Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81930
  • *Latest: kunjb

  • *Total Posts: 490873
  • *Total Topics: 14445
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 260
  • *Total: 265

Facebook

Author Topic: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)  (Read 8674 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13522
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #90 on: June 26, 2017, 06:57:56 PM »
Here is where we are at the moment, in my opinion.

Tanju's electrical measurements using his wattmeter with LED and resistive loads have shown that the electrical output is less than the electrical input by a fairly large margin.

I think we have shown that the "650 watts" flywheel output figure is a conceptual error and cannot be included in the true output of the apparatus. I am pleased to encourage further discussion on this matter, but as it stands now there is no evidence or theoretical justification for excess _continuous_ power available from the flywheel.

So what we have left is the subjective impression of excess light output and reduced temperature rise from the LEDs.

I would like to see some side-by-side comparisons, using instrumental means if possible, of the brightness of the LEDs with the same _current_ flowing through them, in the first case provided by the Tanju apparatus, and in the second case provided by a DC power supply and whatever current-limiting inline resistance is necessary to achieve exactly the same measured current.

The current can be easily measured by looking at the voltage drop across a 1-ohm series resistance, preferably using the oscilloscope, or even a good DMM if we are satisfied that the LED is not being pulsed.  Using an LDR for the light output measurement may be roughly acceptable if done properly, but it would be better to use a phototransistor sensing element as used in real lightmeters, or even the TSL2561 sensor (multiple PTs with different spectral responses) with the appropriate transfer function programmed into the Arduino.
 
The best comparison would be made using the same physical LED unit and current-viewing resistor under both conditions, to control for possible variations in the LEDs themselves. Concurrent temperature measurements would be "icing on the cake".

As others have mentioned, subjective "eyeball" brilliance impressions can be very deceiving. Sometimes it takes an actual doubling of true illuminance before the eye can detect any difference. The only way to really settle this issue is by instrumental means, with proper controls.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #91 on: June 26, 2017, 07:33:03 PM »
Agree with TinsenKola.
 I think, this divice have no ovrunity. Overunity must be esily meshured with osciloscope or with ampermeter and voltmeter on input and output. Or he must same led lamp shine from socket and it must shine at same brightnes like his LED. Then he  can say, that they LEDs shine at nominal, full brightness and power. After capasitor on output, he can add resistor and after resistor add new capasitor to get smooth current and then on that resistor can meshure curent. For example can use 1 omh resistor. So one volts on resistor means one ampere. Wery easily! I not see that is probllems corect meashure current on output?


Offline Tanju

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #92 on: June 26, 2017, 08:20:13 PM »
Overunity or not,
This is my garden at night,
For only 75 watt.

Goodbye everyone and thanks for all contribution.
Tanju

Offline gotoluc

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2835
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #93 on: June 26, 2017, 08:20:45 PM »
Agree with TinsenKola.
 I think, this divice have no ovrunity. Overunity must be esily meshured with osciloscope or with ampermeter and voltmeter on input and output. Or he must same led lamp shine from socket and it must shine at same brightnes like his LED. Then he  can say, that they LEDs shine at nominal, full brightness and power. After capasitor on output, he can add resistor and after resistor add new capasitor to get smooth current and then on that resistor can meshure curent. For example can use 1 omh resistor. So one volts on resistor means one ampere. Wery easily! I not see that is probllems corect meashure current on output?

Okay gentlemen!
We are not going to start bashing what Tanju has shared because he's taking some time off or decides to never come back.
Remember, this site is a place to investigate Overunity... so, should we not hold up to the name and investigate in a respectful way?
There's no need to be bold and impolite while trying to convey information. All that does is push people away as you see and have seen for many years.
Do we not have something to learn here with our communications skills?
The only perpetual energy going around here is the I know better time and again.

Food for thought: if we can't improved our energy solution, maybe we can improve ourselves?

Kind regards
Luc


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3534
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #94 on: June 26, 2017, 08:55:29 PM »
Again. If this is cold current or RF or radiant energy or whatever you call it - then those leds would light when connected to the device using 0.20 mm diameter copper wire.No heat.No damage to the wire. Would be a good starting point to check it.As you wish.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #94 on: June 26, 2017, 08:55:29 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3402
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #95 on: June 27, 2017, 12:35:14 AM »
Mass=33Kg
Radius=0.3 Meters
Rotation=200 RPM
Is that a uniformly distributed aluminum disc?
How thick is it?
How long does it take to accelerate it from 0rpm to 200rpm ?

Offline gyulasun

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3462
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #96 on: June 27, 2017, 12:50:05 AM »
Overunity or not,
This is my garden at night,
For only 75 watt.

Goodbye everyone and thanks for all contribution.
Tanju

Dear Tanju,

Please not so fast...  :o

I assume you can have access to relatively cheap DC motors that could be used as generators, for instance motors used for threadmills for instance, even used such motors could be good for a test.
I think of a test where you attach the shaft of such DC motor to your 30 kg flywheel as if it were a bicycle dynamo. See for ideas how to attach them simply in gotoluc's video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXP2v5ZkUw4 

This way your output energy stored in the flywheel could be utilized even better and it would turn out for yourself how output  relates to input energywise. 

Greetings
Gyula

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #96 on: June 27, 2017, 12:50:05 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #97 on: June 27, 2017, 01:28:37 AM »
Okay gentlemen!
We are not going to start bashing what Tanju has shared because he's taking some time off or decides to never come back.
Remember, this site is a place to investigate Overunity... so, should we not hold up to the name and investigate in a respectful way?
There's no need to be bold and impolite while trying to convey information. All that does is push people away as you see and have seen for many years.
Do we not have something to learn here with our communications skills?
The only perpetual energy going around here is the I know better time and again.

Food for thought: if we can't improved our energy solution, maybe we can improve ourselves?

Kind regards
Luc

Luc

I did not mean to !bash! anyone here,nor did i think i was.
Are we now treading on egg shell's,or do we remain straight and to the point?.

Are we now at that point where we must avoid asking simple question's-like,what is there understanding of radiant energy,and cold electricity,in fear of insulting those making claims of having a free energy device.

I am looking at Tanju's picture of his garden being lit with 75 watt's,and although it looks great,i am sure you would agree that when using LED's,the whole back yard could be lit up like christmas using 75 watt's.

I have 11 x 5 watt LED light bulbs throughout my house,and can light the whole house all at once with 55 watts of power.

You know very well that both of us have been through the very same thing-in the same situation,and even today,some times we still do.
I for one would have it no other way,in that i learn from what others have to say,and i prefer them to be straight to the point.

My understanding of
Cold electricity-->high voltage,low current
Radiant energy---> energy that is radiated away from the source-E.G,radio waves,heat from a fire place-ETC.
A solar panel could be said to work using radiant energy,where the photon's are radiated away from the sun,and collide with the electrons within the solar panel.

Anyway,it would be good if Tanju continued on,and maybe not take offence to those that ask simple questions,and from those that have endured being in his position for many years.


Brad

Offline gotoluc

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2835
Re: Overunity Device by Tanju Argun (Moderated)
« Reply #98 on: June 27, 2017, 07:19:51 AM »
Topic is now locked


Luc

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: