Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: manhatten project 2  (Read 42715 times)

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #105 on: October 01, 2017, 10:53:26 PM »
"is the principle correct? Did anyone try it?"

Its correct.somebody mustv tried it.somebody
must still be trying it.

great! awesome! THANKS!

2 n poles repel each other at r with force b, if spin 1 n pole, the b should be increasing. correct?

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #106 on: October 01, 2017, 11:16:25 PM »
great! awesome! THANKS!

2 n poles repel each other at r with force b, if spin 1 n pole, the b should be increasing. correct?

if spin 1 pole clockwise the b increasing, then spin counterclockwise the b will decreasing. i think. got no magnets to test it out yet.


profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #107 on: October 01, 2017, 11:20:06 PM »
Put some pepper on it and

6
3Li + n → 4
2He ( 2.05 MeV ) + 3
1T ( 2.75 MeV )

 9                  4
 4 Be + n> 2 2He + 2n

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #108 on: October 01, 2017, 11:26:38 PM »
the force between free electrons on any two conductors at distance r, f=Ke x q1q2/rr is really like a massless physical rod that connected them as 1, all the times.

those electrons are the carrier of radiant energy, light, em waves. energy transfer from mass1 to mass2 in vacuum space at infinite speed, energy transfer within matters at light speed/matter wave. 

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #109 on: October 01, 2017, 11:27:22 PM »
Some salt


7
3Li + n → 4
2He + 3
1T + n

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #110 on: October 01, 2017, 11:34:31 PM »
electrons move in conductors maybe similar to balls collide on the pool table. that's why current speed is c but electron speed is very slow?

should momentum conservation apply in electromagnetism?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #111 on: October 02, 2017, 09:21:46 AM »
"should momentum conservation apply in
electromagnetism?"

Chek it out we don't even needs ion beam but just
temperature beam:


             
                       []----------{}< < UNDT pellet

how much of pellet burn before breakup? We just don't know.do you know?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #112 on: October 02, 2017, 09:34:21 AM »
This whole competition can begin to look like this:


Country                   hottest zap
========                ==========

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #113 on: October 02, 2017, 11:09:54 AM »
                         
                     .#fission
                   .
                 .                  .*fusion
   ............*.fusion    .
                     .        .
                          .#.fission
                                 .
                                     .

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #114 on: October 02, 2017, 05:25:12 PM »
"is the principle correct? Did anyone try it?"

Its correct.somebody mustv tried it.somebody
must still be trying it.

Please share your results!

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #116 on: October 05, 2017, 04:27:11 PM »
"Please share your results"






' containing a mixture of cryogenic
deuterium with a few percent of tritium to lower its
ignit'






The world will share results please be patient

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #117 on: October 05, 2017, 05:58:08 PM »
"That's why I pointed to Aviso. That's
exactly what he did to get 3 times voltage during the
same pulse peri"


Throw it all in one golden can?

77,76 + 112?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #118 on: October 05, 2017, 06:20:34 PM »




   frequency fufi------------>0<----------frequency dufi

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: manhatten project 2
« Reply #119 on: October 05, 2017, 06:29:50 PM »



frequency fufi-dufi----------->0