments undertaken with it are unknown.
Americium-244 is synthetic and fissile, with a critical mass
of 84 g. Its half-life of 10 hours and its brutal gamma
radiation yield make it unsuitable for application.
Curium-243 is synthetic and fissile, with a low critical mass
of 147 g and a reasonably long half-life of 28 years. That
said, I can find no evidence of its being used in critical
experiments.
Curium-245 is synthetic and fissile, a long-lived isotope of
curium, with a low critical mass of only 47 g. Like Am-242m,
it has been suggested for use in novel micro-reactors.
Practical Cm-245 is probably too contaminated with neutron-
emitting congeners to be usable in weapons.
Curium-247 is synthetic and fissile, a long-lived isotope of
curium, with a critical mass of 3.5 kg.
Berkelium-250 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 159 g. Its half-life of 3 hours and a barbaric
gamma yield make its use impractical.
Californium-249 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of an attractively-low 62 g and a longish half-
life of 350 years. It may be suitable for a nuclear weapon, but
is hard to produce while excluding congeners that yield
undesirable spontaneous-fission neutrons. I know of no
suggested or tested uses as a fissile material.
Californium-251 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of an attractively-low 28 g and a longish half-
life of 900 years. It may in theory be suitable for a micro-
nuke, in the company of Am-242m and Cm-245, but is hard to
produce, particularly while excluding congeners that yield
undesirable spontaneous-fission neutrons. I know of no
suggested or tested uses as a fissile material.
Californium-252 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 4.8 kg. This is a moot point from the weapons
standpoint, though, because Cf-252 blows out neutrons at a
prodigious rate via its major decay mechanism, spontaneous
fission (SF). The isotope is manufactured and used
commerically for it spontaneous neutron emission.
Californium-253 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 57 g, but an untenable half-life of only 17
days.
Einsteinium-254 is synthetic and fissile, with an estimated
critical mass of 28 g. Its half-life of 40 hours prevents it from
being useful in this regard, however."

I don't know how accurate this is but..
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 07:54:16 AM
Is there an element with critical mass 1 microgram? We just don't know yet
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 08:51:09 AM
"Weapons
Main article: Antimatter weapon
Antimatter has been considered as a trigger
mechanism for nuclear weapons.[73] A major
obstacle is the difficulty of producing antimatter in
large enough quantities, and there is no evidence
that it will ever be feasible.[74] However, the U.S. Air
Force funded studies of the physics of antimatter in
the Cold War, and began considering its possible
use in weapons, not just as a trigger, but as the
explosive itself.[75]"
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 09:07:03 AM
"Positrons are produced naturally in β+ decays of
naturally occurring radioactive isotopes (for
example, potassium-40) and in interactions of
gamma quanta (emitted by radioactive nuclei) with
matter. Antineutrinos are another kind of
antiparticle created by natural radioactivity (β−
decay). Many different kinds of antiparticles are also
produced by (and contained in) cosmic rays."

Are there ways to speeditup? We must see
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 02, 2017, 09:26:23 AM
                         Good Morning,profitis !
elementar pooring                                  elements enriching

                           transmutation

https://www.google.pt/search?q=schneller+brueter+hamm-uentrop&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=01qqWZ3bMuaJ8QfmzreYDA (https://www.google.pt/search?q=schneller+brueter+hamm-uentrop&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=01qqWZ3bMuaJ8QfmzreYDA)

https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=wiederaufbereitungsanlage+wackersdorf&oq=wiederaufbereitungsanlage+wackersdorf&gs_l=psy-ab.3...87183.113470.0.114715.66.46.0.0.0.0.375.1960.0j1j3j3.7.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..61.5.1372...0.EHiauPjexFc (https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=wiederaufbereitungsanlage+wackersdorf&oq=wiederaufbereitungsanlage+wackersdorf&gs_l=psy-ab.3...87183.113470.0.114715.66.46.0.0.0.0.375.1960.0j1j3j3.7.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..61.5.1372...0.EHiauPjexFc)

                                 Expensive toys !

                                  Cheaper:
https://www.google.pt/search?q=jean+pierre+chambrin+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=tGeqWZT9GYTY8gfnwLj4Bg
https://www.google.com/patents/WO1982003249A1?cl=en (https://www.google.com/patents/WO1982003249A1?cl=en)
http://www.econokit.fr/societe/?lang=en (http://www.econokit.fr/societe/?lang=en)

Sincerely
             OCWL
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 10:45:43 AM
A smarter breeder lanca?.smarter and faster?



         
         
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 02, 2017, 11:12:35 AM
http://www.google.com/patents/WO1982004096A1?cl=en (http://www.google.com/patents/WO1982004096A1?cl=en)

http://www.rexresearch.com/chambrin/8204-3.jpg (http://www.rexresearch.com/chambrin/8204-3.jpg)
A REACTOR FOR TRANSFORMING AND CARBURANTS FOR USE AS A FUEL MIXTURE
 WO8204096
 1986-11-26
 Also published as:  BR8102987  //  PT74890  //  FI821543  //   ZA8203054 // IT1147890

Hence, one can say the Reactor is an aparatus to produce calories. For example, if 2000 KCal (kilo/calories) is introduced in the Reactor it will be possible to multiply these calories by 100, 1000, and even 100,000 according to what it is chosen to be used. The only condition to have a progressive multiplication of the calories without problems is to provide a cooling apparatus like the one used in combustion engines during operation.

The results achieved with the Reactor are of great importance. using a mixture of water and ethyl alcohol, equally proportioned in weight, as fuel to feed the Reactor, it was identified at the outlet of the Reactor (before its admission in the engine) 33 different gases, such as: Argon, Aluminum, Cobalt, Molybdenum, Technetium, Ruthenium, Rhodium, Palladium, Lanthanum, Thulium, Astatine, Americium and Curium. In addition, at the outlet of the exhaust pipe it was observed 46 different gases. Among these gases were registered: Hydrogen, Helium, Lithium, Beryllium, Aluminum, Chlorine, Technetium, Ruthenium, Rhodium, Barium, Lanthanum, Polonium, Protactinium, Americium, Curium, Berkelium and Hahnium. Three other gases which are in the group could not be identified according to the Periodic Chart of the Elements; their numbers are 109, 111 and 131. It is interesting to remember that the Periodic Chart of the Elements classifies only up to Element 105.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLLAEfh0Z7w (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLLAEfh0Z7w)
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 11:37:01 AM
Very interesting lanca.Picture it


Slow particle + element Z > element T + 2 fast particles> 2 fast particles + element F > energy

Or


Slow particle + element Z > element T + 2 fast
particles>critical mass>energy
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 12:06:06 PM
"The critical mass for lower-grade uranium depends
strongly on the grade: with 20% U-235 it is over
400 kg; with 15% U-235, it is well over 600 kg."

I don't know how accurate this is but I do know that it is achievable.can we do this with all naturale uranium? Can we use natural uranium in a bomb.well,if we can manage a flash-fission of 0.7% of it then...
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 02, 2017, 12:11:49 PM
                  http://www.rexresearch.com/chambrin/8204-3.jpg (http://www.rexresearch.com/chambrin/8204-3.jpg)

                             Z(en) Tri Fuge

                  zentrifugal(fugir,escape)                        zentipetal
                  stretching                                             quenching


                 Sch(l)auberger Wasserhosen-Wirbel:
https://www.google.pt/search?q=schauberger+wassserwirbel&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT47C6oobWAhVCthoKHWPsDrIQsAQINA&biw=640&bih=894 (https://www.google.pt/search?q=schauberger+wassserwirbel&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT47C6oobWAhVCthoKHWPsDrIQsAQINA&biw=640&bih=894)

                 will me now concentrate to the a-muse-ic:
                  maxi disco hits 1994
                 f.e. https://genius.com/Loft-wake-the-world-lyrics (https://genius.com/Loft-wake-the-world-lyrics)
                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOTQsdwEdk8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOTQsdwEdk8)
                              with ultra-sensivity

https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=k%C3%B6nnen+menschen+ultraschall+h%C3%B6ren&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikp_Tpo4bWAhUJPxoKHdRKC2wQ1QIIZCgD&biw=640&bih=894 (https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=k%C3%B6nnen+menschen+ultraschall+h%C3%B6ren&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikp_Tpo4bWAhUJPxoKHdRKC2wQ1QIIZCgD&biw=640&bih=894)

                 Or und wa !
                                  OCWL

p.s.: C.E.R.N. = STARGATE
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckvs5HHUl4k&pbjreload=10
        I.T.E.R.: ? Multi-Universums explorer
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 02:50:26 PM
Well I"l be damned lanca.surface area is the key?
             


a surface area cross-section I reckon?.we don't need a complete chain.a broken chain should do:

0.7% powder + slow particle generator + slow particle multiplier + slow particle reflector + compressor? Can we do without compressor? Or is compressor necessary...can we do without reflector? or is reflector necessary...

A ginormous amount of energy is locked inside a 00.7. We just hav to unlock it faster
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 02, 2017, 03:05:01 PM
 100kg of eleborate equipment to unlock a hundred grams of .7 ...its worthit
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 03, 2017, 02:10:29 PM
Slotin:
..... _____________
     ,                            ...........................
     ,                     .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......>Heater
..... _____________       ...........................
 ^              ^                             ^
 ^              ^                             ^
Cordite    super          moderated rossi candu x
              reflector                     at peak self-sustain
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 03, 2017, 03:24:37 PM
Slotin:

     _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..... _____________
     ,                            ...........................
     ,                     .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......>Heater
..... _____________       ...........................
 ^    _ _  _ _  ^ _ _                        ^
 ^           ^    ^                             ^
Cordite  ^     super     moderated rossi candu x
               ^    reflector        at peak self-sustain
             TNT
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 03, 2017, 04:22:49 PM
Slotin:

   ========••••••••=========
 {  }[      ]                        [      ]{  }candu x/cordite
   ========••••••••=========
                       ^                             
                    Reflector

Lithium boosteD x
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 05, 2017, 02:43:35 PM

                    Y   super neutron multiplier salt
                    0   
                   
              :           :
              : . . . . . :     
              :           :  critical solution
              :...........:
 
The multiplier drops into the hot bucket and dissolves quickly then after a small time a flash of extra neutrons ensues       
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 06, 2017, 08:45:08 AM
                         the gun engine
        https://peswiki.com/directory:gun-engine (https://peswiki.com/directory:gun-engine)
The engine can run on any liquid or gaseous fuel, including Directory:Acetylene (https://peswiki.com/directory:acetylene). Initial test results showed 92% efficiency.

 A recent test of a Suzuki engine on a dynamometer showed a 14% increase in power using just 10% of the amount of fuel using the Gun Engine technology.
: "The gun-engine does not require any exhaust treatment, thus it does not have catalytic converter. The formation of NOx is blocked by the superior design that does not synthesize pollutants. The efficiency is high (above 95%) because the gun-engine is cooled internally and the cooling preserves heat that is than converted into additional work. The design of the gun-engine eliminated all causes of inefficiency in current engines inherited from the first prototypes of Otto and Diesel inventions. The myth that engines must be inefficient is exposed!" -- Stan (August 15, 2008)




    the syn-crack-fuel for i-/m-/mobilen power station/-s
   http://russianpatents.com/patent/247/2478688.html (http://russianpatents.com/patent/247/2478688.html)

   with crude fossil derivate or bio crude
   #119  http://www.overunity.de/2013/radikal-zukunft-design/105/ (http://www.overunity.de/2013/radikal-zukunft-design/105/)

            f.e. flying power stations in kind of drones
               for oasis,islands,ship rescue, et cet.

    gun engine: up to -90% consume fuel
    syn-crack-fuel: up to -90% fuel base,up to 90% hydrogen
    ergo:
            gun engine               syn-crack-fuel
    100% : 10 = 10%                :10 = 1%

                                -99% CO2 emission
                            ::) vapor is also a THG  :P
  https://skepticalscience.com/arg_Wasserdampf-Treibhausgas.htm (https://skepticalscience.com/arg_Wasserdampf-Treibhausgas.htm)
 
 to much/less oxygene in the air
 http://www.geomar.de/news/article/extrem-sauerstoffarme-wirbel-im-atlantik-produzieren-treibhausgase/ (http://www.geomar.de/news/article/extrem-sauerstoffarme-wirbel-im-atlantik-produzieren-treibhausgase/)
 oxygene as fire catalysator in dry/aride zones

  knowledge about THG= Treib-Haus-Gas
  https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=sauerstoff+als+treibhausgas&oq=sauerstoff+als+treibhausgas&gs_l=psy-ab.3...9418.30768.0.31516.54.34.0.0.0.0.601.1470.2-2j1j0j1.4.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..50.4.1464...0j0i67k1.O1at-I8b3v8 (https://www.google.pt/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&q=sauerstoff+als+treibhausgas&oq=sauerstoff+als+treibhausgas&gs_l=psy-ab.3...9418.30768.0.31516.54.34.0.0.0.0.601.1470.2-2j1j0j1.4.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..50.4.1464...0j0i67k1.O1at-I8b3v8)

                             up to next stage:
no THG-emission thermodynamic cycle engine
https://www.google.pt/search?hl=de&source=hp&q=di+pietro+engine&oq=di+pietro+engine&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i22i30k1l4.2676.11394.0.12990.16.16.0.0.0.0.609.2604.0j2j6j1j0j1.10.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..6.10.2595...0j0i19k1j0i22i30i19k1.1vbHZtrsjfU (https://www.google.pt/search?hl=de&source=hp&q=di+pietro+engine&oq=di+pietro+engine&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i22i30k1l4.2676.11394.0.12990.16.16.0.0.0.0.609.2604.0j2j6j1j0j1.10.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..6.10.2595...0j0i19k1j0i22i30i19k1.1vbHZtrsjfU)

How to close this open engine cycle to a closed thermobaric torus ?
                        Thomas Cosby "Turbonetics" :
http://books.google.pt/books/about/Development_of_the_Steam_Engine_and_Resu.html?id=5eWXtgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y (http://books.google.pt/books/about/Development_of_the_Steam_Engine_and_Resu.html?id=5eWXtgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y)

                   http://www.geocities.ws/cosbytech/ (http://www.geocities.ws/cosbytech/)
           http://www.world-wire.com/news/040104000 (http://www.world-wire.com/news/040104000)

more detailed information about engines and fuels :
   http://www.overunity.de/206/freedom-housecar-project/20/wap2/
http://www.overunity.de/1874/billige-fossile-kraftstoffeerdgas-basierend-oder-durch-co2-recycling/
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 06, 2017, 09:12:04 AM
Tuti
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 06, 2017, 10:17:16 AM
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH-_bsCwdRw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH-_bsCwdRw)

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=hanna+albert+awad&IN=&CPC=&IC= (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=hanna+albert+awad&IN=&CPC=&IC=)

  Fatima,daughter od the captain/emir from Alcacer do Sal
  later,cristian baptizised name : Oriana

  Pilgrim state Fatima in Ourem:
   https://www.visitportugal.com/pt-pt/content/f%C3%A1tima-0 (https://www.visitportugal.com/pt-pt/content/f%C3%A1tima-0)
  based by a " love story"
  http://www.holymary.info/fatimatheprincess.html (http://www.holymary.info/fatimatheprincess.html)

  in Portugal,with the first Kingdom inaugurated,
  not by Afonso Henriques - but by
   https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcia_II_da_Galiza (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcia_II_da_Galiza)
   Rei de Portugal e Galiza
   ( Portugal in original (portus) Cale/Galé/Gaele/Gale/Gael-ecia
   Upper and down Gaelizia meaning
   beginning historical with
                                      the Castro de Sampaio

 H. R. DOMINUS (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominus) GARCIA REX PORTUGALLIAE ET GALLECIAE. FILIUS REGIS MAGNI FERDINANDI. HIC INGENIO CAPTUS A FRATRE SUO IN VINCULIS. OBIIT ERA MCXXVIII XIº K
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 06, 2017, 03:53:30 PM
Shruti

     Y                                             Y   
     0                                             0
                                                  .     .
:           :                                   .         .
: . . . . . :                                  . . . . . . .           
:           :  WC bucket                .        .   WC flask     
:...........:                                      .......
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 06, 2017, 04:29:44 PM
"later,cristian baptizised name : Oriana"
 
 I'l be damned lanca,the Oriana clock we shall call it
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 06, 2017, 10:28:52 PM
                   kamasutra +   ?
                   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama_Sutra (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama_Sutra)

                   Torah         +   ?
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah)

                    Bible        +   ?
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible)

                    Quran       +  ?   
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quran)


? : Universitas,T(h)almud ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yentl (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yentl) )
    ?  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris) ?
    Quran= 1 book

    Islam= Quran + 15 books about the :
                        how to use the "Quran"
               and not misuse f.e. to only offer the Quran without
               "real life examples":
                        Quairoan (the highest Court of the Islam)
                              and beside the University
                                      laws and orders
                                     "ora" et " labora"
       
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Idrisi (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Idrisi)
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silves (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silves)
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almohaden (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almohaden)
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris_I._al-Ma%27mun (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris_I._al-Ma%27mun)

   https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahl-i_Had%C4%ABth (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahl-i_Had%C4%ABth)
   https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafismus (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafismus)

   https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith)
   „Schau, was uns an Hadithen des Gesandten Gottes überliefert wurde, und schreib sie auf! Denn ich fürchte, dass das Wissen schwindet und Gelehrten aussterben. Nur die Hadithe des Propheten (S) sind von Bedeutung, nichts anderes! Und die Menschen sollen das Wissen verbreiten."

„Man ging jedem einzelnen der in den Isnaden erwähnten Gewährsmänner nach, um seinen Charakter zu ergründen, um zu erfahren, ob er moralisch und religiös unanfechtbar sei, ob er nicht Propaganda für antisunnitische Zwecke mache, ob seine Wahrheitsliebe im allgemeinen als erwiesen gelten könne, ob er die persönliche Fähigkeit habe, das Gehörte treu wiederzugeben, ob er ein Mann sei, dessen Zeugenschaft in civilrechtlichem Sinne vom Richter unbedenklich zugelassen würde. Denn die Hadithüberlieferung betrachtete man als die erhabenste Form der Schahāda (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schah%C4%81da), der Zeugenaussage, da der Rawi (d. h. der Überlieferer) ein für die Gestaltung des religiösen Lebens höchst wichtiges Zeugnis ablegt darüber, dass er diese oder jene Worte von dem oder jenem gehört habe."



 "No! to Quran-schools "  = 1 book teaching
 "Yes! to (I)slam-schools"= 1 Quran + 15 Hadith books
                                        (and more "universe" related               
                                        books:cristian 2017 up to date)     
                                        teaching

                  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malikiten (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malikiten)
Der Verfasser war bestrebt, die einzelnen Rechtsfragen in allen Bereichen des islamischen Gesetzes und der Ritualpraxis durch Exzerpte (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exzerpt) aus den damals bekannten Schriften der Rechtsschule darzustellen. Dabei kommen auch kontroverse Lehrmeinungen (Ichtilāf (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichtil%C4%81f)) innerhalb der Rechtsschule von Medina über Ägypten, Nordafrika und al-Andalus zur Sprache.[7] (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malikiten#cite_note-7) Die vollständig erhaltene – etwas spät hergestellte – Handschrift umfasst neunzehn Bände und hat pro Band rund vierhundert Seiten. Die ältesten Abschriften sind, wenn auch nur fragmentarisch vorliegend, noch zu Lebzeiten des Verfassers hergestellt worden.

              Die Druckausgabe umfasst fünfzehn Bände



------------------------------------------------------------------------



https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BFUmar_ibn_%CA%BFAbd_al-%CA%BFAz%C4%ABz (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BFUmar_ibn_%CA%BFAbd_al-%CA%BFAz%C4%ABz)
ʿUmars Gesellschafts- und SteuerreformenUnter ʿUmars Regierung wurden Verwaltungsreformen gefördert mit der Absicht, soziale Spannungen auszugleichen. Ebenso verbot er die öffentliche Verunglimpfung von Ali Ibn Abi Talib (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Ibn_Abi_Talib). Außerdem erließ er ein berühmtes, nach ihm benanntes Edikt, das klar stellte, wie Christen und Juden sich verhalten müssen, um Muslime und ihren Glauben nicht zu beleidigen.

Unter anderem machte er es zur Pflicht, dass Juden einen Gelben Fleck (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelber_Fleck_%28Symbol%29) tragen mussten.

Juden und Christen durften keine hohen Verwaltungsämter mehr innehaben. Öffentliche Kreuze ließ er zerstören. Dieses Edikt forderte massiv die Islamisierung der Gesellschaft. Nicht zuletzt wegen dieser Maßnahmen gilt er aus islamischer Sicht bis heute als besonders fromm

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belmonte_(Portugal (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belmonte_(Portugal))
http://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/neue-christen-neue-juden.1079.de.html?dram:article_id=236908 (http://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/neue-christen-neue-juden.1079.de.html?dram:article_id=236908)

http://www.elfenbein-verlag.de/9783932245770.htm (http://www.elfenbein-verlag.de/9783932245770.htm)
Ralph Roger Glöcklers Reise nach Corvo, ein impressionistisches Gemälde der kleinsten Insel des Archipels der Azoren, schildert die Suche nach dem
                        Mythos des Kommunitarismus,
einer geradezu urchristlichen Lebensweise, und dem, was davon übrig blieb.
http://www.azoren-online.com/corvo/index.shtml (http://www.azoren-online.com/corvo/index.shtml)
(http://www.azoren-online.com/img/trans.gif (http://www.azoren-online.com/img/trans.gif))
   Seit 2007 ist die gesamte Insel samt einer umgebenden Meereszone als ein knapp 26 ha großes UNESCO Biosphärenreservat ausgezeichnet.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 07, 2017, 11:13:32 AM
Don't worry lanca.I won't let these niggas get the bomb
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 07, 2017, 01:53:24 PM
profitis, I am not afraid about bomb/s,
okay very horrible : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisbombe (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisbombe)
the many "calor=heat"ies=Units !

             I am concerned about "small as very big" thinker:
       palatin-Pfalz-Palast-Jer-Burg-chateau-citadella-cité-city

a little peace of land
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moab_(Staat (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moab_(Staat))
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moab (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moab)

God renewed his covenant (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_%28biblical%29) with the Israelites at Moab before the Israelites entered the "promised land (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promised_land)" (Deuteronomy 29:1 (http://www.biblica.com/en-us/bible/online-bible/?osis=niv:Deuteronomy.29:1%E2%80%9329:1)). Moses died there,[8] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moab#cite_note-8) prevented by God from entering the promised land. He was buried in an unknown location in Moab and the Israelites spent a period of thirty days there in mirning
making such international trouble,
 "Gottes (gelobte,gepriesene)Reich"  :P ,
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mescha-Stele (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mescha-Stele)

not meant Jerusalem/Israel-Palaestina =wrong definition
  quasi worthless for me to visit this town physically
we can visit and sightseeing today with calm and conscious virtually
by books-DVD- and 4D-website (re-)presentation without journey time and costs spare

For me Portugal is,actually, great and worldwide collected enough
to be something like : "Leben wie Gott in Portugal/Frankreich"
( I am not alone by this thinking http://estorilportugal.com/features/glorious-sintra/ (http://estorilportugal.com/features/glorious-sintra/) )
its all about the SOUL/SAUDADE : our Jaz-i-go/Refugium/H'eaven
 in reality what was-is-will be our Protector and Protection

Planning to go from Vila Cha in direction of Atlantis/Tartessos:
             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqAhjyCd1fM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqAhjyCd1fM)
             U.N.O. Bio(s)sphere Reservation,too
                      U.N.(Dio,Deus,Allah,JHWE,Gott) gelobte Laender

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViGuInO4M3k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViGuInO4M3k)
                                                       
                    smelling freedom-e and horizon
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/portugal-o-alentejo-paisagem-t%C3%ADpica-4983590.jpg (https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/portugal-o-alentejo-paisagem-t%C3%ADpica-4983590.jpg)
                       and decelerated living
http://images.e-konomista.pt/articles/850_400_rolling-rural-landscape-with-trees-in-alentejo-portugal_1494578968.jpg
 included all was this culture can deliver
                       for  body mind soul
               in corpore sano mens sana

https://www.google.pt/search?q=alentejo+imagen&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9iPTJ8JPWAhWJ2xoKHUl0Cp8QsAQILg&biw=640&bih=894&dpr=1.25 (https://www.google.pt/search?q=alentejo+imagen&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9iPTJ8JPWAhWJ2xoKHUl0Cp8QsAQILg&biw=640&bih=894&dpr=1.25)
                                 
                        in commercial words and praise                           
                        https://www.visitalentejo.pt/de/ (https://www.visitalentejo.pt/de/)
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 08, 2017, 10:53:26 AM
                                                                 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Spencer (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Spencer)
                                                                  Law of Equal Freedom (LEF; Gesetz gleicher Freiheit)
                                                                 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sozialdarwinismus (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sozialdarwinismus)
                                                                 Sir Charles Darwin                            Sir Francis Galton
                     
                                                                         Island Corvo (North American schelf)
                                                                                 Kommunitarismus

http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/videos/sociedade/portugal-ja-e-o-melhor-da-europa-para-viver-e-trabalhar/59b066cd0cf21bc11573dfc6 (http://www.tvi24.iol.pt/videos/sociedade/portugal-ja-e-o-melhor-da-europa-para-viver-e-trabalhar/59b066cd0cf21bc11573dfc6)



I,with 2 from 4 brother(2) and sisters(2)

file:///C:/Users/alfons/Documents/1971%20Beatrix,%20Alfons,%20Oliver%20mit%20H.Granjo%20im%20Palacio.pdf
(probably the pdf does not open,that is so "trist"-e)
1971 in the Cristal Palace in Oporto,today new named Rosa Mota,the Palace,not the town ::)

I do not know what the people have:
 https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=mr.bean&qpvt=mr.bean (https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=mr.bean&qpvt=mr.bean)
I am really totally anders. Not an a(c)tor (new portuguese grammar)
 
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 09, 2017, 03:03:06 PM
Hahaha yeeeesss let the race begin lanca.lekker soos n kracker.which nation will be the first to make the bomb? The concept is simple,the method may be even simpler hahahaha.I wonder how it will look? Hahahaha
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 11, 2017, 12:11:33 AM
Reminder: in this competition no enriched uranium (235/233) or plutonium may be used.the goal is to develop an alternate nuclear explosive device.something completely new.radical.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 13, 2017, 04:26:39 AM
Nations caught cheating will be disqualified.nations with sanctions against them may enter the competition.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 13, 2017, 04:26:13 PM
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_fusion_weapon


"It has been claimed that it is possible to conceive of a crude, deliverable, pure fusion weapon, using only present-day, unclassified technology. The weapon design[1] weighs approximately 3 tonnes, and might have a total yield of approximately 3 tonnes of TNT. The proposed design uses a large explosively pumped flux compression generator to produce the high power density required to ignite the fusion fuel. From the point of view of explosive damage, such a weapon would have no clear advantages over a conventional explosive, but the massive neutron flux"



Imagine,a concentrated neutron spark..
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 14, 2017, 02:53:26 AM
How small can we begin?

   
     :::}}}:::::}}}}}::::::::}}}}}}}}bigger fission
      ^             ^       ^       
      ^             ^         bigger spark     
Spark           fission     
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 14, 2017, 04:46:32 AM
" A palladium foil electrolitically loaded with
deuterium in Li2SO4 electrolyte was taken out of the
cell and placed between a copper block and a high
explosive charge. When the charge was triggered a
sudden neutron burst was generated, together with
the production of a crater in the copper block."
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 14, 2017, 08:10:50 AM
                                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_arc_welding (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_arc_welding)
The plasma (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29) is then forced through a fine-bore copper nozzle which constricts the arc and the plasma exits the orifice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nozzle) at high velocities (approaching the speed of sound) and a temperature approaching 28,000 °C (50,000 °F) or higher.

                                        http://www.lenntech.com/periodic-chart-elements/boiling-point.htm (http://www.lenntech.com/periodic-chart-elements/boiling-point.htm)
                                                   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten)
The free element (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_element) is remarkable for its robustness, especially the fact that it has the highest melting point (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melting_point) of all the elements discovered, melting at 3422 °C (6192 °F, 3695 K). It also has the second highest boiling point (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_point), at 5930 °C (10706 °F, 6203 K).


                                               No safe,no wall is safety (with-/out sandwiched walls): plasma torch related.

                                              1. vacuum 2. plasma(ex called electrons-gas) 3. ........

Sincerely
              OCWL
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 14, 2017, 09:07:51 AM
"A giant atom-smashing racetrack of sorts has just
broken a Guinness World Record by reaching the
highest man-made temperature ever recorded,
scientists announced Monday (June 25).
How hot? 250,000 times hotter than the center of the
sun.
This scorching achievement happened inside the
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), which is a 2.4-
mile (3.9 kilometers) underground track where
particles smash into one another under conditions
that existed about a millionth of a second after the
Big Bang.
The new feat, at Brookhaven National Laboratory in
Upton, N.Y., occurred when gold nuclei (the
positively charged part of the atom made of protons
and neutrons) were sent speeding around RHIC at
near light-speed until they crashed into each other.
When the ions collide, the enormous energy
released is so intense it melts the neutrons and
protons inside the gold nuclei into their constituent
parts, namely quarks and gluons."

7.2 trillion faranheit.4 trillion celcius
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 14, 2017, 10:32:26 AM
Epicatalysis
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 14, 2017, 12:09:12 PM
instead for "unfriendly-rough destroying" these technics "hyperevacuation,plasma"will become the instruments for the
futuric evolution of the human civilian social change :

                             quantum mechanics
instruments for mutation and elementar transmutation( lead to gold)

                          saga  litrature :
                                   Excalibur
                    Merlins/Berlims magic stick

                          science fiction :       
                    Star Wars light-saber

                             science + commercial
                                           laser, l.a.s.e.r.
                                           maser,m.a.s.e.r.
                                           taser,t.a.s.e.r

                                         to
                   by dual-use-possession: peace/war

                          invented in the G.D.R.
                      by Manfred Alexander Gregor
                        from his published oeuvre
     https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=dd&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=manfred+gregor&IN=manfred+gregor&CPC=&IC= (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=dd&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=manfred+gregor&IN=manfred+gregor&CPC=&IC=)

                                  meaning

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19891018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DD&NR=272727A1&KC=A1&ND=4# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?FT=D&date=19891018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=DD&NR=272727A1&KC=A1&ND=4#)
                                             
                 from the "Original Document" :
          Kernfusion und Verteidigungs-=Defense-Technik
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 14, 2017, 07:29:12 PM
Incredible lanca.all those guns out there


Time for interval with chris de burgh:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WaBGR3CfLxA
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 19, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
the
LENR reaction is dependant on the 1) nature of the
material itself

2)the structure of the material itself

3) the manipulation of hysteresis pumping


Knowing this,how many possible bridges can we place between 1,2 and 3 in order to speed the rate up. There must be few known and plenty unknown. bridging these 3 variables correctly, perfectly insync will be partly lottery,partly knowledge,partly art but it can be done
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 20, 2017, 01:42:37 PM
"Apart from the neutron mechanism, other
mechanisms of uranium fission are
also known to exist, for example, fission
induced by slow muons [24]. . The
mechanism of uranium fission under the
action of magnetic monopoles has
been considered theoretically [25]. It was
suggested [25] that the
monopole-nuclear interaction is so strong
that a monopole that comes close
to a nucleus can induce fission."

What if monopoles could induce something else
that then induce fission at a greater rate.what if we had the perfect  bridge. A perfect bridge between hysteresis and target (1,2,3) shall be henceforth christened a “profitis bridge“ for historical reasons. A profitis bridge is then a bridge who's rate of activity is exceptionally efficient exothermicly.a lenr or lenr/nr detonation may or may not rely on the popular actinide elements (uranium,thorium etc) or popular low mass elements (hydrogen,deutrium,lithium etc) as energy sources.we don't yet know enough about the multiple exothermic reactions that are possible with elements inbetween under black hole influences.
 
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 20, 2017, 01:57:37 PM
                                minimal possible distance up to ><= O !
                                  black/white whole : Casimir swirl
                               Erregungsfrequenz to Eigenfrequenz

                 white/white bodies    white/black bodies    black/black bodies

                                             Boltzmann entropy
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 20, 2017, 02:57:08 PM
Yes lanca like this :Just 3 possible ways of approaching a profitis bridge:

1)   CX...÷...@
        ^
        ^ pump the hysteresis faster,bigger,smarter(laser,heat,electricity,explosives)


2)   CX...÷...@
              ^
              ^ use a smarter structure

3)   CX...÷...@
                   ^
                   ^use smarter material
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 20, 2017, 08:56:08 PM
Buble'
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 21, 2017, 02:07:45 PM
"It is a theoretical device. Forget one moment mass,
friction, quantum problems, etc.
It is a mechanical device, so even with
simplifications, in physics, the sum of energy must be
constant."

Its really a train of locks-n-keys
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 22, 2017, 12:15:38 PM
”Don't forget: focus on the device...”

You've got to throw one of these in and let it gather momentim

Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 22, 2017, 12:23:36 PM
they call it "white" but it is not white
they call it "black" but it is not black

DIRAC SEA,surges and Kalmen( portuguese: calma,alma)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7870 (https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7870)

   „23 Da sah Jesus seine Jünger an und sagte zu ihnen: Wie schwer ist es für Menschen, die viel besitzen, in das Reich Gottes zu kommen! 24 Die Jünger waren über seine Worte bestürzt. Jesus aber sagte noch einmal zu ihnen: Meine Kinder, wie schwer ist es, in das Reich Gottes zu kommen! 25 Eher geht ein Kamel durch ein Nadelöhr, als dass ein Reicher in das Reich Gottes gelangt. 26 Sie aber erschraken noch mehr und sagten zueinander: Wer kann dann noch gerettet werden? 27 Jesus sah sie an und sagte: Für Menschen ist das unmöglich, aber nicht für Gott; denn für Gott ist alles möglich.“
 – Mk 10,23-27 EU (http://www.bibleserver.com/go.php?lang=de&bible=EU&ref=Mk10%2C23-27)

They call it "Gott" but ........

 
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 22, 2017, 01:36:15 PM
Wow all that calamari boggles the mind lanca so we zoom out a few parameters for a second: ” a critical set of elements
that all have to be just right to invite the energy in”

Governments want always to look at uranium.uranium this uranium that but let's take a look at lithium for a second.lithium actually undergoes fission when bombed with certain particles and releases quite a whop of powa in the process.it is suspected to be a fuel in certain black/white hole devices.it is suspected to burn at quite an appreciable rate in such devices if indeed it is itself burning and not an intermediary for an other element burn.if lithium can burn at rate x (enough to warm a few houses),what is stopping it from burning at rate y (enough to raise a few houses)?? If only we knew the weak link

(Yes it maybe gott lanca)
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 22, 2017, 02:17:35 PM
                                                                 enriching,pooring as process

 https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWiederaufarbeitung&edit-text= (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWiederaufarbeitung&edit-text=)

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDotierung&edit-text= (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDotierung&edit-text=)


  you are in search of the nuclear or quantum mechanics process
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FModerator_%28Physik%29&edit-text= (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FModerator_%28Physik%29&edit-text=)

                                                reverse/reversible  catalysis
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 22, 2017, 04:38:46 PM
"Physicists have observed spontaneous symmetry
breaking in an optical microcavity, they have
demonstrated experimentally the emergence of
spontaneous symmetry breaking in an ultrahigh-
Q whispering-gallery microresonator. The Optical
whispering gallery (WGW) microcavity is the
structural form that the Surface Plasmon
Polariton assumed in LENR. . These whispering
gallery modes are analogous to the acoustic
resonances in the whispering gallery in St. Paul
Cathedral in London.
A critical clue to the role of symmetry breaking in
LENR is the observation that the application of
an electrostatic field catalyzes spontaneous
symmetry breaking in the WGW via the Kerr
effect."

I don't know howmuch of this shit is accurate but there is something here.we need to enlarge this effect.please remember that all info found on internet on lenr is vulnerable to hazing/obscuring by the fbi/cia.the only reason that some degree of information is accurate is due to international competition
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 22, 2017, 05:51:06 PM
"you are in search of the nuclear or quantum
mechanics process"

The world is in search for a lenr-to-nr process lanca.
This must happen very fast to work.it must happen before breakup of the device.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 22, 2017, 06:21:36 PM
For this kind of energetic plant or instrument : http://e-catworld.com/

nuclear material shall not find entrance in private households:
a. health riscs
b. costs: beginning with the IAEA controle costs  and
    "by law" their ,the IAEA: nuclear material ownership
          https://www.iaea.org/
     nuclear material possession license:
     professional qualification
     safety transport/storage/plant service     

c. technical knowledge from the consumer

fast ? I.T.E.R. is an up to 2050 program

for each private household an up to 1 KW autonomous energetic plant, = up to 24 KWh per day

more: go to Hell
                                        heat is also an THG-emission

                                       KWh per capita
                                                              tax-free
                                           international tax

  http://www.overunity.de/1808/mystery-wattloser-strom/15/#.WcU8cMvwDCw   reply #18
      literature source:
                                       www.oeko-energie.de
                                         http://mtbest.net/

                                bath/kitchen energy Consumer: 2 
                                               1,25 KWh electriciy  per day
                                 + hot waters energy/ room heating/cooling/furnace

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F2000-Watt-Gesellschaft&edit-text=
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: lancaIV on September 22, 2017, 06:50:26 PM
"Physicists have observed spontaneous symmetry
breaking in an optical microcavity, they have
demonstrated experimentally the emergence of
spontaneous symmetry breaking in an ultrahigh-
Q whispering-gallery microresonator. The Optical
whispering gallery (WGW) microcavity is the
structural form that the Surface Plasmon
Polariton assumed in LENR. . These whispering
gallery modes are analogous to the acoustic
resonances in the whispering gallery in St. Paul
Cathedral in London.
A critical clue to the role of symmetry breaking in
LENR is the observation that the application of
an electrostatic field catalyzes spontaneous
symmetry breaking in the WGW via the Kerr
effect."

I don't know howmuch of this shit is accurate but there is something here.we need to enlarge this effect.please remember that all info found on internet on lenr is vulnerable to hazing/obscuring by the fbi/cia.the only reason that some degree of information is accurate is due to international competition
                   
                                       Vortex
                              Broken Symmetry
                              ccw                cw
                             
                                  unbroken
                              "standing" wave

                            "AUGE" view point
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 23, 2017, 01:49:03 PM
There's so many guns out there.What can we do with this one lanca.what if we put the sponge on one end whar will happen?we just don't know
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 24, 2017, 04:09:06 PM
"Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation
of Au nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium/uranium aqua
ions
arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
In these experiments, nano geometry of particles
converts light energy from the laser into vortex
motion of polaritons which are entangled electrons
and photons in a nanoplasmonic “Dark Mode” soliton
produced on the surface of the gold nanoparticles.
Without the gold nanoparticles, laser light alone is
ineffectual in producing these effects"


 A flash in the pan.a highly inefficient profitis bridge but where"s the weak link we all ask
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 26, 2017, 10:25:20 PM
"Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium
under exposure of solid targets in heavy
water
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/
papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf
Other systems using laser irradiation of
various transition metal nanostructures show
both the formation of tritium and its rapid
decay as a simultaneous operation."

Another weak bridge
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 27, 2017, 10:57:03 AM
Impossible is nothing
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 27, 2017, 01:57:19 PM
"One thought
about how to trigger the process: a
>strong magnetic field will shift the
electron orbitals in a preferred
direction<"

Pull its skirt up first to sensitize it.then bomb it?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 28, 2017, 07:24:05 PM
"you
will need so much more driving power that the setup
will get red hot and probably melt under your eyes."


Oh yeah? Have you tried everything that there is to try?


"I am however unsure what is your primary
direction...
What are you trying to do ?"


I don't know yet.relax
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 28, 2017, 09:40:52 PM
"because what your doing isn't nice
Man"

Yeah well its not meant to be nice motherf*#<er.
Deal withit
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 28, 2017, 10:01:09 PM
"because what your doing is old.like 60+years old"

You wanna tel me that all the possible shit with todays
equip and knowledge,was done back then? Go f*#k yourself
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 28, 2017, 10:44:42 PM
"Why this seesaw is working against
physics laws"

Naw man.the shit is stored inna atoms man.you wana
just release just a liiiiittle bit of the mothaf*#>a all-at-once.now I'm not saying that your gonna have to grill
to the beat of a 235 namsayn.there could be a whole lotta other shit out there we just don't yet know about.other shit
that packs a punch.now that could be a hit-and-a-half for yo
ass
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 10:50:36 AM
"So as it stands, I am spending most of my efforts
looking towards the second harmonic modulation"


Maybe ur lookin at the right thing.maybe not.you
must keep inmind the 3 thousand unknown variables
that could trip this shit.maybe after your whole day
of effort you realise,damn,the problem was in the
first motherf*<#er not the second one.the first tune
may leverage a second tune meant for a different
target.the second tune may de-leverage the first tune
for a different target.the target may leverage the second tune for a 2nd target.hell,the 1st tune might
even be the target(feedback).

Let's take another look at the sheehan device.maybe we want a different casimir.maybe we want a long and
wide single casimir.like this:
          .                    .
          .                    .
           ==========  < can we shoot a fire down this gap
                                     and strip the shit outa the first
                                      one or two (or hundred?)
                                     atomic layers? In an instant?
                                     all the other variables eg heat,
                                     pressure,temperature,rf etc will
                                     have to be just at critical point
                                     before firing.maybe some sort
                                      of uniformity is what we seek
 Maybe bimetallics is the way to go.     
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 12:48:20 PM
"The reactor has started". Before he came
out, a few minutes before, I had independently
measured that both the gamma detector and the
mini Geiger had hit the top of the scale, whereas the
two detectors of electromagnetic interference were
not showing anything.”
This meant that a short but intense emission of
gamma radiation had taken place.
But while the reactor was in operation, at the
demonstration on January 14, no measurable nuclear
radiation was"


These minibursts are a key to success.understanding them.what is happening here is a micro-CASCADE of sorts.finding the mechanisms for such cascades within
a bose condinsate soup is prettymuch like looking for a needle in a haystack(did I just say haystack?).finding
the CONDITIONS for these cascades is easier.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 02:14:19 PM
"A polariton is a special quasiparticle. It is an electron
that has most of its mass and charge removed. It can
only exist when it is generated by a nanoparticle or a
pit or bump in the surface of a metal. Unlike an
electron, the polariton is a boson; that means that it
can form a Bose condensate where a aggregation of
electrons cannot. From this boson nature of the
Polariton comes all the miracles of the LENR
reaction."

In our bomb It can exist for a long period of time or a brief splitsecond.up until the point of a major cascade.it is the cascade we are after,up-down.the intelligence of the bridge counts for much
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 04:35:59 PM
" Examples of the
types of particles generated and detected may
include, but are not limited to: alpha particles, beta
particles, gamma rays, energetic protons, deuterons,
tritons, and neutrons. The particles generated by the
implementations of method 10 may have various
applications. For example, the generated particles
may be captured by other nuclei to create new
elements, may be used to remediate nuclear waste,
may be used to create strategic materials..."

.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 05:49:54 PM
"To sum up, the Bose condensate modifies the weak
force so that the energy of excitation that comes
from nuclear reactions that usually generate
neutrons and other radiation is stored in the
condensate and not released to the far field.
But if the Bose condensate is not well formed or very
weak, then neutrons and other radiation is produced
by the LENR reaction."

This is only true for elements with already relative stability.if you look at some of the existing heating machines in action you will see some
interesting emissions.this will matter with inbetween bridges or endstage targets where such dampening
is non-conducive to a cascade effect.you want cascades that escape offsides to the far field
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 29, 2017, 10:06:00 PM
"fake science is the next."


MACROSCOPIC
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 30, 2017, 01:14:50 PM
"No, this theoretical device is there to prove"

that you now have access to certain uncertain particles
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 30, 2017, 02:06:36 PM
"Well then,, I guess the only thing left for you to do is show me that the spring\spheres will
all just "magically" want to jump to a higher state of
energy so you can harvest that energy"

You want to trip this bridge round about here
          -
                -
                ^        -
        .. .. ..^ .. .. ..     -
                 ^ *
              *
     
 and you want to do it offsides
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 30, 2017, 07:13:57 PM
" Finally
the perspectives for developing the plasma focus as
a neutron source with a flux of 14 MeV neutrons
beyond 10(exp15) neutrons/cm ·s are discussed"

I don't know how small a pincher can get to this
kind of level but its well worth looking into.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 30, 2017, 07:50:20 PM
What can we do with these kind of pinchers nowadays?
It boggles the mind.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on September 30, 2017, 09:43:55 PM
i believe the standard model is bs

no scientists can explain how exactly 1 electron and 1 proton able to form into a stable atom.

can you?

atoms have to be solid spheres.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on September 30, 2017, 10:28:30 PM
"can you?"


Nope.but I can find someone who can
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on September 30, 2017, 11:15:13 PM
"can you?"


Nope.but I can find someone who can

who can? do you understand it? why?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 08:31:42 AM
"do you understand it? why?"

Look here pal.are you gonna help us build
this shit or what namsayn.what the f*#k
do we need to get to the other side.how
we gonna trip this bridge ait
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 01:23:15 PM
Check all the offsides in this thing
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 05:53:19 PM
"Explosive-driven ferroelectric generator
Explosive-driven ferromagnetic generator
Explosively pumped gas dynamic laser"


These 3 for a pinch and burst are looking good.

 Our machine may evolve into something like
this:


         []----------{})<00.7 coat
          ^              ^
          ^               PlasmaPincher
         Pump

Everything rests on the pp tech.

Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 06:00:35 PM
Infact..this whole competition can begin to look something like this:

Country :            particle count/cm2 :
=======            ================
           
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 06:22:29 PM
Unfortunately,t3 is hard to come by but a double d may suffice.t3 can be generated in situ under
unusual circumstances
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 06:47:19 PM
Any such device that begins with a dd/dt and ends with a NU shall be christened a profitis-teller design for historical reasons.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 09:43:05 PM
"A
1 microampere ion beam accelerated at 200 kV to a
titanium-tritium target can generate up to 10e8
neutrons per second."

 We candu much better than this cmon
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 10:32:41 PM
"is the principle correct? Did anyone try it?"

Its correct.somebody mustv tried it.somebody
must still be trying it.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on October 01, 2017, 10:53:26 PM
"is the principle correct? Did anyone try it?"

Its correct.somebody mustv tried it.somebody
must still be trying it.

great! awesome! THANKS!

2 n poles repel each other at r with force b, if spin 1 n pole, the b should be increasing. correct?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on October 01, 2017, 11:16:25 PM
great! awesome! THANKS!

2 n poles repel each other at r with force b, if spin 1 n pole, the b should be increasing. correct?

if spin 1 pole clockwise the b increasing, then spin counterclockwise the b will decreasing. i think. got no magnets to test it out yet.

Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 11:20:06 PM
Put some pepper on it and

6
3Li + n → 4
2He ( 2.05 MeV ) + 3
1T ( 2.75 MeV )

 9                  4
 4 Be + n> 2 2He + 2n
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on October 01, 2017, 11:26:38 PM
the force between free electrons on any two conductors at distance r, f=Ke x q1q2/rr is really like a massless physical rod that connected them as 1, all the times.

those electrons are the carrier of radiant energy, light, em waves. energy transfer from mass1 to mass2 in vacuum space at infinite speed, energy transfer within matters at light speed/matter wave. 
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 01, 2017, 11:27:22 PM
Some salt


7
3Li + n → 4
2He + 3
1T + n
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on October 01, 2017, 11:34:31 PM
electrons move in conductors maybe similar to balls collide on the pool table. that's why current speed is c but electron speed is very slow?

should momentum conservation apply in electromagnetism?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 02, 2017, 09:21:46 AM
"should momentum conservation apply in
electromagnetism?"

Chek it out we don't even needs ion beam but just
temperature beam:


             
                       []----------{}< < UNDT pellet

how much of pellet burn before breakup? We just don't know.do you know?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 02, 2017, 09:34:21 AM
This whole competition can begin to look like this:


Country                   hottest zap
========                ==========
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 02, 2017, 11:09:54 AM
                         
                     .#fission
                   .
                 .                  .*fusion
   ............*.fusion    .
                     .        .
                          .#.fission
                                 .
                                     .
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: isawit on October 02, 2017, 05:25:12 PM
"is the principle correct? Did anyone try it?"

Its correct.somebody mustv tried it.somebody
must still be trying it.

Please share your results!
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 04, 2017, 01:37:51 PM
http://tubidy.mobi/watch.php?id=Ads4H6VPxoIhzrKvMQpQ9Q_3D_3D&p=3gp-mobile&rc=1&sid=e72ea4cca031ac33b5a351a70fdd6384

First time I saw this
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 04:27:11 PM
"Please share your results"






' containing a mixture of cryogenic
deuterium with a few percent of tritium to lower its
ignit'






The world will share results please be patient
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 05:58:08 PM
"That's why I pointed to Aviso. That's
exactly what he did to get 3 times voltage during the
same pulse peri"


Throw it all in one golden can?

77,76 + 112?
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 06:20:34 PM




   frequency fufi------------>0<----------frequency dufi
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 06:29:50 PM



frequency fufi-dufi----------->0
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 06:45:08 PM


                                      @
frequency dufi---------->0±@< skirt lifter apparatus/gats
                                      @
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 06:59:17 PM



frequency dufi----------------->Q< quark tex-hex


Ouch
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 05, 2017, 08:23:13 PM
"so how would the HF you refer to connect
to this device and how would it become resonant
with the earth"

You want to focus on upconversion


 "As far as I can see we are not
talking about one thing but more like several
conditions have to be met here as every section does
a function"

Yes


" and it might be an idea to study some of
the Russian explan"


We are aware of this

Best regards
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: ramset on October 06, 2017, 11:18:01 AM
Profitis
quote

The world will share results please be patient
end quote

Please explain your goals here .. in this thread.... the purpose of manhatten project 2 [for readers who may not understand]

and what you hope these "shared"results would eventually look like in our world ?

it would be good for all your readers to really grasp what your cryptic contributions are truly all about here...
 this is an open source free energy forum dedicated to making this world a better place thru PEACEFUL contributions..
AND A LOT OF HARD WORK FROM DEDICATED FELLOWS WHO DO MUCH MORE THAN TYPE....

please share your Dream..... or actual goal here !

you might be TYPING in the wrong forum??
but then again I could be misunderstanding ??

PLEASE ??

Chet K



Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 06, 2017, 02:06:47 PM
"Please explain your goals here"

It is too late to worry about this now dear sir.my work here in this thread is finis.
Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: ramset on October 06, 2017, 02:36:28 PM
Ohh
Dearest sir
I told you once you were taking advantage of the owner here who has been very busy moving house and running the rest of his life

Please do not be bashfull now

a man of true conviction stands proudly by his work?

here is our forum Theme and intent... copied from the top of the forum

                                           Welcome to OverUnity.com

The International Open Source Free Energy Research Forum


free energy  will change the world - free energy will stop all environmental pollution
 
 Free energy will help to heal the planet earth.
 In our disccusion forum www.overunity.com we talk about all kinds of free energy and alternative
 and renewable energy systems.
 The world will soon be very green without any pollution and any chemical fuel polutants
 with this new  technolgy.
 What Tesla has begun in the 19th and 20th century we will now bring to
 market in the 21th century.
 With permanent magnet motors and Solid State magnet free energy convertes into the future.


free energy will give us hope
 and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world to power cars, ships and trains and
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.

 So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world
.

please sir

what are you Finished with here ??  ... that has anything to do with this forum and its topic??

be bold so all will know who shared here [and what they shared]

what is or was your intent ??[yes you already told me once ..... I would not understand]
you're right I don't understand
 
does this fit with what others do here?
or Stefan's Mission statement above [or TERMS OF USE agreement]

please explain ??

respect fully
Chet Kremens
BTW that's what A real name looks like [I see your Post below and have read your "new name" elsewhere.
which seems yet another veil to hide behind.........

its really a shame you put your mind to Attempts at evil works............

its not what we do here.
EDIT
OHH I SEE your changing your posts Now ??
what happened to "your New Name discussion " post below??

now its compliments and poems

your a Brite fellow
put it to the positive ...
not the negative ,we are not interested in how to build Bombs here

never will be [see mission statement above if your confused

nor do we wish to be Guilty by association to your "private" evil agenda...

start your own forum [at least the second time I recommended this publicly ]


 



Title: Re: manhatten project 2
Post by: profitis on October 06, 2017, 02:38:29 PM
You fool,I do one quarter the work for thee.open your eyes
and count to three