Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: manhatten project 2  (Read 43208 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #75 on: September 23, 2017, 01:49:03 PM »
There's so many guns out there.What can we do with this one lanca.what if we put the sponge on one end whar will happen?we just don't know

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #76 on: September 24, 2017, 04:09:06 PM »
"Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation
of Au nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium/uranium aqua
ions
arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
In these experiments, nano geometry of particles
converts light energy from the laser into vortex
motion of polaritons which are entangled electrons
and photons in a nanoplasmonic “Dark Mode” soliton
produced on the surface of the gold nanoparticles.
Without the gold nanoparticles, laser light alone is
ineffectual in producing these effects"


 A flash in the pan.a highly inefficient profitis bridge but where"s the weak link we all ask

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #77 on: September 26, 2017, 10:25:20 PM »
"Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium
under exposure of solid targets in heavy
water
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/
papers/1306/1306.0830.pdf
Other systems using laser irradiation of
various transition metal nanostructures show
both the formation of tritium and its rapid
decay as a simultaneous operation."

Another weak bridge

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #78 on: September 27, 2017, 10:57:03 AM »
Impossible is nothing

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #79 on: September 27, 2017, 01:57:19 PM »
"One thought
about how to trigger the process: a
>strong magnetic field will shift the
electron orbitals in a preferred
direction<"

Pull its skirt up first to sensitize it.then bomb it?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #80 on: September 28, 2017, 07:24:05 PM »
"you
will need so much more driving power that the setup
will get red hot and probably melt under your eyes."


Oh yeah? Have you tried everything that there is to try?


"I am however unsure what is your primary
direction...
What are you trying to do ?"


I don't know yet.relax

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #81 on: September 28, 2017, 09:40:52 PM »
"because what your doing isn't nice
Man"

Yeah well its not meant to be nice motherf*#<er.
Deal withit

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #82 on: September 28, 2017, 10:01:09 PM »
"because what your doing is old.like 60+years old"

You wanna tel me that all the possible shit with todays
equip and knowledge,was done back then? Go f*#k yourself

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #83 on: September 28, 2017, 10:44:42 PM »
"Why this seesaw is working against
physics laws"

Naw man.the shit is stored inna atoms man.you wana
just release just a liiiiittle bit of the mothaf*#>a all-at-once.now I'm not saying that your gonna have to grill
to the beat of a 235 namsayn.there could be a whole lotta other shit out there we just don't yet know about.other shit
that packs a punch.now that could be a hit-and-a-half for yo
ass

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #84 on: September 29, 2017, 10:50:36 AM »
"So as it stands, I am spending most of my efforts
looking towards the second harmonic modulation"


Maybe ur lookin at the right thing.maybe not.you
must keep inmind the 3 thousand unknown variables
that could trip this shit.maybe after your whole day
of effort you realise,damn,the problem was in the
first motherf*<#er not the second one.the first tune
may leverage a second tune meant for a different
target.the second tune may de-leverage the first tune
for a different target.the target may leverage the second tune for a 2nd target.hell,the 1st tune might
even be the target(feedback).

Let's take another look at the sheehan device.maybe we want a different casimir.maybe we want a long and
wide single casimir.like this:
          .                    .
          .                    .
           ==========  < can we shoot a fire down this gap
                                     and strip the shit outa the first
                                      one or two (or hundred?)
                                     atomic layers? In an instant?
                                     all the other variables eg heat,
                                     pressure,temperature,rf etc will
                                     have to be just at critical point
                                     before firing.maybe some sort
                                      of uniformity is what we seek
 Maybe bimetallics is the way to go.     

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #85 on: September 29, 2017, 12:48:20 PM »
"The reactor has started". Before he came
out, a few minutes before, I had independently
measured that both the gamma detector and the
mini Geiger had hit the top of the scale, whereas the
two detectors of electromagnetic interference were
not showing anything.”
This meant that a short but intense emission of
gamma radiation had taken place.
But while the reactor was in operation, at the
demonstration on January 14, no measurable nuclear
radiation was"


These minibursts are a key to success.understanding them.what is happening here is a micro-CASCADE of sorts.finding the mechanisms for such cascades within
a bose condinsate soup is prettymuch like looking for a needle in a haystack(did I just say haystack?).finding
the CONDITIONS for these cascades is easier.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #86 on: September 29, 2017, 02:14:19 PM »
"A polariton is a special quasiparticle. It is an electron
that has most of its mass and charge removed. It can
only exist when it is generated by a nanoparticle or a
pit or bump in the surface of a metal. Unlike an
electron, the polariton is a boson; that means that it
can form a Bose condensate where a aggregation of
electrons cannot. From this boson nature of the
Polariton comes all the miracles of the LENR
reaction."

In our bomb It can exist for a long period of time or a brief splitsecond.up until the point of a major cascade.it is the cascade we are after,up-down.the intelligence of the bridge counts for much

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #87 on: September 29, 2017, 04:35:59 PM »
" Examples of the
types of particles generated and detected may
include, but are not limited to: alpha particles, beta
particles, gamma rays, energetic protons, deuterons,
tritons, and neutrons. The particles generated by the
implementations of method 10 may have various
applications. For example, the generated particles
may be captured by other nuclei to create new
elements, may be used to remediate nuclear waste,
may be used to create strategic materials..."

.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #88 on: September 29, 2017, 05:49:54 PM »
"To sum up, the Bose condensate modifies the weak
force so that the energy of excitation that comes
from nuclear reactions that usually generate
neutrons and other radiation is stored in the
condensate and not released to the far field.
But if the Bose condensate is not well formed or very
weak, then neutrons and other radiation is produced
by the LENR reaction."

This is only true for elements with already relative stability.if you look at some of the existing heating machines in action you will see some
interesting emissions.this will matter with inbetween bridges or endstage targets where such dampening
is non-conducive to a cascade effect.you want cascades that escape offsides to the far field

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #89 on: September 29, 2017, 10:06:00 PM »
"fake science is the next."


MACROSCOPIC