Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: EXPLAIN this: 100% proof of OVERUNITY found in GAS TUBE SIGN Power Supply!  (Read 5965 times)

pfrattali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
5X  overunity:

6 Watts input - 30 Watts output - DO THE MATH



http://www.imagesco.com/science/high-voltage/gas-tube-sign-power-supply.html



TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
5X  overunity:

6 Watts input - 30 Watts output - DO THE MATH



http://www.imagesco.com/science/high-voltage/gas-tube-sign-power-supply.html

DO THE RIGHT MATH.

You should be able to run 4 identical units from the output of the first unit, with enough power left over to run a load. Right? And then from each of those four identical units you should be able to run another 4 identical units, each with power left over to run a load. Then you should be able to run sixteen more units from the outputs of the four. With power left over from each one to run loads. Then you should be able to run 64 identical units off the outputs of the sixteen.... and so on.

DO THE EXPERIMENT.  We will all be waiting to see your results.











(Hints: Peak power is not average power, and nameplate rating numbers are not measurements.)

 :-* :-*

pfrattali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
DO THE RIGHT MATH.

You should be able to run 4 identical units from the output of the first unit, with enough power left over to run a load. Right? And then from each of those four identical units you should be able to run another 4 identical units, each with power left over to run a load. Then you should be able to run sixteen more units from the outputs of the four. With power left over from each one to run loads. Then you should be able to run 64 identical units off the outputs of the sixteen.... and so on.

DO THE EXPERIMENT.  We will all be waiting to see your results.





(Hints: Peak power is not average power, and nameplate rating numbers are not measurements.)

 :-* :-*

Watch this Don Smith video, especially around 23:20.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mnoy2D4wuf8&t=878s


pfrattali

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Now watch this video also (9 min.):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC29rHxx6Es


Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
 Here is help to you in understanding the plasma method link below… It’s is  real and it works ..read this link as it will get you started …
 
Acca..
 
p.s..You may become shark bait being here..
 
It may in fact be another manifestation of the 'vacuum spin' phenomenon, by creating in an aqueous electrolyte, or even in the cathode itself, conditions somewhat analogous to those prevailing in the Correa apparatus. Indeed, there seems to be no doubt that the Correa technology itself bridges two of the above 'excess energy' categories, electrodynamics and vacuum spin. The Correa method is probably the most advanced of these emerging new energy technologies, being fully reproducible, well researched with its test findings well documented in and protected by granted U.S. patents. It already allows us to tap energy from space itself, or rather the vacuum field activity that fills space, and in contrast with the alternative methods it offers what may prove to be a mobile light-weight power source compared with the heavy apparatus needed where magnets and rotating machinery are involved. Unlike 'cold fusion' which generates low grade heat output, the Correa technology generates electricity at power voltage levels.
 
Harold Aspden 1996
 
 https://www.haroldaspden.com/reports/08.htm[/font]

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
I believe there are many threads here and elsewhere on the Correa Bros Tech
perhaps another look ?

member Marco was looking very hard at this .

who cares about sharks...


endlessoceans

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Now watch this video also (9 min.):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC29rHxx6Es

This is junk Tito

No resistive load at the output and using a clamp meter with HF is EXTREMELY inaccurate.

Lets see him charge 5 batteries with the 1 battery at the input, THEN he might have something

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956

This is from armagdn03:
"The neon sign business is concerned with break down voltage of the gas in question, which relates to PEAK VOLTAGE not RMS VOLTAGE. This means that input is measured in RMS mains voltage and amperage whcih can be used for power calculations, while the output is only concerned with PEAK voltage, which CANNOT be used to make power calculations. This is most peoples misinterpretation of the neon sign business."


The idea that NST's are overunity has been discussed a number of times and it is simply a misunderstanding some have about the way they are rated.  NST's are not overunity and if they were I'm sure we'd all be using them by now for lots of things.  Don Smith was wrong about that but then Don said quite a few things that were either wrong or intended to misdirect people with less than his understanding. 

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
5X  overunity:

6 Watts input - 30 Watts output - DO THE MATH



http://www.imagesco.com/science/high-voltage/gas-tube-sign-power-supply.html
Ha Ha! Don Smith was on about that on one of his videos

Also look on the back of an 'electronic 'MICROWAVE' !

PS is it because of the phosphor in the gas ?