Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kawai's Motive Power Generating Device  (Read 2231 times)

mitchellleary

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Kawai's Motive Power Generating Device
« on: July 04, 2017, 04:48:39 PM »
Hi everyone,

I'm new hear and hoping to make a contribution as well as get some feedback.

I recently came across Kawai's Motive Power Generating Device which Hitachi engineers claim to reach over-unity:

"Hitachi Engineers confirm Over-Unity Process

Application by Kawai of adroit self-switching of the magnetic path in magnetic motors results in approximately doubling the COP.  Modification of an ordinary magnetic engine of COP < 0.5 will not produce COP > 1.0.  However, modification of available high efficiency (COP = 0.6 to 0.8) engines to use the Kawai process does result in engines exhibiting COP = 1.2 to 1.6.  Two Kawai-modified Hitachi engines were rigorously tested by Hitachi engineers and produced COP = 1.4 and COP = 1.6 respectively.  The Kawai process and several other Japanese overunity systems have been blocked from further development and marketing.

The Kawai process can be built directly from the Patent, using high-speed switching (such as very efficient photon-coupled switching).

Teruo Kawai, "Motive Power Generating Device," U.S. Patent No. 5,436,518, Jul. 25, 1995.

Diagrams Accompanying Kawai's U.S. Patent"


I was wondering if anyone had heard of this and even tried to build it from the patent which can be found here: http://www.google.co.uk/patents/US5436518

I'd be really interested to find out if anyone believes they can replicate it from the patent. I'd be very interested to collaborate on a project to attempt it if anyone is interested.

Thanks,

Mitch